Probing behavior of Aphis fabae and Myzus persicae on three species of grapevines with analysis of grapevine leaf anatomy and allelochemicals

References

• Ahmed M, Ji M, Qin P, Gu Z, Liu Y, Sikandar A, Iqbal MF, Javeed A. 2019. Phytochemical screening, total phenolic and flavonoids contents and antioxidant activities of Citrullus colocynthis L. and Cannabis sativa L. Applied Ecology And Environmental Research 17(3):6961–6979. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1703_69616979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbar W, Showler AT, Reagan TE, Davis JA, Beuzelin JM. 2014. Feeding by sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari, on sugarcane cultivars with differential susceptibility and potential mechanism of resistance. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 150(1):32–44. DOI: 10.1111/eea.12136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliaño-González MJ, Richard T, Cantos-Villar E. 2020. Grapevine cane extracts: Raw plant material, extraction methods, quantification, and applications. Biomolecules 10(8):1195. DOI: 10.3390/biom10081195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez AE, Garzo E, Verbeek M, Vosman B, Dicke M, Tjallingii WF. 2007. Infection of potato plants with potato leafroll virus changes attraction and feeding behaviour of Myzus persicae. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 125(2):135–144. DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00607.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez AE, Tjallingii WF, Garzo E, Vleeshouwers V, Dicke M, Vosman B. 2006. Location of resistance factors in the leaves of potato and wild tuber-bearing Solanum species to aphid Myzus persicae. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 121(2):145–157. DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-8703.2006.00464.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar E-D, Richardson ML, Abdo Z, Hall DG, RG Jr. S. 2014. Differences in stylet sheath occurrence and the fibrous ring (Sclerenchyma) between x Citroncirus plants relatively resistant or susceptible to adults of the Asian Citrus Psyllid Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae). PLoS ONE 9(10):e110919. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroi AM, Popitiu M, Fierascu I, Sărdărescu I-D, Fierascu RC. 2022. Grapevine wastes: A rich source of antioxidants and other biologically active compounds. Antioxidants 11(2):393. DOI: 10.3390/antiox11020393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baronio CA, Andzeiewski S, Silva da Cunha U, Botton M. 2014. Biologia e tabela de vida de fertilidade do pulgao-preto em cultivares de videira. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasilieira Brasília 49(9):665–672. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2014000900002.
   Google Scholar
• Basso MF, Fajardo TVM, Saldarelli P. 2016. Grapevine virus diseases: Economic impact and current advances in viral prospection and management. Revista Brasiliera de Fruticultura 39(1):e–411. DOI: 10.1590/0100-29452017411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biais B, Krisa S, Cluzet S, Da Costa G, Waffo-Teguo P, Mérillon J-M, Richard T. 2017. Antioxidant and cytoprotective activities of grapevine stilbenes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65(24):4952–4960. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesaga M, Pyrzyńska K. 2013. Stability of bioactive polyphenols from honey during different extraction methods. Food Chemistry 136(1):46–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman RL, Eastop VF. 2006. Host lists and keys. In: Aphids on the world’s herbaceous plants and shrubs. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Natural History Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Boczek J. 1988. Odporność roślin oraz hodowla i uprawa odmian odpornych jako metoda walki ze szkodnikami: 47-57. Nauka o szkodnikach. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne.
   Google Scholar
• Buer CS, Muday GK, Djordjevic MA. 2008. Implications of long-distance flavonoid movement in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signaling & Behavior 3(6):415–417. DOI: 10.4161/psb.3.6.5440.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burns J, Mullen W, Landrault N, Teissedre P-L, Lean MEJ, Crozier A. 2002. Variations in the profile and content of anthocyanins in wines made from cabernet sauvignon and hybrid grapes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(14):4096–4102. DOI: 10.1021/jf011233s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CABI. 2022a. Aphis fabae. In: CABI Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. Available: https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.6196. Accesseed 24 May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• CABI. 2022b. Myzus persicae. In: CABI Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. Available: https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.35642. Accessed: 24 May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Canassa VF, Baldin ELL, Lourencao AL, Barros DRP, Lopes NP, Sartori MMP. 2020. Feeding behavior of Brevicoryne brassicae in resistant and susceptible collard greens genotypes: Interactions among morphological and chemical factors. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 168(3):228–239. DOI: 10.1111/eea.12897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Munoz N, Gomez-Alonso S, Garcıa-Romero E, Hermosın-Gutierrez I. 2010. Flavonol profiles of Vitis vinifera white grape cultivars. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 23(7):699–705. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2010.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CK, Forbes AR, Raworth DA. 1991. Aphid-transmitted viruses and their vectors of the world. Technical Bulletin 1991-3E. Vancouver: Research Branch Agriculture Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Chong J, Poutaraud A, Hugueney P. 2009. Metabolism and roles of stilbenes in plants. Plant Science 177(3):143–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancewicz K, Sznajder K, Załuski D, Kordan B, Gabryś B. 2016. Behavioral sensitivity of Myzus persicae to volatile isoprenoids in plant tissues. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 160(3):229–240. DOI: 10.1111/eea.12480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Fuente Lloreda M. 2018. Use of hybrids in viticulture. A challenge for the OIV. OENO One 52(3):231–234. DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2018.52.3.2312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rosso M, Tonidandel L, Larcher R, Nicolini G, Vedova AD, De Marchi F, Gardiman M, Giusta M, Flamini R. 2014. Identification of new flavonols in hybrid grapes by combined liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry approaches. Food Chemistry 163:244–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.04.110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogimont C, Bendahmane A, Chovelon V, Boissot N. 2010. Host plant resistance to aphids in cultivated crops: Genetic and molecular bases, and interactions with aphid populations. Comptes Rendus - Biologies 333(6–7):566–573. DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs M. 2020. Grapevine viruses: A multitude of diverse species with simple but overall poorly adopted management solutions in the vineyard. Journal of Plant Pathology 102(3):643–653. DOI: 10.1007/s42161-020-00579-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabryś B, Pawluk M. 1999. Acceptability of different species of Brassicaceae as hosts for the cabbage aphid. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 91(1):105–109. DOI: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00471.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goławska S, Łukasik I. 2009. Acceptance of low-saponin lines of alfalfa with varied phenolic concentrations by pea aphid. Biologia Section Zoology 64(2):377–382. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-009-0051-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goławska S, Łukasik I. 2012. Antifeedant activity of luteolin and genistein against the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Journal of Pest Science 85(4):443–450. DOI: 10.1007/s10340-012-0452-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goławska S, Łukasik I, Kapusta I, Janda B. 2010. Analysis of flavonoids content in alfalfa/ Analiza zawartości flawonoidów w lucernie. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering 17(2–3):261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Goławska S, Sprawka I, Łukasik I. 2014. Are naringenin and quercetin useful chemicals in pest-management strategies? Journal of Pest Science 87(1):173–180. DOI: 10.1007/s10340-013-0535-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golonko A, Kalinowska M, Świsłocka R, Świderski G, Lewandowski W. 2015. Zastosowanie związków fenolowych i ich pochodnych w przemyśle i medycynie. Civil and Environmental Engineering 6:161–179.
   Google Scholar
• Goufo P, Singh RK, Cortez I. 2020. A reference list of phenolic compounds (including stilbenes) in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) roots, woods, canes, stems, and leaves. Antioxidants 9(5):398. DOI: 10.3390/antiox9050398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halarewicz A, Gabryś B. 2012. Probing behavior of bird cherry oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) on native bird cherry Prunus padus L. and alien invasive black cherry Prunus serotine Erhr. In Europe and the role of cyanogenic glycosides. Anthropod-Plant Interactions 6(4):497–505. DOI: 10.1007/s11829-012-9228-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harborne JB. 1997. Ekologia biochemiczna. Warszawa: PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Holman J. 2009. Host plant catalog of aphids. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 1140.
   Google Scholar
• Huang F, Tjallingii WF, Zhang P, Zhang J, Lu Y, Lin J. 2012. EPG waveform characteristics of solenopsis mealybug stylet penetration on cotton. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 143(1):47–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01233.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James DG, Whitney J. 1993. Mite populations on grapevines in south-eastern Australia: Implications for biological control of grapevine mites (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae, Eriophyidae). Experimental & Applied Acarology 17(4):259–270. DOI: 10.1007/BF02337275.
   Google Scholar
• Jasiński M, Mazurkiewicz M, Rodziewicz P, Figlerowicz M. 2009. Flawonoidy – Budowa, właściwości i funkcja ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem roślin motylkowatych. Biotechnologia 2(85):81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Jeszka M, Flaczyk E, Kobus-Cisowska J, Dziedzic K. 2010. Związki fenolowe – Charakterystyka i znaczenie w technologii żywności. Nauka Przyroda Technologie 4(2):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang YX, Nombela G, Muniz M. 2001. Analysis by DC-EPG of the resistance to Bemisia tabaci on an Mi -tomato line. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 99(3):295–302. DOI: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.2001.00828.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedrina-Okutan O, Novello V, Hoffmann T, Hadersdorfer J, Schneider A, Schwab W, Ferrandino A. 2019. Polyphenolic diversity in Vitis sp. Leaves. Scientia Horticulturae 256:108569. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller M. 2015a. Botany and anatomy: 1-57. In: The science of grapevines. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier LTD. pp. 522.
   Google Scholar
• Keller M. 2015b. Living with other organisms: 343-367. In: The science of grapevines. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier LTD. pp. 522.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd NAC. 1976. Factors influencing leaf vein selection in the lime aphid (Eucallipterus tiliae L.). Oecologia (Berl.) 23(3):247–254. DOI: 10.1007/BF00361239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger J, Powell G, Thompson GA, Isaacs R. 1998. Phloem specific aphid resistance in Cucumis melo line AR5: Effects on feeding behaviour and performance of Aphis gossypii. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 86(1):79–88. DOI: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00267.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordan B, Gabryś B, Dancewicz K, Lahuta LB, Piotrowicz-Cieślak A, Rowińska E. 2008. European yellow lupine, Lupinus luteus, and narrow-leaf lupine, Lupinus angustifolius, as hosts for the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 128(1):139–146. DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00702.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordan B, Stec K, Słomiński P, Giertych M, Wróblewska-Kurdyk A, Gabryś B. 2018. Susceptibility of forage legumes to infestation by the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Crop & Pasture Science 69(8):775–784. DOI: 10.1071/CP18065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordan B, Stec K, Słomiński P, Laszczak-Dawid A, Wróblewska-Kurdyk A, Gabryś B. 2019. Antixenosis potential in pulses against the pea aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Journal of Economic Entomology 112(1):465–474. DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordan B, Wróblewska-Kurdyk A, Bocianowski J, Stec K, Jankowski K, Gabryś B. 2021. Variation in susceptibility of rapeseed cultivars to the peach potato aphid. Journal of Pest Science 94(2):435–449. DOI: 10.1007/s10340-020-01270-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak A, Chrzanowski G, Sempruch C, Klewek A, Chwedczuk M. 2015. Effect of selected flavonoids on the behavior of the bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi L.) during the colonization of winter wheat. Progress In Plant Protection 55(2):202–206. DOI: 10.14199/ppp-2015-033.
   Google Scholar
• Kozłowska M, Czekała Ł. 2017. Stilbenes and their role in disease resistance. Progress In Plant Protection 57(1):27–35. DOI: 10.14199/ppp-2017-004.
   Google Scholar
• Lattanzio V, Arpaia S, Cardinali A, Di Venere D, Linsalata V. 2000. Role of endogenous flavonoids in resistance mechanism of Vigna to aphids. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48(11):5316–5320. DOI: 10.1021/jf000229y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczyński B. 1996. Kurs praktyczny w zakresie chemicznych interakcji owady – Rośliny na przykładzie mszyc (Aphidoidea). Siedlce: WSRP. pp. 16–63.
   Google Scholar
• Liang L, Liu L, Yu X, Han B. 2012. Evaluation of the resistance of different tea cultivars to tea aphids by EPG technique. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 11(12):2028–2034. DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60460-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado-Assefh CR, Alvarez AE. 2018. Probing behavior of aposymbiotic green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) on susceptible Solanum tuberosum and resistant Solanum stoloniferum plants. Insect Science 25(1):127–136. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majewska M, Czeczot H. 2009. Flawonoidy w profilaktyce i terapii. Farmacja Polska 65(5):369–377.
   Google Scholar
• Makowska-Wąs J, Janeczko Z. 2008. Stilbeny naturalnego pochodzenia. Część I. Czasopismo Aptekarskie, Vol. 15, Suppl. Rośliny Lecznicze w Polsce i na Świecie 2:7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski H. 2008. Strategie obronne roślin drzewiastych przed szkodliwymi owadami. Leśne Prace Badawcze (Forest Research Papers) 69(2):165–173.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti E, Civolani S, Leis M, Chicca M, Tjjalingii WF, Pasqualini E, Baronio P. 2009. Tissue location of resistance in apple to the rosy apple aphid established by electrical penetration graphs. Bulletin of Insectology 62(2):203–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin B, Collar JL, Tjallingi WF, Fereres A. 1997. Intracellular ingestion and salivation by aphids may cause the acquisition and inoculation of non-persistently transmitted plant viruses. Journal of General Virology 78(10):2701–2705. DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-78-10-2701.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayoral AM, Tjallingii WF, Castanera P. 1996. Probing behavior of Diuraphis noxia on five cereal species with different hydroxyamic acid levels. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 78(3):341–348. DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1996.tb00799.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles P. 1999. Aphid saliva. Biological Reviews 74(1):41–85. DOI: 10.1017/S0006323198005271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myśliwiec R. 2009. Uprawa winorośli. Kraków: Plantpress. pp. 164.
   Google Scholar
• Nopo-Olazabal C, Condori J, Nopo-Olazabal L, Medina-Bolivar F. 2014. Differential induction of antioxidant stilbenoids in hairy roots of Vitis rotundifolia treated with methyl jasmonate and hydrogen peroxide. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 74:50–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.10.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocete R, Lopez MA, Gallardo A, Arnold C. 2008. Comparative analysis of wild and cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera) in the Basque Region of Spain and France. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 123(1–3):95–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omer AD, Granett J, Shebelut CW. 1999. Effect of attack intensity on host utilization in grape phylloxera. Crop Protection 18(5):341–347. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-2194(99)00033-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlus AD, Waffo-Téguo P, Shaver J, Mérillon JM. 2012. Stilbenoid chemistry from wine and the genus Vitis, a review. Journal International Des Sciences de la Vigne Et du Vin 46(2):57–111.
   Google Scholar
• Petrussa E et al. 2013. Plant flavonoids–biosynthesis, transport and involvement in stress responses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14(7):14950–14973. DOI: 10.3390/ijms140714950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson J, Tjallingii WF, Hardie J. 2007. Host plant selection and feeding. In: van Emden H, Harrington R, editors. Aphids as crop pests. Wallingford UK: CAB International. pp. 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• Philippi J, Schliephake E, Jurgens HU, Jansen G, Ordon F. 2015. Feeding behavior of aphids on narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) genotypes varying in the content of quinolizidine alkaloids. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 156(1):37–51. DOI: 10.1111/eea.12313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompon J, Pelletier Y. 2012. Changes in aphid probing behaviour as a function of insect age and plant resistance level. Bulletin of Entomological Research 102(5):550–557. DOI: 10.1017/S0007485312000120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portu J, López-Alfaro I, Gómez-Alonso S, López R, Garde-Cerdán T. 2015. Changes on grape phenolic composition induced by grapevine foliar applications of phenylalanine and urea. Food Chemistry 180:171–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell G, Tosh CR, Hardie J. 2006. Host plant selection by aphids: Behavioral, evolutionary, and applied perspectives. Annual Review of Entomology 51(1):309–330. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prado E, Tjallingii WF. 1997. Effects of previous plant infestation on sieve element acceptance by two aphids. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 82(2):189–200. DOI: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00130.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauge M-H, Kervella J, Rahbe Y. 1998. Probing behaviour of the green peach aphid Myzus persicae on resistant Prunus genotypes. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 89(3):223–232. DOI: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00403.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekrecka M, Łabanowska BH, Piotrowski W. 2015. Integrowana metoda ograniczania szkodników winorośli. In: Lisek J, editor. Metodyka Integrowanej Ochrony Winorośli (Materiały dla producentów) – Opracowanie zbiorowe. Skierniewice: Instytut Ogrodnictwa. pp. 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sergiel I, Pohl P, Biesaga M. 2014. Characterisation of honeys according to their content of phenolic compounds using high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry 145:404–408. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.08.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva-Sanzana C, Estevez JM, Blanco-Herrera F. 2020. Influence of cell wall polymers and their modifying enzymes during plant–aphid interactions. Journal of Experimental Botany 71(13):3854–3864. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmonds MSJ. 2003. Flavonoid-insect interactions: Recent advances in our knowledge. Phytochemistry 64(1):21–30. DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00293-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Simon A, Halsey K, Kurup S, Clark S, Aradottir GI. 2020. Characterisation of bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi L.) behaviour and aphid host preference in relation to partially resistant and susceptible wheat landraces. Annals Applied Biology 177(2):184–194. DOI: 10.1111/aab.12616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CM, Boyko EV. 2007. The molecular bases of plant resistance and defense responses to aphid feeding: Current status. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 122(1):1–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00503.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CM, Chuang WP. 2014. Plant resistance to aphid feeding: Behavioral, physiological, genetic and molecular cues regulate aphid host selection and feeding. Pest Management Science 70(4):528–540. DOI: 10.1002/ps.3689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CM, Clement SL. 2012. Molecular bases of plant resistance to arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 57(1):309–328. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100642.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Souza MF, Davis JA. 2020. Detailed characterization of Melanaphis sacchari (Hemiptera: Aphididae) feeding behavior on different host plants. Environmental Entomology 49(3):683–691. DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvaa036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiller NJ, Koenders L, Tjallingii WF. 1990. Xylem ingestion by aphids – A strategy for maintaining water balance. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 55(2):101–104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1990.tb01352.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stec K, Kordan B, Sergiel I, Biesaga M, Mroczek J, Bocianowski J, Gabryś B. 2021. Antixenosis in Glycine max (L.) Merr against Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Scientific Reports 11(1):15289. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94703-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout MJ. 2013. Reevaluating the conceptual framework for applied research on host-plant resistance. Insect Science 20(3):263–272. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M, Voorrips RE, Steenhuis-Broers G, Van’t Westende W, Vosman B. 2018. Reduced phloem uptake of Myzus persicae on an aphid resistant pepper accession. BMC Plant Biology 18(1):138. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1340-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teissedre P-L. 2018. Composition of grape and wine from resistant vines varieties. OENO One 52(3):211–217. DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2018.52.3.2223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetreault HM, Grover S, Scully ED, Gries T, Palmer NA, Sarath G, Louis J, Sattler SE. 2019. Global Responses of Resistant and Susceptible Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to Sugarcane Aphid (Melanaphis sacchari). Frontiers in Plant Science 10:145. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjallingii WF. 1978. Electronic recording of penetration behavior by aphids. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 24(3):521–530. DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1978.tb02836.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjallingii WF. 1986. Wire effects on aphids during electrical recording of stylet penetration. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 40(1):89–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1986.tb02159.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjallingii WF. 1994. Sieve element acceptance by aphids. European Journal of Entomology 91:47–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjallingii WF. 2001. Plant penetration by aphids as revealed by electrical penetration graphs. Aphids and Other Homopterous Insects 8:105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Tjallingii WF. 2006. Salivary secretions by aphids interacting with proteins of phloem wound responses. Journal of Experimental Botany 57(4):739–745. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erj088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjallingii WF, Esch THH. 1993. Fine structure of aphid stylet routes in plant tissues in correlation with EPG signals. Physiological Entomology 18(3):317–328. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1993.tb00604.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togola A, Boukar O, Servent A, Chamarthi S, Tamo M, Fatokun C. 2020. Identification of sources of resistance in cowpea mini core accessions to Aphis craccivora Koch (Homoptera: Aphididae) and their biochemical characterization. Euphytica 216(6):88. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-020-02619-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoof HA. 1958. An investigation of the biological transmission of a non-persistent virus. Doctoral thesis (Van Putten and Oortmijer.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelweith F, Thiéry D, Moret Y, Colin E, Motreuil S, Moreau J. 2014. Defense strategies used by two sympatric vineyard moth pests. Journal of Insect Physiology 64:54–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.03.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen J, Lu LM, Nie ZL, Liu XQ, Zhang N, Ickert-Bond S, Gerrath J, Manchester SR, Boggan J, Chen ZD.2018.A new phylogenetic tribal classification of the grape family (Vitaceae).Journal of Systematics and Evolution 56(4):262–272. Special Issue: Recent Advances in Systematics and Evolution of the Grape Family Vitaceae. DOI: 10.1111/jse.12427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will T, Tjallingii WF, Thonnessen A, van Bel AJ. 2007. Molecular sabotage of plant defense by aphid saliva. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(25):10536–10541. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703535104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wróblewska A, Dancewicz K, Gabryś B, Kordan B. 2012. EPG-registered probing behaviour of the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) on selected varieties of yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) and narrow-leaved lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Progress In Plant Protection 52(2):244–247.
   Google Scholar
• Wróblewska-Kurdyk A, Gniłka R, Dancewicz K, Grudniewska A, Wawrzeńczyk C, Gabryś B. 2019. β-Thujone and its derivatives modify the probing behavior of the peach potato aphid. Molecules 24(10):1–16. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24101847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Zeng L, Zhou A, Xu Y. 2013. Effects of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) tending on the probing behavior of Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Florida Entomologist 96(4):1343–1349. DOI: 10.1653/024.096.0413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Fan J, Francis F, Chen J. 2017. Watery saliva secreted by the grain aphid Sitobion avenae stimulates aphid resistance in wheat. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65(40):8798–8805. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar