Swedish crime scene technicians: facilitations, epistemic frictions and professionalization from the outside

References

• Abbot, A. (1988). The system of professions – an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agar, M. H. (1980). The professional stranger – an informal introduction to ethnography. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out – classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brante, T. (2011). Professions as science-based occupations. Professions & Professionalism, 1(1), 4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Caudill, D. S., & LaRue, L. H. (2006). No magic wand – the idealization of science in law. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. A. (2001). Suspect identities – a history of fingerprinting and criminal identification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. A. (2010). Acculturating forensic science: what is ‘scientific culture’, and how can forensic science adopt it? Fordham Urban Law Journal, 38(2), 435–472.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. A. (2012). Defending a knowledge hierarchy in forensic science. Fordham Urban Law Journal City Square, 39, 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2002). New directions in state and international professional occupations: Discretionary decision-making and acquired regulation. Work, Employment and Society, 16(2), 341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2013). Professionalism: Value and ideology. Current Sociology Review, 61(5–6), 778–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, J. G. (2000). Not science … not support: Forensic solutions to investigative problems. Science and Justice, 40(2), 127–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassaway, B. M. (2007). Good cops, dirty crimes. In S. K. Drew, M. Mills, & B. M. Gassaway (Eds.), Dirty work: The social construction of taint (pp. 149–168). Waco: Baylor University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory – Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, K. (2006). Is crime scene examination science, and does it matter anyway? Science & Justice, 46(2), 65–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, R., & Prainsack, B. (eds). (2010). Genetic suspects – global governance of forensic DNA profiling and databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, L. M. (2017). Sometimes I give up on the report and ring the scientist: Bridging the gap between what forensic scientists write and what police investigators read. Policing & Society, 27(5), 541–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelty, S. F. (2011). Professionalism in crime scene examination: recruitment strategies using the seven key attributes of top crime scene examiners. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal, 2(4), 198–204.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty, S. F., Julian, R., & Robertson, J. (2011). Professionalism in crime scene examination: The seven key attributes of top crime scene examiners. Forensic Science Policy & Management, 2, 175–186.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. D. (1999). Epistemic cultures – how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, C. (2013). The bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility. Social Studies of Science, 43(5), 657–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, C. (2015). Being a crime scene technician in Sweden. In I. Gershon (Ed.), A world of work – imagined manuals for real jobs, (pp. 86-101). Ithaca: Cornell University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, C. (Forthcoming). Making forensic evaluations – forensic objectivity in the Swedish Criminal Justice System. In A. Adam (Ed.), Crime and the construction of forensic objectivity from 1850. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, C. (2016). The social life of forensic evidence. Oakland: The University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, C. (2016). Forensic science: A sociological introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, A., Fraser, J., & Williams, R. (2012). Crime scene examiners and volume crime investigations: An empirical study of perception and practice. Forensic Science Policy & Management, 3, 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., Cole, S. A., McNally, R., & Jordan, K. (2008). Truth machine — the contentious history of DNA fingerprinting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millen, P. (2000). Is crime scene investigation forensic science? Are crime scene investigators forensic scientists? Science & Justice, 40(2), 125–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordgaard, A., Ansell, R., Drotz, W., & Jaeger, L. (2012). Scale of conclusions for the value of evidence. Law, Probability and Risk, 11(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, J., White, R., Kelty, S., & Julian, R. (2014). Professionalization and crime scene examination. Forensic Science Policy & Management, 5(3–4), 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (2014) Varför gav fler poliser inte ökad personuppklaring? Slutrapport i uppdraget ”Satsningen på fler poliser” [The Clearance rate in Sweden and in other countries.]
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (2003). Residual categories and disciplinary knowledge: Personal identity in sociological and forensic investigations. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 515–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (2007). The problem of dust: Forensic investigation as practical action. In S. Hester & D. Francis (Eds.), Orders of ordinary action- Respecifying sociological knowledge (pp. 195–210). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., & Weetman, J. (2013). Enacting forensics in homicide investigations. Policing and Society, 23(3), 376–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Kovacs, D. (2014). ‘Backroom boys’: Occupational dynamics in crime scene examination. Sociology, 48(4), 763–779.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, D. (2014a). Practising crime scene investigation: Trace and contamination in routine work. Policing and Society, 24(4), 443–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, D. (2014b) Accomplishing Technical and Investigative Expertise in Everyday Crime Scene Investigation. Dissertation, University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar