Can consultation ever be collaborative?

References

• Andriof, J., S. Waddock, B. Husted, and S. S. Rahman. 2017. Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2: Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2018. “Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (1): 16–32. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A Ladder Of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and L. Bloomberg. 2014. “Public Value Governance: Moving beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management.” Public Administration Review 74 (4): 445–456. doi:10.1111/puar.12238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabannes, Y. 2004. “72 Frequently Asked Questions about Participatory Budgeting. Urban Governance Toolkit Series. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-HABITAT.
   Google Scholar
• Catt, H., and M. Murphy. 2003. “What Voice for the People? Categorising Methods of Public Consultation.” Australian Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 407–421. doi:10.1080/1036114032000133967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBC News. 2016. “St. Paul’s Hospital Operator Defends Relocation Ahead of Public Forums.” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/st-pauls-hospital-move-forums-1.3449642.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. 2012. “Post-NPM and Changing Public Governance.” Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics 1 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. 2016a. “New St. Paul’s Hospital and Health Campus: Phase 1: Guiding Principles.” Consultation Summary. Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. 2016b. “New St. Paul’s Hospital and Health Campus: Phase 2: Development Concept Options.” Consultation Summary. Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. 2017. “New St. Paul’s Hospital and Health Campus Policy Statement.”
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver n.d. “Talk Vancouver.” Accessed April 27, 2018. https://www.talkvancouver.com/S.aspx?s=126&r=Lf9hD3xc34QP0yw3qX8u0B&so=true&a=313&as=O_5n6d_D_T&fromdetect=1.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, N., and D. Nethercut. 2005. “Citizens Juries: Creating a Trustworthy Voice of the People.” In The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century, edited by John Gastil and Peter Levine, 111–119. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthill, M. 2001. “Developing Local Government Policy and Processes for Community Consultation and Participation.” Urban Policy and Research 19 (2): 183–202. doi:10.1080/08111140108727871.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Hive. 2015. “St. Paul’s Hospital Closure Confirmed, New $1.2 Billion False Creek Flats Hospital to Be Built.” Daily Hive. Accessed October 16, 2018. http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/st-pauls-hospital-closure-confirmed-new-1-2-billion-false-creek-flats-hospital-built/.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, T., I. Williams, S. Bryan, C. Mitton, and S. Robinson. 2018. “Involving Citizens in Disinvestment Decisions: What Do Health Professionals Think? Findings from a Multi-Method Study in the English NHS.” Health Economics, Policy and Law 13 (02): 162–188. doi:10.1017/S1744133117000330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A. L., and R. M. White. 2012. “Collaboration in Natural Resource Governance: Reconciling Stakeholder Expectations in Deer Management in Scotland.” Journal of Environmental Management 112: 160–169. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Justice. 2014. “Online Public Consultation on Prostitution-Related Offences in Canada: Final Results.” Accessed April 27, 2018. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2014/jus/J2-394-2014-eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, D. C. 2005. Legislatures. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierlbeck, K., W. Gardner, and A. Levy. 2018. “New Public Governance in Health Care: Health Technology Assessment for Canadian Pharmaceuticals.” Canadian Public Administration 61 (1): 45–64. doi:10.1111/capa.12253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J., and C. Farrar. 2005. “Deliberative Polling: From Experiment to Community Resource.” In The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century, edited by John Gastil and Peter Levine, 68–79. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, J., and D. Victor. 2017. “Critics at Town Halls Confront Republicans over Health Care.” The New York Times, December 22, 2017, sec. U.S. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/09/us/politics/town-hall-meetings-.html.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66 (s1): 66–75. http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/stable/4096571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halseth, G., and A. Booth. 2003. “‘What Works Well; What Needs Improvement’: Lessons in Public Consultation from British Columbia’s Resource Planning Processes.” Local Environment 8 (4): 437–455. doi:10.1080/13549830306669.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. F. 2009. “Deliberative Democratic Practices in Canada: An Analysis of Institutional Empowerment in Three Cases.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 42 (03): 679–703. doi:10.1017/S0008423909990072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. F. 2011. “The Limits of Deliberative Democracy and Empowerment: Elite Motivation in Three Canadian Cases.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 44 (1): 137–159. doi:10.1017/S0008423910001058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. F. 2015. Democratic Illusion: Deliberative Democracy In Canadian Public Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. F., M. Burns, and K. Porth. 2017. “A Question of Respect: A Qualitative Text Analysis of the Canadian Parliamentary Committee Hearings on the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 50 (04): 921–953. doi:10.1017/S0008423917000294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keast, R., K. Brown, and M. Mandell. 2007. “Getting the Right Mix: Upacking Integration Meanings and Strategies.” International Public Management Journal 10 (1): 9–33. doi:10.1080/10967490601185716
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. P., P. Carter, and M. Dent. 2018. “Major Health Service Transformation and the Public Voice: Conflict, Challenge or Complicity?” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 23 (1): 28–35. doi:10.1177/1355819617728530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niezen, R. 2017. Truth And Indignation: Canada’s Truth And Reconciliation Commission On Indian Residential Schools. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novy, A., and B. Leubolt. 2005. “Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Social Innovation and the Dialectical Relationship of State and Civil Society.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 2023–2026. doi:10.1080/00420980500279828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO). 2005. “Choosing a Way Forward: The Future Management of Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel: Final Study.”
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO). 2005. Dialogue On Choosing A Way Forward: The NWMO Draft Study Report. Toronto: NWMO.
   Google Scholar
• Oregon Legislative Assembly. 2009. House Bill 2895. 75th Assembly, Session.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2006. “The New Public Governance?” Public Management Review 8 (3): 377–387. doi:10.1080/14719030600853022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. 2004. “Hearing Voices: Negotiating Representation Claims in Public Deliberation.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (3): 370–388. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00145.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. 2012. “Participatory Democracy Revisited.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (01): 7–19. doi:10.1017/S1537592711004877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Privy Council Office, Privy Council. n.d. “Commissions of Inquiry.” Government of Canada. Accessed May 25, 2018. https://www.canada.ca/en/privy-council/services/commissions-inquiry.html.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C. 2015. The Age Of Direct Citizen Participation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, R., and M. Shepherd. 2002. “Public Participation in the New NHS: No Closer to Citizen Control?.” Social Policy & Administration 36 (3): 275–290. doi:10.1111/1467-9515.00251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions For Citizen Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., J. L. Perry, and T. K. Miller. 2007. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Collaboration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (1): 23–56. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindal, C. R., S. N. Tindal, K. Stewart, and J. S. Patrick. 2017. Local Government In Canada. Toronto: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. 2015. “Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.”
   Google Scholar
• Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. n.d. “Share Your Truth.” Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Accessed May 25, 2018. http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/index.php?p=807.
   Google Scholar
• Vigoda, E. 2002. “From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 62 (5): 527–540. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar