An empirical model of the decision to switch between electricity price contracts

References

• Borenstein, S. (2012). The redistributional impact of nonlinear electricity pricing. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(3), 56–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännlund, R., Karimu, A., & Söderholm, P. (2012). The electricity market and the development of the electricity price before and after de-regulation: Econometric analyses [Swedish title: Elmarknaden och elprisets utveckling före och efter avregleringen: Ekonometriska analyser] (CERE working paper (WP2012-14)). Department of Economics, USBE, Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, M., & Schweidel, D. A. (2011). Modeling customer lifetimes with multiple causes of churn. Marketing Science, 30(5), 881–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, T. J. (2007). Consumer preference not to choose: Methodological and policy implications. Energy Policy, 35(3), 1616–1627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, A. T., Erdem, T., & Keane, M. P. (2013). Invited paper on learning models: An assessment of progress, challenges, and new developments. Marketing Science, 32(6), 913–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damsgaard, N., Green, R., & Johansson, B. (2005). The new electricity market: Success or failure? [Swedish title: Den nya elmarknaden: Framgång eller misslyckande?]. SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Defeuilley, C. (2009). Retail competition in electricity markets. Energy Policy, 37(2), 377–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGroot, M. H. (2005). Optimal statistical decisions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 9780471729006. doi:10.1002/0471729000
   Google Scholar
• Dhillon, U. S., Shilling, J. D., & Sirmans, C. (1987). Choosing between fixed and adjustable rate mortgages: Note. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 19(2), 260–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ek, K., & Söderholm, P. (2008). Households’ switching behavior between electricity suppliers in Sweden. Utilities Policy, 16(4), 254–261.
   Google Scholar
• Energimarknadsinspektionen. (2014). Easier to understand the bill [Swedish title: Enklare faktura] (Technical report). Swedish Energy Markets Inspectorate.
   Google Scholar
• Energimarknadsinspektionen. (2017). Measures to increase demand side flexibility in the Swedish electricity system [Swedish title: Åtgärder för ökad efterfrågeflexibilitet på den Svenska elmarknaden] (Technical report). Swedish Energy Markets Inspectorate.
   Google Scholar
• Ericson, T. (2011). Households self-selection of dynamic electricity tariffs. Applied Energy, 88(7), 2541–2547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärling, T., Gamble, A., & Juliusson, E. A. (2008). Consumers’ switching inertia in a fictitious electricity market. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(6), 613–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulietti, M., Waterson, M., & Wildenbeest, M. (2014). Estimation of search frictions in the British electricity market. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 62(4), 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goett, A. A., Hudson, K., & Train, K. E. (2000). Customers’ choice among retail energy suppliers: The willingness-to-pay for service attributes. The Energy Journal, 21(4), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goettler, R. L., & Clay, K. (2011). Tariff choice with consumer learning and switching costs. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(4), 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., Hanssens, D., Hardie, B., Kahn, W., Kumar, V., Lin, N., … Sriram, S. (2006). Modeling customer lifetime value. Journal of Service Research, 9(2), 139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, K. (2014). Do consumers respond to marginal or average price? Evidence from nonlinear electricity pricing. The American Economic Review, 104(2), 537–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juliusson, E. A., Gamble, A., & Garling, T. (2007). Loss aversion and price volatility as determinants of attitude towards and preference for variable price in the Swedish electricity market. Energy Policy, 35(11), 5953–5957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kažukauskas, A., & Broberg, T. (2016). Perceptions and inattention in private electricity consumption (CERE working paper (WP2016-2)). Department of Economics, USBE, Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, C. K. B., & Kriström, B. (2015). A cross-country analysis of residential electricity demand in 11 OECD- countries. Resource and Energy Economics, 39, 68–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, A., Seim, K., & Skiera, B. (2007). Does uncertainty matter? Consumer behavior under three-part tariffs. Marketing Science, 26(5), 698–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, A., & Skiera, B. (2006). Paying too much and being happy about it: Existence, causes, and consequences of tariff-choice biases. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 212–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlechild, S. (2006). Competition and contracts in the Nordic residential electricity markets. Utilities Policy, 14(3), 135–147.
   Google Scholar
• Miravete, E. J. (2002). Estimating demand for local telephone service with asymmetric information and optional calling plans. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(4), 943–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miravete, E. J. (2003). Choosing the wrong calling plan? Ignorance and learning. The American Economic Review, 93(1), 297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miravete, E. J., & Palacios-Huerta, I. (2014). Consumer inertia, choice dependence, and learning from experience in a repeated decision problem. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(3), 524–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbakken, R. (1999). Price sensitivity of residential energy consumption in norway. Energy Economics, 21(6), 493–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelt, D., & Train, K. (2000). Customer-specific taste parameters and mixed logit: Households’ choice of electricity supplier (Department of Economics, UCB, working paper). Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., De Silva, R., & Bhatia, R. (2002). Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy, 4(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• SCB. (2016). Renegotiations and switching of electricity contracts [Swedish title: Omförhandling och byten av elavtal] (Technical report) Statistics Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Schleich, J., Faure, C., & Gassmann, X. (2019). Household electricity contract and provider switching in the EU. Journal of Applied Economics, 51(1), 103–116 .
   Google Scholar
• Vesterberg, M. (2018). The effect of price on electricity contract choice. Energy Economics, 69, 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesterberg, M., Kiran, B., & Krishnamurthy, C. (2016). Residential end use electricity demand: The implications for real time pricing in Sweden. Energy Journal, 37(4), 141–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. M., & Price, C. W. (2010). Do consumers switch to the best supplier?. Oxford Economic Papers, 62(4), 647-668..
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. (2014). Understanding household switching behavior in the retail electricity market. Energy Policy, 69, 406–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar