Creative arts, screen research, neo-liberalism, and a dance

References

• Films and Creative Works:
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, Rudolf. 1969. Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, Tom, and Elliot Eisner. 2012. Arts-based Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Estelle, and Barbara Bolt, eds. 2007. Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Estelle, and Barbara Bolt, eds. 2014. Material Inventions: Applying Creative Arts Research. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, Craig, Marsha Berry, Kath Dooley, Bettina Frankham, and Susan Kerrigan, eds. 2019. The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21744-0.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, Craig, and Susan Kerrigan. 2017. Screen Production Research: Creative Practice As a Mode of Enquiry. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Desmond. 2008. “Is There a Doctor in the House? A Riposte to Victor Burgin on Practice-Based Arts and Audiovisual Research.” Journal of Media Practice 9 (2): 171–177. doi:10.1386/jmpr.9.2.171_3.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Desmond. 2018. “The Primacy of Practice: Establishing the Terms of Reference of Creative Arts and Media Research.” In Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry, edited by Craig Batty, and Susan Kerrigan. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Desmond. 2022. “Challenging Practice: Research in the Creative Arts and Media.” Media Practice and Education 23 (2): 100–104. doi:10.1080/25741136.2022.2067386.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Paul. 2004. Material Thinking: The Theory and Practice of Creative Research. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castaing-Taylor, Lucien. (Director, Producer), & Paravel, Véréna (Director, Producer). 2013. Leviathan [Motion picture]. New York: Cinema Guild.
   Google Scholar
• Chanan, Michael. 2017. “Latin American Documentary, A Political Trajectory.” In Latin American Documentary, A Political Trajectory'. In 'A Companion to Latin American Cinema, edited by Maria M. Delgado, Stephen M. Hart, and Randal Johnson, 115–132. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Owen, and Kim Sawchuk. 2012. “Research-Creation: Intervention, Analysis and “Family Resemblances”.” Canadian Journal of Communication 37 (1): 5–26. doi:10.22230/cjc.2012v37n1a2489.
   Google Scholar
• Conquergood, Dwight. 2002. “Performance Studies: Interventions and Radical Research.” TDR/The Drama Review 46: 145–156. doi:10.1162/105420402320980550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., and I. Csikszentmihalyi, eds. 1988. Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Pedigree Books.
   Google Scholar
• FitzSimons, Trish, Pat Laughren, and Dugald Williamson. 2011. Australian Documentary: History, Practices and Genres. Port Melbourne, Victoria: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Ross. 2018. “Foreword: Cognitive Two-steps.” In Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry, edited by C. Betty and S. Kerrigan, iv–xii. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grierson, Elizabeth, and Laura Brearley. 2009. Creative Arts Research. Narratives of Methodologies and Practices. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, Anna, and Amanda Ravetz, eds. 2005. Visualizing Anthropology. Bristol: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haseman, Brad. 2006. “A Manifesto for Performative Research.” Media International Australia 118 (1): 98–106. doi:10.1177/1329878X0611800113.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., S. D. Reicher, and K. Millard. 2015. “Shock Treatment: Using Immersive Digital Realism to Restage and Re-Examine Milgram’s ‘Obedience to Authority’ Research.” PLoS ONE 10 (3): e109015. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, John. 2011. “Ten Conditions of Documentary’.” Arena 110: 42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kälvemark, Torsten. 2010. “University Politics and Practice-Based Research.” In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, edited by Michael Biggs, Henrik Karlsson, and Stiftelsen, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, 3–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, John, and Andrew Edward Fluck. 2022. “Life at the Academic Coalface: Validation of a Holistic Academic Workload Estimation Tool.” Higher Education. Springer. Published August 2022. doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00912-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, Susan, Leo Berkeley, Sean Maher, Michael Sergi, and Alison Wotherspoon. 2015. “Screen Production Enquiry: A Study of Five Australian Doctorates.” Studies in Australasian Cinema 9 (2): 93–109. doi:10.1080/17503175.2015.1059990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauth, N., and T. Brady, eds. 2006. Creative Writing: Theory Beyond Practice. Teneriffe: Post Pressed.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, Susanne. 1957. Problems of Art: Ten Philosophical Lectures. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, Mike, and Howie Movshovitz. 2000. Mike Leigh: Interviews. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loescher, Margaret. 2003. Cameras at the Addy. Journal of Media Practice 3 (2): 75–84. doi:10.1386/jmpr.3.2.75
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, Natalie. 2019. How to Make Art at the End of the World: A Manifesto for Research Creation. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, Shaun. 2013. Art as Research. Intellect: Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, Cleo, and Tom Murray. 2019. “Visual and Screen-Based Research Methodologies.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. London: Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1196
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, Stanley. 1963. “Behavioral Study of Obedience.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67 (4): 371–378. doi:10.1037/h0040525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, Stanley. 1965. “Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority.” Human Relations 18 (1): 57–76. doi:10.1177/001872676501800105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard, Kathryn. 2011. “The Window in the Laboratory.” The Psychologist 24 (9): 658–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard, Kathryn. 2014a. “Revisioning Obedience: Exploring the Role of Milgram's Skills as a Filmmaker in Bringing His Shocking Narrative to Life.” Journal of Social Issues 70: 439–455. doi:10.1111/josi.12070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard, Kathryn. 2014b. Screenwriting in a Digital Era. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Millard, Kathryn. 2015. Shock Room. Sydney: Charlie Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Tom. 2022. “History on Screens: Towards an Australian Historiophoty.” In The Australian History Industry, edited by Paul Ashton, and Paula Hamilton, 312–326. North Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Tom, and Kate Rossmanith. 2022. “The ‘Poietic’ Turn: Creative Arts Research in the Academy.” Continuum. doi:10.1080/10304312.2022.2123449.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, Joshua. 2012. “Perpetrators’ Testimony and the Restoration of Humanity: S-21, Rithy Panh.” In Killer Images: Documentary Film, Memory and the Performance of Violence, edited by J. Ten Brink, and J. Oppenheimer, 243–255. London, UK: Wallflower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, J., Anonymous, & Cynn, C. 2012. The Act of Killing. Drafthouse Films.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, Dennis. 2005. Landmines: A Love Story. Sydney: Camerawork Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Panh, Rithy. 2003. (Director), Couteau, C. (Producer), & Hastier, D. (Producer). 2003. S-21: The Khmer Rouge Death Machine [Motion picture]. Cambodia, France: Institut National del’Audiovisuel, First Run Features.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah. 2011. “A Multisensory Approach to Visual Methods.” In The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, edited by E. Margolis, and L. Pauwels, 97–116. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9781446268278
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2012. Situating Everyday Life: Practices and Places. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, Jane. 2004. “Television: Friend or foe of Australian Documentary?” Media, Culture & Society 26 (2): 288–295. doi:10.1177/0163443704041179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Gillian. 2014. “On the Relation Between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture.” The Sociological Review 62: 24–46. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh, Simon. 2009. “Objects of Study or Commodification of Knowledge? Remarks on Artistic Research.” Art and Research: Journal of Ideas, Context and Methods 2 (2). http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v2n2/sheikh.html.
   Google Scholar
• Simms, Marion. 2019. “The Modern Australian University: Surviving the Politics of the Unified National System’.” Australian Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 288–300. doi:10.1080/10361146.2019.1588225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slager, Henk. 2020. “A History of Violence.” MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research 4 (1): 1–2. doi:10.5334/mjfar.72.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Hazel, and Roger T. Dean, eds. 2009. Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobchack, Vivian. 1992. The Address of the eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Springgay, Stephanie. 2022. Feltness: Research-Creation, Socially Engaged Art, and Affective Pedagogies. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zubrycki, Tom. 2019. The Changing Landscape of Australian Documentary. Strawberry Hills: Currency House.
   Google Scholar