Harmonicity: Behavioral and Neural Evidence for Functionality in Auditory Scene Analysis

References

• Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (1994). Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature, 372, 669–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidelman, G., & Krishnan, A. (2009). Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(42), 13165–13171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bismarck, G. (1974). Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady sounds. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 30(3), 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Blood, A. J., & Zatorre, R. J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(20), 11818–11823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman, A. S. (1994). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bregman, A. S. (2015). Progress in understanding auditory scene analysis. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33(1), 12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabe, P. A., & Pittenger, J. B. (2000). Human sensitivity to acoustic information from vessel filling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(1), 313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caclin, A., McAdams, S., Smith, B. K., & Winsberg, S. (2005). Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: A confirmatory study using synthetic tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 471–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, V. D., Adali, T., Pearlson, G. D., & Pekar, J. J. (2001). A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 14, 140–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, W. C., Kirk, I. J., Hamm, J. P., Shepherd, D., & Teyler, T. J. (2005). Induction of LTP in the human auditory cortex by sensory stimulation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 1135–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, A. K., Wolf, D. H., Valdez, J. N., Turetsky, B. I., Elliott, M. A., Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (2014). Comparison of auditory and visual oddball fMRI in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 158, 183–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, A. (2003). Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 13(4), 500–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, A. (2009). How do you feel – now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 11, 671–684.
   Google Scholar
• Critchley, H. D. (2005). Neural mechanisms of autonomic, affective, and cognitive integration. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493(1), 154–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, T. M., Hamilton, L. S., & Theunissen, F. E. (2013). Acoustic structure of the five perceptual dimensions of timbre in orchestral instrument tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(1), 389–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fecteau, S., Armony, J. L., Joanette, Y., & Belin, P. (2004). Is voice processing species-specific in human auditory cortex? An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 23, 840–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1977). The Feynman lectures of physics (Vol. 1). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966). The ecological approach to visual perception. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, B. L., & McAdams, S. (2006). Material identification of real impact sounds: Effects of size variation in steel, glass, wood, and plexiglass plates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(2), 1171–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A. (1980). Thrills in response to music and other stimuli. Physiological Psychology, 8(1), 126–129.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2009). How do batters use visual, auditory, and tactile information about the success of a baseball swing? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(3), 491–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. C., Baerentsen, K. B., Stodkilde-Jorgensen, H., Roepstorff, A., & Vuust, P. (2012). Listen, learn, and like! Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex involved in the mere exposure effect in music. Neurology Research International, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, J. M. (1977). Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(5), 1270–1277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatherly, S. G. (1892). A treatise on byzantine music. London: A. Gardner.
   Google Scholar
• Horovitz, S. G., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (2002). Correlations and dissociations between BOLD signal and P300 amplitude in an auditory oddball task: A parametric approach to combining fMRI and ERP. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 20(4), 319–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, M. C., Papesh, M. H., & Goldinger, S. D. (2012). Multidimensional scaling. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (Wires): Cognitive Science, 4, 93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., Belliveau, J. W., Tengshe, C., & Ahveninen, J. (2012). Brain networks of novelty-driven involuntary and cued voluntary auditory attention shifting. PloS one, 7, 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huron, D. (2006). Is music an evolutionary adaptation? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 930(1), 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Inui, K., Okamoto, H., Miki, K., Gunji, A., & Kakigi, R. (2005). Serial and parallel processing in the human auditory cortex: A magnetoencephalographic study. Cerebral Cortex, 16(1), 18–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, K. G. (2010). What chord was that? A study of strategies among ear players in rock music. In C. F. Thorgersen & S. Karlsen (Eds.), Music, education and innovation (pp. 17–32). Pitea, Sweden: University Press, Lulea University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, I. (1989). Measured tones: The interplay of physics and music. New York: Adam Hilger.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. I., Mathalon, D. H., Ford, J. M., Mannell, M., Turner, J. A., Brown, G. G., … Calhoun, V. D. (2009). Auditory oddball deficits in schizophrenia: An independent component analysis of the fMRI multisite function BIRN study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35(1), 67–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kober, H., Barrett, L. F., Joseph, J., Bliss-Moreau, E., Lindquist, K., & Wager, T. D. (2008). Functional grouping and cortical-subcortical interactions in emotion: A meta-nalysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage, 42(2), 998–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelsch, S. (2010). Towards a neural basis of music-evoked emotions. Topics in Cognitive Science, 14(3), 131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Koelsch, S., Fritz, T., & Schlaug, G. (2008). Amygdala activity can be modulated by unexpected chord functions during music listening. Neuroreport, 19(18), 1815–1819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelsch, S., Fritz, T., von Cramon, D., Maller, K., & Friederici, A. (2006). Investigating emotion with music: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 27(3), 239–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Sage university paper series on quantitative application in the social sciences. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leaver, A. M., & Rauschecker, J. P. (2010). Cortical representation of natural complex sounds: Effects of acoustic features and auditory object category. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(22), 7604–7612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J. E. (1992). Emotion and the amygdala. In J. P. Aggleton (Ed.), The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (pp. 339–351). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, Massechusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masataka, N. (2006). Preference for consonance over dissonance by hearing newborns of deaf parents and of hearing parents. Developmental Science, 9(1), 46–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeath, M. K. (2018). Natural regularities and coupled predictive perceptual and cognitive biases: Why we evolved to systematically experience spatial illusions. In T. Hubbard (Ed.), Spatial biases in perception and cognition (pp. 278–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBeath, M. K., & Neuhoff, J. G. (2002). The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: Dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensithy change. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(2), 306–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, J. H., & Oxenham, A. J. (2008). Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 18(4), 452–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. J., Makeig, S., Brown, G. G., Jung, T. P., Kindermann, S. S., Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1998). Analysis of the fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Human Brain Mapping, 6(3), 160–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, J. G., & McBeath, M. K. (1996). The Doppler illusion: The influence of dynamic intensity change on perceived pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(4), 970–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Optiz, B., Mecklinger, A., Cramon, D. Y., & Kruggel, F. (1999). Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. Psychophysiology, 36, 142–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orinstein, A. J., & Stevens, M. C. (2014). Brain activity in predominantly-inattentive subtype attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during an auditory oddball attention task. Psychiatry Research, 223(2), 121–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham, A. J. (2018). How we hear: The perception and neural coding of sound. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 27–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, K. J. & McBeath, M. K. (2018). RotCorr and MDStat: New ways to optimize rotation of multidimensional scaling solutions. Paper presented at the 48th annual meeting of the Society for Computer in Psychology, New Orleans, LA, November 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2006). An insular view of anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 60(4), 383–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R., & Levelt, W. J. (1965). Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38, 548–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rameau, J. P. (1722/1971). Treatise on harmonics. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roederer, J. G. (1995). The physics and psychophysics of music: An introduction. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scharine, A. A. (2002). Auditory scene analysis: The role of positive correlation of dynamic changes in intensity and frequency. Ph.D. Dissertation. AZ: Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Scharine, A. A., & McBeath, M. K. (in press). Natural regularity of correlated acoustic frequency and intensity in music and speech: Auditory scene analysis mechanisms account for integrality of pitch and loudness. Auditory Perception & Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• Schellenberg, E. G., & Trehub, S. (1996b). Children’s discrimination of melodic intervals. Developmental Psychology, 32, 1039–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellenberg, E. G., & Trehub, S. E. (1996a). Natural musical intervals: Evidence from infant listeners. Psychological Science, 7(5), 272–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuckler, M. A. (1989). Expectations in music: Investigation of melodic and harmonic processes. Music Perception, 7(2), 109–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten, J. F. (1968, August 21–28). The perception of timbre. The 6th international congress on acoustics, Tokyo, Japan, (35–44). Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Seppanen, M., Hamalainen, J., Pesonen, A., & Tervaniemi, M. (2012). Music training enhances rapid neural plasticity of N1 and P2 source activation for unattended sounds. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira Lots, I., & Stone, L. (2008). Perception of musical consonance and dissonance: An outcome of neural synchronization. Journal of the Royal Society: Interface, 5(29), 1429–1434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N. (1964). Circularity in judgments of relative pitch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36(12), 2346–2353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N. (1980). Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering. Science, 210(4468), 390–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhardt, E. (1977). The two-component theory of musical consonance. In E. F. Evans & J. P. Wilson (Eds.), Psychophysics and physiology of hearing (pp. 381–390). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trainor, L. J., & Trehub, S. E. (1993a). Musical context effects in infants and adults: Key distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(3), 615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trainor, L. J., & Trehub, S. E. (1993b). What mediates infants’ and adults’ superior processing of the major over the augmented triad? Music Perception, 185–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van De Geer, J. P., Levelt, W. J., & Plomp, R. (1962). The connotation of musical consonance. Acta Psychologia, 20, 308–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Helmholtz, H. (1877/1930). On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music, Translated by Alexander J. Ellis. London: Longmans, Green, and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Vytal, K., & Hamann, S. (2010). Neuroimaging support for discrete neural correlates of basic emotions: A voxel-based meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2864–2885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2013). The harmonic organization of auditory cortex. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 114.
   Google Scholar
• Weigl, M., Mecjlinger, A., & Rosburg, T. (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulations over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates auditory mismatch negativity. Clinical Neurophysiology, 127(5), 2263–2272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula. Neuron, 40(3), 655–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, R. (2011). LaughLab: The scientific quest for the world’s funniest joke. London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Worsely, K. A., & Friston, K. J. (1995). Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited-again. Neuroimage, 2(3), 173–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P., He, G., Shapira, N. A., Goodman, W. K., & Liu, Y. (2004). Disgust and the insula: FMRI responses to pictures of mutilation and contamination. Neuroreport, 15(15), 2347–2351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T. (2014). Neurosynth core tools v0.3.1. Zenoob. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.9925
   Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wagner, T. D. (2011). NeuroSynth: Anew platform for large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics Conference Abstracts: 4th INCF Congress of Neuroinformatics, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Yost, W. A. (1992). Auditory image perception and analysis. Hearing Research, 56, 8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar