STEM Education Outreach Involving School-Industry-University Partnerships for Scalable and Sustainable Impact

References

• Archer, L., and J. DeWitt. 2013. ASPIRES: Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10–14. Final project report. London: Department of Education and Professional Studies, King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Barrera-Pedemonte, F. 2016 High-Quality Teacher Professional Development and Classroom Teaching Practices: Evidence from Talis 2013, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 141, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlpszw26rvd-en.
   Google Scholar
• Bodilly, S., and M. Beckett, M. 2005. Making out-of-school time matter: Evidence for an action agenda. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Coolahan, J. 2003. Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers: Country Background Report for Ireland. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., K. Charlton, J.C. Valentine, L. Muhlenbruck, and G.D. Borman. 2000. Making the most of summer school: A meta-analytic and narrative review. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 65 (1): i–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, K., V. McCauley, C. Domegan, and W. McClune. 2008. A report for the standing conference on teacher education north and south. Dublin: Discover Primary Science.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, E. 2008. Education outreach and public engagement. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills 2016. STEM education in the Irish school system report, a report on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Dublin: The Stationery Office, available: https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Education-Reports/STEM-Education-in-the-Irish-School-System.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2007. Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe, Brussels: European Commission Directorate, available: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/reportrocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gajda, R. 2006. Utilizing the CoPCAR to evaluate professional learning communities: Implications for school improvement. Expert Lecture delivered at the American Evaluation Association Annual Conference, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Gajda, R., and C. Koliba. 2007. Evaluating the imperative of intra-organizational collaboration: A school improvement perspective. American Journal of Evaluation 28 (1): 26–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D.C. 2011. Characteristic collaborative processes in school-university partnerships. Planning and Changing 42 (1/2): 63–86. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ952393.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, D., and V. McCauley. 2013. Science outreach and science education: The analysis of dilemmas faced to promote the creation of the third space. Galway: National University Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, D., and V. McCauley. 2012. Science outreach and science education in the primary level: Conceptual and pedagogical challenges faced. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, Special Issue 1 (2): 930–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M., A. O’ Dwyer, A. Leavy, M. Hourigan, C. Carroll, and E. Corry. 2021. A case study exploring primary teachers’ experiences of a STEM education school-university partnership, Teachers and Teaching, 27:1-4, 17-31, DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2021.1920906
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, W.D., and Valli, L. 2001. The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In Continuing professional development, ed. D. Boesel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Library of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, E.K., F. Jensen, and J. Sjaastad. 2015. The role of out-of-school experiences and targeted recruitment efforts in Norwegian science and technology students’ educational choice. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement 5 (3): 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.900585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M.G., A. Howe, and M.J. Rua. 2000. Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests and attitudes towards science and scientists. Science Education 84: 180–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose, S., P.G. Patrick, and C. Moseley. 2017. Experiential learning theory: the importance of outdoor classrooms in environmental education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 7 (3): 269–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C., and R. Fortner. 2007. Educators’ views of collaboration with scientists. American Secondary Education 35 (3): 29–53.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, J.D., W. Kim, and C. Harris. 2014. Collaborations in a community of practice working to integrate engineering design in elementary science education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 15 (3): 21–28. https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1901/1622
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, J., and B. Capobianco. 2012. Creating shared instructional products for integrating engineering education in the science learning through engineering design (SLED) partnership. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education (ASTE), Clearwater, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L.C., J.M. Grimshaw, C. Nielsen, M. Judd, P.C. Coyte, and I.D. Graham. 2009. Evolution of Wenger’s concept of community of practice. Implementation Science 4: 4–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, A. 2014. “Not for People Like Me?” Under-Represented Groups in Science, Technology and Engineering, WISE.
   Google Scholar
• Liston, M. 2018. Designing meaningful STEM lessons. Science 53 (4): 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Liston, M. 2018. Unravelling STEM: Beyond the acronym of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Science 53 (3): 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, A., and A. Oldknow. 2012. School-industry STEM links in the UK. London: National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• Mattessich, P.W., M. Murray-Close, and B.R. Monsey. 2001. Collaboration: What makes it work: A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration (2nd ed.). Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Margot, K.C., and T. Kettler. 2019. Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from "Case Study Research in Education.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B., and T.L. Phillips. 2008. Meaningful linkages between summer programs, schools, and community partners: Conditions and strategies for success. Baltimore, MD: National Center for Summer Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., G. Smith, J. Varley, and O. Razi. 2015. Changing practice: An evaluation of the impact of a nature of science inquiry-based professional development on primary teachers. Cogent Education 2 (1).
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2015. Embedding Professional Development in Schools for Teacher Success. Teaching in Focus, 10, available: https://doi.org/10.1787/5js4rv7s7snt-en
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2021. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Science Foundation Ireland. 2015. Ireland Strategic Plan Agenda 2020, Dublin: SFI.
   Google Scholar
• Starkey, L., A. Yates, L.H. Meyer, C. Hall, M. Taylor, and S. Stevens. 2009. Professional development design: Embedding educational reform in New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (1): 181–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocklmayer, S.M., L.J. Rennie, and J.K. Gilbert. 2010. The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education 46 (1): 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylora, D., and B. Govana. 2017. STEM outreach in Northern Queensland: The importance of providing professional development and networking opportunities to educators. Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education 25 (5): 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, C.P., F.F. Padró, and J.A. Furst-Bowe. eds. 2012. Advancing the STEM Agenda: Quality Improvement Supports STEM: Selected Papers from the 2011 Advancing the STEM Agenda in Education, the Workplace and Society Conference at the University of Wisconsin-Stout, ASQ Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vennix, J., P. Den Brok, and R. Taconis. 2017. Perceptions of STEM-based outreach learning activities in secondary education. Learning Environments Research 20 (1): 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9217-6
   Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, S., and C.M. Haden. 2014. Effective practices for evaluating STEM out-of-school time programs. Afterschool Matters 10–19, available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1021960.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2020. The Future of Jobs Report 2020. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from: WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf (weforum.org)
   Google Scholar
• Young, G.D., D. Knight, W.C. Lee, M. Cardella, M.M. Hynes, K. Reid, and T. Fletcher. 2017. Leveraging a multi-partner approach to develop successful STEM outreach programs. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Oct 2017: 1–5: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190725.
   Google Scholar