Setting the Deadline for Nuclear Weapon Destruction under the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons

References

• Alvarez, R. 2014. “The Nuclear Weapons Dismantlement Problem.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 70 (6): 22–28. doi:10.1177/0096340214555082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brussels Treaty. 1954. “Text of Modified Brussels Treaty.” Paris, Accessed 23 October 1954. http://www.cvce.eu/obj/modified_brussels_treaty_paris_23_october_1954-en-7d182408-0ff6-432e-b793-0d1065ebe695.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bukharin, O. 1998. “Securing Russia’s HEU Stocks.” Science & Global Security 7 (3): 311–331. doi:10.1080/08929889808426464.
   Google Scholar
• Bukharin, O. 2001. “Downsizing Russia’s Nuclear Warhead Production Infrastructure.” Nonproliferation Review 8 (1): 116–130. Spring 2001. doi:10.1080/10736700108436843.
   Google Scholar
• Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 1993. “Now Is that Clear?.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 49 (6): 56–57. doi:10.1080/00963402.1993.11456375.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, M. 1998. “‘pit-stuffing’: How to Rapidly Disable Thousands of Warheads and Easily Verify Their Dismantlement.” F.A.S. Public Interest Report, March/April 1998, with commentary by Richard L. Garwin.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, M. 2008. “Transparent and Irreversible Dismantlement of Nuclear Weapons.” In Reykjavik Revisited: Steps toward a World Free of Nuclear Weapons, edited by G. P. Shultz, S. P. Andreasen, S. D. Drell, and J. Goodby, 205–227. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. 2012. “Disarming Trident.” Accessed 22 February 2019. https://cnduk.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Disarming-Trident.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clements, T. 2016. “United States to Dispose of 6 MT of Weapon-grade Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.” International Panel on Fissile Materials, 6 January 2016. Accessed 2 May 2019. http://fissilematerials.org/blog/2016/01/united_states_to_dispose_.html
   Google Scholar
• Commissariat de l’Energie Atomique. 2016. “La Direction Des Application Militaire Au Coeur De La Dissuasion Nucléaire Francaises.” Direction des Application Militaires. http://www.cea.fr/presse/Documents/actualites/direction-applications-militaires-cea-dissuasion-nucleaire-france.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Committee on International Security and Arms Control. 1994. Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2345/management-and-disposition-of-excess-weapons-plutonium
   Google Scholar
• Committee on International Security and Arms Control. 1997. The Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy. National Academy of Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5796/the-future-of-us-nuclear-weapons-policy
   Google Scholar
• Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. “World Overview.” Accessed 22 July 2019. https://www.ctbto.org/nuclear-testing/history-of-nuclear-testing/world-overview
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, D. R. 1987. “Peacetime Operations: Safety and Security.” In Managing Nuclear Operations, edited by A. B. Carter, J. D. Steinbruner, C. A. Zakret, 17–74. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Doward, J. 2018. “UK Nuclear Warhead Plant Warned: ‘Improve Safety or Shut Down.’” The Guardian, 5 August 2018. Accessed 3 March 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/05/nucklea-warhead-plant-berkshire-uk-improve-safety-or-shut-down
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. 2007. “Safety Fears at UK Nuclear Weapons Plant.” New Scientist 195 (2622): 8–9. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(07)62373-2.
   Google Scholar
• Feiveson, H. A., A. Glaser, Z. Mian, and F. von Hippel. 2014. Unmaking the Bomb: A Fissile Material Approach. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• France. 2010. “Reporting by France on Actions 5, 20 and 21 of the 2010 NPT Review Conference Final Document.” Accessed 2 May 2019. www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/npt/prepcom14/nationalreports/FranceEng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garwin, R. 2002. “Letter to Mr. Scott Malcoms, Assistant Editor.” New York Times. Op-Ed Page, 20 May 2002. Accessed 12 June 2019. https://fas.org/rlg/020520-nyt.htm
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, A. 2017. “Ceci N’est Pas Une Bombe – Toward a Verifiable Definition of a Nuclear Weapon.” 58th Annual INMM Meeting, Indian Wells, California, July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, J. 1999. Russian Nuclear Warhead Dismantlement Rates and Storage Site Capacity: Implications for the Implementation of START II and De-alerting Initiatives. CEES Report AC-99-01. Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Hollande, F. 2015. “Speech by the President of France François Hollande.” Istres, 19 February 2015. Accessed 12 June 2019 https://cd-geneve.delegfrance.org/Nuclear-weapons-statement-of-Mr-Francois-Hollande-in-Istres-on-the-19th-of
   Google Scholar
• International Panel on Fissile Materials. 2007. Global Fissile Material Report 2007. Princeton: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• IPFM Blog. 2016. “Disposition of Plutonium in Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP).” International Panel on Fissile Materials, September 24. Accessed 2 May 2019. http://fissilematerials.org/blog/2016/09/disposition_of_plutonium_.html
   Google Scholar
• IPFM Blog. 2019. “NRC Terminates Construction Authorization for the MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility.” February 11. Accessed 19 March 2019. http://fissilematerials.org/blog/2019/02/nrc_terminates_constructi.html
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., and M. Korda. 2018. “Indian Nuclear Forces, 2018.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74 (6): 361–366. doi:10.1080/00963402.2018.1533162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., and M. Korda. 2019a. “Status of World Nuclear Forces.” Federation of American Scientists. Accessed 23 April 2019. https://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., and M. Korda. 2019b. “Russian Nuclear Forces, 2019.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75 (2): 73–84. doi:10.1080/00963402.2019.1580891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., and M. Korda. 2019c. “United States Nuclear Forces 2019.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75 (3): 122–134. doi:10.1080/00963402.2019.1606503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., and R. S. Norris. 2013. “Global Nuclear Weapons Inventories, 1945-2013.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 69 (5): 75–81. doi:10.1177/0096340213501363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., and R. S. Norris. 2018. “Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2018.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74 (4): 289–295. doi:10.1080/00963402.2018.1486620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., R. S. Norris, and J. Diamond. 2018. “Pakistani Nuclear Forces, 2018.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74 (5): 348–358. doi:10.1080/00963402.2018.1507796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mian, Z. 2017. “Warhead Elimination Timelines and the Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty,” IPFM Blog, 2 June 2017. Accessed 22 March 2019. http://fissilematerials.org/blog/2017/06/warhead_elimination_timelines.html
   Google Scholar
• Mikhailov, V. 1993. “Press Conference by RF Atomic Energy Minister Victor Mikhailov (Tomsk Accident and Other Problems),” held at Bolshaya Ordynka Str., Official Kremlin International News Broadcast, 20 April 1993, (Federal News Service), as cited in (Handler 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Norris, R. S., and H. M. Kristensen. 2004. “Dismantling U.S. Nuclear Warheads.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 60 (1): 72–74. doi:10.1080/00963402.2004.11460752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, R. S., and H. M. Kristensen. 2012. “Nuclear Pursuits, 2012.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68 (1): 94–98. doi:10.1177/0096340211433025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, R. S., and H. M. Kristensen. 2013. “The British Nuclear Stockpile, 1953–2013.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 69 (4): 69–75. doi:10.1177/0096340213493260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Technology Assessment. 1993. Dismantling the Bomb and Managing the Nuclear Materials. Washington DC: United States Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. 1997. “Chemical Weapons Convention, Article IV.” https://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention/articles/article-iv-chemical-weapons
   Google Scholar
• Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. 2011. “Decision: Final Extended Deadline Of 29 April 2012.” Conference of the States Parties of the Chemical Weapons Convention, Sixteenth Session, The Hague, 1 December 2011. Accessed 12 June 2019. https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/CSP/C-16/en/c16dec11_e_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• P5. 2015. “P5 Glossary of Key Nuclear Terms. P5 Working Group on the Glossary of Key Nuclear Terms.” China Atomic Energy Press. Accessed 2 May 2019 https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/243293.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pantex Employees for Safe & Sustainable Operations. 2006. “An Open & Anonymous Letter to Mr. John A. Fees and the BWXT Pantex LLC Board of Managers.” 7 November 2006. Accessed 13 May 2019. http://pogoarchives.org/m/hsp/hsp-LetterToPantex-11072006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Podvig, P., editor. 2001. Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podvig, P., and R. Snyder. 2019. Watch Them Go: Simplifying the Elimination of Fissile Materials and Nuclear Weapons. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.
   Google Scholar
• Project on Government Oversight. 2006. “POGO Letter to DOE Secretary Bodman regarding Serious Safety Problems at Pantex, a Nuclear Weapons Assembly Facility.” 12 December 2006. Accessed 12 May 2019. https://www.pogo.org/letter/2006/12/pogo-letter-to-doe-secretary-bodman-regarding-serious-safety-problems-at-pantex-nuclear-weapons-assembly-facility/
   Google Scholar
• Robertson-DeMers, K. 2011. “Pantex Plant Site Expert Interview Summary.” National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Advisory Board On Radiation And Worker Health. Accessed 12 June 2019 https://www.cdc.gov/NIOSH/OCAS/pdfs/abrwh/scarpts/sca-pantexintv-r0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ruminer, J. 2016. “Russian-American Workshop on the Safety of Nuclear Weapons Dismantlement.” In Doomed to Cooperate – How American and Russian Scientists Joined Forces to Avert Some of the Greatest post-Cold War Nuclear Dangers, edited by S. Hecker, 263–268. Vol. 1. Los Alasmos: Bathtub Row Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savannah River Site. 2013. “Savannah River Tritium Enterprise.” Factsheet. February 2013. Accessed 12 June 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190308080817/https://www.srs.gov/general/news/factsheets/tritium_esrs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. B. 1989. “Verified Elimination of Nuclear Warheads.” Science & Global Security 1 (1–2): 1–26. doi:10.1080/08929888908426321.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1967. “Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean.” http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/tlatelolco/text
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1997a. “Model Nuclear Weapons Convention.” United Nations General Assembly A/C.1/52/7, November 17 1997. http://inesap.org/sites/default/files/inesap_old/publ_nwc_english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1997b. “Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction.” https://www.un.org/Depts/mine/UNDocs/ban_trty.htm
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2006. “Treaty on a Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in Central Asia.” http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/canwfz/text
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2008a. “Model Nuclear Weapons Convention April 2007.” United Nations General Assembly A/62/650, 18 January 2008. http://inesap.org/sites/default/files/inesap_old/mNWC_2007_Unversion_English_N0821377.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2008b. “Convention on Cluster Munitions.” https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CTC/26-6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2017. “Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.” A/CONF.229/2017/8. https://undocs.org/A/CONF.229/2017/8
   Google Scholar
• United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. 1969. “Field Test FT-34: Demonstrated Destruction of Nuclear Weapons.” Washington DC, January 1969. https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/cloudgap
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Defense. 1998. “DoD Nuclear Weapons Transportation Manual.” DODM-4540.5-M. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=502
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Defense. 2017. “Department of Energy Weapon Dismantlement Activity (FY 1994-2016).” https://open.defense.gov/Portals/23/Documents/frddwg/2017_Tables_UNCLASS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy. 1996a. “Environmental Assessment for Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico Offsite Transportation of Low-Level Radioactive Waste.” https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/037/28037248.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy. 1996b. “Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Pantex Plant and Associated Storage of Nuclear Weapon Components - Volume II – Appendices.”
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy. 1997. “Transparency and Verification Options: An Initial Analysis of Approaches for Monitoring Warhead Dismantlement.” Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy. 2002. “Restricted Data Declassification Decisions – 1946 To The Present (RDD-8).” https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/rdd-8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy. 2011. “Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12 SWEIS), DOE/EIS-0387, Volume 1, Appendix A: Y-12 Planning Process and Facility Information.” National Nuclear Security Administration, Y-12 Site Office. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/EIS-0387-FEIS-01-2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy. 2013. “The National Nuclear Security Administration’s Weapons Dismantlement and Disposition Program.” Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections. http://fissilematerials.org/library/doe13a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy. 2018a. “Environmental Cleanup and Restoration Pantex Plant – Amarillo, Texas.” https://pantex.energy.gov/sites/default/files/Pantex_Plant_Environmental_Cleanup_and_Restoration_Booklet_Jan2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy. 2018b. “Final Supplement Analysis For The Final Environmental Impact Statement For The Continued Operation Of The Pantex Plant And Associated Storage Of Nuclear Weapon Components.” https://pantex.energy.gov/sites/default/files/final_sa_0618.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy. 2019. “Pantex History.” Accessed 12 June 2019. https://pantex.energy.gov/sites/default/files/Pantex_History.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. 2014. “Actions Needed by NNSA to Clarify Dismantlement Performance Goal.” GAO-14-449, April 2014. https://www.gao.gov/assets/670/662840.pdf
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, F., and M. Gordon 2013. “Alternatives to MOX. Direct-disposal Options for Stockpiles of Separated Plutonium.” International Panel on Fissile Material. http://fissilematerials.org/library/rr13.pdf
   Google Scholar