References
- Berland, M., and S. Duncan. 2016. Computational thinking in the wild: Uncovering complex collaborative thinking through gameplay. Educational Technology 56 (3): 29–35.
- Code Advocacy Coalition and CSTA. 2018. 2018 State of Computer Science Education: Policy and Implementation. Retrieved from https://advocacy.code.org/
- Harteveld, C., G. Smith, G. Carmichael, E. Gee, and C. Stewart-Gardiner. 2014. A design-focused analysis of games teaching computer science. Proceedings of Games, Learning and Society 10: 1–8.
- Kazimoglu, C., M. Kiernan, L. Bacon, and L. Mackinnon. 2012. A serious game for developing computational thinking and learning introductory computer programming. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 47: 1991–1999.
- Madkins, T.C., A. Martin, J. Ryoo, K.A. Scott, J. Goode, A. Scott, and F. McAlear. 2019. Culturally relevant computer science pedagogy: From theory to practice. In 2019 research on equity and sustained participation in engineering, computing, and technology (RESPECT), Minneapolis, MN, pp. 1–4.
- Nacke, L.E., C. Bateman, and R.L. Mandryk. 2014. BrainHex: A neurobiological gamer typology survey. Entertainment computing 5 (1): 55–62.
- National Science Board and National Science Foundation. 2021. Elementary and Secondary STEM Education. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022. NSB-2021-1. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20211/.
- Shute, V.J., C. Sun, and J. Asbell-Clarke. 2017. Demystifying computational thinking.
- Weintrop, D., E. Beheshti, M. Horn, K. Orton, K. Jona, L. Trouille, and U. Wilensky. 2016. Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (1): 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5