Linear algebra and multivariate analysis in statistics: development and interconnections in the twentieth century

References

• Aitken, A C, ‘Note on selection from a multivariate normal population’, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 4 (1935), 106–110.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, A C, ‘A further note on multivariate selection’, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 5 (1936), 37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, A C, Determinants and matrices, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1939a. 9th edition, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, A C, Statistical mathematics, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1939b. 2nd edition, 1942.
   Google Scholar
• Aldous, D J, ‘Random walks on finite groups and rapidly mixing Markov chains’, Séminaire De Probabilitée, 17 (1983), 243–297. (Springer: Lecture Notes in Mathematics 986).
   Google Scholar
• Aldous, D J, and Diaconis, P, ‘Shuffling cards and stopping times’, American Mathematical Monthly, 93 (1986), 333–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldous, D J, and Diaconis, P, ‘Longest increasing subsequences: from patience to the Baik-Deift-Johansson theorem’, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 36 (1999), 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amari, S-I, Information geometry and its applications, New York: Springer, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T W, An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis, New York: Wiley, 1958. (2nd edition 1984, 3rd edition 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T W, ‘Samuel Stanley Wilks, 1906–1964’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 36 (1965), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Barndorff-Nielsen, O E, and Schou, G, ‘On the parametrization of autoregressive models by partial autocorrelation’, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 3 (1973), 408–419.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, D J, and Knott, M, Latent variable models and factor analysis, London: Arnold, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M S, ‘Further aspects of the theory of multiple regression’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 34 (1938), 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M S, ‘Multivariate analysis’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 10 (1947), 176–197.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M S, ‘An inverse matrix adjustment arising in discriminant analysis’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22 (1951), 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M S, and Whittaker, J M, ‘Obituary, A. C. Aitken’, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 14 (1968), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, N H, ‘Szegő's theorem and its probabilistic descendants’, Probability Surveys, 9 (2012), 287–324.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, N H, and Fry, J M, Regression linear models in statistics (Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series (SUMS)), Heidelberg: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, N H, and Symons, T L, ‘Gaussian random fields: with and without covariances’, Theory of Probability and Mathematical Statistics (Special Issue in memory of M I Yadrenko, ed A Olenko), to appear, 2022; arXiv:2111.11960.
   Google Scholar
• Birkhoff, G, and MacLane, S, A survey of modern algebra, 2nd edition, New York: Macmillan, 1953. (1st edition 1941).
   Google Scholar
• Blower, G, Random matrices: high-dimensional phenomena (London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series, 367), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bougerol, P, and Lacroix, J, Products of random matrices with applications to Schrödinger operators (Progress in Probability and Statistics, 8), Basel: Birkhäuser, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Box, J F, Fisher, R. A.: The life of a scientist, New York: Wiley, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Brechenmacher, F, ‘Une histoire de l'universalité des matrices mathématiques’, Revue de Synthèse, 131 (2010), 569–603.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, J G, ‘The generalized discriminant function: mathematical foundation and computational routine’, Harvard Educational Review, 21 (1951), 90–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkill, H; Ledermann, W; Hooley, C, and Perfect, H, ‘Obituary, Leon Mirsky’, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 18 (1986), 1945–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D R, and Wermuth, N, Multivariate dependencies: models, analysis and interpretation (Monographs in Statistics and Applied Probability, 67), Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D R, and Wermuth, N, ‘Causality: a statistical view’, International Statistical Review, 72 (2004), 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramér, H, Random variables and probability distributions (Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 36), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1937. (2nd edition 1962, 3rd edition 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Cramér, H, Mathematical methods of statistics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1946. (1945, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm).
   Google Scholar
• Curnow, R N, Applied statistics at the university of reading: the first forty years, Reading: University of Reading, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dawid, A P, ‘Conditional independence in statistical theory (with discussion)’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 41 (1979), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, A P, Elements of continuous multivariate analysis, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, A P, ‘Covariance selection’, Biometrics, 28 (1972), 157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison, D G T; Holmes, C C; Mallick, B K, and Smith, A F M, Bayesian methods for nonlinear classification and regression, New York: Wiley, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, M L, Multivariate statistics: a vector space approach, Wiley, 1983. (reprinted, Inst. Math. Stat., 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, M L, Group invariance in statistics, Inst. Math. Stat, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Eckart, C, and Young, G, ‘The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank’, Psychometrika, 1 (1936), 211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, F Y, ‘Note on the calculation of correlation between organs’, Philosophical Magazine (Series 5), 36 (1893), 350–351.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A, ‘Die grundlage der allgemeinen relativitätstheorie’, Annalen der Physik (4), 49 (1916), 770–822.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, C, ‘Boscovich and the combination of observations’, in L L Whyte (ed), Roger Joseph Boscovich, Allen & Unwin, 1961, 200–212.
   Google Scholar
• Farebrother, R W, Fitting linear relationships: a history of the calculus of observations, Springer, 1999, 1750–1900.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R A, ‘Applications of vector analysis to geometry’, Messenger of Mathematica, 42 (1913), 161–178. (Collected Papers of R. A. Fisher, Vol. I (ed. J H Bennett), University of Adelaide Press, 1971).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R A, ‘The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems’, Annals of Eugenics, 7 (1936), 179–198. (Collected Papers of R. A. Fisher, Vol III (ed J H Bennett), University of Adelaide Press, 1973).
   Google Scholar
• Gantmacher, F H, The theory of matrices, vol 1, 2, New York: Chelsea, 1959. (Russian 1953).
   Google Scholar
• Golub, G H, and Van Loan, C F, Matrix computations, 3rd edition, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. (1st ed 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Good, I J, ‘Some applications of the singular decomposition of a matrix’, Technometrics, 11 (1969), 823–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower, J C, ‘Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis’, Biometrika, 53 (1966), 325–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guivarc'h, Y, ‘Quelques propriétés asymptotiques des produits des matrices aléatoires’, in Ecole d'Eté de Probabilités de Saint-Flour VIII-1978 (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 774), New York: Springer, 1980, 177–234.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D J, Discrimination and classification, New York: Wiley, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D J, Construction and assessment of classification rules, New York: Wiley, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Harville, D A, Matrix algebra from a statistician's perspective, Heidelberg: Springer, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, T, ‘The theory of matrices in the 19th century’, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematics Vancouver 1974, vol 2, 1975a, 561–570.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, T, ‘Cauchy and the spectral theory of matrices’, Historia Mathematica, 2 (1975b), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, R A, and Johnson, C R, Matrix analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. (2nd edition 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Horn, R A, and Johnson, C R, Topics in matrix analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H, ‘The generalization of student's ratio’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 2 (1931), 360–378.
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H, ‘Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 24 (1933), 417–441. and 498–520.
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H, ‘Relations between two sets of variates’, Biometrika, 28 (1936), 321–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, NM, and Sarnak, PC, ‘Zeros of zeta functions and symmetry’, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 36 (1999a), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, N M, and Sarnak, P C, Random matrices, Frobenius eigenvalues and monodromy, Providence: American Mathematical Society, 1999b.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, J P, and Snaith, N C, Random matrices and L-functions', Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36 (2003), 2859–2881.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M G, A course in multivariate analysis, London: Griffin, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M G, and Stuart, A, The advanced theory of statistics, volume 1, distribution theory, London: Griffin, 1977.4th edition.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M G, and Stuart, A, The advanced theory of statistics, volume 2, inference and relationship, London: Griffin, 1979.4th edition.
   Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J B, ‘Multidimensional scaling by optimising goodness-of-fit to a non-parametric hypothesis’, Psychometrika, 29 (1964a), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J B, ‘Non-metric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method’, Psychometrika, 29 (1964b), 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzanowski, W J, ‘The algebraic basis of classical multivariate methods’, The Statistician, 20 (1971), 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Krzanowski, W J, Principles of multivariate analysis: a user's perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lachenbruch, P A, and Mickey, M R, ‘Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis’, Technometrics, 10 (1968), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberg, J M, Tensors: geometry and applications (Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 128), Providence: American Mathematical Society, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lauritzen, S L, Graphical models, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lawley, D N, ‘The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section A, 60 (1940), 64–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lawley, D N, ‘Further investigations in factor estimation’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section A, 61 (1941), 176–185.
   Google Scholar
• Lawley, D N, ‘A note on Karl Pearson's selection formulae’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section A, 62 (1942), 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lawley, D N, and Maxwell, E A, Factor analysis as a statistical method, New York: American Elsevier, 1971.1st edition 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Ledermann, W, ‘Sampling distribution and selection in a normal population’, Biometrika, 30 (1939), 295–304.
   Google Scholar
• Ledrappier, F, ‘Quelques propriétés des exposants characteristiques’, in Ecole d'Eté de Probabilités de Saint-Flour XII-1982 (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1097), Heidelberg: Springer, 1984, 305–396.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, E H, Theory of point estimation, New York: Wiley, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus, J R, and Neudecker, H, Matrix differential calculus, New York: Wiley, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalanobis, P C, ‘On the generalized distance in statistics’, Proceedings of the National Institute of Science, India, 2 (1936), 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia, K V; Kent, J T, and Bibby, J M, Multivariate analysis, London: Academic Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P, Tensor methods in statistics (2nd edition, Monographs in Statistics and Applied Probability, 29), Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2017. (1st edition, 1987).
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G J, Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition, New York: Wiley, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Markoff, A A, Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Leipzig: B G Teubner, 1912.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, M L, Random matrices and the statistical theory of energy levels, London: Academic Press, 1967. (2nd edition 1991, 3rd edition 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Mirsky, L, An introduction to linear algebra, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, T, The theory of determinants in the historical order of development, vol 1, London: Macmillan, 1906.
   Google Scholar
• Pastur, L, and Shcherbina, M, Eigenvalue distributions of large random matrices (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 17), Providence: American Mathematical Society, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, J, Causality: models, reasoning and inference, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009a. (1st edition 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, J, ‘Causal inference in statistics: an overview’, Statistics Surveys, 3 (2009b), 96–146.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, K, ‘On lines and planes of closest fit to a system of points in space’, Philosophical Magazine, Series 6, 2 (1901), 559–572.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, K, ‘Mathematical contributions to the theory of natural selection. XI. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 200 (1903), 1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, K, ‘On the general theory of the influence of selection on correlation and variation’, Biometrika, 8 (1911–12), 437–443.
   Google Scholar
• Puntanen, S, and Styan, G P H, ‘Schur complements in probability and statistics’, in Chapter 6, 163–226 in Zhang, F (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, A S, Dynamics, part II, Cambridge University Press, 1937. (2nd edition, 1944).
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F L, ‘Characterization of the partial autocorrelation function’, Annals of Statistics, 2 (1974), 1296–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, C R, ‘Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters’, Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, 37 (1945), 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, C R, ‘The utilisation of multiple measurements in problems of biological classification’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Supplement, 9 (1948), 159–203.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, C R, Linear statistical inference and its applications, New York: Wiley, 1965. 2nd edition, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, G, and Levi-Civita, T, ‘Méthodes de calcul différentiel absolu et leurs applications’, Mathematische Annalen, 54 (1900), 125–201.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, G K, ‘That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects’, Statistical Science, 6 (1991), 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rue, H, and Held, L, Gaussian Markov random fields (Monographs in Statistics and Applied Probability, 104), Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Schur, I, ‘Über Potenzreihen, die im Innern der Einheitskreises beschränkt sind’, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 147 (1917), 205–232.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, S R, Matrix algebra useful for statistics, New York: Wiley, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Seneta, E, Non-negative matrices and Markov chains, Heidelberg: Springer, 1981. (revised 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, J, and Morrison, W J, ‘Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to a change in one element of a given matrix’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21 (1950), 124–127. (Abstract, 20 (1949), 62).
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B, Orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. Part 1: classical theory (American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, 54.1), Providence: American Mathematical Society, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, G W, ‘On the early history of the singular values decomposition’, SIAM Review, 35 (1993), 551–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, S M, The measurement of uncertainty before 1900, Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, S M, ‘Studies in the history of probability and statistics L: Karl Pearson and the rule of three’, Biometrika, 99 (2012), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, S M, ‘Mahalanobis & Fisher: mathematical statistics as a global enterprise’, Sanhkyā B, 80 (2018), S167–S178.
   Google Scholar
• Todhunter, I, ‘On the method of least squares’. Trans. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 11 (Part II), 1869, 219; Addition, 238.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, H W, The theory of determinants, matrices and invariants, London: Blackie, 1928. 2nd edition, 1945.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, H W, and Aitken, A C, An introduction to the theory of canonical matrices, London: Blackie, 1932.
   Google Scholar
• Verblunsky, S, ‘On positive harmonic functions (second paper)’, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 40 (1936), 290–320.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherburn, C E, Elementary vector analysis, with applications to geometry and mechanics, G. Bell and Sons, 1921. (2nd edition, 1955).
   Google Scholar
• Webb, A R, and Copsey, K D, Statistical pattern recognition, 3rd edition, New York: Wiley, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, P, ‘A Realised Path. The Cambridge Statistical Laboratory up to 1993’ (revised 2002), www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/history-statistical- laboratory. Statistical Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J H, The algebraic eigenvalue problem, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Wilks, S S, ‘Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance’, Biometrika, 24 (1932), 471–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, S S, Mathematical statistics, New York: Wiley, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Wishart, J, ‘The generalised product moment distribution in samples from a normal multivariate population’, Biometrika, 20A (1928), 32–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wishart, J, ‘Multivariate analysis’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, 4 (1955), 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Wishart, J, and Bartlett, M S, ‘The generalised product moment distribution in a normal system’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 29/2 (1933), 260–270.
   Google Scholar
• Woodbury, M A, Inverting modified matrices (Statistical Research Group Memorandum Report, 42), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Ycart, B, ‘A case of mathematical eponymy: the vandermonde determinant’, Revue d'Histoire des Mathématiques, 19 (2013), 43–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F, The Schur complement and its applications (Numerical Methods and Algorithms, 4), Heidelberg: Springer, 2005.
   Google Scholar