Acoustic-Phonetic Mismatches Impair Serial Recall of Degraded Words

References

• Allen, B., & Becker, M. (2015). Learning alternations from surface forms with sublexical phonology. Available at lingbuzz/002503
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. S., Oxenham, A. J., Nelson, P. B., & Nelson, D. A. (2012). Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(6), 3925–3934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1968). How does acoustic similarity influence short-term memory? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 249–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosen, A. K., & Barry, M. F. (2020). Serial recall predicts vocoded sentence recognition across spectral resolutions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(4), 1282–1298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosen, A. K., & Luckasen, M. C. (2019). Interactions between item set and vocoding in serial recall. Ear and Hearing, 40(6), 1404–1417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camos, V., Mora, G., & Barrouillet, P. (2013). Phonological similarity effect in complex span task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(10), 1927–1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Cowan, N. (2009). Core verbal working-memory capacity: The limit in words retained without covert articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(7), 1420–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, M., Macnamara, B. N., & Conway, A. R. A. (2016). Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks. Memory and Cognition, 44(6), 937–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, V. (1993). Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists. Memory & Cognition, 21(4), 539–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, R. (1979). The deaf schoolchild: Language and cognitive function. London: Harper & Row
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 429–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1986). A matrix of consonant-cluster-free monosyllabic words in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18(5), 434–446.
   Google Scholar
• Davies-Venn, E., Nelson, P., & Souza, P. (2015). Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(1), 492–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(2), 222–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, A. B., Groves, K., & Tehan, G. (1999). Phonological similarity and trace degradation in the serial recall task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN. International Journal of Psychology, 34(5–6), 301–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2003). Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 29(5), 838–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farris-Trimble, A., McMurray, B., Cigrand, N., & Tomblin, J. B. (2014). The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 308–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., & Wang, X. (2001). Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(2), 1150–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. D. (1990). A cochlear frequency-position function for several species – 29 years later. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87(6), 2592–2605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, K. C., Allen, B., Fry, M., Johnson, K., Lo, R., Mackie, S., & McAuliffe, M. (2017). Phonological CorpusTools, Version 1.3. [Computer program]. Available from http://phonologicalcorpustools.github.io/CorpusTools/.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (2009). Introductory Phonology. Malden, MA ; Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Hurlstone, M. J., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2014). Memory for serial order across domains: An overview of the literature and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 339–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrold, C., Cocksey, J., & Dockerill, E. (2008). Phonological similarity and lexicality effects in children’s verbal short-term memory: Concerns about the interpretation of probed recall data. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 324–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre, P. (2013). Model II regression user’s guide, R edition. R Vignette, 4, 1–14. Retrieved from http://ftp-nyc.osuosl.org/pub/cran/web/packages/lmodel2/vignettes/mod2user.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Litvak, L. M., Spahr, A. J., Saoji, A. A., & Fridman, G. Y. (2007). Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(2), 982–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, D. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Bent, T., Borrie, S. A., & Van Engen, K. J. (2018). Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 80(6), 1559–1570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., Farris-Trimble, A., & Rigler, H. (2017, August). Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally. Cognition, 169, 147–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehraei, G., Gallun, F. J., Leek, M. R., & Bernstein, J. G. W. (2014). Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: Dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(1), 301–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M., & Roodenrys, S. (2012). Serial recall, word frequency, and mixed lists: The influence of item arrangement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 38(6), 1731–1740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müllensiefen, D., Gingras, B., Musil, J., & Stewart, L. (2014). The musicality of non-musicians: An index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e89642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., Donaldson, G. S., Allen, S. L., Collison, E. A., & Nelson, D. A. (2003). Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 925–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfingst, B. E., Xu, L., & Thompson, C. S. (2004). Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: Relation to speech recognition. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 9(6), 341–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phatak, S. A., Yoon, Y., Gooler, D. M., & Allen, J. B. (2009). Consonant recognition loss in hearing impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), 2683–2694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquado, T., Cousins, K. A. Q., Wingfield, A., & Miller, P. (2010). Effects of degraded sensory input on memory for speech: Behavioral data and a test of biologically constrained computational models. Brain Research, 1365, 48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirier, M., Saint-Aubin, J., Mair, A., Tehan, G., & Tolan, A. (2015). Order recall in verbal short-term memory: The role of semantic networks. Memory and Cognition, 43(3), 489–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1968). Channel-capacity, intelligibility, and immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodenrys, S., Hulme, C., Lethbridge, A., Hinton, M., & Nimmo, L. M. (2002). Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1019–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., Foo, C., RÖnnberg, J., & Lunner, T. (2009). Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: Specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(5), 405–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., Rönnberg, J., & Lunner, T. (2011). Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 22(3), 156–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saoji, A. A., Litvak, L., Spahr, A. J., & Eddins, D. A. (2009). Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 955–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H. M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 414–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2013). A corpus of consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) real words and nonwords: Comparison of phonotactic probability, neighborhood density, and consonant age-of-acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1159–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. J., Watkins, O. C., & Crowder, R. G. (1974). The modality effect in free and serial recall as a function of phonological similarity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(4), 430–447.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, O., Hildebrandt, A., & Oberauer, K. (2013, JUL). What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. S., & Dorman, M. F. (2008). Cochlear implants: Current designs and future possibilities. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45(5), 695–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. B., Won, J. H., & Moon, I. J. (2016). Assessment of spectral and temporal resolution in cochlear implant users using psychoacoustic discrimination and speech cue categorization. Ear and Hearing, 37(6), e377–e390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, J. H., Drennan, W. R., Nie, K., Jameyson, E. M., & Rubinstein, J. T. (2011). Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 376–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar