Hope Becomes Law: The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in the Asia-Pacific Region

References

• Adler-Nissen, R. 2014. “Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society.” International Organization 68 (1): 143–176. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbatov, A. 2019. “Mad Momentum Redux? the Rise and Fall of Nuclear Arms Control.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 61 (3): 7–38. doi:10.1080/00396338.2019.1614785.
   Google Scholar
• Ayson, R., and D. Ball. 2014. “Can a Sino-Japanese War Be Controlled?.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 56 (6): 135–166. doi:10.1080/00396338.2014.985441.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. 1980. A Suitable Piece of Real Estate: American Installations in Australia. Hale & Iremonger.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D., B. Robinson, and R. Tanter. 2016. Australia’s participation in the Pine Gap enterprise, Nautilus Institute Special Report, 8 June 2016. https://nautilus.org/napsnet/napsnet-special-reports/australias-participation-in-the-pine-gap-enterprise/.
   Google Scholar
• Bandarra, L. 2019. “Brazilian Nuclear Policy under Bolsonaro: No Nuclear Weapons, but a Nuclear Submarine.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 12 April 2019. https://thebulletin.org/2019/04/brazilian-nuclear-policy-under-bolsonaro/
   Google Scholar
• Behm, A. 2020. ‘Extended Deterrence and Extended Nuclear Deterrence in a Pandemic World.’ NAPSNet Special Reports, 15 October 2020. https://nautilus.org/napsnet/napsnet-special-reports/extended-deterrence-and-extended-nuclear-deterrence-in-a-pandemic-world/.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, K., P. Lewis, B. Pélopidas, N. Sokov, and W. Wilson. 2010. Delegitimizing Nuclear Weapons: Examining the Validity of Nuclear Deterrence. Monterey, CA USA: Monterey Institute of International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bracken, P. 2019. ‘NC3 in A Multipolar Nuclear World: Big Structures and Large Processes.’ NAPSNet Special Reports, 14 May 2019. https://nautilus.org/napsnet/napsnet-special-reports/nc3-in-a-multipolar-nuclear-world-big-structures-and-large-processes/.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2009. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2020. The Force of Nonviolence. London and New York: Verso.e.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero-Anthony, M. 2020. The Ban Treaty: Perspectives from Southeast Asia. Asia-Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament (APLN) Policy Brief No. 71, 29 September 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. 2018. “Nuclear Weapon Prohibition Treaty: A Safeguards Debacle.” Trust & Verify, Issue 158: 1–6. VERTIC.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. 2019a. ‘The 2020 NPT Review Conference and the TPNW Factor’, in Arms Control: Burden of Change, edited by Vatcheslav Kantor, 86-100. International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. 2019b. “Is the NPT Still Relevant? – How to Progress the NPT’s Disarmament Provisions.” Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 2 (1): 97–113. doi:10.1080/25751654.2019.1611187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, H., and M. Chalmers. 2014. ‘Relocation, Relocation, Relocation.’ RUSI Occasional Paper, August 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, M., and W. Walker. 2002. “The United Kingdom, Nuclear Weapons and the Scottish Question.” The Non-Proliferation Review 9 (1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, M. 2020. “Running Out of (Legal) Excuses: Extended Nuclear Deterrence in the Era of the Prohibition Treaty.” In Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law - Volume V, 269-290, edited by J. L. Black-Branch and D. Fleck. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, M., and A. Hood. 2017. “Australia’s Reliance on U.S. Extended Nuclear Deterrence under International Law.” Journal of International Law and International Relations 13 (2): 3–47.
   Google Scholar
• Dalaqua, R. H. 2019. ““We Will Not Make the Bomb because We Do Not Want to Make the Bomb”: Understanding the Technopolitical Regime that Drives the Brazilian Nuclear Program.” The Nonproliferation Review 26 (3–4): 231–249. doi:10.1080/10736700.2019.1630094.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, T., A. E. Wyatt Hoffman, L. B. Levite, G. Perkovich, and T. Zhao. 2017. Toward a Nuclear Firewall: Bridging the NPT’s Three Pillars. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dobell, G. 2013. ‘Australia-East Asia/US Relations: Election Plus Marines, Joint Facilities and the Asian Century.’ Comparative Connections, September 2013. http://cc.pacforum.org/2013/09/election-plus-marines-joint-facilities-asian-century/.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, W. A. 1990. The Case for a United Nations Verification Agency: Disarmament under Effective International Control. Working Paper 26, Ottawa: Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security, July 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, W. A. 2007. Tools of the Trade? Monitoring and Surveillance Technologies in UN Peacekeeping. Department of Peacekeeping Operations, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Egeland, K. 2018. “Banning the Bomb: Inconsequential Posturing or Meaningful Stigmatization?.” Global Governance 24 (1): 11–20. doi:10.1163/19426720-02401002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ella Plumanns, P., and R. Eckersley. 2017. “The High Ambition Coalition at Paris COP21.” In An Introduction to International Relations, edited by R. Devetak, J. George, and S. Percy, 3rd Edition, 492-505, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, T. 2005. A standing United Nations verification body: necessary and feasible. Compliance Chronicles, 1 1-42.
   Google Scholar
• Finnane, K. 2020. Peace Crimes: Pine Gap, National Security and Dissent. University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M. 2014. ‘America: Australia’s Dangerous Ally.’ The National Interest, 16 December 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M., and C. Roberts. 2014. Dangerous Allies. Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grare, F. 2020. “France, the Other Indo-Pacific Power.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 21 October 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, N. 1996. Secret Power: New Zealand’s Role in the International Spy Network. Nelson, New Zealand: Craig Potton.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, N. 2010. ‘Wikileaks: Leaked US Cables Spill the Beans on NZ Ties.’ Star Times, 12 December 2010. http://www.nickyhager.info/wikileaks-leaked-us-cables-spill-the-beans-on-nz-ties/.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel-Green, M. 2018. “The Implications of the 2017 UN Nuclear Prohibition Treaty for Existing and Proposed Nuclear-weapon-free Zones.” Global Change, Peace & Security 30 (2): 209–232. doi:10.1080/14781158.2018.1438387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harries, M. 2017. “The Real Problem with a Nuclear Ban Treaty.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 15 March 2017. https://carnegieendowment.org/2017/03/15/real-problem-with-nuclear-ban-treaty-pub-68286
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, P. 2018. “Trump and the Interregnum of American Nuclear Hegemony.” Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 1 (2): 219–237. doi:10.1080/25751654.2018.1532525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, P., B. Kampmark, P. Reiner, and D. Gordon. 2019. ‘Synthesis Report–NC3 Systems and Strategic Stability: A Global Overview.’ NAPSNet Special Reports, 5 May 2019. https://nautilus.org/napsnet/napsnet-special-reports/synthesis-report-nc3-systems-and-strategic-stability-a-global-overview/.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, P., L. Zarsky, and W. Bello. 1987. American Lake: Nuclear Peril in the Pacific. New York: Viking/Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, T. 2016. The Role of Alliances in International Climate Policy after Paris. Berlin and Heidelberg: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/12689.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, A. 2020. “Questioning International Nuclear Weapons Law as a Field of Resistance.” In Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law - Volume V - Legal Challenges for Nuclear Security and Deterrence, edited by J. L. Black-Branch and D. Fleck, 11–30, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, I. 2015. “Trident: The British Question.” The Guardian, 11 February 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/11/trident-the-british-question
   Google Scholar
• Jasani, B. 2003. “International Satellite Monitoring Agency – Has the Time Come for Its Establishment?.” Proceedings of Workshop on Safeguards Perspectives for a Future Nuclear Environment, Cernobbio Villa Erba, Italy, 16 October 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kassenova, T. 2014. “Brazil’s Nuclear Kaleidoscope: An Evolving Identity.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace March 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kassenova, T. 2016. “External Perceptions of Brazil’s Nuclear Policy: Views from Argentina and the United States.” The Nonproliferation Review 23 (5–6): 595–615. doi:10.1080/10736700.2017.1339932.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M. 1999. Japan under the Nuclear Umbrella: U.S. Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear War Planning in Japan during the Cold War. Nautilus Institute. https://nautilus.org/supporting-documents/japan-under-the-us-nuclear-umbrella/.
   Google Scholar
• Leah, C. 2014. Australia and the Bomb. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, R. N. 2010. Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, E. M. 2020. “US Urges Countries to Withdraw from UN Nuke Ban Treaty.” AP News 22 October 2020. https://apnews.com/article/nuclear-weapons-disarmament-latin-america-united-nations-gun-politics-4f109626a1cdd6db10560550aa1bb491
   Google Scholar
• Long, A., and B. R. Green. 2012. “Stalking the Secure Second Strike: Intelligence, Counterforce, and Nuclear Strategy.” Journal of Strategic Studies 38 (1–2): 38–73. doi:10.1080/01402390.2014.958150.
   Google Scholar
• Maclellan, N. 2017a. Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons: A Pacific Islands Priority. Carlton, VIC: ICAN Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Maclellan, N. 2017b. Grappling with the Bomb: Britain’s Pacific H-Bomb Tests. Acton, ACT: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maclellan, N. 2019. “Nuclear Testing and Racism in the Pacific Islands.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Ethnicity, edited by S. Ratuva, 885–904, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, R. S., W. M. Arkin, and W. Burr. 1999. “Where They Were.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 55 (6): 26–35. doi:10.1080/00963402.1999.11460389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, R. S., W. M. Arkin, and W. Burr. 2000. “Where They Were. How Much Did Japan Know?.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 56 (1): 11–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, T., and A. Glaser. 2017. ‘Nuclear Verification.’ Institute of Nuclear Materials, 58th Annual Meeting
   Google Scholar
• Patton, T., S. Philippe, and Z. Mian. 2019. “Fit for Purpose: An Evolutionary Strategy for the Implementation and Verification of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.” Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 2 (2): 387–409. doi:10.1080/25751654.2019.1666699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkovich, G. 2009. ‘Extended Deterrence on the Way to a Nuclear-free World.’ Research Paper, International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament.
   Google Scholar
• Perkovich, G. 2020. “Living with the Nuclear Prohibition Treaty: First, Do No Harm.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 12 November 2020. https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/11/10/living-with-nuclear-prohibition-treaty-first-do-no-harm-pub-83198
   Google Scholar
• Persbo, A. 2016. “Compliance Science: The CTBT’s Global Verification System.” The Nonproliferation Review 23 (3–4): 317–328. doi:10.1080/10736700.2016.1265727.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. 2010. ‘Attachment 1, “US-UK Special Relationship”.’ Written testimony to the House of Commons, Foreign Affairs Committee, Sixth Report on Global Security: UK-US Relations, 18 March 2010. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmfaff/114/114we12.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. 2013. “Legitimizing and Delegitimizing Nuclear Weapons.” In Viewing Nuclear Weapons through a Humanitarian Lens, edited by J. Borrie and T. Caughley, 44–76. New York and Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. UNIDIR/2013/4. https://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/viewing-nuclear-weapons-through-a-humanitarian-lens-en-601.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. 2014. “Waiting for Kant: Devaluing and Delegitimizing Nuclear Weapons.” International Affairs 90 (3): 601–623. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. 2019. “A Hegemonic Nuclear Order: Understanding the Ban Treaty and the Power Politics of Nuclear Weapons.” Contemporary Security Policy 40 (4): 409–434. doi:10.1080/13523260.2019.1571852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N., and K. Egeland. 2018. “The Diplomacy of Resistance: Power, Hegemony and Nuclear Disarmament.” Global Change, Peace & Security 30 (2): 121–141. doi:10.1080/14781158.2018.1467393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. 2018. “Intelligence Cooperation and New Trends in Space Technology: Do the Ties Still Bind?.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 72 (4): 364–370. doi:10.1080/10357718.2018.1452897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffran, J. 2018. “Verification and Security of Transformation to a Nuclear-weapon-free World: The Framework of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.” Global Change, Peace & Security 30 (2): 143–162. doi:10.1080/14781158.2018.1472565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. M. 2018. International Law. Kindle Edition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, N. 2005. “Stigmatizing the Bomb: Origins of the Nuclear Taboo.” International Security 29 (4): 5–49. doi:10.1162/isec.2005.29.4.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, N. 2018a. “How Strong Is the Nuclear Taboo Today?.” The Washington Quarterly 41 (3): 89–109. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2018.1520553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, N. 2018b. “The Great Unravelling: The Decline of the Nuclear Normative Order.” In Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age, edited by N. Tannenwald and M. James, 6–31. Acton: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Tanter, R. 2011. ““Just in Case”: Extended Nuclear Deterrence in the Defense of Australia.” Pacific Focus 26 (1): 113–136. doi:10.1111/j.1976-5118.2011.01058.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanter, R. 2012b. The “Joint Facilities” revisited – Desmond Ball, democratic debate on security, and the human interest. Special Report, Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability, 12 December 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tanter, R. 2012c. “American Bases in Australia Revisited.” In Insurgent Intellectual: Essays in Honour of Professor Desmond Ball, edited by B. Taylor, N. Farrelly, and S. Lee, 206–208, Singapore: ISEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Tanter, R. 2014. “Indonesia, Australia and the Edward Snowden Legacy: Shifting Asymmetries of Power.” Japan Focus: The Asia Pacific Journal 12(10), 1-13, . 10 March 2014. https://apjjf.org/2014/12/10/Richard-Tanter/4088/article.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tanter, R. 2018. “Tightly Bound: Australia’s Alliance-Dependent Militarization.” Global Asia 13 (1), 62-67. https://www.globalasia.org/v13no1/cover/tightly-bound-australias-alliance-dependent-militarization_richard-tanter.
   Google Scholar
• Tanter, R. 2019a. An Australian Pathway through Pine Gap to the Nuclear Ban Treaty. Pearls & Irritations 5 August 2019. [extended and footnoted version]. http://nautilus.org/network/associates/richard-tanter/publications/
   Google Scholar
• Tanter, R. 2019b. Hiding from the light: The establishment of the Joint Australia-United States Relay Ground Station at Pine Gap. Special Report, Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability, 1-22, November 2. https://nautilus.org/napsnet/napsnet-policy-forum/hiding-from-the-light-the-establishment-of-the-joint-australia-united-states-relay-ground-station-at-pine-gap/?view=pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Department for Disarmament Affairs. 1983. Report of the Secretary-General: The Implications of Establishing an International Satellite Monitoring Agency. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. 2008. Verification in All Its Aspects, Including the Role of the United Nations in the Field of Verification. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Ushioda, S. 1992. Satellite-Based Multilateral Arms Control Verification Schemes and International Law. Dissertation, Montreal: Institute of Air and Space Law, McGill University.
   Google Scholar
• Ushioda, S. 1994. “Possible Organizational Framework for a Multilateral Monitoring Organization.” The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy 6: 345–365.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, W. 2010a. “The Absence of a Taboo on the Possession of Nuclear Weapons.” Review of International Studies 36 (04): 865–876. doi:10.1017/S0260210510001324.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, W. 2010b. “The UK, Threshold Status and Responsible Nuclear Sovereignty.” International Affairs 86 (2): 447–464. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00891.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W. 2014. “International Reactions to the Scottish Referendum.” International Affairs 90 (4): 743–759. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W. 2015. “Trident’s Replacement and the Survival of the United Kingdom.” Survival 57 (5): 7–28. doi:10.1080/00396338.2015.1090120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeden, B., and V. Samson. 2019. “India’s ASAT Test Is Wake-up Call for Norms of Behavior in Space.” SpaceNews 8 April 2019. https://spacenews.com/op-ed-indias-asat-test-is-wake-up-call-for-norms-of-behavior-in-space
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, N. J. 2009. “Beyond Waltz’s Nuclear World: More Trust May Be Better.” International Relations 23 (3): 428–445. doi:10.1177/0047117809340489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, T. 2016. “Do No Harm: Ban Nuclear Weapons Now.” International Campaign Against Nuclear Weapons October 2016. https://www.icanw.org/do_no_harm_ban_nuclear_weapons_now]
   Google Scholar