References
- Adank, P., & Janse, E. (2009). Perceptual learning of time-compressed and natural fast speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), 2649–2659.
- Ahissar, M., Nahum, M., Nelken, I., & Hochstein, S. (2009). Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1515), 285–299.
- Baese-Berk, M. (2018). Perceptual learning for native and non-native speech. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 68, pp. 1–29). Academic Press.
- Baese-Berk, M. M., Bradlow, A. R., & Wright, B. A. (2013). Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), EL174–EL180.
- Baese-Berk, M. M., & Morrill, T. H. (2019). Perceptual consequences of variability in native and non-native speech. Phonetica, 76(2–3), 126–141.
- Baguley, T., & Kaye, W. S. (2010). Review of: Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference, by Z. Dienes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 695–698.
- Banai, K., & Lavner, Y. (2012). Perceptual learning of time-compressed speech: More than rapid adaptation. PloS One, 7(10), e47099.
- Banai, K., & Lavner, Y. (2014). The effects of training length on the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech and its generalization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(4), 1908–1917.
- Banai, K., & Lavner, Y. (2016). The effects of exposure and training on the perception of time-compressed speech in native versus nonnative listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(3), 1686–1696.
- Banai, K., & Lavner, Y. (2019). Effects of stimulus repetition and training schedule on the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech and its transfer. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 1–12.
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christiansen, R., Singmann, H., … Grothendieck, G. (2019). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-21. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
- Bent, T., & Frush Holt, R. (2013). The influence of talker and foreign-accent variability on spoken word identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), 1677–1686.
- Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. I. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985.
- Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729.
- Brosseau-Lapré, F., Rvachew, S., Clayards, M., & Dickson, D. (2013). Stimulus variability and perceptual learning of nonnative vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(3), 419–441.
- Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3647–3658.
- Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects. Language and Speech, 47(3), 207–238.
- Dahan, D., & Mead, R. L. (2010). Context-conditioned generalization in adaptation to distorted speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 704.
- Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134(2), 222.
- Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Palgrave Macmillan. Website for associated online Bayes factor calculator. Retrieved from http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Zoltan_Dienes/inference/Bayes.htm
- Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781.
- Dunn, P. K., & Smyth, G. K. (2018). Generalized linear models with examples in R, chapter 9. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0118-7
- Dupoux, E., & Green, K. (1997). Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: Effects of talker and rate changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 914.
- Gabay, Y., Karni, A., & Banai, K. (2017). The perceptual learning of time-compressed speech: A comparison of training protocols with different levels of difficulty. PloS One, 12(5), e0176488.
- Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B., & Logan, J. S. (1991). On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 152.
- Green, C. S., Banai, K., Lu, Z. L., & Bavelier, D. (2018). Perceptual learning. Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 1–47.
- Halliday, L. F., Moore, D. R., Taylor, J. L., & Amitay, S. (2011). Dimension-specific attention directs learning and listening on auditory training tasks. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(5), 1329–1335.
- Harms, C., & Lakens, D. (2018). Making ‘null effects’ informative: Statistical techniques and inferential frameworks. Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, 3(Suppl 2), 382–393.
- Hawkey, D. J., Amitay, S., & Moore, D. R. (2004). Early and rapid perceptual learning. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1055.
- Hervais-Adelman, A. G., Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Taylor, K. J., & Carlyon, R. P. (2011). Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 283.
- Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? Cognitive Psychology, 51(2), 141–178.
- Levitt, H. C. C. H. (1971). Transformed up‐down methods in psychoacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2B), 467–477.
- Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242–1255.
- Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y. I., & Yamada, T. (1994). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l/. III. Long‐term retention of new phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(4), 2076–2087.
- Loebach, J. L., Bent, T., & Pisoni, D. B. (2008). Multiple routes to the perceptual learning of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(1), 552–561.
- Manheim, M., Lavie, L., & Banai, K. (2018). Age, hearing, and the perceptual learning of rapid speech. Trends in Hearing, 22, 2331216518778651.
- Martin, C. S., Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Summers, W. V. (1989). Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(4), 676.
- McLennan, C. T., & Luce, P. A. (2005). Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 306.
- Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(5), 519–533.
- Nahum, M., Nelken, I., & Ahissar, M. (2010). Stimulus uncertainty and perceptual learning: Similar principles govern auditory and visual learning. Vision Research, 50(4), 391–401.
- Peelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A. (2005). Dissociations in perceptual learning revealed by adult age differences in adaptation to time-compressed speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1315–1330.
- Polley, D. B., Steinberg, E. E., & Merzenich, M. M. (2006). Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(18), 4970–4982.
- Prior, A., & Bentin, S. (2006). Differential integration efforts of mandatory and optional sentence constituents. Psychophysiology, 43(5), 440–449.
- R Core Team, (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. https://R-project.org/.
- Reinisch, E., & Holt, L. L. (2014). Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 40(2), 539.
- Rotman, T., Lavie, L., & Banai, K. (2020). Rapid perceptual learning: A potential source of individual differences in speech perception under adverse conditions? Trends in Hearing. in press. doi:10.1177/2331216520930541.
- Samuel, A. G., & Kraljic, T. (2009). Perceptual learning for speech. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71(6), 1207–1218.
- Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5), 3306–3316.
- Simhony, M. A., Grinberg, M., Lavie, L., & Banai, K. (2014). Rapid adaptation to time-compressed speech in young and older adults. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, 25(3), 285–288.
- Vaughn, C., Baese-Berk, M., & Idemaru, K. (2019). Re-examining phonetic variability in native and non-native speech. Phonetica, 76(5), 327–358.
- Verhelst, W., & Roelands, M. (1993). An overlap-add technique based on waveform similarity (WSOLA) for high quality time-scale modification of speech. In 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Vol. 2, pp. 554–557).
- Wade, T., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2007). Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds. Phonetica, 64(2–3), 122–144.
- Wright, B. A., Wilson, R. M., & Sabin, A. T. (2010). Generalization lags behind learning on an auditory perceptual task. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(35), 11635–11639.
- Xie, X., Earle, F. S., & Myers, E. B. (2018). Sleep facilitates generalisation of accent adaptation to a new talker. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(2), 196–210.