Classifying facts and opinions in Twitter messages: a deep learning-based approach

References

• Abbasi, A., Hassan, A., & Dhar, M. 2014. Benchmarking Twitter sentiment analysis tools. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on language resources and evaluation,Reykjavik, Iceland. Paris, France: European Languages Resources Association (ELRA).
   Google Scholar
• Abbasi, A., Zhang, Z., Zimbra, D., Chen, H., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2010). Detecting fake websites: The contribution of statistical learning theory. MIS Quarterly, 34(3), 435–461.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, R., Gopal, R., Gupta, A., & Singh, H. (2012). Putting money where the mouths are: The relation between venture financing and electronic word-of-mouth. Information Systems Research, 23(3–Part–2), 976–992.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H., Iter, D., Naaman, M., & Gravano, L. 2012. Identifying content for planned events across social media sites. Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 533–542). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cambria, E., Schuller, B., Xia, Y., & Havasi, C. (2013). New avenues in opinion mining and sentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2, 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. 2011. Information credibility on twitter. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web(pp. 675–684). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• CFPB. (2016). Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Enforcing federal consumer protection laws. Retrieved from http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/07132016_cfpb_SEFL_anniversary_factsheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining(pp. 785–794). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, C.-H., Sinha, A. P., & Zhao, H. (2010). A hybrid attribute selection approach for text classification. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(9), 491–518.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S. R., & Chen, M. Y. (2007). Yahoo! for Amazon: Sentiment extraction from small talk on the web. [Article]. Management Science, 53(9), 1375–1388.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, S., Sinha, A. P., & Zhao, H. (2017a). Adapting sentiment lexicons to domain-specific social media texts. Decision Support Systems, 94, 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, S., Sinha, A. P., & Zhao, H. (2017b). Resolving ambiguity in sentiment classification: The role of dependency features. ACM Transactions Manage Information Systems, 8(2–3), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dewan, S., & Ramaprasad, J. (2014). Social media, traditional media, and music sales. [Article]. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N. C. M. D. N. M. 2012. Finding and assessing social media information sources in the context of journalism. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2451–2460). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, X., Liu, B., & Yu, P. S. 2008. A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 231–240). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Eaglesham, J. (2011). Warning shot on financial protection. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703507804576130370862263258?mod=googlenews_wsj.
   Google Scholar
• Evermann, J., Rehse, J.-R., & Fettke, P. (2017). Predicting process behaviour using deep learning. Decision Support Systems, 100, 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2007). The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, G. (2017). World’s biggest banks fined $321 billion since financial crisis. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-03-02/world-s-biggest-banks-fined-321-billion-since-financial-crisis
   Google Scholar
• Ghiassi, M., Zimbra, D., & Lee, S. (2016). Targeted twitter sentiment analysis for brands using supervised feature engineering and the dynamic architecture for artificial neural networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(4), 1034–1058.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzivassiloglou, V., & Wiebe, J. M. 2000. Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. Proceedings of the 18th conference on computational linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 299–305). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• He, W., Wu, H., Yan, G., Akula, V., & Shen, J. (2015). A novel social media competitive analytics framework with sentiment benchmarks. Information & Management, 52(7), 801–812.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, V. A., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, C. J., & Gilbert, E. E. (2014). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Paper presented at the eighth international conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-14), Ann Arbor, MI,
   Google Scholar
• Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., & Mikolov, T. (2016). Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. arXiv Preprint arXiv, 1607, 01759.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, M., & Feuerriegel, S. (2017). Decision support from financial disclosures with deep neural networks and transfer learning. Decision Support Systems, 104, 38–48.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., Lei, K. H., Khadiwala, R., & Chang, K.-C.-C. 2012. Tedas: A twitter-based event detection and analysis system. Data engineering (ICDE), 2012 IEEE 28th international conference on (pp. 1273–1276). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B. (2010). Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing, 2, 627–666.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 5(1), 1–167.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, X., Zhang, J., & Duan, W. (2013). Social media and firm equity value. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 146–163.
   Google Scholar
• March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, A., Bernstein, M. S., Badar, O., Karger, D. R., Madden, S., & Miller, R. C. 2011. Twitinfo: Aggregating and visualizing microblogs for event exploration. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 227–236). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., Pappas, I. O., Krogstie, J., & Giannakos, M. (2017). Big data analytics capabilities: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1–32. doi:10.1007/s10257-017-0362-y
   Google Scholar
• Mishne, G., & Glance, N. 2006. Predicting movie sales from blogger sentiment. Proceedings of AAAI 2006 Spring symposium on computational approaches to analysing weblogs (pp. 155-158). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nasukawa, T., & Yi, J. 2003. Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge capture (pp. 70–77). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Nunamaker Jr, J. F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. (1990). Systems development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, C., & Sheng, O. R. L. 2011. Investigating predictive power of stock micro blog sentiment in forecasting future stock price directional movement. The International conference on information systems (pp. 57–58). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, M. J., & Dredze, M. 2011. You are what you tweet: Analyzing twitter for public health. Fifth International AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM 2011). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riloff, E., & Wiebe, J. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. Proceedings of the 2003 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 105–112). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Riloff, E., Wiebe, J., & Wilson, T. Learning subjective nouns using extraction pattern bootstrapping. Proceedings of the seventh conference on natural language learning at HLT-NAACL 2003-Volume 4, 2003 (pp. 25–32): Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, A., Etzioni, O., & Clark, S. 2012. Open domain event extraction from twitter. Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1104–1112). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan, J., Samet, H., Teitler, B. E., Lieberman, M. D., & Sperling, J. 2009. Twitterstand: News in tweets. Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems (pp. 42–51) New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85–117.
   Google Scholar
• Siering, M., Koch, J.-A., & Deokar, A. V. (2016). Detecting fraudulent behavior on crowdfunding platforms: The role of linguistic and content-based cues in static and dynamic contexts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(2), 421–455.
   Google Scholar
• Simos, G. (2015). How much data is generated every minute on social media? Retrieved from http://wersm.com/how-much-data-is-generated-every-minute-on-social-media/2015
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2014). Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1), 1929–1958.
   Google Scholar
• Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011). Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 37(2), 267–307.
   Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., & Paltoglou, G. (2012). Sentiment strength detection for the social Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 163–173.
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2011). Election forecasts with Twitter: How 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 402–418.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, P. D. 2002.Thumbs up or thumbs down?: Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 417–424). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G. A., Wang, H. J., Li, J., Abrahams, A. S., & Fan, W. (2014). An analytical framework for understanding knowledge-sharing processes in online Q&A communities. ACM Transactions Manage Information Systems, 5(4), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe, J. (2002). Instructions for annotating opinions in newspaper articles.
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe, J., & Riloff, E. 2005. Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unannotated texts. International conference on intelligent text processing and computational linguistics (pp. 486–497). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., Hoffmann, P., Somasundaran, S., Kessler, J., Wiebe, J., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., Riloff, E., & Patwardhan, S. 2005. OpinionFinder: A system for subjectivity analysis. Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP on interactive demonstrations (pp. 34–35). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. (2009). Our sentiments, exactly. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H., & Hatzivassiloglou, V. 2003. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. Proceedings of the 2003 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 129–136). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., Duan, W., & Cao, Q. (2013). The impact of social and conventional media on firm equity value: A sentiment analysis approach. Decision Support Systems, 55(4), 919–926.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., Chen, F., Dai, J., Hua, T., Lu, C., & Ramakrishnan, N. (2013). Unsupervised spatial event detection in targeted domains with applications to civil unrest modeling. PloS One, 9(10), e110206–e110206.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Twitchell, D. P., Qin, T., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2004). A comparison of classification methods for predicting deception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(4), 139–166.
   Google Scholar