Capricious credibility – legal assessments of voluntariness in Swedish negligent rape judgements

References

• Anderson, U. (2004). Hans (ord) eller hennes? En könsteoretisk analys av straffrättsligt skydd mot sexuella övergrepp. Bokbox förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, U. (2001). The unbounded body of the law of rape. In K. Lundström, K. Niemi-Kiesiläinen, E.-M. Svensson, & K. Nousiasainen (Eds.), Responsible selves: Women in the Nordic legal culture (pp. 331–351). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, U., & Edgren, M. (2018). Vulnerability, agency and the ambivalence of Place in narratives of rape in three high-profile Swedish Cases. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(3), 197–209. 10.1080/08038740.2018.1472140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, U., Edgren, M., Karlsson, L., & Nilsson, G. (2019). Rape narratives in motion. Palgrave Macmillan. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, U., & Wegerstad, L. (2016). Sexualbrott – Kriminaliserad sexualitet eller sexualiserad kriminalitet? Juridisk Tidskrift Vid Stockholms Universitet, 2016-17(1), 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Asp, P., Ulväng, M., & Jareborg, N. (2013). Kriminalrättens grunder (2nd ed.). Iustus förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bandes, S. (2016). Remorse and criminal justice. Emotion Review, 8(1), 14–19. 10.1177/1754073915601222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbalet, J. (1998). Emotion, social theory, and social structure: A macrosociological approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbalet, J. (2011). Emotions beyond regulation: Backgrounded emotions in science and trust. Emotion Review, 3(1), 36–43. 10.1177/1754073910380968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman Blix, S., & Wettergren, Å. (2016). Empathy and objectivity in the legal procedure: The case of Swedish prosecutors. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 17(1), 19–35. 10.1080/14043858.2015.1136501.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman Blix, S., & Wettergren, Å. (2018). Professional emotion in Court: A sociological perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman Blix, S., & Wettergren, Å. (2019). The emotionality of judicial objectivity. Onati Socio-legal series.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, R. L., & McNiel, D. E. (2007). “He Said—She Said”: The role of the forensic evaluator in determining credibility of plaintiffs who allege sexual exploitation and boundary violations. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 35(2), 11–18. http://jaapl.org/content/35/2/211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitsch, A. (2019). The geography of rape: shaming narratives in Norwegian rape cases. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(4), 931–953. 10.1086/702032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitsch, A., & Klemetsen, M. (2017). The legal grading of sexual citizenship: Sentencing practices in Norwegian rape cases. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(2), 174–188. 10.1080/0966369X.2017.1298572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bladini, M. (2013). I objektivitetens sken: En kritisk granskning av objektivitetsideal, objektivitetsanspråk och legitimeringsstrategier i diskurser om dömande i brottmål. Makadam.
   Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., Eyssel, F., Pina, A., Siebler, F., & Viki, G. T. (2009). Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In M. A. H. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 17–45). Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., Reinhard, M., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti‐victim attitudes on men’s self reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(2), 257–268. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<257::AID-EJSP871>3.0.CO;2-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bruvik Heinskou, M., Skilbrei, M.-L., & Stefansen, K. (2020). Rape in the Nordic countries. Continuity and change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burgin, R. (2019). Persistent narratives of force and resistance: Affirmative consent as law reform. British Journal of Criminology, 59(2), 296–314. 10.1093/bjc/azy043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. (2012). Emotional reflexivity: Feeling, emotion and imagination in reflexive dialogues. Sociology (Oxford), 46(3), 458–472,doi: 10.1177/0038038511422587
   Google Scholar
• Burman, M. (2009). Evidencing sexual assault: women in the witness box. Probation Journal, 56(4), 379–398. 10.1177/0264550509346506.
   Google Scholar
• Burman, M. (2010). Rethinking rape law in Sweden: Coercion, consent or non-voluntariness? InC. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law: International and comparative perspectives (pp. 196–208). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa, R. (1987). The rationality of emotion. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, E., & Munro, V. (2005). Juror stereotypes and blame attribution in rape cases involving intoxicants. British Journal of Criminology, 45(1), 25–38. 10.1093/bjc/azh055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotell, L. (2010). Canadian sexual assault law: Neoliberalism and the erosion of feminist-inspired law reforms. In C. McGlynn & V. E. Munro (Eds.), Rethinking rape law: International and comparative perspectives (pp. 209–223). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. M. (2015). What constitutes a reasonable belief in consent to sex? A thematic analysis. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(3), 337–353. 10.1080/13552600.2014.900122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, L. (2020). Samtyckesdynamiker: Sex, våldtäkt och gråzonen däremellan.Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, A. (17/12 2017). Regeringen inför samtyckeslag – sex ska vara frivilligt. News article. https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/samhalle/a/0EKAxA/regeringen-infor-samtyckeslag–sex-ska-vara-frivilligt
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, S., & Lewenhagen, L. (2019). Våldtäkt och sexualbrott. Brottsförebyggande rådet. Accessed 2020-05-01. https://www.bra.se/statistik/statistik-utifran-brottstyper/valdtakt-och-sexualbrott.html.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, S., & Lewenhagen, L. (2020). Den nya samtyckeslagen I praktiken. Brottsförebyggande rådet. Accessed 2020-07-02. https://www.bra.se/download/18.7d27ebd916ea64de5306522c/1593612601122/2020_6_Den_nya_samtyckeslagen_i_praktiken.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jokila, H., & Niemi, J. (2020). Rape law and coersive circumstances. In B. Heinskou & S. Stefansen (Eds..), Rape in the Nordic countries: Continuity and change(pp. 120–136). Routledge. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kleres, J. (2011). Emotions and narrative analysis: A methodological approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(2), 182–202. 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00451.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landström, S., Ask, K., & Sommar, C. (2019). Credibility judgments in context: Effects of emotional expression, presentation mode, and statement consistency. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(3), 279–297. 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1519828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, B. (2002). The emotional dimension in legal regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 29(1), 197–225. 10.1111/1467-6478.00216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijonhufvud, M. (2008). Samtyckesutredningen: Lagskydd for den sexuella integriteten. Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Leverick, F. (2020). What do we know about rape myths and juror decision making?. International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 24(3), 255–279. 10.1177/1365712720923157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. (2016). Rape redefined. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 10(2), 431.
   Google Scholar
• Maroney, T. A. (2011). The persistent cultural script of judicial dispassion. California Law Review, 99(2), 629–681. http://ssrn.com/paper=1656102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naffine, N. (2002). Can woman be legal persons? In S. James & S. Palmer (Eds.), Visible women: Essays on feminist legal theory and political philosophy (pp. 150–173). Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L., Hansen, M., & Ingemann-Hansen, O. (2018). Predicting charges and convictions for rape suspects in Denmark: Characteristics associated with the notion of the ‘credible criminal’. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 19(2), 136–151. 10.1080/14043858.2018.1526469.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, J. (2010). What we talk about when we talk about buying sex. Violence against Women, 16(2), 159–172. 10.1177/1077801209355239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, G. (2020). Towards voluntariness in Swedish rape law: Hyper-medialised group rape cases and the shift in the legal discourse. In M. Bruvik Heinskou, M. L. Skilbrei, & K. Stefansen (Eds.), Rape in the Nordic countries: Continuity and change (pp. 101–119). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prop. ( 2017/18:177). En ny sexualbrottslagstiftning byggd på frivillighet. Accessed 2020-02-09. https://www.regeringen.se/4950e9/contentassets/20977a5e47ab41bd89e4ff609208bfa8/en-ny-sexualbrottslagstiftning-byggd-pa-frivillighet-prop.-201718177
   Google Scholar
• Renzetti, C. (2013). Feminist criminology (Key ideas in criminology). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, C. (2018). Rape as ‘one person’s word against another’s’: Challenging the conventional wisdom. International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 22(2), 161–181. 10.1177/1365712718766478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A., Garner, D. N., Di Leone, B., & Hadley, A. (2006). Gender and emotion. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 63–79). Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (1995). Law, crime and sexuality. Essays in feminism. SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, O., & Skinner, T. (2017). How rape myths are used and challenged in rape and sexual assault trials. Social & Legal Studies, 26(4), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916680130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supreme court judgement(B 1200-19, June 11).
   Google Scholar
• Sutorius, H., & Kaldal, A. (2003). Bevisprovning vid sexualbrott. Norstedts juridik.
   Google Scholar
• Temkin, J., Gray, M. J., & Barret, J. (2018). Different functions of rape myth use in court: Findings from a trial observation study. Feminist Criminology, 13(2), 205–226. 10.1177/1557085116661627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnqvist, N. (2018). Att göra rätt. En studie om professionell respektabilitet, emotioner och narrativa linjer bland relationsvåldsspecialiserade åklagare. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Criminology, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Wettergren, Å. (2010). Managing unlawful feelings: the emotional regime of the Swedish migration board. International Journal for Work, Organisation and Emotion, 3(4), 400–419. 10.1504/IJWOE.2010.035327.
   Google Scholar
• Wettergren, Å. (2019). Emotive-cognitive rationality, background emotions and emotion work. In A. Bellocchi, S. Khorana, J. McKenzie, R. Olson, R. Patulny, & M. Peterie (Eds.), Emotions in late modernity(pp. 25–39). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wrede, O. (2015). The role of emotions in judgments of crime victims, doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Wrede, O., & Ask, K. (2015). More than a feeling: gender-specific stereotypes about victims’ emotional responses to crime. Violence and Victims, 30(5), 902–915. 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar