Practicing public policy in an age of disruption

References

• Allen, C., G. Metternicht, and T. Wiedmann. 2018. “Initial Progress in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Review of Evidence from Countries.” Sustainability Science 13 (5): 1453–1467. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0572-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bali, A. S., and M. Ramesh. 2019. Assessing health reform: studying tool appropriateness & critical capacities. Policy and Society, 38: 148–166.
   Google Scholar
• Bali, A. S., G. Capano, and M. Ramesh. 2019. “Anticipating and Designing for Policy Effectiveness.” Policy and Society 38 (1): 1. doi:10.1080/14494035.2019.1579502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, P. 2000. Essential Elements for Plant Growth: Law of the Minimum. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. https://soils.wisc.edu/facstaff/barak/soilscience326/lawofmin.htm
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., and S. Parnell. 2016. “Ideas, Implementation and Indicators: Epistemologies of the Post-2015 Urban Agenda.” Environment and Urbanization 28 (1): 87–98. doi:10.1177/0956247815621473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M., and R. Lidskog. 2018. “Deliberative Democracy Meets Democratised Science: A Deliberative Systems Approach to Global Environmental Governance.” Environmental Politics 27 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1371919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, D., and M. A. Ali. 2014. “The SDGs–What Are the “Means of Implementation?” Future United Nations Development System.” Briefing 21: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N., A. Dafoe, and C. Flynn. 2018. Public Policy and Superintelligent AI: A Vector Field Approach. Oxford, UK: Governance of AI Program, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., and J. J. Woo. 2017. “Resilience and Robustness in Policy Design: A Critical Appraisal.” Policy Sciences 50 (3): 399–426. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9273-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore, B., S. Bernstein, D. Humphreys, I. Visseren-Hamakers, and K. Rietig. 2019. “Designing Stakeholder Learning Dialogues for Effective Global Governance.” Policy and Society 38: 118–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., O. M. Laegreid, and P. Laegreid. 2019. “Administrative Coordination Capacity; Does the Wickedness of Policy Areas Matter?” Policy and Society 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Laegreid. 2007. “The Whole‐of‐Government Approach to Public Sector Reform.” Public Administration Review 67 (6): 1059–1066. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K. 2002. “Government and Governmentality: Using Multiple Approaches to the Analysis of Government.” Australian Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 417–435. doi:10.1080/1036114021000026346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., P. ‘T Hart, and J. Torfing. 2017. “Public Value Creation through Collaborative Innovation.” Public Management Review 19 (5): 655–669. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2012. “The Legacy of Positivism and the Emergence of Interpretive Tradition in Spatial Planning.” Regional Studies 46 (4): 429–441. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.618120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida, A. B. 2009. “The 1755 Lisbon Earthquake and the Genesis of the Risk Management Concept.” In The 1755 Lisbon Earthquake: Revisited, 147–165. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., and J. V. Denhardt. 2000. “The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering.” Public Administration Review 60 (6): 549–559. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, M., M. Bengtsson, and L. Akenji. 2016. “An Optimistic Analysis of the Means of Implementation for Sustainable Development Goals: Thinking about Goals as Means.” Sustainability 8 (9): 962. doi:10.3390/su8090962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 1967. “Mixed-Scanning: A' Third" Approach to Decision-Making.” Public Administration Review 27 (5): 385–392. doi:10.2307/973394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 1986. “Mixed Scanning Revisited.” Public Administration Review 46 (1): 8–14. doi:10.2307/975437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2007. “Policy Analysis in Critical Perspective: The Epistemics of Discursive Practices.” Critical Policy Analysis 1 (1): 97–109. doi:10.1080/19460171.2007.9518510.
   Google Scholar
• Goldratt, E. M., and J. Cox. 1984. The Goal: excellence in Manufacturing. Great Barrington, MA: North River Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habegger, B. 2010. “Strategic Foresight in Public Policy: Reviewing the Experiences of the UK, Singapore, and The Netherlands.” Futures 42 (1): 49–58. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2009.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, K. 2015. Can Government Think?: Flexible Economic Opportunism and the Pursuit of Global Competitiveness. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, K., and J. Zhang. 2018. “Measuring Policy Capacity Through Governance Indices.” In Policy Capacity and Governance, 67–97. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, S., A. Mainka, and W. G. Stock. 2017. “Citizen Relationship Management in Local Governments: The Potential of 311 for Public Service Delivery.” In Beyond Bureaucracy, 337–353. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2008. “Wicked Problems in Public Policy.” Public Policy 3 (2): 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2018. “Forty Years of Wicked Problems Literature: forging Closer Links to Policy Studies.” Policy and Society 1–18. doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberlein, T. A., et al. 1974. “The Three Fixes: Technological, Cognitive and Structural.” In Water and Community Development: Social and Economic Perspectives, edited by Field, 279–296. London: Ann Arbor Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert, L. 1836. The Engineer's and Mechanic's Encyclopedia, Vol. 2. London: Thomas Kelly.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. 2009. “Deliberative Governance in the Context of Power.” Policy and Society 28 (3): 173–184. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.08.004.
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, R., and J. J. Woo. 2019. A Global ‘Policy Turn’? The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration, 310–327.
   Google Scholar
• Homer-Dixon, T. 2010. The upside of down: catastrophe, creativity, and the renewal of civilization. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. 2002. “Cultures of Public Policy Problems.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 4 (3): 305–326. doi:10.1080/13876980208412685.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. 2010. “Power, Discourse, and Policy: Articulating a Hegemony Approach to Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (3–4): 309–335. doi:10.1080/19460171003619725.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and S. Geist. 2013. “The Policy-Making Process.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Policy, edited by E. Araral Jr., S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, and X. Wu, 17–28. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. P., and K. Saguin. 2018. Policy Capacity for Policy Integration: Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research Paper No. 18-06.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, A. 2015. “Measuring Policy Analytical Capacity for the Environment: A Case for Engaging New Actors.” Policy and Society 34 (3–4): 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, R., ed. 2008. Confronting Evil in International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. 2001. Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software. New York: Scribner Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaivo-Oja, J., J. Marttinen, and J. Varelius. 2002. “Basic Conceptions and Visions of the Regional Foresight System in Finland.” Foresight 4 (6): 34–45. doi:10.1108/14636680210453470.
   Google Scholar
• Karo, E., and R. Kattel. 2018. “Innovation and the State: Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Policy Capacity.” In Policy Capacity and Governance, 123–150. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kuah, A., and S. H. Lim. 2014. “After Our Singapore Conversation: The Futures of Governance.” Ethos 13: 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kuecker, G., and K. Hartley. 2019. “How smart cities became the urban norm: Power and knowledge in New Songdo City.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Kuecker, G. D. 2014 (2007). “The Perfect Storm: Catastrophic Collapse in the 21st Century.” In Transitions to Sustainability: Theoretical Debates for a Changing Planet, edited by D. Humphreys and S. Stober, 89–105. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuosa, T. 2011. Practising Strategic Foresight in Government: The Cases of Finland, Singapore, and the European Union. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. 2005. The Singularity Is near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, C., and C. M. Stiefmueller. 2019. “Disruptive Technologies and the Public Sector: The Changing Dynamics of Governance.” In Public Service Excellence in the 21st Century, 237–274. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. 1959. “The Science of Muddling through.” Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., N. Nakicenovic, M. Visbeck, and A. S. Stevance. 2015. Policy: Five priorities for the UN sustainable development goals. Nature 520: 432–433.
   Google Scholar
• Lukensmeyer, C. J., and S. Brigham. 2002. “Taking Democracy to Scale: Creating a Town Hall Meeting for the Twenty‐First Century.” National Civic Review 91 (4): 351–366. doi:10.1002/ncr.91406.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T., and M. Lane. 2005. “What ‘Whole-of-Government’ Means for Environmental Policy and Management: An Analysis of the Connecting Government Initiative.” Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 12 (1): 47–54. doi:10.1080/14486563.2005.10648633.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, S., and M. Howlett. 2017. “Policy Myopia as a Source of Policy Failure: Adaptation and Policy Learning under Deep Uncertainty.” Policy & Politics 45 (1): 103–118. doi:10.1332/030557316X14788776017743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., and M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, A., G. A. Brewer, and O. Neumann. 2016. “Public Service Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review and Outlook.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 414–426. doi:10.1111/puar.12505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. D. 2012. “From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals.” The Lancet 379 (9832): 2206–2211. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvajayakesavalu, S. 2015. “Addressing Challenges of Developing Countries in Implementing Five Priorities for Sustainable Development Goals.” Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 1 (7): 1–4. doi:10.1890/EHS15-0028.1.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1957. Models of Man; Social and Rational. Oxford, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., and E. Meijers. 2009. “Spatial Planning and Policy Integration: Concepts, Facilitators and Inhibitors.” Planning Theory & Practice 10 (3): 317–332. doi:10.1080/14649350903229752.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, N. 2006. How should we theorise public policy? Problem solving and problematicity. Policy and Society 25 (2): 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• van der Wal, Z. 2017. The 21st Century Public Manager. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., and N. Frantzeskaki. 2016. “Cities and Systemic Change for Sustainability: Prevailing Epistemologies and an Emerging Research Agenda.” Sustainability 8 (2): 144. doi:10.3390/su8020144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., M. Howlett, and M. Ramesh, eds. 2018. Policy Capacity and Governance. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., M. Ramesh, and M. Howlett. 2015. “Policy Capacity: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Policy Competences and Capabilities.” Policy and Society 34 (3–4): 165–171. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman-Parker, M., and G. Shank. 2008. “The Town Hall Focus Group: A New Format for Qualitative Research Methods.” The Qualitative Report 13 (4): 630–635.
   Google Scholar