References

• Aguado-López, Eduardo, Arianna Becerril-García, and Sheila Godínez-Larios. 2018. “Asociarse o perecer: la colaboración funcional en las ciencias sociales latinoamericanas.” Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 161: 3–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.161.3.
   Google Scholar
• Alatas, S. F. 2003. “Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labor in the Social Sciences.” Current Sociology 51 (6): 599–613.
   Google Scholar
• Alperin, J. P., D. Babini, and G. Fischman, eds. 2014. Open Access Indicators and Scholarly Communications in Latin America. Buenos Aires: CLACSO-Unesco.
   Google Scholar
• Alperin, J. P., A. Packer, E. Aguado-López, A. Becerril-García, D. Babini, G. Archuby, V. Carrizo, D. A. García, S. Higa, and D. Spano. 2014. Indicadores de Acceso Abierto y Comunicaciones Académicas en América Latina. CLACSO. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20141217052547/Indicadores_de_acceso_abierto.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Altbach, P., L. Reisberg, and L. Rumbley. 2009. Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Beigel, F. 2013. The Politics of Academic Autonomy in Latin America. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Beigel, F. 2014. “Publishing from the Periphery: Structural Heterogeneity and Segmented Circuits. The Evaluation of Scientific Publications for Tenure in Argentina’s CONICET.” Current Sociology 62 (5): 743–765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beigel, F. 2017. “Peripheral Scientists, between Ariel and Caliban. Institutional Know-how and Circuits of Recognition in Argentina. The ‘Career-Best Publications’ of the Researchers at CONICET.” DADOS – Revista de Ciências Sociais 60 (3): 825–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beigel, F. 2019. “PROINCE versus CONICET: guerra fría, convivencia pacífica y doble-agentes.” In Culturas evaluativas: Impactos y dilemas del Programa de Incentivos a Docentes-Investigadores en Argentina (1993–2018), edited by F. Beige and F. Bekerman. Buenos Aires: CLACSO-CONADU.
   Google Scholar
• Beigel, F., and F. Bekerman, eds. 2019. Culturas evaluativas: Impactos y dilemas del Programa de Incentivos a Docentes-Investigadores en Argentina (1993–2018). CLACSO-CONADU. https://www.clacso.org/culturas-evaluativas/
   Google Scholar
• Beigel, F., and O. Gallardo. 2020. “Productividad, bibliodiversidad y bilingüismo en un corpus completo de producciones científicas.” in Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, N° 46, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Beigel, F., O. Gallardo, and F. Bekerman. 2018. “Institutional Expansion and Scientific Development in the Periphery. The Structural Heterogeneity of Argentina's Academic Field (1983–2015).” Minerva. A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 56 (3): 305–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9340-2.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-David, J. (1977) 1992. Centers of Learning. New York, NY: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, A., and A. Wilkis. 2018. “The Internationalization of Sociology in Argentina 1985–2015: Geographies and Trends.” In The Social and Human Sciences in Global Power Relations, Socio-Historical Studies of the Social and Human Sciences, edited by J. Heilbron et al., 215–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73299-2_8.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1999. Meditaciones Pascalianas. Barcelona: Anagrama.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2003. El oficio del científico. Ciencia de la ciencia y reflexividad. Barcelona: Anagrama.
   Google Scholar
• Codner, D., and R. Perrota. 2018. “Blind Technology Transfer Process from Argentina.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 13 (3): 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• De Swaan, A. 2001. Words of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhards, J. 2014. “Transnational Linguistic Capital: Explaining English Proficiency in 27 European Countries.” International Sociology 29 (1): 56–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 1959. Formacao economica do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Fondo de Cultura Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Gingras, Y. 2016. Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation. Uses and Abuses. London: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Guédon, Jean-Claude. 2011. “El acceso abierto y la división entre ciencia principal y periférica.” Crítica y Emancipación, 2011 III (6): 135–180.
   Google Scholar
• Keim, W. 2010. “Pour un modèle centre-périphérie dans les sciences sociales. Aspects problématiques des relations internationales en sciences sociales.” Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances, 2010/3 4 (3): 570–598. doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.011.0570.
   Google Scholar
• Kreimer, Pablo. 2006. “¿DEPENDIENTES o iNTEGRADOS?. La ciencia latinoamericana y la nueva división internacional del trabajo.” Nómadas (Col) 24: 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Kreimer, P., and H. Vessuri. 2018. “Les sciences en Amérique latine. Tensions du passé et défis du présent.” In Les ancrages nationaux de la science mondiale xviiie–xxie siècles, dir. Mina Kleiche-Dray, 99–131. Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaine – IRD Éditions.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, Theresa, and Mary Jane Curry. 2011. Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Losego, P., and R. Arvanitis. 2008. “La science dans les pays non hégémoniques.” Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 2 (3): 334–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.005.0334.
   Google Scholar
• Mallorquin, Carlos. 2011. “Repensando la noción de heterogeneidad en la concepción estructuralista latinoamericana.” In Visiones del desarrollo, edited by H. Márquez, R. Soto, and E. Zayago. México: Miguel Angel Porrúa.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E., and B. Org. Göbel. 2018. Desigualdades interdependentes a geopolitica do conhecimento: negociacoes, fluxos, assimetrias. Rio de Janeiro: FAPERJ-IAI.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K. 2005. “A Question of Autonomy: Bourdieu's Field Approach and Higher Education Policy.” Journal of Education Policies 20 (6): 687–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugnaini, R., R. J. P. Damaceno, L. A. Digiampietri, and J. P. Mena-Chalco. 2019. “Panorama da produção científi ca do Brasil além da indexação: Uma análise exploratória da comunicação em periódicos.” Transinformação 31: e190033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e190033.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, Renato. 2009. La supremacía del inglés en las ciencias sociales. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Paradeise, C., and J. C. Thoenig. 2013. “Academic Institutions in Search of Quality: Local Orders and Global Standards.” Organization Studies 34 (2): 189–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradeise, C., and J. C. Thoenig. 2015. In Search of Academic Quality. New York, NY: Palgrave Mac Millian.
   Google Scholar
• Ràfols, I. 2019. “S&T Indicators ‘In the Wild': Contextualization and Participation for Responsible Metrics.” Research Evaluation 28 (1): 7–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos Zincke, C. 2014. “Local and Global Communications in Chilean Social Science: Inequality and Relative Autonomy.” Current Sociology 62 (5): 704–722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114521374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos Zincke, C. 2020. Una población bien adaptada ala regulación internacional: los invstigadores científicos chilenos del siglo XXI. Mendoza: Informe NEIES-MERCOSUR.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson-García, N., and I. Ràfols. 2019. The Differing Meanings of Indicators Under Different Policy Contexts. The Case of Internationalization. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335990226
   Google Scholar
• Salatino, M. 2019. “Circuitos locales en contextos globales de circulación. Una aproximación a las revistas científicas argentinas.” Palabra Clave (La Plata) 9 (1): e073. doi:https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e073.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, S. 2019. Presentation in the First FOLEC FORUM. México: CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Schimanski, L. A., and J. P. Alperin. 2018. “ The Evaluation of Scholarship in Academic Promotion and Tenure Processes: Past, Present, and Future.” F1000Research 2018 7: 1605. doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1.
   Google Scholar
• Schott, Thomas. 1998. “Ties between Center and Periphery in the Scientific World-System: Accumulation of Rewards, Dominance, and Self-Reliance.” Journal of World-Systems Research 4: 112–144.
   Google Scholar
• Vélez-Cuartas, Gabriel, Diana Lucio-Arias, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2016. “Regional and Global Science: Publications from Latin America and the Caribbean in the SciELO Citation Index and the Web of Science.” El profesional de la información 25 (1): 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vessuri, H., J. C. Guédon, and A. M. Cetto. 2018. “A divisiao Norte-Sul e as iniciativas do Sul Global para superar a barreira de reconhecimento em publicacoes científicas.” In Desigualdades interdependentes a geopolitica do conhecimento: Negociacoes, fluxos, assimetrias, edited by E. Martin and B. Org Göbel, 31–55. Rio de Janeiro: FAPERJ-IAI.
   Google Scholar
• Vessuri, H., J. C. Guédon, and A. M. Cetto. 2014. “Excellence or Quality? Impact of the Current Competition Regime on Science and Scientific Publishing in Latin America and its Implications for Development.” Current Sociology 62(5).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, C., T. Whetsell, and S. Mukherjeec, eds. 2019. “International Research Collaboration: Novelty, Conventionality, and Atypicality in Knowledge Recombination.” Research Policy 48: 1260–1270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. 1991. “World System Versus World-Systems. A Critique.” Critique of Anthropology 11 (2): 189–194.
   Google Scholar