5
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Feature

Using Human-Centered Design to Enhance the Guest Experience at the Dallas Arboretum

References

  • Baskinger M., and W. Bardel. 2013 Drawing ideas: A hand-drawn approach for better design. Watson-Guptill.
  • Carroll, M., S. Goldman, L. Britos, J. Koh, A. Royalty, and M. Hornstein. 2010. Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art and Design Education 29 (1): 37–53.
  • Cook, K.L., and S.B. Bush. 2018. Design thinking in integrated STEAM learning: Surveying the landscape and exploring exemplars in elementary grades. School Science and Mathematics 118 (3–4): 93–103.
  • Diefenthaler, A., L. Moorhead, S. Speicher, C. Bear, and D. Cerminaro. 2017. Thinking and acting like a designer: How design thinking supports innovation in K–12 education. Retrieved from https://www.wise-qatar.org/2017-wise-research-design-thinking/
  • Hanington, B., and B. Martin. 2012. Universal methods of design. Rockport Publishers.
  • IDEO. The field guide to human-centered design: Design Kit, IDEO.org, 2015.
  • Melber, L.M., and A.M. Cox-Petersen. 2005. Teacher professional development and informal learning environments: Investigating partnerships and possibilities. Journal of Science Teacher Education 16 (2): 103–120.
  • Moisan, H. 2009. Partners in process: How museum educators and classroom teachers can create outstanding results. Journal of Museum Education 34 (1): 23–40.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Call to action for science education: building opportunity for the future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26152.
  • NSTA. 2021. Learning science in informal environments [Position statement]. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/learning-science-informal-environments
  • Weinstein, M., E.R. Whitesell, and A.E. Schwartz. 2014. Museums, zoos, and gardens: How formal-informal partnerships can impact urban students’ performance in science. Evaluation Review 38 (6): 514–545.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.