References

• Amado, G., and H. V. Brasil. 1991. “Organizational Behaviors and Cultural Context: The Brazilian ‘Jeitinho’.” International Studies of Management & Organization 21 (3): 38–61.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, E. N. D. 1912. Utilidade das florestas. São Paulo: Secretaria da Agricultura, Commercio e Obras Públicas.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, C. W., and E. Bariani, eds. 2009. Administração pública no Brasil: breve história política. São Paulo: Editora UNIFESP.
   Google Scholar
• Arima, E. Y., P. Barreto, E. Araújo, and B. Soares-Filho. 2014. “Public Policies Can Reduce Tropical Deforestation: Lessons and Challenges from Brazil.” Land Use Policy 41 (1): 465–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruda, J. 1925. “Conservação de recursos naturaes.” Revista da Faculdade de Direito de São Paulo 22: 129–147.
   Google Scholar
• Avritzer, L. 2008. “Terra e cidadania no Brasil.” In Utopias agrárias, edited by H. M. M. Starling, H. E. Rodrigues, and M. Telles, 150–163. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.
   Google Scholar
• Barreto, P., P. Amaral, E. Vidal, and C. Uhl. 1998. “Costs and Benefits of Forest Management for Timber Production in Eastern Amazonia.” Forest Ecology and Management 108 (1): 9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benatti, J. H. 2005. “O meio ambiente e os bens ambientais.” In O direito e o desenvolvimento sustentável: curso de direito ambiental, edited by C. Irigaray, T. Hugueney, A. Rios, and V. Veiga, 205–243. São Paulo: Peirópolis; Brasília, IEB.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. 2012. “The Social Construction of Bakerlite: Toward a Theory of Invention.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 152–182. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, N. 1997. Teoria do ordenamento jurídico. Brasília: UnB.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, I. 2009. Incentives to Sustain Forest Ecosystem Services: Review and Lessons for REDD. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bora, A. 2010. “Technoscientific Normativity and the ‘Iron Cage’ of Law.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35 (1): 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börner, J., E. Marinho, and S. Wunder. 2015. “Mixing Carrots and Sticks to Conserve Forests in the Brazilian Amazon: A Spatial Probabilistic Modeling Approach.” PloS One 10 (2): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1987. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Hastings Law Journal 38 (1): 805–853.
   Google Scholar
• Brito, B., and P. Barreto. 2006. “A eficácia da aplicação da lei de crimes ambientais pelo Ibama para proteção de florestas no Pará.” Revista de Direito Ambiental 43 (3): 35–65.
   Google Scholar
• de Carvalho Cabral, D., and S. Cesco. 2007. “Árvores do rei, floresta do povo A instituição das ‘madeiras-de-lei’no Rio de Janeiro e na ilha de Santa Catarina (Brasil) no final do período colonial.” Luso-Brazilian Review 44 (2): 50–86.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, F. H., and M. M. Moreira. 2008. Cultura das Transgressões no Brasil: lições da história. São Paulo: Saraiva.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, E. B. 2008. “A Modernização do Sertão: terras, florestas, estado e lavradores na Colonização de Campo Mourão, Paraná, 1939–1964.” Doctoral dissertation, Tese (Doutorado em História). Programa de Pós-Graduação em História da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina–UFSC, Florianópolis).
   Google Scholar
• Cukierman, H. 2007. Yes, nós temos Pasteur: Manguinhos, Oswaldo Cruz e a história da ciência no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: FAPERJ.
   Google Scholar
• Damatta, R. 1979. Carnavais, Malandros e Heróis: para uma sociologia do dilema brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, W. 1995. With Broadax and Firebrand: The Destruction of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, J., and A. F. Barros-Platiau. 2006. “Brazilian Environmental Laws and Policies, 1934–2002: A Critical Overview.” Law & Policy 28 (1): 83–108.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, O. 1950. Direito Florestal Brasileiro: ensaio. Rio de Janeiro: Editor Borsoi.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1893) 1984. The Division of Labour in Society. Houndmills: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Faminow, M. D. 1998. Cattle, Deforestation and Development in the Amazon: An Economic and Environmental Perspective. New York, NY: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Fearnside, P. M. 1989. “A Prescription for Slowing Deforestation in Amazonia.” Environment 31 (4): 16–20, 39–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, A., C. Souza Jr., and A. Veríssimo. 2015. Boletim do desmatamento da Amazônia Legal (janeiro de 2015) SAD. Belém: Imazon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., G. Burchell, and C. Gordon. 1991. The Foucault Effect Governmentality, 87–104. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Froger, G., and P. Méral. 2012. “Towards an Institutional and Historical Analysis of Environmental Policy in Madagascar.” Environmental Policy and Governance 22 (5): 369–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godelier, M. 2014. Rationality and Irrationality in Economics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, D., and D. M. C. Martinelli. 2012. “O código florestal e o uso da propriedade rural na perspectiva da (in) constitucionalidade da reserva legal.” Cadernos de Direito 12 (23): 215–233.
   Google Scholar
• Guimarães, J. R. 2008. “Do sentimento à imaginação Republicana: em busca de uma narrativa para a reforma agrária no século XXI.” In Utopias agrárias, edited by H. M. M. Starling, H. E. Rodrigues, and M. Telles, 273–286. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.
   Google Scholar
• Hirakuri, S. R. 2003. Can Law Save the Forest? Lessons from Finland and Brazil. Bogor Barat: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P., S. Michaels, and R. Friedman. 1987. “‘Dirty Hands’ Versus ‘Clean Models’: Is Sociology in Danger of Being Seduced by Economics?” Theory and Society 16 (3): 317–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K., and M. E. Keck. 2007. Greening Brazil: Environmental Activism in State and Society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Holanda, S. B. (1936) 1995. Raízes do Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, A., and G. Wickham. 1994. Foucault and the Law. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ioris, E. M. 2008. “Na trilha do manejo científico da floresta tropical: indústria madeireira e florestas nacionais.” Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 3 (3): 289–309.
   Google Scholar
• Irigaray, C., and A. V. V. Rios. 2005. O direito e o desenvolvimento sustentável: curso de direito ambiental. São Paulo: Peirópolis; Brasília, IEB.
   Google Scholar
• Jordana, J., and D. Levi-Faur, eds. 2004. The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kanowski, P. J., C. L. McDermott, and B. W. Cashore. 2011. “Implementing REDD+: Lessons from Analysis of Forest Governance.” Environmental Science & Policy 14 (2): 111–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1990. “Technology is Society Made Durable.” The Sociological Review 38 (S1): 103–131.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2010. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the coseil d'état. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, S. 2014. “Creating Forests with Words – a Review of Forest-Related Discourse Studies.” Forest Policy and Economics 40: 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobato, M. 1919. Urupés (contos). São Pulo: Ed. da Revista do Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, M. 1924. Jeca Tatuzinho. São Paulo: Fontoura & Serpe.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1988. “Law as a Social System.” Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1–2): 136–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., and J. Wajcman, eds. 1999. The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, J. d. S. 1996. “O tempo da fronteira. Retorno à controvérsia sobre o tempo histórico da frente de expansão e da frente pioneira.” Tempo Social 8 (1): 25–70.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. (1845) 1970. The German Ideology. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, L. K. 2008. Making Law Matter: Environmental Protection and Legal Institutions in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCleary, R. M. 1991. “The International Community’s Claim to Rights in Brazilian Amazonia.” Political Studies 39 (4): 691–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. W. 2000. Fruitless Trees: Portuguese Conservation and Brazil’s Colonial Timber. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, E. F. 1996. “Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.” In Tropical Deforestation: The Human Dimension, edited by L. E. Sponsel, T. N. Headland, and R. C. Bailey, 145–148. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moutinho, P., M. Santilli, S. Schwartzman, and L. Rodrigues. 2005. “Why Ignore Tropical Deforestation? A Proposal for Including Forest Conservation in the Kyoto Protocol.” Unasylva 222 (56): 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Nepstad, D., D. McGrath, C. Stickler, A. Alencar, A. Azevedo, B. Swette, T. Bezerra, et al. 2014. “Slowing Amazon Deforestation Through Public Policy and Interventions in Beef and Soy Supply Chains.” Science 344 (6188): 1118–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepstad, D., B. S. Soares-Filho, F. Merry, A. Lima, P. Moutinho, J. Carter, M. Bowman, et al. 2009. “The End of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.” Science 326 (5958): 1350–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, L. J., M. H. Costa, B. S. Soares-Filho, and M. T. Coe. 2013. “Large-Scale Expansion of Agriculture in Amazonia May be a No-Win Scenario.” Environmental Research Letters 8 (2): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pádua, J. A. 2002. Um sopro de destruição: pensamento político e crítica ambiental no Brasil escravista, 1786–1888. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, O. D. 1950. Direito florestal brasileiro (ensaio). Rio de Janeiro: Editor Borsoi.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff, A. 1999. “What Drives Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37 (1): 26–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaffenberger, B. 1992. “Technological Dramas.” Science, Technology & Human Values 17 (3): 282–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, T., and W. Bijker. 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Social Studies of Science 14 (3): 399–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., and P. J. DiMaggio, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prado Junior, C. (1945) 1978. História econômica do Brasil. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
   Google Scholar
• Rajão, R. 2013. “Representations and Discourses: The Role of Local Accounts and Remote Sensing in the Formulation of Amazonia’s Environmental Policy.” Environmental Science & Policy 30: 60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajão, R., and Y. Georgiadou. 2014. “Blame Games in the Amazon: Environmental Crises and the Emergence of a Transparency Regime in Brazil.” Global Environmental Politics 14 (4): 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajão, R., and T. Vurdubakis. 2013. “On the Pragmatics of Inscription: Detecting Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.” Theory, Culture & Society 30 (4): 151–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantala, S., T. Kontinen, K. Korhonen-Kurki, and I. Mustalahti. 2015. “Equity in REDD+: Varying Logics in Tanzania.” Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (3): 201–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, A., B. Crona, and Ö Bodin. 2014. “Legitimacy in Co-Management: The Impact of Preexisting Structures, Social Networks and Governance Strategies.” Environmental Policy and Governance 24 (1): 60–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C., and C. L. McDermott. 2014. “Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Local Explanations for Forestry Law Compliance.” Social & Legal Studies 24 (1): 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, L. M. O. 2008. Terras devolutas e latifúndio: efeitos da lei de 1850. Campinas: Editora UNICAMP.
   Google Scholar
• Silva Z. L. d. 2005. “As percepções das elites brasileiras dos anos de 1930 sobre a natureza: das projeções simbólicas às normas para o seu uso.” In Natureza, fronteiras e territórios: imagens e narrativas, edited by G. Arruda, 177–215. Londrina: Eduel.
   Google Scholar
• Stickler, C. M., D. C. Nepstad, A. A. Azevedo, and D. G. McGrath. 2013. “Defending Public Interests in Private Lands: Compliance, Costs and Potential Environmental Consequences of the Brazilian Forest Code in Mato Grosso.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368 (1619): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. 2003. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” In The Democracy Sourcebook, edited by R. A. Dahl, I. Shapiro, and J. A. Cheibub, 393–397. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C., and L. B. Edelman. 1996. “Legal Rational Myths: The New Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition.” Law & Social Inquiry 21 (4): 903–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supiot, A. 2007. Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of the Law. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G., ed. 1987. Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Tietenberg, T., and L. Lewis. 2012. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tranter, K. 2007. “Nomology, Ontology, and Phenomenology of Law and Technology.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 8 (2): 449–474.
   Google Scholar
• Twining, W., and D. Miers. 1999. How to Do Things with Rules: A Primer of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, R. M. (1987) 2001. False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, R. M. 1996. What Should Legal Analysis Become? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• van der Hoff, R., R. Rajão, P. Leroy, and D. Boezeman. 2015. “The Parallel Materialization of REDD+ Implementation Discourses in Brazil.” Forest Policy and Economics 55: 37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veljanovski, C. 2007. Economic Principles of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1922) 1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York, NY: Bedminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woortmann, E. F., org. 2004. Significados da terra. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Woortmann, K. 1990. “Com parente não se neguceia’: O Campesinato como ordem moral.” Anuário Antropológico 87: 11–73.
   Google Scholar