References
- Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
- Braun, V., V. Clarke, N. Hayfield, and T. Gareth. 2019. Thematic analysis. In Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, 843–860. Hoboken, New Jersey: Springer.
- Delaloye, N., E. Adams, C. Hester, D. Ware, D. Vanek, A. Holian, and T.J. Ward. 2016. The Clean Air and Healthy Homes Program: A model for authentic science learning. Science Education and Civic Engagement 8 (2), 13–19.
- Delaloye, N., L. Blank, D. Ware, C. Hester, T. Ward, A. Holian, and E. Adams. 2018. Evaluating the impact of authentic research on secondary student self-efficacy and future scientific possible selves, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 13 (9): 737–746.
- Fishbein, L., and C. Henry. 1991. Introduction: Workshop on the methodology for assessing health risks from complex mixtures in indoor air. Environmental Health Perspectives 95: 3–5.
- Gardner, B. 2021. The Deadly Cost of Dirty Air. National Geographic 239 (4): 41–63.
- Goode, S., R.A. Willis, J.R. Wolf, and A.L. Harris. 2007. Enhancing IS education with flexible teaching and learning. Journal of Information Systems Education 18 (3): 297–302.
- Hofstein, A., I. Eilks, and R. Bybee. 2011. Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education—a pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Math Education 9 (6): 1459–1483.
- Holbrook, J., and M. Rannikmae. 2007. The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education 29 (11): 1347–1362.
- Jenkins, P., T. Phillips, J. Mulberg, and S. Hui. 1992. Activity patterns of Californians: Use of and proximity to indoor pollutant sources. Atmospheric Research 26A (12): 2141–2148.
- Johnson, J., D. Showalter, R. Klein, and C. Lester. 2014. Why Rural Matters 2013–14. The Condition of Rural Education in the 50 States. http://www.ruraledu.org/user_uploads/file/2013-14-Why-Rural-Matters.pdf.
- NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For states by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Osborne, J. 2007. Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 3 (3): 173–184.
- Showalter, D., S. Hartman, J. Johnson, and R. Klein. 2019. Why Rural Matters 2018–19. The Time Is Now. Retrieved October 2021 from http://www.ruraledu.org/WhyRuralMatters.pdf
- Stuckey, M., A. Hofstein, R. Mamlok-Naaman, and I. Eilks. 2013. The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education 49(1): 1–34. DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
- Vanek, D., N. Marra, C. Hester, D. Ware, A. Holian, T. Ward, R. Knuth, and E. Adams. 2011. The power of the symposium – impacts from students’ perspectives. The Rural Educator 32 (3): 22–28.
- Vangrieken, K., F. Dochy, E. Raes, and E. Kyndt. 2015. Teacher collaboration: A systematic Review. Educational Research Review 15 (June): 17–40.
- Ward, T., N. Delaloye, E. Adams, D. Ware, D. Vanek, R. Knuth, C. Hester, N. Marra, and A. Holian. 2016. Air toxics under the big sky: Examining the effectiveness of authentic scientific research on high school students’ science skills and interest. International Journal of Science Education 38 (6): 905–921.