References
- Astor‐Jack, T., P. Balcerzak, and E. McCallie. 2006. Professional development and the historical tradition of informal science institutions: Views of four providers. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 6 (1): 67–81.
- Darling-Hammond, L. 2010. Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education 61 (1–2): 35–47.
- Hirabayashi, J., and L. Stokes. 2006. The place and role of the Exploratorium’s Teacher Institute in strengthening the teaching of science. http://inverness-research.org/reports/2006-06-Rpt-ExploreTI-RoleTeachingScience.pdf.
- McDermott, L.C. 2006. Preparing K–12 teachers in physics: Insights from history, experience, and research. American Journal of Physics 74 (9) :758–62.
- McDermott, L.C., and L.S. DeWater. 2000. The need for special science courses for teachers: two perspectives. In Inquiring and inquiry learning and teaching in science, ed. J. Minstrell and E.H. van Zee., 242–57. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NAS). 2015. Science teachers’ learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council (NRC). 2007. Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council (NRC). 2009. Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council (NRC). 2012. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council (NRC). 2014. STEM learning is everywhere: Summary of a convocation on building learning systems. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.
- Penuel, W.R., A. Allen, C.E. Coburn, and C. Farrell. 2015 Conceptualizing research–practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 20 (1–2): 182–97.
- Windschitl, M. 2002. Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research 72 (2): 131–75