Approximation by finite mixtures of continuous density functions that vanish at infinity

References

• Bacharoglou, A. G. 2010. Approximation of probability distributions by convex mixtures of Gaussian measures. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 138:2619–18.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, A. R. (1993). Universal approximation bound for superpositions of a sigmoidal function. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 39(3), 930–945. doi: 10.1109/18.256500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartle, R. G. (1995). The Elements of Integration and Lebesgue Measure. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, W. & Light, W. (2000). A Course in Approximation Theory. Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. B. (2012). A Course in Abstract Analysis. American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• DasGupta, A. (2008). Asymptotic Theory Of Statistics And Probability. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Branges, L. 1959. The Stone-Weierstrass theorem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 10:822–824.
   Google Scholar
• Devroye, L. & Lugosi, G. (2000). Combinatorial Methods in Density Estimation. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, M. J., Gurvits, L., Darken, C. & Sontag, E. (1997). Rates of convex approximation in non-Hilbert spaces. Constructive Approximation, 13(2), 187–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt, B. S. & Hand, D. J. (1981). Finite Mixture Distributions. Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Feichtinger, H. G. (1977). A characterization of wiener’s algebra on locally compact groups. Archiv der Mathematik, 29(1), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01220386
   Google Scholar
• Folland, G. B. (1999). Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, F. & Wraith, D. (2013). A new family of multivariate heavy-tailed distributions with variable marginal amounts of tailweights. Statistics and computing, 24(6), 971–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-013-9414-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruwirth-Schnatter, S. (2006). Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fruwirth-Schnatter, S., Celeux, G., & Robert, C. P. (editors). (2019). Handbook of Mixture Analysis. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. K. (1992). A simple lemma on greedy approximation in Hilbert space and convergence rates for projection pursuit regression and neural network training. Annals of statistics, 20(1), 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176348546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullback, S. & Leibler, R. A. (1951). On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729694
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. X. & McLachlan, G. J. (2016). Finite mixtures of canonical fundamental skew t-distributions: the unification of the restricted and unrestricted skew t-mixture models. Statistics and computing, 26(3), 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-015-9545-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. Q. & Barron, A. R. (1999). Mixture density estimation. In S. A. Solla, T. K. Leen, & K. R. Mueller (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 12, pp. 279–285). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, B. G. 1995. Mixture models: theory, geometry and applications. In NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Series in Probability and Statistics. Hayward.
   Google Scholar
• Makarov, B. & Podkorytov, A. (2013). Real Analysis: Measures, Integrals and Applications. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J. & Basford, K. E. (1988). Mixture Models: Inference and Applications to Clustering. Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J. & Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mengersen, K. L., Robert, C. & Titterington, M. (2011). Mixtures: Estimation and Applications. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nestoridis, V. & Papadimitropoulos, C. (2005). Abstract theory of universal series and an application to Dirichlet series. Comptes Rendus Academy of Science Paris Series I, 341(9), 530–543. doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2005.09.028
   Google Scholar
• Nestoridis, V., Schmutzhard, S. & Stefanopoulos, V. (2011). Universal series induced by approximate identities and some relevant applications. Journal of Approximation Theory, 163(12), 1783–1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jat.2011.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestoridis, V. & Stefanopoulos, V. 2007. Universal series and approximate identities. Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. D. & McLachlan, G. J. (2019). On approximations via convolution-defined mixture models. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 48(16), 3945–3955. In press. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2018.1487069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, D. & McLachlan, G. J. (2000). Robust mixture modelling using the t distribution. Statistics and computing, 10(4), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008981510081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakhlin, A., Panchenko, D. & Mukherjee, S. (2005). Risk bounds for mixture density estimation. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics, 9, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1051/ps:2005011
   Google Scholar
• Rudin, W. (1976). Principles of Mathematical Analysis. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, I. W. (2001). Gaussian radial basis functions and inner product space. Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, 20(6), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01270933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlattmann, P. (2009). Medical Applications of Finite Mixture Models. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. H. 1948. The generalized Weierstrass approximation theorem. Mathematical Magazine, 21:237–254.
   Google Scholar
• Titterington, D. M., Smith, A. F. M. & Makov, U. E. (1985). Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• van de Geer, S. (2003). Asymptotic theory for maximum likelihood in nonparametric mixture models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 41(3–4), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00188-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2011). Advances in discrete choice: mixture models. In A. De Palma, R. Lindsey, E. Quinet, & R. Vickerman (Eds.), A Handbook of transport economics (pp. 160–187). Edward Edgar.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Light, W. A. (1993). and E W Cheney. Constructive methods of approximation by ridge functions and radial functions. Numerical Algorithms, 4(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02144104
   Google Scholar
• Yona, G. (2011). Introduction to Computational Proteomics. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeevi, A. J., & Meir, R. (1997). Density estimation through convex combinations of densities: approximation and estimation bounds. Neural computation, 10(1), 99–109. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00037-8
   Google Scholar