References
- Allen, P.J., and G.G. Noam. 2016. STEM learning ecosystems: Evaluation and assessment findings. Cleveland Heights, OH: Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM.
- Allen, P.J., G.G. Noam, and T.D. Little. 2017. Multi-state evaluation finds evidence that investment in afterschool STEM works. In STEM ready America, ed. R. Ottinger. http://stemreadyamerica.org/multi-state-evaluation-finds-evidence-that-investment-in-afterschool-stem-works.
- Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2003. Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. London: Open University Press.
- Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2009. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 1–31.
- Krishnamurthi, A., and B. Bevan. 2017. From evidence to policy: The case for STEM in afterschool. In STEM ready America, ed. R. Ottinger. http://stemreadyamerica.org/article-evidence-to-policy.
- National Research Council (NRC). 2015. Identifying and supporting productive programs in out-of-school settings. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.
- Traphagen, K. 2018. From niche to necessary: Scale and sustainability lessons from the Frontiers in Urban Science Education (FUSE) initiative. San Diego, CA: STEM Next Opportunity Fund. http://bit.ly/2SaaddN.
- Traphagen, K., and S. Trail. 2014. How cross-sector collaborations are advancing STEM learning: Working paper. Report to The Noyce Foundation.
- Yeiser, L., and C. Sneider. 2013. Formative assessment: Attending to the substance of student thinking. In Opening the door to physics through formative assessment, ed. C. Sneider and B. Wojnowski. Aurora, CO: National Science Education Leadership Association.