Distribution of Diaphanosoma (Diplostraca: Sididae) genus in Central Europe – morphological and molecular approach

References

• Agnarsson I, Kuntner M. 2007. Taxonomy in a changing world: Seeking solutions for a science in crisis. Systematics Biology 56:531–539. DOI: 10.1080/10635150701424546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike H. 1973. Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika 60:255–265. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/60.2.255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiou R, Stamou G, Minoudi S, Tourli F, Tsartsianidou V, Triantafyllidis A, Michaloudi E. 2021. The genus Diaphanosoma (Diplostraca: Sididae) in Greece: Morphological and molecular assessment. Zootaxa 5082:572–582. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5082.6.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Błędzki LA, Rybak JI. 2016. Freshwater Crustacean zooplankton of Europe. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Brown WM. 1985. The mitochondrial genome of animals. In: MacIntyre RJ, editor. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Plenum. pp. 399–411.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont HJ. 1994. On the diversity of the Cladocera in the tropics. Hydrobiologia 272:27–38. DOI: 10.1007/BF00006510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont HJ, Han BP, Guo F et al. 2021. Toward a phylogeny and biogeography of Diaphanosoma (Crustacea: Cladocera). Aquatic Ecology 55:1207–1222. DOI: 10.1007/s10452-020-09819-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10:564–567. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flößner D. 2000. Die Haplopoda und Cladocera (ohne Bosminidae) Mitteleuropas. Leiden: Backhuys.
   Google Scholar
• Forró L, Korovchinsky NM, Kotov AA, Petrusek A. 2008. Global diversity of cladocerans (Cladocera; Crustacea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:177–184. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-007-9013-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller J, Meyer C, Parker M, Hawk H. 2013. Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Molecular Ecology Resources 13:851–861. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller W, Müller H. 1981. The filtration apparatus of Cladocera: Filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food selectivity. Oecologia 49:316–321. DOI: 10.1007/BF00347591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: A user‐friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Han B-P, Yin J, Lin X, Dumont HJ. 2011. Why is Diaphanosoma (Crustacea: Ctenopoda) so common in the tropics? Influence of temperature and food on the population parameters of Diaphnaosoma dubium and a hypothesis on the nature of tropical cladocerans. Hydrobiologia 668:109–115. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-010-0501-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Finston TL. 2001. Macrogeographic patterns of breeding system diversity in the Daphnia pulex group from the United States and Mexico. Heredity 87:153–161. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00885.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudec I. 2010. Fauna Slovenska III. Anomopoda, Ctenopoda, Haplopoda, Onychopoda (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Vol III. Bratislava: VEDA, Vydavatel stvo Slovenskej adadémie vied.
   Google Scholar
• Illyova M, Nemethova D. 2005. Long-term changes in cladoceran assemblages in the Danube floodplain area (SlovakHungarian stretch). Limnologica 35:274–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2005.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowicz M. 2014. Influence of eutrophic lowland reservoir on crustacean zooplankton assemblages in river valley oxbow lakes. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 23:2055–2061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowicz M. 2017. Biodiversity of microcrustaceans (Cladocera, Copepoda) in a lowland river ecosystem. Journal of Limnology 76:15–22. DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2016.1449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowicz M, Ejsmont-Karabin J. 2021. Diversity and structure of pelagic zooplankton (Crustacea, Rotifera) in NE Poland. Water 13:456. DOI: 10.3390/w13040456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowicz M, Feniova I, Gladyshev MI, Ejsmont-Karabin J, Górniak A, Sushchik NN, Anishchenko OV, Dzialowski AR. 2021a. Transfer efficiency of carbon, nutrients, and polyunsaturated fatty acids in planktonic food webs under different environmental conditions. Ecology and Evolution 11:8201–8214. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowicz M, Sługocki Ł, Kozłowska J, Ochocka A, López C. 2020. Body size of Daphnia cucullata as an indicator of the ecological status of temperate lakes. Ecological Indicators 17:106585. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106585.
   Google Scholar
• Karpowicz M, Świsłocka M, Moroz J, Sługocki Ł. 2021b. New insight into the taxonomic resolution of the genus Bythotrephes Leydig (Crustacea: Cladocera) based on molecular data from Central Europe. Scientific Reports 11:23158. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02648-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller B, Spaak P. 2004. Non-Random sexual reproduction and diapausing egg production in a Daphnia hybrid species complex. Limnology and Oceanography 49:1393–1400. DOI: 10.4319/lo.2004.49.4_part_2.1393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korovchinsky NM. 1986. Variability, taxonomy, distribution of Diaphanosoma orghidani (Cladocera, Sididae) and description of D. orientalis sp.n. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 2:208–220.
   Google Scholar
• Korovchinsky NM. 1987. A study of Diaphanosoma species (Crustacea: Cladocera) of the “mongolianum” group. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobioligie 72:727–758. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19870720609.
   Google Scholar
• Korovchinsky NM. 1992. Sididae & Holopediidae (Crustacea: Daphniiformes). In: F DHJ, editor. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world. Vol. 3. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing. 82 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Korovchinsky NM. 2018. Cladocera: Ctenopoda: Families Sididae, Holopediidae & Pseudopenilidae (Branchiopoda: Cladocera). In: Dumont HJF, editor. Identification guides to the plankton and benthos of inland waters 27. Weikersheim: Backhuys Publishers and Margraf Publishers. 204 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Korovchinsky NM, Petkovski TK. 2014. The ancient Balkan lakes harbor a new endemic species of Diaphanosoma Fischer, 1850 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Cladocera). Zootaxa 3784:539–549. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3784.5.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korovchinsky NM, Walsh EJ, Smolak R. 2017. Diaphanosoma Fischer, 1850 (Crustacea: Cladocera: Sididae) of Lake Turkana (East Africa), with the description of a new species of the genus. Zootaxa 4250:77–89. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4250.1.6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotov AA. 2015. A critical review of the current taxonomy of the genus Daphnia OF Müller, 1785 (Anomopoda, Cladocera). Zootaxa 3911:184–200. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3911.2.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos C, Urabe J, Makino W. 2015. Cryptic diversity of Japanese Diaphanosoma (Crustacea: Cladocera) revealed by morphological and molecular assessments. Inland Waters 5:253–262. DOI: 10.5268/IW-5.3.847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazareva VI, Bolotov SE. 2013. Analysis of coexistence of the recent invader Diaphanosoma orghidani Negrea with the aboriginal species D. brachyurum (Lievin) (Crustacea, Cladocera) in the Rybinsk Reservoir. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 4:161–173. DOI: 10.1134/S2075111713030077.
   Google Scholar
• Lazareva VI, Bolotov SE. 2014. Peculiarities of the biology of two Diaphanosoma species (Crustacea, Cladocera) in Rybinsk Reservoir. Inland Water Biology 7:108–116. DOI: 10.1134/S1995082914020096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Xu L, Xu S-L, Martínez A, Chen H, Cheng D, Dumont HJ, Han B-P, Fontaneto D. 2018. Species and hybrids in the genus Diaphanosoma Fischer, 1850 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Cladocera). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 118:369–378. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napiórkowski P, Kentzer A, Dembowska E. 2006. Zooplankton of the lower Vistula River: The effect of Włocławek dam reservoir (Poland) on community structure. SIL Proceedings 29:2109–2114.
   Google Scholar
• Pentinsaari M, Salmela H, Mutanen M, Roslin T. 2016. Molecular evolution of a widely-adopted taxonomic marker (COI) across the animal tree of life. Scientific Reports 6:35275. DOI: 10.1038/srep35275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25:1253–1256. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter S, Olesen J, Wheeler WC. 2007. Phylogeny of Branchiopoda (Crustacea) based on a combined analysis of morphological data and six molecular loci. Cladistics 23:301–336. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00148.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarma SSS, Nandini S, Gulati RD. 2005. Life history strategies of cladocerans: Comparisons of tropical and temperate taxa. Hydrobiologia 542:315–333. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-004-3247-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk K, Spaak P. 1995. Evolutionary and ecological consequences of interspecific hybridization in cladocerans. Experientia 51:465–481. DOI: 10.1007/BF02143199.
   Google Scholar
• Semenova AS, Tchougounov VK. 2018. The distribution of Moina micrura Kurz, 1875 (Crustacea: Moinidae) in the Russian part of the Vistula Lagoon (Baltic Sea). Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 9:175–183. DOI: 10.1134/S207511171802011X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sługocki Ł, Czerniawski R. 2018. Trophic state (TSISD) and mixing type significantly influence pelagic zooplankton biodiversity in temperate lakes (NW Poland). PeerJ 6:e5731. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaak P, Hoekstra JR. 1997. Fish predation on a Daphnia hybrid species complex: A factor explaining species coexistence? Limnology and Oceanography 42:753–762. DOI: 10.4319/lo.1997.42.4.0753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:2725–2729. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler W. 1997. Erstfund von Diaphanosoma orghidani Negrea 1982 (Crustacea: Sididae) für Deutschland und ihre Begleitarten [First record of Diaphanosoma orghidani Negrea 1982 (Crustacea: Sididae) in Germany and its companions]. Lauterbornia H 32:73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Wolinska J, Bittner K, Ebert D, Spaak P. 2006. The coexistence of hybrid and parental Daphnia: The role of parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:1977–1983. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Innes DJ, Lynch M, Cristescu ME. 2013. The role of hybridization in the origin and spread of asexuality in Daphnia. Molecular Ecology 22:4549–4561. DOI: 10.1111/mec.12407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar