Computational modelling of particle-fluid dynamics in comminution and classification: a review

References

• Agrawala S, Rajamani RK, Songfack P, Mishra BK. 1997. Mechanics of media motion in tumbling mills with 3d discrete element method. Miner Eng. 10:215–227. doi: 10.1016/S0892-6875(96)00147-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aketi VAK, Teja Reddy V, Mangadoddy N, S GE, Raparla SK, Kumar R. 2018. Numerical simulation of near-gravity coal particle behavior in a dense medium cyclone using a mixture model coupled with a discrete phase model. Int J Coal Prep Util. 1–23. doi:10.1080/19392699.2018.1491844.
   Google Scholar
• Alkec D. 2011. Modeling flow in pulp lifter channels of grinding mills with CFD. University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS. 2011. Fluent 14 Theory Guide, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Aurelien D, Eric C, Florent B, Kumar MA. 2012. Analysis of swirling flow in hydrocyclones operating under dense regime. Miner Eng. 31:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazy P, Zarogatsky LP, Jdid EA, Hamdadou M. 1994. Vibroinertial comminution — principles and performance. Int J Miner Process. 41:33–51. doi: 10.1016/0301-7516(94)90004-3
   Google Scholar
• Boysan F, Ewan BCR, Swithenbank J, Ayers WH. 1983. Experimental and theoretical studies of cyclone separator aerodynamics. Inst Chem Eng Symp Series. 305–319.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley D. 1965. The hydrocyclone. London: Pergamon Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan M. 2006. CFD simulations of hydrocyclones with an air core: comparison between large eddy simulations and a second moment closure. Chem Eng Res Des. 84(6 A):495–505. doi: 10.1205/cherd.05111
   Google Scholar
• Brennan MS. 2003. Multiphase CFD simulations of dense medium and classifying hydrocyclones. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Chu KW, Chen J, Wang B, Yu AB, Vince A, Barnett GD, Barnett PJ. 2017. Understand solids loading effects in a dense medium cyclone: effect of particle size by a CFD-DEM method. Pow Tech. 320:594–609. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu KW, Wang B, Yu AB, Vince A. 2009. CFD-DEM modelling of multiphase flow in dense medium cyclones. Pow Tech. 193:235–247. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu KW, Wang B, Yu AB, Vince A. 2012. Computational study of multiphase flow in dense medium cyclones: effect of particle density. Chem Eng Sci. 73:123–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary PW, Morrison RD. 2012. Prediction of 3D slurry flow within the grinding chamber and discharge from a pilot scale SAG mill. Miner Eng. 39:184–195. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary PW, Sinnott M, Rob Morrison B. 2006. Prediction of slurry transport in SAG mills using SPH fluid flow in a dynamic DEM based porous media. Miner Eng. 19:1517–1527. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2006.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson MR. 1988. Numerical calculations of flow in a hydrocyclone operating without an air core. Appl Math Model. 12:119–128. doi: 10.1016/0307-904X(88)90003-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson MR. 1994. A Numerical Model of Liquid-Solid Flow in a Hydrocyclone with High Solids Fraction. International Symposium Numerical methods for Multiphase flows, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Delgadillo JA, Rajamani RK. 2005. A comparative study of three turbulence-closure models for the hydrocyclone problem. Int J Miner Process. 77:217–230. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin KP, Smitham JB. 1994. Use of X-rays to determine the distribution of particles in an operating cyclone. Miner Eng. 7:1269–1280. doi: 10.1016/0892-6875(94)90117-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao D, Herbst JA. 2009. Alternative ways of coupling particle behaviour with fluid dynamics in mineral processing. Int J Comput Fluid D. 23:109–118. doi: 10.1080/10618560902754932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadirian M, Hayes RE, Mmbaga J, Afacan A, Xu Z. 2013. On the simulation of hydrocyclones using CFD. Can J Chem Eng. 91:950–958. doi: 10.1002/cjce.21705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghodrat M, Qi Z, Kuang SB, Ji L, Yu AB. 2016. Computational investigation of the effect of particle density on the multiphase flows and performance of hydrocyclone. Miner Eng. 90:55–69. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2016.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourdel C, Simonin O, Brunier E. 1998. Modelling and simulation of gas-solid turbulent flows with a binary mixture of particles. Third International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Govender I, Mangesana N, Mainza AN, Franzidis JP. 2011. Measurement of shear rates in a laboratory tumbling mill. Miner Eng. 24:225–229. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2010.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gujjula R, Mangadoddy N. 2015. Hydrodynamic study of gas-solid internally circulating fluidized bed using multi-phase CFD model. Part Sci Technol. 33:593–609. doi: 10.1080/02726351.2015.1013590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh KT. 1988. Phenomenological model of the hydrocyclone. University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh KT, Rajamani RK. 1988. Phenomenalogical model of hydrocyclone: model development and verification for single-phase flow. Int J Miner Process. 22:223–237. doi: 10.1016/0301-7516(88)90065-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh KT, Rajamani RK. 1991. Mathematical model of the hydrocyclone based on the physics of fluid flow. AlChE J. 37(5):735–746. doi: 10.1002/aic.690370511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii M, Mishima K. 1984. Two-fluid model and hydrodynamic constitutive relations. Nucl Eng Des. 82:107–126. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(84)90207-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasundara CT, Yang RY, Guo BY, Yu AB, Govender I, Mainza A, Westhuizen AVD, Rubenstein J. 2011. CFD-DEM modelling of particle flow in IsaMills - comparison between simulations and PEPT measurements. Miner Eng. 24:181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2010.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi M, Akdogan G, Bradshaw SM, Mainza A. 2012. Numerical modelling of air core in hydrocyclones. Ninth International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kelsall DF. 1952. A study of the motion of solid particles in a hydraulic cyclone. Trans Inst Chem Eng. 30:87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kuang SB, Chu KW, Yu AB, Vince A. 2012. Numerical study of liquid–gas–solid flow in classifying hydrocyclones effect of feed solids concentration: effect of feed solids concentration. Miner Eng. 31:17–31. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Ingham DB, Wen X. 2000. Numerical modelling of the fluid and particle penetration through small sampling cyclones. J Aerosol Sci. 31:23. doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(00)00016-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manninen M, Taivassalo V, Kallio S. 1996. On the mixture model for multiphase flow. Finland: VTT Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mayank K, Malahe M, Govender I, Mangadoddy N. 2015. Coupled DEM-CFD model to predict the tumbling mill dynamics. Procedia IUTAM. 15:139–149. doi: 10.1016/j.piutam.2015.04.020
   Google Scholar
• Mayank K, Narasimha M, Govender I. 2015. Two way coupled CFD-DEM model to predict tumbling mill dynamics. SAG Conference, Vancouer, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra BK, Rajamani RK. 1992. The discrete element method for the simulation of ball mills. Appl Math Model. 16:598–604. doi: 10.1016/0307-904X(92)90035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monredon TC, Hsieh KT, Rajamani RK. 1992. Fluid flow model of the hydrocyclones: an investigation of device dimensions. Int J Miner Process. 35:65–83. doi: 10.1016/0301-7516(92)90005-H
   Google Scholar
• Mousavian SM, Najafi AF. 2009. Numerical simulations of gas–liquid–solid flows in a hydrocyclone separator. Arch Appl Mech. 79:395–409. doi: 10.1007/s00419-008-0237-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nageswararao K. 1978. Further modelling and scale-up of hydrocyclones. JKMRC, University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Napier-Munn T. 2018. The dense medium cyclone – past, present and future. Miner Eng. 116:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2017.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narasimha M, Brennan M, Holtham PN. 2006. Large eddy simulation of hydrocyclone—prediction of air-core diameter and shape. Int J Miner Process. 80:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narasimha M, Brennan MS, Holtham PN. 2006. Numerical simulation of magnetite segregation in a dense medium cyclone. Miner Eng. 19:1034–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2006.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narasimha M, Brennan MS, Holtham PN. 2012. CFD modeling of hydrocyclones: prediction of particle size segregation. Miner Eng. 39:173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narasimha M, Brennan MS, Holtham PN, Napier-Munn TJ. 2007. A comprehensive CFD model of dense medium cyclone performance. Miner Eng. 20:414–426. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narasimha M, Mainza AN, Holtham PN, Brennan MS. 2012. Air-core modelling for hydrocyclones operating with solids. Int J Miner Process. 102–103: 19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2011.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Narasimha M, Mainza AN, Holtham PN, Powell MS, Brennan M. 2014. A semi-mechanistic model of hydrocyclones – developed from industrial data and inputs from CFD. Int J Miner Process. 133:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2014.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passalacqua A, Marmo L. 2009. A critical comparison of frictional stress models applied to the simulation of bubbling fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci. 64:2795–2806. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patankar NA, Joseph DD. 2001. Modeling and numerical simulation of particulate flows by the Eulerian–lagrangian approach. Int J Multiphase Flow. 27:1659–1684. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(01)00021-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pericleous KA, Rhodes N. 1986. The hydrocyclone classifier-a numerical approach. Int J Miner Process. 17(23):43.
   Google Scholar
• Petty CA, Parks SM. 2001. Flow predictions within hydrocyclones. Filtr Sep. 38:28–34. doi: 10.1016/S0015-1882(01)80379-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popoff B, Braun MA. 2007. Lagrangian approach to dense particulate flows. 6th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Qi Z, Kuang SB, Yu AB. 2015. Numerical investigation of the separation behaviours of fine particles in large dense medium cyclones. Int J Miner Process. 142:35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2015.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Rajamani RK, Songfack P, Mishra BK. 2000. Impact energy spectra of tumbling mills. Pow Tech. 108:116–121. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00208-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao TC. 1966. The characteristics of hydrocyclones and their application as control units in comminution circuits. Univeristy of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Raziyeh S, Ataallah GS. 2014. CFD simulation of an industrial hydrocyclone with Eulerian–Eulerian approach: A case study. Int J Mining Eng. 24:643–648.
   Google Scholar
• Razmi H, Soltani Goharrizi A, Mohebbi A. 2019. CFD simulation of an industrial hydrocyclone based on multiphase particle in cell (MPPIC) method. Sep Purif Technol. 209:851–862. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner VG. 1976. The action of the hydrocyclone. The University of London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenert K. 1986. Limits of energy saving in mills. 1st World Congress on Particle Technology, Nurnberg. p. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sevilla EM, Branion R. 1997. The fluid dynamics of hydrocyclones. J Pulp Pap Sci. 23:85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Shi FN, Napier-Munn TJ. 1996. A model for slurry rheology. Int J Miner Process. 47:103–123. doi: 10.1016/0301-7516(95)00101-8
   Google Scholar
• Slechta J, Firth BA. 1984. Classification of fine coal with a hydrocyclone. Int J Miner Process. 12:213–237. doi: 10.1016/0301-7516(84)90030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens DW, Mohanarangam K. 2009. Turbulence model analysis of flow inside a hydrocyclone. Seventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian VJ. 2002. Measurement of Medium Segregation in the Dense Medium Cyclone using Gamma-Ray Tomography. JKMRC, University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Syamlal M, Rogers W, O'Brien TJ. 1993. MFIX documentation: theory guide. Technical Report DOE/METC-94/1004 (DE9400087). Morgantown Energy Technology Centre, Morgantown, West Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares LM. 2017. A review of advanced ball mill modelling. KONA Powder Part J. 34:106–124. doi: 10.14356/kona.2017015
   Google Scholar
• Teja Reddy V, Venkata Kowshik A, Narasimha M. 2015. Dense slurry CFD model for hydrocyclone performance evaluation incorporating rheology, particle drag and lift forces. Seventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Vakamalla TR, Mangadoddy N. 2015. Rheology-based CFD modeling of magnetite medium segregation in a dense medium cyclone. Pow Tech. 277:275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakamalla TR, Mangadoddy N. 2017. Numerical simulation of industrial hydrocyclones performance: role of turbulence modelling. Sep Purif Technol. 176:23–39. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.11.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakamalla TR, Mangadoddy N. 2019. The dynamic behaviour of a large-scale 250-mm hydrocyclone: A CFD study. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng. 14(2):e2287. doi: 10.1002/apj.2287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Chu KW, Yu AB, Vince A. 2009. Modeling the multiphase flow in a dense medium cyclone. Ind Eng Chem Res. 48:3628–3639. doi: 10.1021/ie801175c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerasekara NS, Powell MS, Cleary PW, Tavares LM, Evertsson M, Morrison RD, Quist J, Carvalho RM. 2013. The contribution of DEM to the science of comminution. Pow Tech. 248:3–24. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood CJ. 1990. A Performance Model for Coal-Washing Dense Medium Cyclones. University of Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Cai P, Jiang F, Dong K, Jiang Y, Wang B. 2017. Understanding the separation of particles in a hydrocyclone by force analysis. Pow Tech. 322:471–489. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.09.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Wang C, Wang H, Wang J. 2016. Eulerian–lagrangian study of dense liquid–solid flow in an industrial-scale cylindrical hydrocyclone. Int J Miner Process. 151:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2016.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Zhu HP, Zhou ZY, Yang RY, Yu AB. 2007. Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: Theoretical developments. Chem Eng Sci. 62:3378–3396. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.12.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar