Intelligent collective: some issues with collective cardinality

References

• Arazy, O., Halfon, N., & Malkinson, D. (2015). Forecasting rain events – Meteorological models or collective intelligence? Proceedings of EGU General Assembly Conference 17, Vienna, Austria (pp. 15611–15614).
   Google Scholar
• Argote, L., Devadas, R., & Melone, N. (1990). The base-rate fallacy: Contrasting processes and outcomes of group and individual judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(2), 296–310. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90034-7
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Combining forecasts. In Principles of forecasting (pp. 417–439). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2006). How to make better forecasts and decisions: Avoid face-to-face meetings. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/marketing_papers/44.
   Google Scholar
• Conradt, L. (2011). Collective behaviour: When it pays to share decisions. Nature, 471(7336), 40–41. doi: 10.1038/471040a
   Google Scholar
• Cui, R., Gallino, S., Moreno, A., & Zhang, D. J. (2015). The operational value of social media information. Production and Operations Management. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2702151
   Google Scholar
• Galton, F. (1907). Vox populi (the wisdom of crowds). Nature, 75, 450–451. doi: 10.1038/075450a0
   Google Scholar
• Gaur, V., Kesavan, S., Raman, A., & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Estimating demand uncertainty using judgmental forecasts. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(4), 480–491. doi: 10.1287/msom.1060.0134
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, K. (1924). Group judgments in the field of lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7(5), 398–400. doi: 10.1037/h0074666
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A., & Armstrong, J. S. (2011). Comparing face-to-face meetings, nominal groups, delphi and prediction markets on an estimation task. International Journal of Forecasting, 27(1), 183–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kawamura, H., & Ohuchi, A. (2000). Evolutionary emergence of collective intelligence with artificial pheromone communication. Proceedings of 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Nagoya (pp. 2831–2836).
   Google Scholar
• Lang, M., Bharadwaj, N., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2016). How crowdsourcing improves prediction of market-oriented outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4168–4176. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1(2), 115–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F., & Helbing, D. (2011). How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(22), 9020–9025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008636108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T. (2008a). Advanced methods for inconsistent knowledge management. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T. (2008b). Inconsistency of knowledge and collective intelligence. Cybernetics and Systems, 39(6), 542–562. doi: 10.1080/01969720802188268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V. D. (2017). Collective knowledge: An enhanced analysis of the impact of collective cardinality. Proc ACIIDS, 1, 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V. D., & Nguyen, N. T. (2015a). A method for improving the quality of collective knowledge. Proc ACIIDS, 1, 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V. D., & Nguyen, N. T. (2015b). A two-stage consensus-based approach for determining collective knowledge. Proc ICCSAMA, 1, 301–310.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V. D., & Nguyen, N. T. (2016). An influence analysis of the inconsistency degree on the quality of collective knowledge for objective case. Proc ACIIDS, 2, 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shermer, M. (2004). The science of good and evil. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H. (2000). Leadership and the decision-making process. Organizational Dynamics, 28(4), 82–94. doi: 10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00003-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, C., & Suh, A. (2014). The wisdom of crowds: Impact of collective size and expertise transfer on collective performance. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2014, Waikoloa, HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C., & Vinaimont, T. (2010). Evaluating the wisdom of crowds. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 11(1), 724–732.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, H., Cui, B., & Huang, Y. (2011). Finding a wise group of experts in social networks. Proc ADMA, 1, 381–394.
   Google Scholar