Power and Nuclear Weapons: The Case of the European Union

References

• Arendt, H. 1972. Crisis of the Republic. New York: Harcourt-Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, J., and H. Cooper. 2019. “Trump Discussed Pulling US from NATO, Aides Say amid New Concerns over Russia.” The New York Times, January 14.
   Google Scholar
• Boniface, P. 1996. “Dissuasion Concertée: Le Sense de la Formule.” Relations Internationales et Stratégiques 21: 101–106.
   Google Scholar
• Borrie, J. 2014. “Humanitarian Reframing of Nuclear Weapons and the Logic of a Ban.” International Affairs 90 (3): 625–646. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, B. 1946. The Absolute Weapon. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Brzozowski, A. 2020. “In Post-Brexit Push, Macron Calls for European Nuclear Arms Control Agenda.” Euractiv, 7th of February, https://www.euractiv.com/section/defence-and-security/news/in-post-brexit-push-macron-calls-for-joint-european-nuclear-deterrence/
   Google Scholar
• Butler, L. 1998. “The Risks of Nuclear Deterrence.” Speech at the National Press Club. Washington DC. 2 February. https://www.wagingpeace.org/the-risks-of-nuclear-deterrence-from-superpowers-to-rogue-leaders/
   Google Scholar
• Cilessen, B. 1998. “Embracing the Bomb: Morality, and Nuclear Deterrence in the US Air Force, 1945-1955.” Journal of Strategic Studies 21, 1, March. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402399808437710.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. 2020. “Can the Danger of Nuclear War Be Eliminated by Nuclear Disarmament ?” In Towards Non-Nuclear Peace, edited by T. Sauer, J. Kustermans, and B. Segaert, 167–180. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Cranston, A. 1999. “The Role of Civilian Society.” Remarks at the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation on 30th of April. Waging Peace Worldwide, Special Report.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, S. 1996. “European Integration, Nuclear Deterrence and Franco-British Nuclear Cooperation.” International Affairs 72 (4): 771–788. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2624121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchène, F. 1972. “Europe’s Role in World Peace.” In Europe Tomorrow, edited by R.Mayne. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins, 32-47.
   Google Scholar
• Dumoulin, A. 1996. “La Dissuasion Nucléaire Européenne: Quel avenir ?” In GRIP Dossier 211-212, 136 p.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows, J. 1981. National Defense. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. 2017a. “Fearing U.S. Withdrawal, Europe Considers Its Own Nuclear Deterrent.” The New York Times, March 6.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. 2017b. “European Nuclear Weapons Program Would Be Legal, German Review Finds.” The New York Times, July 5.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. 2018. “The Humanitarian Turn in Nuclear Disarmament and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.” The Nonproliferation Review 25 (1–2): 11–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2018.1486960.
   Google Scholar
• Giscard d’Estaing, V. 1995. “Comment Passer À La Phase De Simulation.” Le Figaro.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, M. 2018. “Normalizing Zero Nuclear Weapons.” Contemporary Security Policy 39 (3): 464–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1421344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, A. 2009. “Nuclear Weapons as the Currency of Power. Deconstructing the Fetishism of Force.” The Nonproliferation Review 16 (3): 325–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700903255029.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, A. 2016. “Power, Violence, and Nuclear Weapons.” Critical Studies on Security 4 (1): 91–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2016.1177784.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, T. 2005. Racing the Enemy. Stalin, Truman and the Surrender of Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, R. 2017. “German Nukes Would Be a National Tragedy”. Foreign Policy. 10 March.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. 1990. “European Foreign Policy.” In The Evolution of an International Actor, edited by R. Rummel. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., ed. 1996. The Actors in European Foreign Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. 2004. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hymans, J. 2006a. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hymans, J. 2006b. “Theories of Nuclear Proliferation.” Nonproliferation Review 13 (3): 455–465. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700601071397.
   Google Scholar
• Hymans, J. 2013. “The Threat of Nuclear Proliferation: Perception and Reality.” Ethics and International Affairs 27 (3): 281–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267941300021X.
   Google Scholar
• ICAN. 2018. “Europeans Reject US Nuclear Weapons on Their Soil.” https://www.icanw.org/new_poll_europeans_reject_us_nuclear_weapons_on_own_soil
   Google Scholar
• Intondi, V. 2015. Afro Americans against the Bomb. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, U., and C. Portela. 2010. “EU Defense Integration and Nuclear Weapons: A Common Deterrent for Europe ?” Security Dialogue 41 (2): 145–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610361889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonter, T. 2016. The Key to Nuclear Restraint. The Swedish Plans to Acquire Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, U. 2016. “The Sudden German Nuke Flirtation.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (online).
   Google Scholar
• Küntzel, M. 1995. Bonn and the Bomb. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lifton, R., and R. Falk. 1982. Indefensible Weapons. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. 1966. “The President, the Polls, and Vietnam.” Transactions 3: 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Macron, E. 2020. “Speech of the President of the Republic on the Defense and Deterrence Strategy.” Paris, Ecole de Guerre, 7th of February, https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2020/02/07/speech-of-the-president-of-the-republic-on-the-defense-and-deterrence-strategy
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2002. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms ?” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MccGwire, M. 1998. “Anatomy of the Argument.” In Nuclear Weapons, The Road to Zero, edited by J.Rotblat.London: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P., and T. Sauer. 2018. “The Nuclear Ban Treaty: A Sign of Global Impatience.” Survival 60 (2): 61–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2018.1448574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyn, C. 2018. “Realism for Nuclear-Policy Wonks.” The Nonproliferation Review 25 (1–2): 111–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2018.1505274.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. 2005. “Majority Supports Use of Atomic Bomb on Japan in WWII.” Gallup News Service 5 (August). https://news.gallup.com/poll/17677/majority-supports-use-atomic-bomb-japan-wwii.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. 1988. “The Essential Irrelevance of Nuclear Weapons.” International Security 13 (2): 55–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2538971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. 1996. “L’Union Européenne et la dissuasion nucléaire: évaluation critique.” Relations Internationales et Stratégiques 21: 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H. and others. 2016. “A Nuclear Weapon-free Zone in Europe. Concepts – Problems – Chances.” PRIF Working Paper, January.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. n.d. http://www.nuclearfiles.org/menu/key-issues/nuclear-weapons/history/pre-cold-war/manhattan-project/trinity/eyewitness-thomas-farrell_1945-07-16.htm
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. 1991. ““French Strategic Options in the 1990s.” In Adelphi Paper 260. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• Pélopidas, B. 2016. “Nuclear Weapons Scholarship as a Case of Self-Censorship in Security Studies.” Journal of Global Security Studies 1 (4): 326–336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogw017.
   Google Scholar
• Perot, E. 2019. “The Aachen Mutual Defense Clause. A Closer Look at the Franco-German Treaty.” Egmont Security Brief 105. February, 7p.
   Google Scholar
• Pflüger, F. 1995. “Bonn Might Be Interested.” The International Herald Tribune, September 12.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, B. 2014. Restraint. A New Foundation for US Grand Strategy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius, J., and T. Sauer. 2019. “Is It Time to Ditch the NPT ?” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. 2013. “Valuing and Devaluing Nuclear Weapons.” Contemporary Security Policy 34 (1): 146–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2013.771040.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. 2018. “Ban the Bomb or Bomb the Ban?” ELN Policy Brief, March 22.
   Google Scholar
• Rühle, H., and M. Rühle. 2017. “German Nukes: The Phanton Menace.” National Institute for Public Policy Information Series 419. 22 March.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. 1996/1997. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search for a Bomb.” International Security 21 (3), (Winter): 54-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539273.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, T. 1998. “Epilogue: The Possible ‘Europeanization’ of the French (And British ?) Nuclear Weapons.” In Nuclear Arms Control. Nuclear Deterrence in the Post-Cold War Period, edited by T. Sauer, 96–102. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, T. 2005. Nuclear Inertia. U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy after the Cold War. London: I.B.Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, T. 2007. “Coercive Diplomacy by the EU: The Iranian Nuclear Weapons Crisis.” Third World Quarterly 28 (3): 613–633. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701200620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, T. 2019a. “The Role of Informal International Organizations in Resolving the Iranian Nuclear Crisis (2003-2015).” Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (5): 939–955. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12861.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, T. 2019b. “Rough Times Ahead for NATO.” In Security and Defense in Europe, edited by M. Ramirez and J. Biziewsky, 245–254. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, T., and J. Pretorius. 2014. “Nuclear Weapons and the Humanitarian Approach.” Global Change, Peace & Security 26 (3): 233–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2014.959753.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, T., and M. Reveraert. 2018. “The Potential Stigmatizing Effect of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.” The Nonproliferation Review 25 (5–6): 437-455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2018.1548097.
   Google Scholar
• Scheinman, A. 2019. “No, It Is Not Time to Ditch the NPT.” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 7th of October.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, E. 2009. Command and Control. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, B. 1997. “L’Europe et la dissuasion nucléaire.” WEU Institute for Security Studies Occasional Paper 3, 29 p.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S., ed. 1998. Atomic Audit. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sjursen, H. 2003. “Understanding the Common Foreign and Security Policy.” In Understanding the EUs External Relations, edited by M. Knodt and S. Princen. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stockton, P. 1991. “The New Game on the Hill.” International Security 16 (2), Fall: 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539063.
   Google Scholar
• Tertrais, B. 1999. “Nuclear Policies in Europe.” In Adelphi Paper. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• Tertrais, B. 2019. “Will Europe Gets Its Own Bomb ?” Survival 42 (2): 47–66.
   Google Scholar
• Times of India. 1998. “Overwhelming Majority Supports N-tests.”
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S. 1967. “Public Opinion and War in Vietnam.” American Political Science Review 61 (2): 317–333. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1953248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, S. 2018. The Hell of Good Intentions. America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of US Primacy. Farrar: Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. 1981. “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better.” In Adelphi Papers, 171. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. 2008. “The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence.” The Nonproliferation Review 15 (3): 421–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700802407101.
   Google Scholar
• Wittner, L. 2003. Toward Nuclear Abolition. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar