Visual prey categorization by a generalist jumping spider

References

• Bartos M. 2002. Distance of approach to prey is adjusted to the prey’s ability to escape in Yllenus arenarius Menge (Araneae, Salticidae). In: Toft S, Scharff N, editors. European arachnology. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press. pp. 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bartos M. 2004. The prey of Yllenus arenarius (Araneae, Salticidae). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 13:83–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bartos M. 2005. The life history of Yllenus arenarius (Araneae, Salticidae): Evidence for sympatric populations isolated by the year of maturation. Journal of Arachnology 36:300–305. DOI:10.1636/CSt107-134.1.
   Google Scholar
• Bartos M. 2007. Hunting prey with different escape potentials: Alternative predatory tactics in a dune-dwelling salticid. Journal of Arachnology 33:214–221. DOI:10.1636/04-73.1.
   Google Scholar
• Bartos M. 2008. Alternative predatory tactics in a juvenile jumping spider. Journal of Arachnology 36:300–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartos M. 2011. Partial dietary separation between coexisting cohorts of Yllenus arenarius (Araneae: Salticidae). Journal of Arachnology 39:230–235. DOI:10.1636/CP10-63.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartos M. 2013. Optical cues used in prey identification by a juvenile jumping spider, Yllenus arenarius (Araneae, Salticidae). Dr. Hab. thesis, University of Łódź, Łódź University Press, Łódź, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Bartos M, Minias P. 2016. Visual cues used in directing predatory strikes by the jumping spider Yllenus arenarius (Araneae, Salticidae). Animal Behaviour 120:51–59. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartos M, Szczepko K. 2012. Development of prey-specific predatory behavior in a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). Journal of Arachnology 40:228–233. DOI:10.1636/Hi11-66.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear A, Hasson O. 1997. The predatory response of a stalking spider, Plexippus paykulli, to camouflage and prey type. Animal Behaviour 54:993–998. DOI:10.1006/anbe.1997.0525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarski JV, Taylor P, Jakob EM. 2012. Optical cues used in predation by jumping spiders, Phidippus audax (Araneae, Salticidae). Animal Behaviour 84:1221–1227. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blest AD, Hardie RC, McIntyre P, Williams DS. 1981. The spectral sensitivities of identified receptors and the function of retinal tiering in the principal eyes of a jumping spider. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 145:227–239. DOI:10.1007/BF00605035.
   Google Scholar
• Clark DL, Uetz GW. 1993. Signal efficacy and the evolution of male dimorphism in the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 90 (24): 11954–11957. DOI:10.1073/pnas.90.24.11954.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin TW. 2005. The visual ecology of predator-prey interactions. In: Barbosa P, Castellanos I, editors. Ecology of predator-prey interactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 105–138.
   Google Scholar
• Darmaillacq AS, Chichery R, Poirier R, Dickel L. 2004. Effect of early feeding experience on subsequent prey preference by cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Developmental Psychobiology 45:239–244. DOI:10.1002/dev.20034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Agrò M, Rößler DC, Kim K, and Shamble PS. 2021. Perception of biological motion by jumping spiders. PLoS biology 19(7):e3001172. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolev Y, Nelson XJ. 2014. Innate pattern recognition and categorization in a jumping spider. PLoS One 9(6):e97819. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0097819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolev Y, Nelson XJ. 2016. Biological relevance affects object recognition in jumping spiders. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 43:42–53. DOI:10.1080/03014223.2015.1070183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards GB, Jackson RR. 1993. Use of prey-specific predatory behaviour by North American jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae) of the genus Phidippus. Journal of Zoology 229:709–716. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1993.tb02666.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards GB, Jackson RR. 1994. The role of experience in the development of predatory behaviour in Phidippus regius, a jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from Florida. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 21:269–277. DOI:10.1080/03014223.1994.9517994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias DO, Maddison WP, Peckmezian C, Girard MB, Mason AC. 2012. Orchestrating the score: Complex multimodal courtship in the Habronattus coecatus group of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 105(3):522–547. DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01817.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns JT. 2004. The thinking eye, the seeing brain: Explorations in visual cognition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ewert J-P. 2004. Motion perception shapes the visual world of amphibians. In: Prete FR, editor. Complex worlds from simpler nervous systems. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 117–160.
   Google Scholar
• Forster LM. 1977. A qualitative analysis of hunting behaviour in jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 4:51–62. DOI:10.1080/03014223.1977.9517936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster L. 1982. Visual communication in jumping spiders (Salticidae). In: Witt PN, Rovner JS, editors. Spider communication: Mechanisms and ecological significance. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 161–212.
   Google Scholar
• Forster L. 1985. Target discrimination in jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). In: Barth FG, editor. Neurobiology of Arachnids. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 249–274.
   Google Scholar
• Förster J, Higgins ET. 2005. How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science 16:631–636. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freed AN. 1984. Foraging behaviour in the jumping spider Phidippus audax: Bases for selectivity. Journal of Zoology 203:49–61. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1984.tb06043.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goté JT, Butler PM, Zurek DB, Buschbeck EK, Morehouse NI. 2019. Growing tiny eyes: How juvenile jumping spiders retain high visual performance in the face of size limitations and developmental constraints. Vision Research 160:24–36. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2019.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland DP, Jackson RR. 2000. Cues by which Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider, distinguishes jumping-spider prey from other prey. Journal of Experimental Biology 203:3485–3494. DOI:10.1242/jeb.203.22.3485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland DP, Jackson RR. 2001. Prey classification by Portia fimbriata, a salticid spider that specializes at preying on other salticids: Species that elicit cryptic stalking. Journal of Zoology 255:445–460. DOI:10.1017/S0952836901001534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland DP, Jackson RR. 2002. Influence of cues from the anterior medial eyes of virtual prey on Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider. Journal of Experimental Biology 205:1861–1868. DOI:10.1242/jeb.205.13.1861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland DP, Jackson RR. 2004. Portia perceptions: The Umwelt of an araneophagic jumping spider. In: Prete FR, editor. Complex worlds from simpler nervous systems. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 5–40.
   Google Scholar
• Harland DP, Li D, Jackson RR. 2012. How jumping spiders see the world. In: Lazareva OF, Shimizu T, Wasserman EA, editors. How animals see the world: Comparative behavior, biology, and evolution of vision. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 133–163.
   Google Scholar
• Ingle DJ. 1983. Brain mechanisms of visual localization by frogs and toads. In: Ewert J-P, Capranica RR, Ingle DJ, editors. Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. New York: Plenum. pp. 177–226.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson RR. 1988a. The biology of Jacksonoides queenlandicus, a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Queensland: Intraspecific interactions, web-invasion, predators, and prey. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 15:1–37. DOI:10.1080/03014223.1988.10422606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR. 1988b. The biology of Tauala lepidus, a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Queensland: Display and predatory behaviour. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 15:347–364. DOI:10.1080/03014223.1988.10422960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR. 1990. Predatory and nesting behaviour of Cocalus gibbosus, a spartaeine jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Queensland. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 17:483–490. DOI:10.1080/03014223.1990.10422947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Hallas SEA. 1986. Predatory versatility and intraspecific interactions of spartaeine jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae): Brettus adonis. B. cingulatus, Cyrba algerina and Phaeacius sp. indet. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 13:491–520. DOI:10.1080/03014223.1986.10422979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Nelson X. 2012. Attending to detail by communal spider-eating spiders. Animal Cognition 15:461–471. DOI:10.1007/s10071-012-0469-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Nelson XJ, Sune GO. 2005. A spider that feeds indirectly on vertebrate blood by choosing female mosquitoes as prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102:15155–15160. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0507398102.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Pollard S. 1996. Predatory behavior of jumping spiders. Annual Review of Entomology 41:287–308. DOI:10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.001443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob E, Skow C, Long S. 2011. Plasticity, learning and cognition. In: Herberstein M, editor. Spider behaviour, flexibility and versatility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 307–447.
   Google Scholar
• Kimchi R. 1992. Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 112:24. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourtzi Z, Connor CE. 2011. Neural representations for object perception: Structure, category, and adaptive coding. Annual Review of Neurosciences 34:45–67. DOI:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral K, Prete FR. 2004. In the mind of a hunter: The visual world of the praying mantis. In: Prete FR, editor. Complex worlds from simpler nervous systems. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 75–116.
   Google Scholar
• Land MF. 1969. Movements of the retinae of jumping spiders (Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) in response to visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Biology 51:471–493. DOI:10.1242/jeb.51.2.471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land MF, Nilsson D-E. 2001. Animal eyes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Jackson RR, Cutler B. 1996. Prey-capture techniques and prey preferences of Habrocestum pulex (Hentz), an ant-eating jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from North America. Journal of Zoology 240:551–562. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05305.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Jackson RR, Harland DP. 1999. Prey-capture techniques and prey preferences of Aelurillus aeruginosus, A. cognatus and A. kochi, ant-eating jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Israel. Israel Journal of Zoology 45:341–359.
   Google Scholar
• Nagata T, Koyanagi M, Tsukamoto H, Saeki S, Isono K, Shichida Y, Tokunaga F, Kinoshita M, Arikawa K, Terakita A. 2012. Depth perception from image defocus in a jumping spider. Science 335:469–471. DOI:10.1126/science.1211667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagelkerke NJD. 1991. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78:691–692. DOI:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson XJ. 2010. Visual cues used by ant-like jumping spiders to distinguish conspecifics from their models. Journal of Arachnology 38:27–34. DOI:10.1636/Hi09-35.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson XJ, Card A. 2016. Locomotory mimicry in ant-like spiders. Behavioral Ecology 27(3):700–707. DOI:10.1093/beheco/arv218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson XJ, Jackson RR. 2006. A predator from East Africa that chooses malaria vectors as preferred prey. PLoS ONE 1:e132. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0000132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson XJ, Jackson RR. 2007. Complex display behaviour during the intraspecific interactions of myrmecomorphic jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). Journal of Natural History 41(25–28):1659–1678. DOI:10.1080/00222930701450504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson X, Jackson RR. 2011. Flexibility in the foraging strategies of spiders. In: Herberstein M, editor. Spider behaviour, flexibility and versatility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 31–56.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson XJ, Jackson RR. 2012a. Fine-tuning of vision-based prey-choice decisions by a predator that targets malaria vectors. Journal of Arachnology 40:23–33. DOI:10.1636/Hill-61.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson XJ, Jackson RR. 2012b. The discerning predator: Decision rules underlying prey classification by a mosquito-eating jumping spider. Journal of Experimental Biology 215:2255–2261. DOI:10.1242/jeb.069609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson XJ, Jackson RR, Sune GO. 2005. Use of Anopheles-specific prey-capture behavior by the small juveniles of Evarcha culicivora, a mosquito-eating jumping spider. Journal of Arachnology 33:541–548. DOI:10.1636/05-3.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peaslee AG, Wilson G. 1989. Spectral sensitivity in jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A 164:359–363. DOI:10.1007/BF00612995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prete FR. 1992a. Discrimination of visual stimuli representing prey versus non-prey by the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.). Brain, Behavior & Evolution 39:285–288. DOI:10.1159/000114125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prete FR. 1992b. The effects of background pattern and contrast on prey discrimination by the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.). Brain, Behavior & Evolution 40:311–320. DOI:10.1159/000113921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prete FR. 1993. Stimulus configuration and location in the visual field affect appetitive responses by the praying mantis. Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.). Visual Neuroscience 10:997–1005. DOI:10.1017/S0952523800010105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prete FR. 1999. Prey recognition. In: Prete FR, Wells H, Wells PH, Hurd LE, editors. The praying mantids. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 141–179.
   Google Scholar
• Prete FR, Mahaffey RJ. 1993. Appetitive responses to computer-generated visual stimuli by the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola. (Burm.) Visual Neuroscience 10:669–679. DOI:10.1017/S0952523800005368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prete FR, McLean T. 1996. Responses to moving small-field stimuli by the praying mantis, Sphodromantis lineola (Burmeister). Brain Behavior & Evolution 47:42–54. DOI:10.1159/000113228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman D, Jackson RR. 1992. A review of the ethology of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). Bulletin of the British Arachnology Society 9:33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Rößler DC, De Agrò M, Kim K, and Shamble PS. 2022. Static visual predator recognition in jumping spiders. Functional Ecology 36:561–571. DOI:10.1111/1365-2435.13953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamble PS, Hoy RR, Cohen I, Beatus T. 2017. Walking like an ant: A quantitative and experimental approach to understanding locomotor mimicry in the jumping spider Myrmarachne formicaria. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 284:20170308. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2017.0308.
   Google Scholar
• Soto FA, Wasserman EA. 2014. Mechanisms of object recognition: What we have learned from pigeons. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 8:1–22. DOI:10.3389/fncir.2014.00122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spano L, Long SM, Jakob EM. 2012. Secondary eyes mediate the response to looming objects in jumping spiders (Phidippus audax. Salticidae). Biology Letters 8:949–951. DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl G, Elias D. 2011. Communication. In: Herberstein M, editor. Spider behaviour, flexibility and versatility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 127–189.
   Google Scholar
• Wachowitz S, Ewert J-P. 1996. A key by which the Toad’s visual system gets access to the domain of prey. Physiology & Behavior 60:877–887. DOI:10.1016/0031-9384(96)00070-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemans J, Elder JH, Kubovy M, Palmer SE, Peterson MA, Singh M, von der Heydt R. 2012. A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin 138:1172–1217. DOI:10.1037/a0029333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D, McIntyre P. 1980. The principal eyes of a jumping spider have a telephoto component. Nature 288:578–580. DOI:10.1038/288578a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Spider Catalog. 2022. World spider catalog. Version 23.0. Natural history museum Bern. http://wsc.nmbe.ch. Accessed 2022 02 09.
   Google Scholar
• Zurek DB, Nelson XJ. 2012a. Saccadic tracking of targets mediated by the anterior-lateral eyes of jumping spiders. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 198:411–417. DOI:10.1007/s00359-012-0719-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurek DB, Nelson XJ. 2012b. Hyperacute motion detection by the lateral eyes of jumping spiders. Vision Research 66:26–30. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurek DB, Taylor AJ, Evans CS, Nelson XJ. 2010. The role of the anterior lateral eyes in the vision-based behaviour of jumping spiders. Journal of Experimental Biology 213:2372–2378. DOI:10.1242/jeb.042382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar