The winding road of requesting healthcare data for analytics purposes: using the one-interview mental model method for improving services of health data governance and big data request processes

References

• Al-Badi, A., Tarhini, A., & Khan, A. I. (2018). Exploring big data governance frameworks. Procedia Computer Science, 141, 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.181
   Google Scholar
• Albert, B., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring User Experience. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Alofaysan, S., Alhaqbani, B., Alseghayyir, R., & Omar, M. (2014, March). The significance of data governance in healthcare. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies-Volume 5 (pp. 178–187). SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
   Google Scholar
• Ancker, J. S., Kern, L. M., Abramson, E., & Kaushal, R. (2012). The Triangle Model for evaluating the effect of health information technology on healthcare quality and safety. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colijn, C., Jones, N., Johnston, I. G., Yaliraki, S., & Barahona, M. (2017). Toward precision healthcare: Context and mathematical challenges. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dhir, R., Patel, A. A., Winters, S., Bisceglia, M., Swanson, D., Aamodt, R., & Becich, M. J. (2008). A multidisciplinary approach to honest broker services for tissue banks and clinical data: a pragmatic and practical model. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, 113(7), 1705–1715.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, L. (2003). Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35(3), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195514
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feldman, B., Martin, E. M., & Skotnes, T. (2012). Big Data in Healthcare - Hype and Hope. Dr. Bonnie 360, https://www.west-info.eu/files/big-data-in-healthcare.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goguen, J. A. (1994). Requirements engineering as the reconciliation of social and technical issues. In M. Jirotka & J. A. Goguen (Eds.), Requirements engineering: Social and technical issues (pp. 165–199)). Academic Press Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, P., Kayyali, B., Knott, D., & Kuiken, S. V. (2013, January). The Big Data Revolution in Healthcare: Accelerating Value and Innovation. McKinsey & Company. http://repositorio.colciencias.gov.co/bitstream/handle/11146/465/1661-The_big_data_revolution_in_healthcare.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Hantho, A., Jensen, L., & Malterud, K. (2002). Mutual understanding: A communication model for general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 20(4), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/028134302321004926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, T. (2009). Systems design with the socio-technical walkthrough. In A. Whitworth & B. De Moore (Eds.), Handbook of research on socio-technical design and social networking systems (pp. 336–351). Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, T., & Loser, K. (1999). Vagueness in models of socio-technical systems. Behavior & Information Technology, 18(5), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492999118904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, T., Loser, K., & Jahnke, I. (2007). Sociotechnical walkthrough: A means for knowledge integration. The Learning Organization, 14(5), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470710762664
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, T., Loser, K., & Moysich, K. (2000). Intertwining training and participatory design for the development of groupware applications. In Proceedings of PDC (pp. 106–115). Location: Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Jagdish, H. V., Gehrke, J., Labrinidis, A., Papakonstantinou, Y., Patel, J., Ramakrishnan, R., & Shahabi, C. (2014). Big data and its technical challenges. Communications of the ACM, 57(7), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1995, October). Operationalizing mental models: Strategies for assessing mental models to support meaningful learning and design-supportive learning environments. The first international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, Proceedings of CSCL (pp. 182–186). https://doi.org/10.3115/222020.222166
   Google Scholar
• Khatri, V., & Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1629175.1629210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S., Shapiro, J. S., Genes, N., Aguilar, M. V., Mohrer, D., Baumlin, K., & Belden, J. L. (2012). A pilot study on usability analysis of emergency department information system by nurses. Applied Clinical Informatics, 3(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2011-11-RA–0065
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1990). What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? CSCW ‘90: Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, 357–370, https://doi.org/10.1145/99332.99367
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Edwards, H. M., & Zhao, T. (2012). Exploring think-alouds in usability testing. An International Survey. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2011.2182569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In Thompson L., Levine J., & Messick D. (Eds.), Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge, (pp. 3–31). Psychology Press
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, T. B., & Detsky, A. S. (2013). The inevitable application of big data to health care. American Medical Association (JAMA), 309(13), 1351–1352. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambiar, R., Bhardawaj, R., Sethi, A., & Vargheese, R. (2013, October). A look at challenges and opportunities of big data analytics in healthcare. In Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference of Big Data (pp. 17–22).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1994). 10 usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved September 2020, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Okal, C. O., & Loice, H. T. (2019). Usability of big data analytics Within clinical decision support systems. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 4(5), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.33564/IJEAST.2019.v04i05.010
   Google Scholar
• Patil, H., & Seshadri, R., (2014, June). Big data security and privacy issues in healthcare. In The Proceedings of the IEEE International Congress on Big Data (pp. 762–765)
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. (2019). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. (2014). Big data analytics in healthcare: Promise and potential. Health Information Science and Systems, 2(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2501-2-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeves, M. G., & Bowen, R. (2013). Developing a data governance model in health care: Although the term may be unfamiliar, data governance is a longstanding obligation of the healthcare industry. Healthcare Financial Management, 67(2), 82–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69–97). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, M. K. (1990). Interviewer bias: How it affects survey research. Aaohn Journal, 38(12), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/216507999003801203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders, D. (2013). 7 essential practices for data governance in healthcare. HealthCatalyst.
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, J. (2012). 10 things to know about the Single Ease Question (SEQ). Measuring U. https://measuringu.com/seq10
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, J. (2018). Using Task Ease (SEQ) to predict completion rates and times. Measuring U. https://measuringu.com/seq-prediction/
   Google Scholar
• Sreenivas, S., Ramchandran, N., & Ferrell, R. (2015). Quality of big data in health care. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 28(6), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2014-0080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, D., Chow, C. K., Ly, T. P., Tong, C. Y., & Tam, K. W. (2018, August). The challenges of big data governance in healthcare. In 2018 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE) (pp. 1632–1636). https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom/BigDataSE.2018.00240
   Google Scholar
• Valluripally, S., Raju, M., Calyam, P., Chisholm, M., Sivarathri, S. S., Mosa, A., & Joshi, T. (2019, January). Community cloud architecture to improve use accessibility with security compliance in health big data applications. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking (pp. 377–380).
   Google Scholar
• Valluripally, S., Raju, M., Calyam, P., Lemus, M., Purohit, S., Mosa, A., & Joshi, T. (2019). Increasing protected data accessibility for age-related cataract research using a semi-automated honest broker. Modeling and Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology, 2(3), 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Haak, M., De Jong, M., & Jan Schellens, P. (2003). Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(5), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/0044929031000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verizon. (2019). Data breach investigation report. https://enterprise.verizon.com/resources/reports/2019-data-breach-investigations-report.pdf. Accessed September 2020
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K., & Colomb, P. (2020). Important considerations for the institutional review board when granting health insurance portability and accountability act authorization waivers. The Ochsner Journal, 20(1), 95–97. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Patel, V. L., Johnson, K. A., & Smith, J. W. (2002). Designing human-centered distributed information systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(5), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2002.1039831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar