Incarcerated people’s challenges for digital inclusion in Finnish prisons

References

• Batastini, A. B., King, C. M., Morgan, R. D., & McDaniel, B. (2015). Telepsychological services with criminal justice and substance abuse clients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Services, 13(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking. A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Champion, N., & Edgar, K. (2013). Through the gateway: How computers can transform rehabilitation. Prison Reform Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Sanction Agency. (2014). Supervised probationary freedom. https://www.rikosseuraamus.fi/en/index/enforcement/release/supervisedprobationaryfreedom.html
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Sanction Agency. (2020). Goals, values and principles. https://www.rikosseuraamus.fi/en/index/criminalsanctionsagency/goalsvaluesandprinciples.html
   Google Scholar
• DeValiant, G., McGrath, L., & Kougiali, Z. (2020). Through the prison walls: Using published poetry to explore current UK prisoners’ narratives of past, present and future selves. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1442701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, S., Taylor, C. D. J., Gire, N., Riley, M., Caton, N., & Husain, N. (2015). Digital inclusion: The concept and strategies for people with mental health difficulties. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49(9), 772–773. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415591827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1957, April 15–17). The characteristics of total institution. In Symposium on preventive and social psychiatry. Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. An essay on organization of experience. Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H-T., Lundberg, K., & Syltevik, L. J. (2016). Digitalization, street-Level bureaucracy and welfare users´ experiences. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12283
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. (2008). Digital inclusion: An analysis of social disadvantage and the information society. Department for Communities and Local Government. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/26938
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järveläinen, E. & Rantanen, T. (2019). Social interaction between employee and offender in supervised probationary freedom in Finland. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 20(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2578983X.2019.1637093
   Google Scholar
• Jewkes, Y., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2016). A brave new world: The problems and opportunities presented by new media technologies in prisons. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(5), 534–551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1748895816654953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, H. (2004). A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schemata. In H. Johnston & B. Kandermans (Eds.), Social movement and culture. Social movements, protest, and contention (Vol. 4, pp. 217–246). University of Minneapolis Press. https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Social-Movements-and-Culture-edited-by-
   Google Scholar
• Knight, V. (2015). Some observations on the digital landscape of prisons today. Prison Service Journal, 220, 3–9. https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/PSJ%20220%20July%202015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Knight, V. (2017). The technology of confinement and quasi-therapeutic control: Managing souls with in-cell television. In M. McGuire & T. J. Holt (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of technology, crime and justice (pp. 547–564). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, V., & Van de Steene, S. (2017a). The capacity and capability of digital innovation in prisons: Towards smart prisons. Advancing Corrections Journal, 4, 90–103. http://hdl.handle.net/2086/16650
   Google Scholar
• Knight, V., & Van De Steene, S. (2017b). Digitizing the prison: The light and dark future. Prison Service Journal, 231, 22–30. https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/PSJ%20231%20May%202017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A., & Crewe, B. (2012). Prisons beyond the new penology: The shifting moral foundations of prison management. In R. Sparks & J. Simon (Eds.), Handbook of punishment and society (pp. 283–307). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A., Price, D., & Shefer, G. (2011). Staff-prisoner relationship: The heart of the prison work. In The prison officer (2nd ed., pp. 83–120). Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, C., Pearson, D. A. S., Torgerson, D. J., & Garcia-Reyes, M. (2017). The effect of digital technology on prisoner behavior and reoffending a natural stepped-wedge design. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 455–482. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9303-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meško, G. & Hacin, R. (2018). Prisoners’ and prison workers’ views on the prison subculture in Slovenia. Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo, Ljubljana 69(4), 333–345. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gorazd_Mesko/publication/330449787_Prisoners'_and_Prison_Workers'_Views_on_the_Prison_Subculture_in_Slovenia/links/5c40a1df92851c22a37c44fb/Prisoners-and-Prison-Workers-Views-on-the-Prison-Subculture-in-Slovenia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, A., Barros, R., & Leite, C. (2011). Lifelong learning through e-learning in European prisons. In Rethinking digital and social inclusion. Proceedings of INTED2015 Conference (pp. 1038–1046), 2–4 March 2015, Madrid, Spain. https://library.iated.org/view/MONTEIRO2015LIF
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. A., Fazzino, T., Garnet, B., Cutter, C. J., & Barry, D. T. (2011). Computer-based interventions for drug use disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 40(3), 215–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2010.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. D., Patrick, A. R., & Magaletta, P. R. (2008). Does the use of telemental health alter the treatment experience? Inmates’ perceptions of telemental health versus face-to-face treatment modalities. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(1), 158–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.76.1.158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, M. (2010). The art of the possible – Public protection in a closed establishment. Prison Service Journal, 189, 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Araya, R., Marsch, L. A., Unützer, J., Patel, V., & Bartels, S. J. (2017). Digital technology for treating and preventing mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries: A narrative review of the literature. Lancet Psychiatry, 4(6), 486–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30096-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office of Finland. (2016). Uusintarikollisuuden vähentäminen rangaistusaikana ja sen jälkeen [Reducing recidivism during and after sentence] (Performance Audit Report. Audit Reports of the State Audit Office, 18/2016). Lönnberg Print & Promo.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. G., Szkodny, L. E., Llera, S. J., & Przeworski, A. (2011). A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for anxiety and depression: Is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy? Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, I. F., Toyama, K., & Dillahunt, T. R. (2019, May). Towards an effective digital literacy intervention to assist returning citizens with job search. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland, UK (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300315
   Google Scholar
• Passey, D., Shonfeld, M., Appleby, L., Judge, M., Saito, T., & Smits, A. (2018). Digital agency: Empowering equity in and through education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 425–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9384-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltola, S., & Vesala, K. M. (2013). Constructing entrepreneurial orientation in a selling context: The qualitative attitude approach. Poznan University of Economics Review, 13(1), 26–47. https://www.ebr.edu.pl/pub/2013_1_26.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perlgut, D. (2011, November 7). Digital inclusion in the broadband world: Challenges for Australia. Communications Policy and Research Forum Sydney. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30680191.pdf
   Google Scholar
• PrisonCloud. (2020). PrisonCloud. https://www.ebo-enterprises.com/prisoncloud
   Google Scholar
• Puolakka, P., & Hovila, S. (2019, April 2–4). TIC19012 – The development of digitalization and “smart prison” solutions for prisoners in Finnish criminal sanctions agency. In Technology in Corrections Conference: Digital Transformation in Lisbon, Portugal. https://icpa.org/library/tic19012-the-development-of-digitalization-and-smart-prison-solutions-for-prisoners-in-finnish-criminal-sanctions-agency/
   Google Scholar
• Pyysiäinen, J., & Vesala, K. M. (2013). Activating farmers. Uses of entrepreneurship discourse in the rhetoric of policy implementers. Discourse & Communication, 7(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1750481312466475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisdorf, B. C., & Jewkes, Y. (2016). (B)Locked sites: Cases of Internet use in three British prisons. Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 771–786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisdorf, B. C., & Rikard, R. V. (2018). Digital rehabilitation: A model of reentry into the digital age. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1273–1290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, S. (2011). A typology of prison officer approaches to care. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 440–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1477370811413804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity [TENK]. (2012). Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. https://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/HTK_ohje_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland (2019) (Finnish National Board on Research Integrity guidelines 3/2019). https://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/Ihmistieteiden_eettisen_ennakkoarvioinnin_ohje_2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Imprisonment Act (767/2005). Finlex. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2005/en20050767.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Probationary Liberty under Supervision Act (629/2013). Finlex. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2013/20130629
   Google Scholar
• Toreld, E. M., Haugli, K. O., & Svalastog, A. L. (2018). Maintaining normality when serving a prison sentence in the digital society. Croatian Medical Journal, 59(6), 335–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2018.59.335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truswell, D. M., Vacher, G., & Young, J. (2014). Mental health rehabilitation and digital social inclusion. International Journal of Integrated Care, 14(8). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1838
   Google Scholar
• Vesala, K. M. & Rantanen, T. (2007). Laadullinen asennetutkimus: Lähtökohtia, periaatteita, mahdollisuuksia [Qualitative attitude approach: Departure points, principles, possibilities]. In K. M. Vesala & T. Rantanen (Eds.), Argumentaatio ja tulkinta: Laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lähestymistapa [Argumentation and interpretation: Qualitative attitude approach] (pp. 11–61). Helsinki: Gaudeamus
   Google Scholar
• Ylisassi, H., Seppänen, L., Uusitalo, H., Kalavainen, S., & Piispanen, P. (2016). Aktivoiva lähityö: Vankiloiden valvonta- ja ohjaushenkilöstö vuorovaikutuksellista lähityötä kehittämässä [Activating Interactive Work: Developing reciprocal interactive work in prisons with supervision and rehabilitation staff] (Criminal Sanctions Agency publication series, 2). Criminal Sanction Agency.
   Google Scholar