The Nuclear Fuel Cycle and the Proliferation “Danger Zone”

References

• Ahmed, S. 1999. “Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Program: Turning Points and Nuclear Choices.” International Security 23 (4): 178–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.4.178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albright, D., and C. Hinderstein. 2005. “Unraveling the A. Q. Khan and Future Proliferation Networks.” The Washington Quarterly 28 (2): 109–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/0163660053295176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, D. M., S. Herzog, and J. Ko. 2019. “Under the Umbrella: Nuclear Crises, Extended Deterrence, and Public Opinion.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida Silva, A. R., and J. A. A. Moura. 2016. “The Brazilian Navy’s Nuclear-Powered Submarine Program.” The Nonproliferation Review 23 (5–6): 617–633. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2017.1337625.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. B., R. D. Gibbons, and S. Herzog. 2020 “Japanese Public Opinion, Political Persuasion, and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.” Working paper. Yale University and Harvard University Project on Managing the Atom.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. B., and S. Herzog. Forthcoming. “Public Opinion on Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Weapons: The Attitudinal Nexus in the United States.” Energy Research & Social Science. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101567
   Google Scholar
• Bin Salman, M. 2018. Interview with Norah O’Donnell. 60 Minutes. March 15. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/saudi-crown-prince-mohammed-bin-salman-iran-nuclear-bomb-saudi-arabia/
   Google Scholar
• Bollfrass, A. K. 2017. The Half-Lives of Others: The Democratic Advantage in Nuclear Intelligence Assessment. PhD diss., Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Brands, H., and D. Palkki. 2011. “Saddam, Israel, and the Bomb: Nuclear Alarmism Justified?” International Security 36 (1): 133–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braut-Hegghammer, M. 2011. “Revisiting Osirak: Preventive Attacks and Nuclear Proliferation Risks.” International Security 36 (1): 101–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braut-Hegghammer, M. 2016. Unclear Physics: Why Iraq and Libya Failed to Build Nuclear Weapons. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budjeryn, M. 2015. “The Power of the NPT: International Norms and Ukraine’s Nuclear Disarmament.” The Nonproliferation Review 22 (2): 203–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2015.1119968.
   Google Scholar
• Budjeryn, M. 2016. The Power of the NPT: International Norms and Nuclear Disarmament of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine, 1990–1994. PhD diss., Central European University.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, M., M. B. Malin, W. C. Potter, and L. S. Spector, eds. 2018. Preventing Black Market Trade in Nuclear Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. M., and T. Sunohara. 2004. “Japan: Thinking the Unthinkable.” In The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices, edited by K. M. Campbell, R. J. Einhorn, and M. Reiss, 218–253. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, A., and A. Carson. 2019. “The Disclosure Dilemma: Nuclear Intelligence and International Organizations.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (2): 269–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. 2018. “How to Stop North Korea’s Nuclear Ambition: Failed Diplomacy and Future Options.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 7 (1): 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2018.1499426.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. 1998. Israel and the Bomb. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalaqua, R. H. 2019. ““We Will Not Make the Bomb because We Do Not Want to Make the Bomb”: Understanding the Technopolitical Regime that Drives the Brazilian Nuclear Program.” The Nonproliferation Review 26 (3–4): 231–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2019.1630094.
   Google Scholar
• De Geer, L.-E., and C. M. Wright. 2018. “The 22 September 1979 Vela Incident: Radionuclide and Hydroacoustic Evidence for a Nuclear Explosion.” Science & Global Security 26 (1): 20–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2018.1451050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debs, A., and N. P. Monteiro. 2017. Nuclear Politics: The Strategic Causes of Proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debs, A., and N. P. Monteiro. 2018. “Cascading Chaos in Nuclear Northeast Asia.” The Washington Quarterly 41 (1): 97–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2018.1445902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutch, J. M. 1992. “The New Nuclear Threat.” Foreign Affairs 71 (4): 120–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/20045313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, B. 1993. “The Brooding Shadow: Systemic Incentives and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation.” Security Studies 2 (3–4): 37–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419309347519.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M. 2009. “Taking a Walk on the Supply Side: The Determinants of Civilian Nuclear Cooperation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (2): 181–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708330288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M. 2012. Atomic Assistance: How “Atoms for Peace” Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M. 2017. “The Logic of Latent Nuclear Deterrence.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/da10/92d95dbd16a89cee3ada882755698e6424e6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M., and B. Tkach. 2015. “Almost Nuclear: Introducing the Nuclear Latency Dataset.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 32 (4): 443–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894214559672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M., and Y. Lupu. 2016. “Do Arms Control Treaties Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (3): 530–539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguly, Š. 1999. “India’s Pathway to Pokhran II: The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi’s Nuclear Weapons Program.” International Security 23 (4): 148–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.4.148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheorghe, E. 2019. “Proliferation and the Logic of the Nuclear Market.” International Security 43 (4): 88–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D. 2020. “Supply to Deny: The Benefits of Nuclear Assistance for Nuclear Nonproliferation.” Journal of Global Security Studies 5 (2): 282–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, C. L. 2010. Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldemberg, J., C. F. Alvim, and O. Y. Mafra. 2018. “The Denuclearization of Brazil and Argentina.” Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 1 (2): 383–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2018.1479129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. H. 2019. “A Path to War with Iran: How Washington’s Escalation Could Lead to Unintended Catastrophe.” Foreign Affairs, May 20. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/iran/2019-05-20/path-war-iran
   Google Scholar
• Hagerty, D. T. 1998. The Consequences of Nuclear Proliferation: Lessons from South Asia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, V., S. Hatang, and P. Liberman. 2004. “Unveiling South Africa’s Nuclear Past.” Journal of Southern African Studies 30 (3): 457–476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305707042000254074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinonen, O. 2016. “Lessons Learned from Dismantlement of South Africa’s Biological, Chemical, and Nuclear Weapons Programs.” The Nonproliferation Review 23 (1–2): 147–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2016.1182685.
   Google Scholar
• Hersman, R. K. C., and R. Peters. 2006. “Nuclear U-Turns: Learning from South Korean and Taiwanese Rollback.” The Nonproliferation Review 13 (3): 539–553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700601071629.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, S. 2018a. “A Way Forward with North Korea: The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.” War on the Rocks, June 11. https://warontherocks.com/2018/06/a-way-forward-with-north-korea-the-comprehensive-nuclear-test-ban-treaty/
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, S. 2018b. “After the Summit: A Next Step for the United States and North Korea.” Arms Control Today 48 (6): 6–11. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2018-07/features/after-summit-next-step-united-states-north-korea
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, W., and T. A. Volpe. 2018. “Internet of Nuclear Things: Managing the Proliferation Risks of 3-D Printing Technology.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74 (2): 102–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2018.1436811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymans, J. E. C. 2001. “Of Gauchos and Gringos: Why Argentina Never Wanted The Bomb, and Why The United States Thought It Did.” Security Studies 10 (3): 153–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410108429440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymans, J. E. C. 2006. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hymans, J. E. C. 2010. “When Does a State Become a ‘Nuclear Weapon State’? An Exercise in Measurement Validation.” The Nonproliferation Review 17 (1): 161–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700903484728.
   Google Scholar
• Hymans, J. E. C. 2012. Achieving Nuclear Ambitions: Scientists, Politicians, and Proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2002. “IAEA Safeguards Glossary 2001 Edition.” International Nuclear Verification Series, No. 3. Vienna: IAEA. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/nvs-3-cd/PDF/NVS3_scr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2009. “Nuclear Fuel Cycle Information System: A Directory of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities.” IAEA-TECDOC-1613, April. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1613_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2020a. “Integrated Nuclear Fuel Cycle Information System.” https://www.iaea.org/resources/databases/integrated-nuclear-fuel-cycle-information-system-infcis
   Google Scholar
• IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2020b. “Incidents of Nuclear and Other Radioactive Material Out of Regulatory Control.” Factsheet. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/20/02/itdb-factsheet-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2020c. “Power Reactor Information System.” https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/home.aspx
   Google Scholar
• IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2020d. Research Reactor Database. https://nucleus.iaea.org/RRDB/RR/ReactorSearch.aspx?filter=0
   Google Scholar
• Jo, D.-J., and E. Gartzke. 2007. “Determinants of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (1): 167–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002706296158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpin, M. 2006. The Bomb in the Basement: How Israel Went Nuclear and What that Means for the World. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, F. 2012. Eating Grass: The Making of the Pakistani Bomb. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, J. 2019. “Alliance and Public Preference for Nuclear Forbearance: Evidence from South Korea.” Foreign Policy Analysis 15 (4): 509–529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/ory014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, S. E., and M. Fuhrmann. 2011. “Attacking the Atom: Does Bombing Nuclear Facilities Affect Proliferation?” Journal of Strategic Studies 34 (2): 161–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.559021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., and R. S. Norris. 2017. “Worldwide Deployments of Nuclear Weapons, 2017.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 73 (5): 289–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2017.1363995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M. 2009a. “Exporting the Bomb: Why States Provide Sensitive Nuclear Assistance.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 113–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M. 2009b. “Importing the Bomb: Sensitive Nuclear Assistance and Nuclear Proliferation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (2): 161–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708330287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M. 2010. Exporting the Bomb: Technology Transfer and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M., and T. A. Volpe. 2015. “3-D Printing the Bomb? The Nuclear Nonproliferation Challenge.” The Washington Quarterly 38 (3): 7–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2015.1099022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, Y. 2017. “Spear Versus Shield? North Korea’s Nuclear Path and Challenges to the NPT System.” In North Korea and Nuclear Weapons: Entering the New Era of Deterrence, edited by K. S. Chull and M. Cohen, 179–194. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippman, T. W. 2004. “Saudi Arabia: The Calculations of Uncertainty.” In The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices, edited by K. M. Campbell, R. J. Einhorn, and M. Reiss, 111–144. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Litwak, R. S. 2007. Regime Change: U.S. Strategy through the Prism of 9/11. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Litwak, R. S. 2008. “Living with Ambiguity: Nuclear Deals with Iran and North Korea.” Survival 50 (1): 91–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330801899496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., and S. Morsy. 2007. “Development of the Physical Model.” International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA-SM-367/13/07. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/ss-2001/PDF%20files/Session%2013/Paper%2013-07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. H. 2002. “Rewarding North Korea: Theoretical Perspectives on the 1994 Agreed Framework.” Journal of Peace Research 39 (1): 51–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039001003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War.” International Security 15 (1): 5–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. 1993. “The Case for a Ukrainian Nuclear Deterrent.” Foreign Affairs 72 (3): 50–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/20045622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, R. N., and R. E. Whitlark. 2017. “The Benefits and Burdens of Nuclear Latency.” International Studies Quarterly 61 (3): 517–528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, S. M. 1984. The Dynamics of Nuclear Proliferation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, N. L. 2017. “Why Nuclear Energy Programs Rarely Lead to Proliferation.” International Security 42 (2): 40–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. L. 2018. Stopping the Bomb: The Sources and Effectiveness of US Nonproliferation Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, N. L., and T. A. Volpe. 2018. “Abstinence or Tolerance: Managing Nuclear Ambitions in Saudi Arabia.” The Washington Quarterly 41 (2): 27–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2018.1484224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. E., and S. D. Sagan. 2009. “Nuclear Power Without Nuclear Proliferation?” Dædalus 138 (4): 7–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2009.138.4.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro, N. P., and A. Debs. 2014. “The Strategic Logic of Nuclear Proliferation.” International Security 39 (2): 7–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, A. H. 2013. “Stop Helping Me: When Nuclear Assistance Impedes Nuclear Programs.” In The Nuclear Renaissance and International Security, edited by A. M. Stulberg and M. Fuhrmann, 177–202. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, A. H., and S. D. Sagan. 2009. “The Perils of Predicting Proliferation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (2): 302–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708330581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavian, S. H., and M. M. Mousavian. 2018. “Building on the Iran Nuclear Deal for International Peace and Security.” Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 1 (1): 169–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2017.1420373.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., and A. Schmidt. 2010. “The Little Known Story of De-Proliferation: Why States Give up Nuclear Weapons Activities.” In Forecasting Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century: The Role of Theory, edited by W. C. Potter and G. Mukhatzhanova, 124–158. Vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narang, V. 2014. Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era: Regional Powers and International Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento Plum, M. O., and C. A. R. Resende. 2016. “The ABACC Experience: Continuity and Credibility in the Nuclear Programs of Brazil and Argentina.” The Nonproliferation Review 23 (5–6): 575–593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2017.1339402.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Energy Agency. 2019. “Review of Operating and Forthcoming Experimental Facilities Opened to International R&D Co-operation in the Field of Advanced Fuel Cycles.” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. NEA/NSC/R(2018)4, February 26. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=NEA/NSC/R(2018)4&docLanguage=En
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Engineering International. 2019. World Nuclear Industry Handbook. Surrey, UK: Business Press International.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Threat Initiative. 2019. “Iran.” https://www.nti.org/learn/countries/iran/
   Google Scholar
• Perkovich, G. 1999. India’s Nuclear Bomb: The Impact on Global Proliferation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkovich, G. 2010. “Global Implications of the U.S.-India Deal.” Daedalus 139 (1): 20–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2010.139.1.20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkitt, H. E., and S. F. Burgess. 2005. South Africa’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, O. 2014. Bargaining on Nuclear Tests: Washington and Its Cold War Deals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radchenko, S. 2015. “Russia’s Policy in the Run-Up to the First North Korean Nuclear Crisis 1991–1993.” Woodrow Wilson Center. Nuclear Proliferation International History Project Working Paper, No. 4. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/russias-policy-the-run-to-the-first-north-korean-nuclearcrisis-1991-1993
   Google Scholar
• Reed, T. C., and D. B. Stillman. 2009. The Nuclear Express: A Political History of the Bomb and Its Proliferation. Minneapolis, MN: Zenith Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. 1988. Without the Bomb: The Politics of Nuclear Nonproliferation. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. 1995. Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain Their Nuclear Capabilities. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richelson, J. 2007. Spying on the Bomb: American Nuclear Intelligence from Nazi Germany to Iran and North Korea. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Rublee, M. R. 2009. Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rublee, M. R. 2015. “Fantasy Counterfactual: A Nuclear-Armed Ukraine.” Survival 57 (2): 145–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2015.1026091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. D. 1996–1997. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb.” International Security 21 (3): 54–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2539273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. D. 2010. “Nuclear Power, Nuclear Proliferation and the NPT.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1642168
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. D. 2011. “The Causes of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation.” Annual Review of Political Science 14 (1): 225–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052209-131042.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., and C. R. Way. 2004. “The Correlates of Nuclear Proliferation: A Quantitative Test.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (6): 859–885. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704269655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolski, H., and W. Tobey. 2018. “A Poorly Negotiated Saudi Nuclear Deal Could Damage Future Regional Relationships.” National Interest. February 5. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/poorly-negotiated-saudi-nuclear-deal-could-damage-future-24367
   Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. 1994. “The Political Economy of Nuclear Restraint.” International Security 19 (2): 126–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2539198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. 2007. Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, L. S., and A. Cohen. 2008. “Israel’s Airstrike on Syria’s Reactor: Implications for the Nonproliferation Regime.” Arms Control Today 38 (6): 15–21. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2008_07-08/SpectorCohen
   Google Scholar
• Spektor, M. 2016. “The Evolution of Brazil’s Nuclear Intentions.” The Nonproliferation Review 23 (5–6): 635–652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2017.1345518.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll,R. J. 1996. “World Production of Latent Nuclear Capacity.” Rice University dataset. http://es.rice.edu/projects/Poli378/Nuclear/Proliferation/proliferation.html
   Google Scholar
• Sukin, L. Forthcoming. “Credible Nuclear Security Commitments Can Backfire: Explaining Domestic Support for Nuclear Weapons Acquisition in South Korea.” Journal of Conflict Resolution. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719888689.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai, A., and D. Esfandiary. 2018. Triple-Axis: Iran’s Relations with Russia and China. London: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Takubo, M. 2008. “Wake Up, Stop Dreaming: Reassessing Japan’s Reprocessing Program.” The Nonproliferation Review 15 (1): 71–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700701852928.
   Google Scholar
• Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. 1968. 729 UNTS 161. 7 ILM 809. https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/npt/text/
   Google Scholar
• Volpe, T. A. 2017. “Atomic Leverage: Compellence with Nuclear Latency.” Security Studies 26 (3): 517–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1306398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe, T. A. 2019. “Dual-Use Distinguishability: How 3D-Printing Shapes the Security Dilemma for Nuclear Programs.” Journal of Strategic Studies 42 (6): 814–840. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2019.1627210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. 2015. “Flash from the Past: Why an Apparent Israeli Nuclear Test in 1979 Matters Today.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September 8. https://thebulletin.org/2015/09/flash-from-the-past-why-an-apparent-israeli-nuclear-test-in-1979-matters-today/
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa, K. 2019. “The North Korea–United States Summit and Possibilities for New Security-Oriented Thinking.” Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 2 (1): 357–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2019.1592708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, F. 2018. “Japan Should Scrutinise the Credibility of the US Nuclear Umbrella: An Interview with Shigeru Ishiba.” Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 1 (2): 464–473. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2018.1507414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., and K. Wang. 2019. “A Nuclear-Armed North Korea without ICBMs: The Best Achievable Objective.” The Nonproliferation Review 26 (1–2): 143–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2019.1596574.
   Google Scholar