References
- Abram, K. M., Teplin, L. A., Charles, D. R., Longworth, S. L., McClelland, G. M., & Dulcan, M. K. (2004). Posttraumatic stress disorder and trauma in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(4), 403–410.
- Anderson, V. R., Davidson, W. S., Barnes, A. R., Campbell, C. A., Petersen, J. L., & Onifade, E. (2016). The differential predictive validity of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory: The role of gender. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(7), 666–677. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1174861
- Anderson, V. R., Walerych, B. M., Campbell, N. A., Barnes, A. R., Davidson, W. S., Campbell, C. A., … Petersen, J. L. (2019). Gender-responsive intervention for female juvenile offenders: A quasi-experimental outcome evaluation. Feminist Criminology, 14(1), 24–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116677749
- Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (1995). LSI-R: The level of service inventory-revised. Toronto, ONT: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
- Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Austin, P. C. (2011). Comparing paired vs. non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine, 30(11), 1292–1301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4200
- Austin, J., Johnson, K. D., & Weitzer, R. J. (2005). Alternatives to the secure detention and confinement of juvenile offenders. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office ofJustice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Baglivio, M. T., Wolff, K. T., Jackowski, K., Chapman, G., Greenwald, M. A., & Gomez, K. (2018). Does treatment quality matter?: Multilevel examination of the effects of intervention quality on recidivism of adolescents completing long-term juvenile justice residential placement. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 147–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12338
- Bai, H. (2011). A comparison of propensity score matching methods for reducing selection bias. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 34(1), 81–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2011.552338
- Barnes, A. R., Campbell, N. A., Anderson, V. R., Campbell, C. A., Onifade, E., & Davidson, W. S. (2016). Validity of initial, exit, and dynamic juvenile risk assessment: An examination across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55(1), 21–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2015.1107004
- Baumer, T. L., Maxfield, M. G., & Mendelsohn, R. I. (1993). A comparative analysis of three electronically monitored home detention programs. Justice Quarterly, 10(1), 121–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829300091731
- Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6, 1–22.
- Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. (2000). Can electronic monitoring make a difference? An evaluation of three Canadian programs. Crime & Delinquency, 46(1), 61–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128700046001004
- Burrell, W. D., & Gable, R. S. (2008). From B. F. Skinner to Spiderman to Martha Stewart: The past, present and future of electronic monitoring of offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46(3–4), 101–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802143342
- Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
- Cate, S. (2016). Devolution, not decarceration: The limits of juvenile justice reform in Texas. Punishment & Society, 18(5), 578–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516642860
- Cauffman, E., Feldman, S., Waterman, J., & Steiner, H. (1998). Posttraumatic stress disorder among female juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 11–23.
- Chesney-Lind, M., Morash, M., & Stevens, T. (2008). Girls troubles, girls’ delinquency, and gender responsive programming: A review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41(1), 162–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.41.1.162
- Conron, K. J., & Wilson, B. D. (2019). LGBTQ youth of color impacted by the child welfare and juvenile justice systems: A research agenda. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/content/qt6jf587wr/qt6jf587wr.pdf
- Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.
- Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
- Development Services Group, Inc. (2014). Home Confinement and Electronic Monitoring. Literature Review. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/Home_Confinement_EM.pdf
- Dierkhising, C. B., Ko, S. J., Woods-Jaeger, B., Briggs, E. C., Lee, R., & Pynoos, R. S. (2013). Trauma histories among justice-involved youth: Findings from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1), 20274. doi:https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20274
- Epstein, R., Blake, J., & Gonzalez, T. (2017). Girlhood interrupted: The erasure of Black girls’ childhood. Retrieved from https://www.law.georgetown.edu/poverty-inequality-center/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2017/08/girlhood-interrupted.pdf
- Gable, R. K., & Gable, R. S. (2005). Electronic monitoring: Positive intervention strategies. Federal Probation, 69, 21–25.
- Himmelstein, K. E., & Brückner, H. (2011). Criminal-justice and school sanctions against nonheterosexual youth: A national longitudinal study. PEDIATRICS, 127(1), 49–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2306
- Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2003). Youth level of service/case management inventory (YLS/CMI) user's manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
- Javdani, S., & Allen, N. E. (2016). An ecological model for intervention for juvenile justice-involved girls: Development and preliminary prospective evaluation. Feminist Criminology, 11(2), 135–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085114559514
- Kiessling, J. J., & Andrews, D. A. (1980). Behavior analysis systems in corrections: A new approach to the synthesis of correctional theory, practice, management and research. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 22(4), 412–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.22.4.412
- King, D., & Gibbs, A. (2003). Is home detention in New Zealand disadvantaging women and children? Probation Journal, 50(2), 115–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550503502003
- Maidment, M. R. (2002). Toward a “woman-centered” approach to community-based corrections. Women & Criminal Justice, 13(4), 47–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v13n04_04
- Morash, M. (2016). The nature of co-occurring exposure to violence and of court responses to girls in the juvenile justice system. Violence against Women, 22(8), 923–942. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215614973
- Morash, M., Stevens, T., & Yingling, J. (2014). Focus on the family: Juveniles court responses to girls and their caretakers. Feminist Criminology, 9(4), 298–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085114527151
- Nisevic, A. J., Franic, N., & Rajic, S. (2015). An overview of the research into the effectiveness of electronic monitoring as an alternative sanction. Criminology and Social Integration Journal, 23, 51–71.
- Padgett, K. G., Bales, W. D., & Blomberg, T. G. (2006). Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology Public Policy, 5(1), 61–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00102.x
- Paparozzi, M. A., & Gendreau, P. (2005). An intensive supervision program that worked: Service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness. The Prison Journal, 85(4), 445–466. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505281529
- Payne, B. K., & Gainey, R. R. (2002). The influence of demographic factors on the experience of house arrest. Federal Probation, 66, 64–70.
- Renzema, M., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2005). Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(2), 215–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-1615-1
- Rios, V. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino boys. New York, NY:NYU Press.
- Saar, M. S., Epstein, R., Rosenthal, L., & Vafa, Y. (2015). The sexual abuse to prison pipeline: The girls' story.
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin and Company.
- Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Pittsburgh, PA: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency & Prevention.
- Stanz, R., & Tewksbury, R. (2000). Predictors of success and recidivism in a home incarceration program. The Prison Journal, 80(3), 326–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885500080003006
- Steinberg, L., & Scott, E. (2003). Less guilty by reason of adolescence: Developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility and the juvenile death penalty. American Psychologist, 58(12), 1009–1018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1009
- Strom, K. J., Warner, T. D., Tichavsky, L., & Zahn, M. A. (2014). Policing juveniles: Domestic violence arrest policies, gender, and police response to child–parent violence. Crime & Delinquency, 60(3), 427–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128710376293
- Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25(1), 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313
- Sullivan, C. J. (2019). Taking juvenile justice seriously: Developmental insights and system challenges. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Watson, L., & Edelman, P. (2012). Improving the juvenile justice system for girls: Lessons from the states. Georgetown Journal on Poverty, Inequality and Public Policy, 20, 215–268.
- Wattanaporn, K. A., & Holtfreter, K. (2014). The impact of feminist pathways research on gender-responsive policy and practice. Feminist Criminology, 9(3), 191–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085113519491
- Weisburd, K. (2015). Monitoring youth: The collision of rights and rehabilitation. Iowa Law Review, 101, 297–341.
- Wodahl, E. J., Garland, B., Culhane, S. E., & McCarty, W. P. (2011). Utilizing behavioral interventions to improve supervision outcomes in community-based corrections. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 386–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810397866
- Zahn, M. A., Day, J. C., Mihalic, S. F., & Tichavsky, L. (2009). Determining what works for girls in the juvenile justice system. A summary of evaluation evidence. Crime & Delinquency, 55(2), 266–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128708330649