Closed-form solutions of dynamic vibration equations of seismically excited structures

References

• Abd-Elhamed, A., & Mahmoud, S. (2019a). Simulation analysis of TMD controlled building subjected to far- and near-fault records considering soil-structure interaction. Journal of Building Engineering, 26, 100930. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-Elhamed, A., & Mahmoud, S. (2019b). Seismic response evaluation of structures on improved liquefiable soil. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 25, 1695–1717. doi:10.1080/19648189.2019.1595738
   Google Scholar
• Abd-Elhamed, A., & Tolan, M. (2022). Tuned liquid damper for vibration mitigation of seismic-excited structures on soft soil. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(12), 9583–9599. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-Elhamed, A., Shaban, Y., & Mahmoud, S. (2018). Predicting dynamic response of structures under earthquake loads using logical analysis of data. Buildings, 8(4), 61. doi:10.3390/buildings8040061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoub, S., & Reza, E. (2022). A framework for exergy analysis of process control systems. Journal of Process Control, 109, 104–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathe, K. J. (1996). Finite element procedures. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Carnahan, B., Lither, H. A., & Wilkes, J. O. (1969). Applied numerical methods. Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Castanon, L. J., Naredo, J. L., Zuluaga, J. R., Banuelos-Cabral, E., & Pablo, G. (2021). Laplace transform inversion through the theta algorithm for power-system EMT analysis. Electric Power Systems Research, 197, 107342. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldo, P., & Tubaldi, E. (2018). Influence of ground motion characteristics on the optimal single concave sliding bearing properties for base-isolated structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 104, 346–364. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. (2007). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, C., & Frank, R. (2021). Comparison of implicit and explicit numerical integration schemes for a bounding surface soil model without elastic range. Computers and Geotechnics, 140. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukkipati, R. V. (2010). Numerical methods. New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• El-Azab, M. S., Mahmoud, S., & Abd-Elhameed, A. (2011). Seismic response evaluation of buildings considering soil flexibility. Advanced Materials Research, 243, 1383–1390.
   Google Scholar
• Gangadharaiah, Y., & Sandeep, N. (2021). Engineering applications of the laplace transform. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Geradin, M., & Rixen, D. (1997). Mechanical vibrations-theory and application to structural dynamics (2nd ed.). Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hairer, E., & Wanner, G. (1991). Solving ordinary differential equations II, Vol. 14: Stiff and differential-algebraic problems. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 614 p. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05221-7
   Google Scholar
• Hareen, C. B., & Mohan, S. (2021). Evaluation of seismic torsional response of ductile RC buildings with soft first story. Structures, 29, 1640–1654. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. M., & Piersol, A. G. (2002). Harris’ shock and vibration handbook (ed. C. M. Harris & A. G. Piersol). McGraw-Hill Publishing, New York.
   Google Scholar
• He, J., Amer, T., Abolila, A., & Galal, A. (2022). Stability of three degrees-of-freedom auto-parametric system. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(11), 8393–8415. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, C. H., Amer, T. S., Tian, D., Abolila, A. F., & Galal, A. A. (2022). Controlling the kinematics of a spring-pendulum system using an energy harvesting device. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, 0(0), 1–24. doi:10.1177/14613484221077474
   Google Scholar
• Huang, L.,Deng, L.,Li, A.,Gao, R.,Zhang, L., &Lei, W. (2021). A novel approach for solar greenhouse air temperature and heating load prediction based on Laplace transform. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 102682 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. A., & Dutta, S. C. (2020). Inelastic seismic behaviour of asymmetric structures under bidirectional ground motion: An effort to incorporate the effect of bidirectional interaction in load resisting elements. Structures, 25, 241–255. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, G. (1966). Holbrook, Laplace transforms for electronic engineers (2nd ed.). Elsevier Science & Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, J., Song, N., Xu, Z., He, Z., & Bai, Y. (2015). Structural damage distribution induced by Wenchuan Earthquake on 12th May, 2008. Earthquakes and Structures, 9(1), 93–109. doi:10.12989/eas.2015.9.1.093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joel Schiff, L. (1999). The Laplace transform: Theory and applications.
   Google Scholar
• Linus, W., Illias, H., & Arno, S. (2022). Scenario-based robustness assessment of building system life cycle performance. Applied Energy, 311. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, S., Abd-Elhameed, A., & Jankowski, R. (2012). Behaviour of colliding multi-storey buildings under earthquake excitation considering soil-structure interaction. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 166, 2283–2292.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, L., & Daichao, S. (2022). Assessing the accuracy and efficiency of different order implicit and explicit integration schemes. Computers and Geotechnics, 141. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osama, H., & Huda, A. (2018). Computational methods based Laplace decomposition for solving nonlinear system of fractional order differential equations. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 3549–3557. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2017.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz, M. (1997). Structural dynamics: Theory and computation (4th ed.). Chapman & Hall, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rajasekaran, S. (2009). 7—Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods. In Woodhead publishing series in civil and structural engineering, structural dynamics of earthquake engineering (pp. 171–239). Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK. doi:10.1533/9781845695736.1.171
   Google Scholar
• Sawant, L. S. (2018). Applications of Laplace transform in engineering fields. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 5(5), 3100–3105.
   Google Scholar
• Söderlind, G. (2006). Time-step selection algorithms: Adaptivity, control, and signal processing. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 56(3–4), 488–502. doi:10.1016/j.apnum.2005.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xinpeng, L., & Xianqiang, Y. (2020). A variational Bayesian approach for robust identification of linear parameter varying systems using mixture Laplace distributions. Neurocomputing, 395(2020), 15–23. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.088
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X.-S. (2016). Engineering mathematics with examples and applications. Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar