Does Performance-Related-Pay work? Recommendations for practice based on a meta-analysis

ReferencesNote: References marked by * are included in the meta-analysis

• *Anderfuhren-Biget, S., F. Varone, D. Giauque, and A. Ritz. 2010. “Motivating Employees of the Public Sector: Does Public Service Motivation Matter?” International Public Management Journal 13 (3): 213–246. doi:10.1080/10967494.2010.503783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Andersen, L. B., S. Boye, and R. Laursen. 2018. “Building Support? The Importance of Verbal Rewards for Employee Perceptions of Governance Initiatives.” International Public Management Journal 21 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1080/10967494.2017.1329761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki, N., and S. Rawat. 2020. “Performance-Based Pay: Investigating Its International Prevalence in Light of National Contexts.” The American Review of Public Administration 50 (8): 865–879. doi:10.1177/0275074020919995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banuri, S., and P. Keefer. 2016. “Pro-Social Motivation, Effort and the Call to Public Service.” European Economic Review 83: 139–164. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellé, N. 2015. “Performance‐Related Pay and the Crowding out of Motivation in the Public Sector: A Randomized Field Experiment.” Public Administration Review 75 (2): 230–241. doi:10.1111/puar.12313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bénabou, R., and J. Tirole. 2006. “Incentives and Prosocial Behavior.” American Economic Review 96 (5): 1652–1678. doi:10.1257/aer.96.5.1652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M. 2006. “Motivation Crowding and the Federal Civil Servant: Evidence from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.” International Public Management Journal 9 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1080/10967490600625191.
   Google Scholar
• *Bertelli, A. M. 2006. “Determinants of Bureaucratic Turnover Intention: Evidence from the Department of the Treasury.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (2): 235–258. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Campbell, J. W. 2018a. “Felt Responsibility for Change in Public Organizations: General and Sector-Specific Paths.” Public Management Review 20 (2): 232–253. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1302245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Campbell, J. W. 2018b. “Efficiency, Incentives, and Transformational Leadership: Understanding Collaboration Preferences in the Public Sector.” Public Performance & Management Review 41 (2): 277–299. doi:10.1080/15309576.2017.1403332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-A., and C.-W. Hsieh. 2015. “Does Pursuing External Incentives Compromise Public Service Motivation? Comparing the Effects of Job Security and High Pay.” Public Management Review 17 (8): 1190–1213. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.895032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Choi, S., and A. B. Whitford. 2017. “Employee Satisfaction in Agencies with Merit-Based Pay: Differential Effects for Three Measures.” International Public Management Journal 20 (3): 442–466. doi:10.1080/10967494.2016.1269860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. H., and H. G. Rainey. 2005. “Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in US Federal Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (4): 529–557. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C., and V. Lapuente. 2010. “Explaining Cross-Country Differences in Performance-Related Pay in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (3): 577–600. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Daley, D., M. L. Vasu, and M. B. Weinstein. 2002. “Strategic Human Resource Management: Perceptions Among North Carolina County Social Service Professionals.” Public Personnel Management 31 (3): 359–375. doi:10.1177/009102600203100308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Butter, F. A. G. 2009. “Falen Van De Financiële Markten.” Bank & Effectenbedrijf 59: 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Forest, V. 2008. “Performance-Related Pay and Work Motivation: theoretical and Empirical Perspectives for the French Civil Service.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 74 (2): 325–339. doi:10.1177/0020852308089907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., R. M. Walker, and J. Monster. 2019. “Does Strategic Planning Improve Organizational Performance? A Meta‐Analysis.” Public Administration Review 79 (6): 810–819. doi:10.1111/puar.13104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish, E. 2016. “The Impact of Performance Management on Performance in Public Organizations: A Meta‐Analysis.” Public Administration Review 76 (1): 48–66. doi:10.1111/puar.12433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J., and G. Marschke. 2010. “Incentives and Their Dynamics in Public Sector Performance Management Systems.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (1): 183–208. doi:10.1002/pam.20484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hodgkinson, I. R., P. Hughes, Z. Radnor, and R. Glennon. 2018. “Affective Commitment Within the Public Sector: Antecedents and Performance Outcomes Between Ownership Types.” Public Management Review 20 (12): 1872–1895. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1444193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, D. J. 2014. “Public Service Motivation in the Post-Communist State.” Public Administration 92 (4): 843–860. doi:10.1111/padm.12070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jacobsen, C. B., and L. E. Jensen. 2017. “Why Not “Just for the Money”? An Experimental Vignette Study of the Cognitive Price Effects and Crowding Effects of Performance-Related Pay.” Public Performance & Management Review 40 (3): 551–580. doi:10.1080/15309576.2017.1289850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. S. 2014. “Organizational Goal Ambiguity and Job Satisfaction in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (4): 955–981. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, H. W. 2019. “Moderators of the Motivational Effects of Performance Management: A Comprehensive Exploration Based on Expectancy Theory.” Public Personnel Management 48 (1): 27–55. doi:10.1177/0091026018783003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., and J. L. Perry. 2016. “The Psychological Mechanisms of Public Service Motivation. A Two-Wave Examination.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 36 (1): 4–30. doi:10.1177/0734371X14549672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. A., J. Doherty, and P. Nadash. 2013. “Pay for Performance in Five States: Lessons for the Nursing Home Sector.” Public Administration Review 73 (s1): S153–S163. doi:10.1111/puar.12060.
   Google Scholar
• Mussagulova, A., and Z. Van der Wal. 2021. “All Still Quiet on the Non-Western Front?” Public Service Motivation Scholarship in Non-Western Contexts: 2015–2020.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 43 (1): 23–46. doi:10.1080/23276665.2020.1836977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigro, L. G., and J. E. Kellough. 2000. “Civil Service Reform in Georgia: Going to the Edge.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 20 (4): 41–54. doi:10.1177/0734371X0002000405.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, William A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. 2014. “The Motivational Basis of Public Service: Foundations for the Third Wave of Research.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 36 (1): 34–47. doi:10.1080/23276665.2014.892272.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., T. A. Engbers, and S. Y. Jun. 2009. “Back to the Future? Performance-Related Pay, Empirical Research, and the Perils of Persistence.” Public Administration Review 69 (1): 39–51. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01939_2.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., A. Hondeghem, and L. R. Wise. 2010. “Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future.” Public Administration Review 70 (5): 681–690. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, L. D., T. D. Nguyen, and M. G. Springer. 2021. “Teacher Merit Pay: A Meta-Analysis.” American Educational Research Journal 58 (3): 527–566. doi:10.3102/0002831220905580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2011. “30 Years of Public Management Reforms: Has There Been a Pattern?” World Bank Blog: Governance for Development Available at: http://blogs.worldbank.org/governance/30-years-of-public-managementreforms-has-there-been-a-pattern
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2017. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-Into the Age of Austerity. 4th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., and J. E. Kellough. 2000. “Civil Service Reform and Incentives in the Public Service.” In The Future of Merit, edited by J. P. Pfiffner and D. A. Brook, 127–145. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ringquist, E. 2013. Meta-Analysis for Public Management and Policy. New York: Jossey-Bass
   Google Scholar
• Ritz, A., G. A. Brewer, and O. Neumann. 2016. “Public Service Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review and Outlook.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 414–426. doi:10.1111/puar.12505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stazyk, E. C. 2013. “Crowding out Public Service Motivation? Comparing Theoretical Expectations with Empirical Findings on the Influence of Performance-Related Pay.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 33 (3): 252–274. doi:10.1177/0734371X12453053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, T. L.-P., and R. K. Chiu. 2003. “Income, Money Ethic, Pay Satisfaction, Commitment, and Unethical Behavior: Is the Love of Money the Root of Evil for Hong Kong Employees?” Journal of Business Ethics 46 (1): 13–30. doi:10.1023/A:1024731611490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Taylor, J., and L. Beh. 2013. “The Impact of Pay-for-Performance Schemes on the Performance of Australian and Malaysian Government Employees.” Public Management Review 15 (8): 1090–1115. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.816523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. 2013. “Mandarins Vs. Machiavellians? On Differences Between Work Motivations of Political and Administrative Elites.” Public Administration Review 73 (5): 749–759. doi:10.1111/puar.12089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. 2015. “All Quiet on the non-Western Front?” A Review of Public Service Motivation Scholarship in non-Western Contexts.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 37 (2): 69–86. doi:10.1080/23276665.2015.1041223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., A. Mussagulova, and C. A. Chen. 2021. “Path‐Dependent Public Servants: Comparing the Influence of Traditions on Administrative Behavior in Developing Asia.” Public Administration Review 81 (2): 308–320. doi:10.1111/puar.13218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virani, A. A., and Z. Van der Wal. 2023. “Enhancing the Effectiveness of Public Sector Performance Regimes. A Proposed Causal Model for Aligning Governance Design with Performance Logics.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 6 (1): 54–65. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvac026.
   Google Scholar
• *Weibel, A., K. Rost, and M. Osterloh. 2010. “Pay for Performance in the Public Sector—Benefits and (Hidden) Costs.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (2): 387–412. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, A.-K., T. A. Krause, and D. Vogel. 2019. “Making Performance Pay Work: The Impact of Transparency, Participation, and Fairness on Controlling Perception and Intrinsic Motivation.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 39 (2): 232–255. doi:10.1177/0734371X17715502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalm, G. 2009. “The Forgotten Risk: Financial Incentives.” De Economist 157 (2): 209–213. doi:10.1007/s10645-009-9111-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar