201
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Advancing maritime technology: Evaluating situation awareness support systems for engine room monitoring at the future shore control centre

ORCID Icon, , &
Article: 2365504 | Received 12 Apr 2024, Accepted 04 Jun 2024, Published online: 11 Jun 2024

References

  • AAWA. (2016). Remote and autonomous ships - the next steps. https://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/customers/marine/ship-intel/aawa-whitepaper-210616.pdf
  • Allal, A. A., Mansouri, K., Youssfi, M., & Qbadou, M. (2018). Toward energy saving and environmental protection by implementation of autonomous ship. 2018 19th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), Marrakech, Morocco. https://doi.org/10.1109/MELCON.2018.8379089
  • An, S. (2013). Schema theory in reading. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 130–11. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.1.130-134
  • Anderson, R. C., Pichert, J. W., Goetz, E. T., Schallert, D. L., Stevens, K. V., & Trollip, S. R. (1976). Instantiation of general terms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(6), 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5371(76)90059-1
  • Atchley, P., & Chan, M. (2011). Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: A driving simulator investigation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 53(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810391215
  • Baumann, M. R., Rösler, D., & Krems, J. F. (2007). Situation awareness and secondary task performance while driving. EPCE 2007: Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: 7th International Conference, Beijing, China. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73331-7_27
  • Brand, N., Hanson, E., & Godaert, G. (2000). Chronic stress affects blood pressure and speed of short-term memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(1), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.291
  • Brookhuis, K. A., & de Waard, D. (2000). Assessment of drivers’ workload: Performance and subjective and physiological indexes. In P. A. Hancock & P. A. Desmond (Eds.), Stress, workload, and fatigue (pp. 321–333). CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12791-2.5
  • Brüngger, J., Niederhauser, M., Wirth, M., Peter, J., & Huber, T. (2020). Reducing monotony in rail signaling by secondary tasks with various levels of demand–an experimental study. German Workshop on Rail Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.26041/fhnw-3543
  • Burns, C. M., Skraaning, G., Jr., Jamieson, G. A., Lau, N., Kwok, J., Welch, R., & Andresen, G. (2008). Evaluation of ecological interface design for nuclear process control: Situation awareness effects. Human Factors, 50(4), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X312305
  • Dekker, S. W. (2015). The danger of losing situation awareness. Cognition, Technology & Work, 17(2), 159–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0320-8
  • Endsley, M. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 32(2), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128803200221
  • Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
  • Endsley, M. R. (1999). Situation awareness in aviation systems. In D. J. Garland, J. A. Wise, & V. D. Hopkin (Eds.), Handbook of aviation human factors (pp. 257–276). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://www.pacdeff.com/pdfs/AviationSA-Endsley%201999.pdf
  • Endsley, M. R. (2000). Direct measurement of situation awareness: Validity and use of SAGAT. In M. R. Endsley & D. J. Garland (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 147–173). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245934995_Direct_Measurement_of_Situation_Awareness_Validity_and_Use_of_SAGAT
  • Endsley, M. R. (2001). Designing for situation awareness in complex systems. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on symbiosis of humans, artifacts and environment, 1–14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238653506_Designing_for_situation_awareness_in_complex_system
  • Endsley, M. R. (2016). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design. CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11371
  • Han, C., Abeysiriwardhane, A., Islam, T., & Chai, S. (2024). Situation awareness for engine room monitoring at future shore control centre. Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2024.2340168
  • Han, C., Abeysiriwardhane, A., Islam, T., & Chai, S. (2024). Situation awareness information requirement for marine engine room monitoring at future shore control centre [manuscript submitted for publication]. Australian Maritime College. University of Tasmania.
  • Helton, W. S., & Russell, P. N. (2011). Working memory load and the vigilance decrement. Experimental Brain Research, 212(3), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2749-1
  • IMO. (2021). Autonomous shipping. https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/Autonomous-shipping.aspx
  • Jensen, M. S., Yao, R., Street, W. N., & Simons, D. J. (2011). Change blindness and inattentional blindness. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(5), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.130
  • KASS. (2021). What is an autonomous ship? http://kassproject.org/en/info/info.php
  • Lamme, V. A. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00013-x
  • MacKinnon, S. N., Man, Y., & Michael, B. (2015). D8.8 final report: Shore control centre. http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/MUNIN-D8-8-Final-Report-Shore-Control-Centre-CTH-final.pdf
  • Ma, R., & Kaber, D. B. (2005). Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(10), 939–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.002
  • Ma, S., Zhang, W., Yang, Z., Kang, C., Wu, C., Chai, C., Shi, J., & Li, H. (2020). Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance. Traffic Injury Prevention, 21(7), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1804060
  • Mazyar, H., Van den Berg, R., Seilheimer, R. L., & Ma, W. J. (2013). Independence is elusive: Set size effects on encoding precision in visual search. Journal of Vision, 13(5), 8. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.5.8
  • Merat, N., Jamson, H., Lai, F., & Carsten, O. (2010). Automated driving, secondary task performance and situation awareness. Human factors: A system view of human, technology, and organisation, 41–53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285976484_Automated_driving_secondary_task_performance_and_situation_awareness
  • Mishler, S., & Chen, J. (2023). Boring but demanding: Using secondary tasks to counter the driver vigilance decrement for partially automated driving. Human Factors, 66(6), 1798–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231168697
  • Mutzenich, C., Durant, S., Helman, S., & Dalton, P. (2021). Situation awareness in remote operators of autonomous vehicles: Developing a taxonomy of situation awareness in video-relays of driving scenes. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 727500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727500
  • NYKLINE. (2020). NYK to participate in crewless maritime autonomous surface ship trial project. https://www.nyk.com/english/news/2020/20200615_01.html
  • Patrick, J., James, N., & Ahmed, A. (2007). Awareness of control room teams. Le Travail Humain: A Bilingual and Multi-Disciplinary Journal in Human Factors, 70(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.3917/th.701.0067
  • Porathe, T., Prison, J., & Man, Y. (2014). Situation awareness in remote control centres for unmanned ships. Human Factors in Ship Design & Operation. https://doi.org/10.3940/rina.hf.2014.12
  • Rensink, R. A., O’regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x
  • Sandi, C., & Pinelo-Nava, M. T. (2007). Stress and memory: Behavioral effects and neurobiological mechanisms. Neural Plasticity, 2007, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/78970
  • Shenoi, R. A., Bowker, J. A., Dzielendziak, A., Lidtke, S., Konrad, A., Zhu, G., Cheng, F., Argyos, D., Fang, I., Gonzalez, J., Johnson, S., Ross, K., Kennedy, I., O’Dell, M., & Westgarth, R. (2015). Global marine technology trends 2030. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/388628
  • Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.006
  • Smit, A. S., Eling, P. A., & Coenen, A. M. (2004). Mental effort causes vigilance decrease due to resource depletion. Acta Psychologica, 115(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.001
  • Solberg, E., Nystad, E., & McDonald, R. (2023). Situation awareness in outage work–a study of events occurring in US nuclear power plants between 2016 and 2020. Safety Science, 158, 105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105965
  • St. John, M., & Risser, M. R. (2009). Sustaining vigilance by activating a secondary task when inattention is detected. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 53(3), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120905300304
  • Van den Berg, R., Shin, H., Chou, W.-C., George, R., & Ma, W. J. (2012). Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(22), 8780–8785. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117465109
  • Vedhara, K., Hyde, J., Gilchrist, I., Tytherleigh, M., & Plummer, S. (2000). Acute stress, memory, attention and cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 25(6), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4530(00)00008-1
  • Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Hancock, P. A. (2018). Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mustapha (Eds.), Automation and human performance (pp. 183–200). CRC Press.
  • Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., & Matthews, G. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X312152
  • Wickens, C. D., & Alexander, A. L. (2009). Attentional tunneling and task management in synthetic vision displays. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 19(2), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508410902766549
  • Wulf, F., Rimini-Döring, M., Arnon, M., & Gauterin, F. (2014). Recommendations supporting situation awareness in partially automated driver assistance systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(4), 2290–2296. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2376572
  • Yoshida, M., Shimizu, E., Sugomori, M., & Umeda, A. (2020). Regulatory requirements on the competence of remote operator in maritime autonomous surface ship: Situation awareness, ship sense and goal-based gap analysis. Applied Sciences, 10(23), 8751. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238751