Looks or personality: what drives damselfly male mating success in the wild?

References

• Amat I, Desouhant E, Gomes E, Moreau J, Monceau K. 2018. Insect personality: What can we learn from metamorphosis? Current Opinion in Insect Science 27:46–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2018.02.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CN, Cordoba‐Aguilar A, Drury JP, Grether GF. 2011. An assessment of marking techniques for odonates in the family Calopterygidae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 141(3):258–261. DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01185.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson MB. 1994. Sexual selection. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archard GA, Braithwaite VA. 2010. The importance of wild populations in studies of animal temperament. Journal of Zoology 281(3):149–160. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00714.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnqvist G, Nilsson T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: Multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60:145–164. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baguette M, Blanchet S, Legrand D, Stevens VM, Turlure C. 2013. Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks. Biological Reviews 88(2):310–326. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangham J, Chapman T, Partridge L. 2002. Effects of body size, accessory gland and testis size on pre- and postcopulatory success in Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 64(6):915–921. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2002.1976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AM. 2005. Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18(2):464–473. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00817.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AM. 2007. Future directions in behavioural syndromes research. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274(1611):755–761. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AM, Sih A. 2007. Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ecology Letters 10(9):828–834. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01081.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briffa M, Rundle SD, Fryer A. 2008. Comparing the strength of behavioural plasticity and consistency across situations: Animal personalities in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275(1640):1305–1311. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briffa M, Sneddon L. 2010. Contest behavior. In: Westneat D, Fox C, editors Evolutionary behavioral ecology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 246–265.
   Google Scholar
• Brodin T. 2009. Behavioral syndrome over the boundaries of life carryovers from larvae to adult damselfly. Behavioral Ecology: Official Journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology 20(1):30–37. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arn111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burk T. 1982. Evolutionary significance of predation on sexually signalling males. The Florida Entomologist 65(1):90–104. DOI: 10.2307/3494148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple DG, Simmonds SM, Wong BBM. 2012. Can behavioral and personality traits influence the success of unintentional species introductions? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27(1):57–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbet P. 2004. Dragonflies: Behaviour and ecology of Odonata. Oxford: Harley Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cordero A. 1999. Forced copulations and female contact guarding at a high male density in a Calopterygid damselfly. Journal of Insect Behavior 12(1):27–37. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020972913683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero Rivera A, Andrés JA. 2002. Male coercion and convenience polyandry in a calopterygid damselfly. Journal of Insect Science 2(14):1–7. DOI: 10.1673/031.002.1401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Córdoba-Aguilar A. 2002. Wing pigmentation in territorial male damselflies, Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis: A possible relation to sexual selection. Animal Behaviour 63(4):759–766. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1974.
   Google Scholar
• Córdoba-Aguilar A. 2008. Dragonflies and damselflies: Model organisms for ecological and evolutionary research. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Córdoba-Aguilar A, Cordero-Rivera A. 2005. Evolution and ecology of Calopterygidae (Zygoptera: Odonata): Status of knowledge and research perspectives. Neotropical Entomology 34(6):861–879. DOI: 10.1590/S1519-566X2005000600001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote J, Clobert J, Brodin T, Fogarty S, Sih A. 2010. Personality-dependent dispersal: Characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365(1560):4065–4076. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall SRX, Bell AM, Bolnick DI, Ratnieks FLW, Sih A. 2012. An evolutionary ecology of individual differences. Ecology Letters 15(10):1189–1198. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01846.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra K, Schröter A, Lewington R. 2020. Field guide to the dragonflies of Britain and Europe. 2nd ed. London.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJN, Reale D, Wright J. 2010. Behavioural reaction norms: Animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25(2):81–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse NJ, Reale D. 2005. Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour 142:1159–1184. DOI: 10.1163/156853905774539445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher DN, James A, Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Tregenza T. 2015. Behaviour in captivity predicts some aspects of natural behaviour, but not others, in a wild cricket population. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282:20150708. Available: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspb.2015.0708. Accessed Dec 2020 7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzstephens DM, Getty T. 2000. Colour, fat and social status in male damselflies, Calopteryx maculata. Animal Behaviour 60(6):851–855. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1548.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fogarty S, Cote J, Sih A. 2011. Social personality polymorphism and the spread of invasive species: A model. The American Naturalist 177(3):273–287. DOI: 10.1086/658174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler-Finn KD, Hebets EA. 2011. The degree of response to increased predation risk corresponds to male secondary sexual traits. Behavioral Ecology 22(2):268–275. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadgil M. 1972. Male dimorphism as a consequence of sexual selection. The American Naturalist 106(951):574–580. DOI: 10.1086/282797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golab MJ, Gołąb PA, Contreras-Garduño J, Zając T, Sniegula S. 2017. The effects of habitat deterioration and social status on patrolling behavior in the territorial damselfly Calopteryx splendens. Polish Journal of Ecology 65(1):122–131. DOI: 10.3161/15052249PJE2017.65.1.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golab MJ, Sniegula S. 2012. Changes in reproductive behavior in adult damselfly Calopteryx splendens (Odonata: Calopterygidae) in response to flood. Entomological Science 15(3):280–287. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-8298.2012.00516.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golab MJ, Sniegula S, Antoł A, Brodin T. 2021. Adult insect personality in the wild—Calopteryx splendens as a model for field studies. Ecology and Evolution 11(24):18467–18476. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8439.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golab MJ, Sniegula S, Brodin T. 2022. Cross-latitude behavioural axis in an adult damselfly Calopteryx splendens (Harris, 1780). Insects 13(4):342. DOI: 10.3390/insects13040342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golab MJ, Śniegula S, Drobniak SM, Zając T, Serrano-Meneses MA. 2013. Where do floaters settle? An experimental approach in odonates. Animal Behaviour 86(5):1069–1075. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling SD. 2001. From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin 127(1):45–86. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grether G. 1996. Sexual selection and survival selection on wing coloration and body size in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. Evolution 50(5):1939–1948. DOI: 10.2307/2410752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herborn K, Macleod R, Miles WTS, Schofield ANB, Arnold K, Arnold KE. 2010. Personality in captivity reflects personality in the wild. Animal Behaviour 79:835–843. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten KB, Andriamandimbiarisoa LN, Fox SF, Raxworthy CJ. 2009. Sexual selection on body size and secondary sexual characters in 2 closely related, sympatric chameleons in Madagascar. Behavioral Ecology 20(5):1079–1088. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsten P, van Overveld T, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E. 2013. Genetic integration of local dispersal and exploratory behaviour in a wild bird. Nature Communications 4:2362. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotiaho JS. 2002. Sexual selection and condition dependence of courtship display in three species of horned dung beetles. Behavioral Ecology 13(6):791–799. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/13.6.791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kralj-Fišer S, Schuett W. 2014. Studying personality variation in invertebrates: Why bother? Animal Behaviour 91:41–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchta SR, Svensson EI. 2014. Predator-mediated natural selection on the wings of the damselfly Calopteryx splendens: Differences in selection among trait types. The American Naturalist 184(1):91–109. DOI: 10.1086/676043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuitunen K, Kotiaho J, Luojumaki M, Suhonen J. 2011. Selection on size and secondary sexual characters of the damselfly Calopteryx splendens when sympatric with the congener Calopteryx virgo. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 89(1):1–9. DOI: 10.1139/Z10-090.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein JLL, Rice HK, Pruitt JN. 2018. Personality variation in two predator species does not impact prey species survival or plant damage in staged mesocosms. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 72(4):1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-018-2487-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle D, Bogan M, Finn D. 2008. Evolution of aquatic insect behaviours across a gradient of disturbance predictability. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 275(1633):453–462. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marden JH, Waage JK. 1990. Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Animal Behaviour 39(5):954–959. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80960-1.
   Google Scholar
• Mather J, Logue D. 2013. The bold and the spineless : Invertebrate personalities. In: Carere C, Maestripieri D, editors. Animal personalities : Behavior, physiology, and evolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. pp. 13–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mathot KJ, Dingemanse NJ. 2014. Plasticity and personality. In: Integrative organismal biology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 55–69. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118398814.ch4. Accessed Oct 2022 14.
   Google Scholar
• Mazué GPF, Dechaume-Moncharmont F-X, Godin J-G. 2015. Boldness–exploration behavioral syndrome: Interfamily variability and repeatability of personality traits in the young of the convict cichlid (Amatitlania siquia). Behavioral Ecology 26(3):900–908. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arv030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouchet A, Dingemanse NJ, Pinter-Wollman N. 2021. A quantitative genetics approach to validate lab- versus field-based behavior in novel environments. Behavioral Ecology 32(5):903–911. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arab059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemelä PT, Dingemanse NJ. 2014. Artificial environments and the study of ‘adaptive’ personalities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29(5):245–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn A, Briffa M. 2017. Does repeatable behaviour in the laboratory represent behaviour under natural conditions? A formal comparison in sea anemones. Animal Behaviour 123:197–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outomuro D, Johansson F. 2015. Bird predation selects for wing shape and coloration in a damselfly. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28(4):791–799. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge L, Ewing A, Chandler A. 1987. Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster: The roles of male and female behaviour. Animal Behaviour 35(2):555–562. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80281-6.
   Google Scholar
• Pettorelli N, Hilborn A, Duncan C, Durant SM. 2015. Chapter two - Individual variability: The missing component to our understanding of predator–prey interactions. In: Pawar S, Woodward G, Dell A editors. Advances in ecological research. Vol. 52. Academic Press. (Trait-Based Ecology - From Structure to Function). pp. 19–44. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065250415000021. Accessed Oct 2022 6.
   Google Scholar
• Pigliucci M. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity: Beyond Nature and nurture. 1st ed. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polverino G, Cigliano C, Nakayama S, Mehner T. 2016. Emergence and development of personality over the ontogeny of fish in absence of environmental stress factors. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 70(12):2027–2037. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-016-2206-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner JG, Schneider WT, Bailey NW. 2020. Can behaviour impede evolution? Persistence of singing effort after morphological song loss in crickets. Biology Letters 16(6):20190931. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available: http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Réale D, Reader S, Sol D, McDougall P, Dingemanse N. 2007. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews 82(2):291–318. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00010.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reaney LT, Backwell PRY. 2007. Risk-taking behavior predicts aggression and mating success in a fiddler crab. Behavioral Ecology 18(3):521–525. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arm014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss MJ. 1989. The allometry of growth and reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/allometry-of-growth-and-reproduction/13F0415230CA60BED2A56EFD2275AE34. Accessed Feb 2023 1.
   Google Scholar
• Riotte-Lambert L, Matthiopoulos J. 2020. Environmental predictability as a cause and consequence of animal movement. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 35(2):163–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.09.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal GG, Flores Martinez TY, García de León FJ, Ryan MJ. 2001. Shared preferences by predators and females for male ornaments in swordtails. The American Naturalist 158(2):146–154. DOI: 10.1086/321309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüppell G, Hilfert-Rüppell D. 2013. Biting in dragonfly fights. International Journal of Odonatology 16(3):219–229. DOI: 10.1080/13887890.2013.804364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüppell G, Hilfert-Rüppell D. 2020. Rapid acceleration in Odonata flight: Highly inclined and in-phase wing beating. International Journal of Odonatology 23(1):63–78. DOI: 10.1080/13887890.2019.1688017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüppell G, Rehfeldt G, Schütte C, Hilfert-Rüppell D. 2005. Die Prachtlibellen Europas: Gattung Calopteryx. Hohenwarsleben, Germany: Westarp Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Sagarin RD, Gaines SD. 2002. The ‘abundant centre’ distribution: To what extent is it a biogeographical rule? Ecology Letters 5(1):137–147. DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00297.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuett W, Tregenza T, Dall SRX. 2010. Sexual selection and animal personality. Biological Reviews 85(2):217–246. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00101.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutte G, Reich M, Plachter H. 1997. Mobility of the rheobiont damselfly Calopteryx splendens (Harris) in fragmented habitats (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 26(3):317–327.
   Google Scholar
• Shamble PS, Wilgers DJ, Swoboda KA, Hebets EA. 2009. Courtship effort is a better predictor of mating success than ornamentation for male wolf spiders. Behavioral Ecology 20(6):1242–1251. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC. 2004b. Behavioral syndromes: An ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19(7):372–378. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC, Ziemba RE. 2004a. Behavioral syndromes: An integrative overview. The Quarterly Review of Biology 79(3):241–277. DOI: 10.1086/422893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A, Chang AT, Wey TW. 2014. Effects of behavioural type, social skill and the social environment on male mating success in water striders. Animal Behaviour 94:9–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siva-Jothy MT. 1999. Male wing pigmentation may affect reproductive success via female choice in a calopterygid damselfly (Zygoptera). Behaviour 136(10/11):1365–1377. DOI: 10.1163/156853999500776.
   Google Scholar
• Smith BR, Blumstein DT. 2007. Fitness consequences of personality: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Ecology 19(2):448–455. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arm144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns SC. 1992. The Evolution of life histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stettmer C. 1996. Colonisation and dispersal patterns of banded (Calopteryx splendens) and beautiful demoiselles (C-virgo) (Odonata: Calopterygidae) in south-east German streams. European Journal of Entomology 93(4):579–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart–Fox DM, Ord TJ. 2004. Sexual selection, natural selection and the evolution of dimorphic coloration and ornamentation in agamid lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 271(1554):2249–2255. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson E, Eroukhmanoff F, Friberg M. 2006. Effects of natural and sexual selection on adaptive population divergence and premating isolation in a damselfly. Evolution 60(6):1242–1253. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01202.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson DJ, Hassall C, Lowe CD, Watts PC. 2011. Field estimates of reproductive success in a model insect: Behavioural surrogates are poor predictors of fitness. Ecology Letters 14(9):905–913. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01655.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill R, Alcock J. 1983. Evolution of insect mating systems. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tynkkynen K, Grapputo A, Kotiaho J, Rantala M, Väänänen S, Suhonen J. 2008. Hybridization in Calopteryx damselflies: The role of males. Animal Behaviour 75(4):1431–1439. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.017.
   Google Scholar
• Tynkkynen K, Rantala M, Suhonen J. 2004. Interspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17(4):759–767. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00733.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oers K, Drent PJ, de Goede P, van Noordwijk AJ. 2004. Realized heritability and repeatability of risk-taking behaviour in relation to avian personalities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 271(1534):65–73. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waage JK. 1987. Choice and utilization of oviposition sites by female Calopteryx maculata (Odonata: Calopterygidae). I. Influence of site size and the presence of other females. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20(6):439–446. DOI: 10.1007/BF00302987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Way GP, Kiesel AL, Ruhl N, Snekser JL, McRobert SP. 2015. Sex differences in a shoaling-boldness behavioral syndrome, but no link with aggression. Behavioural Processes 113:7–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf M, Weissing FJ. 2012. Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27(8):452–461. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen CH, Pillay N, Heinrichs M, Schoepf I, Schradin C. 2016. Personality traits are consistent when measured in the field and in the laboratory in African striped mice (Rhabdomys pumilio). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 70(8):1235–1246. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-016-2131-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen CH, Schoepf I, Schradin C, Pillay N. 2017. Boldness: Are open field and startle tests measuring the same personality trait? Animal Behaviour 128:143–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar