Participatory policy design in system innovation

References

• Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2000. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research Towards a Reflexive Methodology. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Borch, K., and F. Merida. 2013. “Dialogue in Foresight: Consensus, Conflict and Negotiation.” In Participation and Interaction in Foresight: Dialogue, Dissemination and Visions, edited by K. Borch, S. M. Dingli and M. S. Jørgensen, 97–117. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., T. Steen, and B. Verschuere. 2018. Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L. 2003. “Reflexive Inquiry in Organizational Research: Questions and Possibilities.” Human Relations 56 (8): 983–1003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267030568004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smedt, P, et al. 2008. “Strategic Intelligence in Decision Making.” In Future-Oriented Technology Analysis. Strategic Intelligence for an Innovative Economy, edited by C. Cagnin, M. Keenan, R. Johnston, F. Scapolo and R. Barré, 89–102. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, A., and V. Galaz. 2008. “Governance and Complexity—Emerging Issues for Governance Theory.” Governance 21 (3): 311–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00402.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA. 2020. European Environment – State and Outlook 2020. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency. Published 16 December 2019, last modified 08 June 2020. https://www.eea.europa.eu/articles/the-eea-s-european-environment-soer
   Google Scholar
• Endovitsky, D., and E. Popkova. 2018. Management of Changes in Socio-Economic Systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, B. C., R. R. Brown, and A. Deletic. 2013. “A Diagnostic Procedure for Transformative Change Based on Transitions, Resilience, and Institutional Thinking.” Ecology and Society 18 (4): 57. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05901-180457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 1990. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2005. “Processes and Patterns in Transitions and System Innovations: Refining the co-Evolutionary Multi-Level Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72 (6): 681–696. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. 2019. Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L., and J. Bailey. 2017. “Prototyping and the New Spirit of Policymaking.” CoDesign 13 (3): 214–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2010. “Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework.” Governance 23 (1): 161–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., and J. Chilvers. 2014. “The Future of Science Governance: publics, Policies, Practices.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 (3): 530–548. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/c1245j.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, D., L. Smillie, G. La Placa, F. Schwendinger, M. Raykovska, Z. Pasztor, and R. Van Bavel. 2019. Understanding Our Political Nature: How to Put Knowledge and Reason at the Heart of Political Decision-Making, EUR 29783 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:https://doi.org/10.2760/374191.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, I. S., C. E. van Daalen, and P. Bots. 2018. “Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design.” In Routledge Handbook of Policy Design, edited by M. Howlett and I. Mukherjee. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., and R. Agranoff. 2011. “The Limitations of Public Management Networks.” Public Administration 89 (2): 265–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01917.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre-Mills, J. 2004. Critical Systemic Praxis for Social and Environmental Justice: Participatory Policy Design and Governance for a Global Age. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. 1999. Leverage Points. Places to Intervene in a System. The Sustainability Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., and J. Luetjens. 2016. “Design Thinking in Policymaking Processes: Opportunities and Challenges.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (3): 391–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. Embracing Innovation in Government: Global Trends 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, P., T. Banuri, G. Gallopin, P. Butman, A. Hammond, R. Kates, and R. Swart. 2002. Great Transition. The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead. Boston, MA: Stockholm Environment Institute and Global Scenario Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. 2002. “Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence‐Based Policy Making.” Public Administration 80 (1): 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scapolo, F., P. Churchill, P. De Smedt, et al. 2014. How Will Standards Facilitate New Production Systems in the Context of EU Innovation and Competitiveness in 2025? JRC Foresight Study. European Commission DG Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Steen, M. 2017. “Anticipation Tools in Policy Formulation: Forecasting, Foresight and Implications for Policy Planning.” In Handbook od Policy Formulation, edited by M. Howlett and I. Mukherjee, 182–197. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
   Google Scholar
• van Kerkhoff, L., and L. Lebel. 2015. “Co-Productive Capacities: Rethinking Science and Governance in a Diverse World.” Ecology and Society. 20 (1): 14. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07188-200114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar