References
- Adams, J.D., P. Gupta, A. Cotumaccio. 2014. Long-term participants: A museum program enhances girls’ STEM interest, motivation, and persistence. Afterschool Matters 20: 13–20.
- Allen, C.D., and M. Eisenhart. 2017. Fighting for desired versions of a future self: How young women negotiated STEM-related identities in the discursive landscape of educational opportunity. Journal of the Learning Sciences 26 (3) 407–36.
- Çakır, N.A., A. Gass, A. Foster, and F.J. Lee. 2017. Development of a game-design workshop to promote young girls’ interest towards computing through identity exploration. Computers and Education 108: 115–30.
- Carlone, H.B., A. Johnson, and C.M. Scott. 2015. Agency amidst formidable structures: How girls perform gender in science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (4): 474–88.
- Civil, M. 2016. STEM learning research through a funds of knowledge lens. Cultural Studies of Education 11 (1): 41–59.
- Flagg, B.N. 2010. Summative evaluation of SciGirls television series season one. Bellport, NY: Multimedia Research. www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/SG_SummativeEval_2010.pdf.
- Flagg, B.N. 2012. Summative evaluation of SciGirls season two: Television series and website. Bellport, NY: Multimedia Research. www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/SG2_SummativeEval_2012.pdf.
- Flagg, B.N. 2016. Contribution of multimedia to girls’ experience of citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.51.
- Gay, G. 2000. Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Hubert, T.L. 2014. Learners of mathematics: High school students’ perspectives of culturally relevant mathematics pedagogy. Journal of African American Studies 18 (3): 324–36.
- Knight-Williams, V. 2008. SciGirls outreach program summative evaluation. Sacramento, CA: Knight Williams Research Communications. www.informalscience.org/scigirls-grantee-program-summative-evaluation.
- Knight-Williams, V. 2014. SciGirls season 2 outreach program summative evaluation report. Sacramento, CA: Knight Williams Research Communications. www.informalscience.org/evaluation-scigirls-season-two-outreach-program.
- Knight-Williams, V. 2016. SciGirls CONNECT final evaluation report. Sacramento, CA: Knight Williams Research Communications. www.informalscience.org/scigirls-connect-final-evaluation-report.
- Ladson-Billings, G. 2014. Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: Aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review 84 (1): 74–84.
- Riedinger, K., and A. Taylor. 2016. I could see myself as a scientist: The potential of out-of-school time programs to influence girls’ identities in science. Afterschool Matters 23: 1–7.
- Sammet, K., and L. Kekelis. 2016. Changing the game for girls in STEM: Findings on high impact programs and system-building strategies. TechBridge. https://techbridgegirls.org/index.php?id=277.
- Verdin, D., A. Godwin, and B. Capobianco. 2016. Systematic review of the funds of knowledge framework in STEM education. School of Engineering Education Graduate Student Series. Paper 59. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enegs/59.