2,011
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Rapid Perceptual Learning and Individual Differences in Speech Perception: The Good, the Bad, and the Sad

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 201-211 | Received 31 Dec 2020, Accepted 22 Mar 2021, Published online: 07 Apr 2021

References

  • Adank, P., & Devlin, J. T. (2010). On-line plasticity in spoken sentence comprehension: Adapting to time-compressed speech. Neuroimage, 49(1), 1124–1132.
  • Adank, P., & Janse, E. (2009). Perceptual learning of time-compressed and natural fast speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), 2649–2659.
  • Adank, P., & Janse, E. (2010). Comprehension of a novel accent by young and older listeners. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 736–740.
  • Ahissar, M., Nahum, M., Nelken, I., & Hochstein, S. (2009). Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1515), 285–299.
  • Baese-Berk, M. M., Bradlow, A. R., & Wright, B. A. (2013). Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), EL174–180.
  • Banai, K., & Lavie, L. (2020). Perceptual learning and speech perception: A new hypothesis. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 7, 53–60. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2019-07
  • Banai, K., & Lavner, Y. (2014). The effects of training length on the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech and its generalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(4), 1908.
  • Banai, K., & Lavner, Y. (2016). The effects of exposure and training on the perception of time-compressed speech in native versus nonnative listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(3), 1686.
  • Banks, B., Gowen, E., Munro, K. J., & Adank, P. (2015). Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(4), 2015–2024.
  • Bent, T., Baese-Berk, M., Borrie, S. A., & McKee, M. (2016). Individual differences in the perception of regional, nonnative, and disordered speech varieties. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(5), 3775.
  • Bieber, R. E., & Gordon-Salant, S. (2020). Improving older adults’ understanding of challenging speech: Auditory training, rapid adaptation and perceptual learning. Hearing Research, 108054. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2020.108054
  • Borrie, S. A., Lansford, K. L., & Barrett, T. S. (2017). Generalized adaptation to dysarthric speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(11), 3110–3117.
  • Borrie, S. A., McAuliffe, M. J., & Liss, J. M. (2012). Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: A review of experimental studies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(1), 290–305.
  • Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729.
  • Bsharat, D., & Karawani, H. (2020). Bilinguals in challenging listening conditions: How challenging can it be? In 19th Annual Auditory Perception, Cognition, and Action Meeting, Virtual. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WljOe3RyaNADdt1yNIp0jJtUE1kOte90gp-pPVEqmVY/view
  • Cooper, A., & Bradlow, A. (2018). Training-induced pattern-specific phonetic adjustments by first and second language listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 32–49.
  • Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134(2), 222–241.
  • Dupoux, E., & Green, K. (1997). Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: Effects of talker and rate changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 914–927.
  • Eisner, F., McGettigan, C., Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(21), 7179–7186.
  • Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(2), 224–238.
  • Eisner, F., Melinger, A., & Weber, A. (2013). Constraints on the transfer of perceptual learning in accented speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 148.
  • Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Gordon-Salant, S., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Schurman, J. (2010). Short-term adaptation to accented English by younger and older adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4), EL200–204.
  • Green, C. S., Banai, K., Lu, Z. L., & Bavelier, D. (2018). Perceptual learning. Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 1–47.
  • Greenspan, S. L., Nusbaum, H. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1988). Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 421–433.
  • Guediche, S., Blumstein, S. E., Fiez, J. A., & Holt, L. L. (2014). Speech perception under adverse conditions: Insights from behavioral, computational, and neuroscience research. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 126.
  • Henshaw, H., & Ferguson, M. A. (2013). Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: A systematic review of the evidence. PloS One, 8(5), e62836.
  • Hervais-Adelman, A. G., Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Taylor, K. J., & Carlyon, R. P. (2011). Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 283–295.
  • Huyck, J. J., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2012). Rapid perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech requires attention. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(3), EL236–242.
  • Huyck, J. J., Smith, R. H., Hawkins, S., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2017). Generalization of perceptual learning of degraded speech across talkers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(11), 3334–3341.
  • Irvine, D. R. F. (2018). Auditory perceptual learning and changes in the conceptualization of auditory cortex. Hearing Research, 366, 3–16.
  • Karawani, H., Bitan, T., Attias, J., & Banai, K. (2016). Auditory perceptual learning in adults with and without age-related hearing loss. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2066.
  • Karawani, H., Lavie, L., & Banai, K. (2017). Short-term auditory learning in older and younger adults. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 6, 1–8. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2017-01
  • Kennedy-Higgins, D., Devlin, J. T., & Adank, P. (2020). Cognitive mechanisms underpinning successful perception of different speech distortions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(4), 2728.
  • Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 262–268.
  • Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1), 1–15.
  • Lecumberri, M. L. G., Cooke, M., & Cutler, A. (2010). Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review. Speech Communication, 52(11–12), 864–886.
  • Lehet, M. I., Fenn, K. M., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2020). Shaping perceptual learning of synthetic speech through feedback. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(5), 1043–1051.
  • Loebach, J. L., & Pisoni, D. B. (2008). Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(2), 1126–1139.
  • Manheim, M., Lavie, L., & Banai, K. (2018). Age, hearing, and the perceptual learning of rapid speech. Trends in Hearing, 22, 2331216518778651.
  • McLaughlin, D. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Bent, T., Borrie, S. A., & Van Engen, K. J. (2018). Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1559–1570.
  • McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 1113–1126.
  • Pallier, C., Sebastian-Galles, N., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A., & Mehler, J. (1998). Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: A cross-linguistic study. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 844–851.
  • Peelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A. (2005). Dissociations in perceptual learning revealed by adult age differences in adaptation to time-compressed speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1315–1330.
  • Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y., & Wong, P. C. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 461–472.
  • Rayes, H., Al-Malky, G., & Vickers, D. (2019). Systematic review of auditory training in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(5), 1574–1593.
  • Reetzke, R., Xie, Z., Llanos, F., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2018). Tracing the trajectory of sensory plasticity across different stages of speech learning in adulthood. Current Biology, 28(9), 1419–1427 e1414.
  • Rotman, T., Lavie, L., & Banai, K. (2020). Rapid perceptual learning: A potential source of individual differences in speech perception under adverse conditions? Trends in Hearing, 24, 2331216520930541.
  • Samuel, A. G., & Kraljic, T. (2009). Perceptual learning for speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(6), 1207–1218.
  • Saunders, G. H., Smith, S. L., Chisolm, T. H., Frederick, M. T., McArdle, R. A., & Wilson, R. H. (2016). A randomized control trial: Supplementing hearing aid use with listening and communication enhancement (LACE) auditory training. Ear and Hearing, 37(4), 381–396.
  • Sohoglu, E., & Davis, M. H. (2016). Perceptual learning of degraded speech by minimizing prediction error. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(12), E1747-–1756.
  • Song, J. H., Skoe, E., Banai, K., & Kraus, N. (2012). Training to improve hearing speech in noise: Biological mechanisms. Cerebral Cortex, 22(5), 1180–1190.
  • Tarabeih-Ghanayim, M., Lavner, Y., & Banai, K. (2020). Tasks, talkers, and the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 3, 1–22.
  • Vermeire, K., Knoop, A., De Sloovere, M., Bosch, P., & van den Noort, M. (2019). Relationship between working memory and speech-in-noise recognition in young and older adult listeners with age-appropriate hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(9), 3545–3553.
  • Wayne, R. V., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2012). The role of visual speech information in supporting perceptual learning of degraded speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 18(4), 419–435.
  • Yang, J., Yan, F. F., Chen, L., Xi, J., Fan, S., Zhang, P., … Huang, C. B. (2020). General learning ability in perceptual learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(32), 19092–19100.
  • Zheng, Y., & Samuel, A. G. (2020). The relationship between phonemic category boundary changes and perceptual adjustments to natural accents. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(7), 1270–1292.