Removal of CO₂ in a multi stage fluidised bed reactor by monoethanolamine impregnated activated carbon

References

• Boehm HP. 1994. Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons. Carbon N Y. 32(5):759–769. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(94)90031-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplow M. 1968. Kinetics of carbamate formation and breakdown. J Am Chem Soc. 90(24):6795–6803. doi: 10.1021/ja01026a041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danckwerts PV. 1979. The reaction of CO2 with ethanolamines. Chem Eng Sci. 34(4):443–446. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(79)85087-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das D, Meikap BC. 2017. Optimization of process condition for the preparation of amine-impregnated activated carbon developed for CO2 capture and applied to methylene blue adsorption by response surface methodology. J Environ Sci Health Eff, Part A. 52(12):1164–1172. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2017.1356204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das D, Samal DP, Meikap BC. 2015. Preparation of activated carbon from green coconut shell and its characterization. J Chem Eng Process Technol. 6(5):1–7. doi: 10.4172/2157-7048.1000248
   Google Scholar
• Das D, Samal DP, Meikap BC. 2016a. Removal of CO2 in a multistage fluidized Bed reactor by activated carbon prepared from green coconut shell. Recent Adv Chem Eng. 133–142. Springer, Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1633-2_15
   Google Scholar
• Das D, Samal DP, Meikap BC. 2016b. Removal of CO2 in a multistage fluidized bed reactor by diethanol amine impregnated activated carbon. J Environ Sci Health, Part A. 51(9):769–775. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2016.1170462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das D, Samal DP, Mohammada N, Meikap BC. 2017. Hydrodynamics of a multi-stage counter-current fluidized bed reactor with down-comer for amine impregnated activated carbon particle system. Adv Powder Technol. 28(3):854–864. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2016.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauden PA, Wiśniewski M. 2007. CO2 sorption on substituted carbon materials: computational chemistry studies. Appl Surf Sci. 253(13):5726–5731. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.12.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgulho HF, Mesquita JP, Gonçalves F, Pereira MFR, Figueiredo JL. 2008. Characterization of the surface chemistry of carbon materials by potentiometric titrations and temperature-programmed desorption. Carbon N Y. 46(12):1544–1555. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.06.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung DY, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer MM. 2014. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev. 39:426–443. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroto-Valer MM, Tang Z, Zhang Y. 2005. CO2 capture by activated and impregnated anthracites. Fuel Process Technol. 86(14):1487–1502. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty CR, Adapala S, Meikap BC. 2008a. Hydrodynamics of a multistage countercurrent fluidized bed reactor with downcomer for lime-dolomite mixed particle system. Ind Eng Chem Res. 47(18):6917–6924. doi: 10.1021/ie8007693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty CR, Malavia G, Meikap BC. 2008b. Development of a countercurrent multistage fluidized-bed reactor and mathematical modeling for prediction of removal efficiency of sulfur dioxide from flue gases. Ind Eng Chem Res. 48(3):1629–1637. doi: 10.1021/ie801615c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty CR, Rajmohan B, Meikap BC. 2010. Identification of stable operating ranges of a counter-current multistage fluidized bed reactor with downcomer. Chem Eng Process. 49(1):104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2009.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pels JR, Kapteijn F, Moulijn JA, Zhu Q, Thomas KM. 1995. Evolution of nitrogen functionalities in carbonaceous materials during pyrolysis. Carbon N Y. 33(11):1641–1653. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00154-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przepiórski J, Skrodzewicz M, Morawski AW. 2004. High temperature ammonia treatment of activated carbon for enhancement of CO 2 adsorption. Appl Surf Sci. 225(1):235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2003.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Mohanty CR, Meikap BC. 2009. Multistage fluidized bed reactor performance characterization for adsorption of carbon dioxide. Ind Eng Chem Res. 48(23):10718–10727. doi: 10.1021/ie901133r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samanta A, Zhao A, Shimizu GK, Sarkar P, Gupta R. 2011. Post-combustion CO2 capture using solid sorbents: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res. 51(4):1438–1463. doi: 10.1021/ie200686q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Song C, Miller BG, Scaroni AW. 2005. Influence of moisture on CO2 separation from gas mixture by a nanoporous adsorbent based on polyethylenimine-modified molecular sieve MCM-41. Ind Eng Chem Res. 44(21):8113–8119. doi: 10.1021/ie050382n
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Xu Z, Fan M, Gupta R, Slimane RB, Bland AE, Wright I. 2008. Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: a review. J Environ Sci. 20(1):14–27. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorgun S, Vural N, Demiral H. 2009. Preparation of high-surface area activated carbons from Paulownia wood by ZnCl 2 activation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 122(1):189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelenak V, Halamova D, Gaberova L, Bloch E, Llewellyn P. 2008. Amine-modified SBA-12 mesoporous silica for carbon dioxide capture: effect of amine basicity on sorption properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 116(1):358–364. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wang B, Sun Q. 2014. Fly ash-derived solid amine sorbents for CO2 capture from flue gas. Energy Procedia. 63:2367–2373. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.258
   Google Scholar