139
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Kepler’s snow: the epistemic playfulness of geometry in seventeenth-century Europe

Bibliography

  • Aït-Touati, Frédérique, Fictions of the cosmos: Science and literature in the seventeenth century, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011.
  • Alberti, Leandro, Descrittione di tutta Italia, Venice: Ludovico degli Avanzi, 1561.
  • Almási, Gábor, ‘Rethinking sixteenth-century “Lutheran Astronomy”’, Intellectual History Review, 24 (2014), 5–20.
  • Andrault, Raphaële, ‘Mathématiser l’anatomie: la myologie de Stensen (1667)’, Early Science and Medicine, 15 (2010), 505–536.
  • Andrews, Noam, ‘Tabula III: Kepler’s mysterious polyhedral model’, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 48 (2017), 281–311.
  • Archdeacon, Anthony, ‘All about nothing: cross-disciplinary academic discussions of nihil in the seventeenth century’, The Seventeenth Century, 35 (2020), 141–161.
  • Ball, Philip, ‘In retrospect: On the six-cornered snowflake’, Nature, 480 (2011), 455.
  • Barker, Peter, ‘Kepler’s epistemology’, in C Methuen, D Di Liscia and E Kesslerpp. (ed), Method and order in Renaissance natural philosophy. New York: Kluwer, 1997, 355–368.
  • Barker, Peter, and Goldstein, Bernard R, ‘Realism and instrumentalism in sixteenth century astronomy: A reappraisal’, Perspectives on Science, 6 (1998), 232–258.
  • Berrey, Marquis, ‘Reading communities and hippocratism in Hellenistic medicine’, Science in Context, 28 (2015), 465–487.
  • Biagioli, Mario, Galileo’s instruments of credit: telescopes, images, secrecy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2006.
  • Biagioli, Mario, ‘Witnessing astronomy: Kepler on the uses and misuses of testimony’, in M Biagioli and J Riskin. (ed), Nature engaged: Science in practice from the Renaissance to the present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, 103–124.
  • Boner, Patrick J, ‘Life in the liquid fields: Kepler, Tycho and Gilbert on the nature of the heavens and Earth’, History of Science, 46 (2008), 275–297.
  • Bos, Henk J M, Redefining geometric exactness: Descartes’ transformation of the early modern concept of construction, Dordrecht: Springer, 2001.
  • Bowen, Alan C, ‘Problemata 15: Its title and agenda’, in R Mayhew (ed), The Aristotelian Problemata physica: philosophical and scientific investigations, Leiden: Brill, 2015, 214–225.
  • Bredekamp, Horst, The Lure of Antiquity and the Cult of the Machine: The Kunstkammer and the Evolution of nature, Art and Technology, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
  • Burnyeat, M F, ‘Plato on why mathematics is good for the soul’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 103 (2000), 1–81.
  • Cardano, Girolamo, De subtilitate, Paris: Fezandat and Granion, 1551.
  • Chen-Morris, Raz, ‘From emblems to diagrams: Kepler’s new pictorial language of scientific representation’, Renaissance Quarterly, 62 (2009), 134–170.
  • Chen-Morris, Raz, Measuring shadows: Kepler’s optics of invisibility, Philadelphia: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2016.
  • Christianson, John Robert, On Tycho’s island: Tycho Brahe and his assistants, 1570–1601, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • Claessens, Guy, ‘Imagination as self-knowledge: Kepler on Proclus’ Commentary on the first book of Euclid’s Elements’, Early Science and Medicine, 16 (2011), 179–199.
  • Cleary, John J, ‘The mathematical cosmology of Plato’s Timaeus’, in J M Dillon and B O’Byrne (ed), Studies on Plato, Aristotle and Proclus, Leiden: Brill, 2014, 153–180.
  • Cosgrove, Denis E, ‘Images of Renaissance cosmography, 1450–1650’, in D Woodward. (ed), The History of Cartography, vol 3, part 1, Cartography in the European Renaissance, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, 55–98.
  • Crowther, Kathleen M, and Barker, Peter, ‘Training the intelligent eye: Understanding illustrations in early modern astronomy texts’, Isis, 104 (2013), 429–470.
  • Davids, Karel, ‘Craft secrecy in Europe in the early modern period: A comparative view’, Early Science and Medicine, 10 (2005), 341–348.
  • De Boodt, Anselmus Boëtius, Gemmarum et lapidum historia, Hanau: Marnius, 1609.
  • De Groot, Jean, ‘Modes of explanation in the Aristotelian Mechanical Problems’, Early Science and Medicine, 14 (2009), 22–42.
  • Descartes, René, Les météores, Maire: Leiden, 1637.
  • Dornavius, Caspar, Amphitheatrum sapientiae socraticae joco-seriae, Wechelius: Hanover, 1619.
  • Dupré, Sven, ‘Inside the camera obscura: Kepler’s experiment and theory of optical imagery’, Early Science and Medicine, 13 (2008), 219–244.
  • Dupré, Sven, and Korey, Michael, ‘Inside the Kunstkammer: the circulation of optical knowledge and instruments at the Dresden court’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 40 (2009), 405–420.
  • Dürer, Albrecht, Underweysung der messung, Nuremberg: Andreae, 1525.
  • Echterling, Terry, ‘What did Glaucon draw?: A diagrammatic proof for Plato's divided line’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 56 (2018), 1–15.
  • Eden, Kathy, The Renaissance rediscovery of intimacy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.
  • Elmqvist Söderlund, Inga, Taking possession of astronomy: frontispieces and illustrated title pages in 17th-century books on astronomy, Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2010.
  • Enenkel, Karl A E, ‘The species and beyond: classification and the place of hybrids in Early Modern zoology’, in K Enenkel and M Smith. (ed), Early Modern Zoology: The construction of animals in science, literature and the visual arts, Leiden: Brill, 2014, 57–148.
  • Field, Judith V, Kepler’s geometrical cosmology, London: Athlone, 1988.
  • Findlen, Paula, ‘Jokes of nature and jokes of knowledge: The playfulness of scientific discourse in early modern Europe’, Renaissance Quarterly, 43 (1990), 292–331.
  • Fleck, Ludwik, Genesis and development of a scientific fact, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, [1935] 1979.
  • Fowler, D. H., The Mathematics of Plato’s academy: A new reconstruction, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.
  • Friedman, Michael, A History of folding in mathematics: Mathematizing the margins, Cham: Birkhäuser, 2018.
  • Friedman, Michael, and Rougetet, Lisa, ‘Folding in recreational mathematics during the 17th–18th centuries: Between geometry and entertainment’, Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, 5 (2017), 5–34.
  • Gallo, Vincent, and Chittka, Lars, ‘Cognitive aspects of comb-building in the honeybee?’, Frontiers in Psychology, 9 (2018), 1–9.
  • Giaquinto, Marcus, Visual thinking in mathematics: An epistemological study, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  • Gielis, Johan, The geometrical beauty of plants, Dordrecht: Springer, 2017.
  • Ginzburg, Carlo, Clues, myths, and the historical method, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.
  • Grafton, Anthony, ‘Kepler as a reader’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 53 (1992), 561–572.
  • Gulizia, Stefano, ‘Cosmology and scholarship in seventeenth-century Helmstedt: The Baltic mathematician and scientific mediator Nicolaus Andreae Granius (c. 1569–1631)’, in P D Omodeo and V Wels (ed), Natural knowledge and Aristotelianism at Early Modern Protestant universities, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2019, 109–122.
  • Harrison, Peter, The Fall of Man and the foundations of science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Hasse, D N, ‘Spontaneous generation and the ontology of Forms in Greek, Arabic and medieval Latin sources’, in P Adamson (ed), Classical Arabic philosophy: Sources and reception, London: The Warburg Institute, 2007, 150–175.
  • Heiberg, J L, Apollonii Pergaei quae Graece extant cum commentariis antiquis, Leipzig: Teubner, 1891.
  • Høyrup, Jens Egede, ‘Tertium non datur: On reasoning styles in early mathematics’, in P Mancosu (ed), Visualization, explanation and reasoning styles in mathematics Dordrecht: Springer, 2005, 91–121.
  • Ingold, Tim, ‘Bringing things back to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials’, NCRM Working Paper, University of Manchester, 2010.
  • Jaeger, Mary, Archimedes and the Roman imagination, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008.
  • Jamnitzer, Wenzel, Perspectiva corporum regularium, Nuremberg: Heussler, 1568.
  • Jardine, Nicholas, ‘The places of astronomy in early-modern culture’, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 29 (1998), 49–62.
  • Jardine, Nicholas, ‘Koyré’s Kepler/Kepler’s Koyré’, History of Science, 38 (2000), 363–376.
  • Jardine, Nicholas, ‘Kepler as transgressor and amalgamator of disciplines’, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 40 (2009), 375–380.
  • Jardine, Nicholas, ‘God’s “ideal reader”: Kepler and his serious jokes’, in R L Kremer and J Wlodarczyk (ed), Johannes Kepler: from Tübingen to Żagan. Studia Copernicana, 42, 2009b, 41–51.
  • Karr Schmidt, Suzanne, ‘Making time and space: Collecting Early Modern printed instruments’, in S Karr Schmidt and E H Wouk (ed), Prints in translation, 1450–1750 London: Routledge, 2017, 114–13.
  • Kepler, Johannes, Mysterium cosmographicum, Tübingen: Gruppenbach, 1596.
  • Kepler, Johannes, Astronomia nova, Heidelberg: Vögelin, 1609.
  • Kepler, Johannes, Strena seu De nive sexangula, Frankfurt am Main: Tampach, 1611.
  • Kepler, Johannes, Nova stereometria doliorum vinariorum, Linz: Plancus, 1615.
  • Kepler, Johannes, Tabulae rudolphinae, Ulm: Saurius, 1627.
  • Kepler, Johannes, Gesammelte Werke, dir. Max Caspar, Munich: Beck, 1937–2017.
  • Klein, Ursula, and Spary, E C, Materials and expertise in Early Modern Europe: Between market and laboratory, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010.
  • Knorr, Wilbur R, ‘Archimedes’ neusis-constructions in Spiral lines’, 22 (1978), 77–98.
  • Kremer, Richard L, ‘Playing with geometrical tools: Johannes Stabius's Astrolabium imperatorium (1515) and its successors’, Centaurus, 58 (2016), 104–134.
  • Leopold, J H, ‘Collecting instruments in Protestant Europe before 1800’, Journal of the History of Collections, 7 (1995), 151–157.
  • Limbach, Saskia, ‘Advertising medical studies in sixteenth-century Basel: Function and use of academic disputations’, in A Pettegree (ed), Broadsheets: Single-sheet publishing in the first age of print, Leiden: Brill, 2017, 376–398.
  • Lipking, Lawrence, ‘Johannes Kepler and twenty-first-century science’, Nuncius, 35 (2020), 413–428.
  • Lüthy, Christoph, ‘An Aristotelian watchdog as avant-garde physicist’, The Monist, 84 (2001), 542–561.
  • Maclean, Ian, ‘Diagrams in the defence of Galen: Medical uses of tables, squares, dichotomies, wheels, and latitudes, 1480–1574’, in S Kusukawa and I Maclean (ed), Transmitting knowledge: Words, images, and instruments in Early Modern Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 135–164.
  • Maclean, Ian, ‘Cardano’s eclectic psychology and its critique by Julius Caesar Scaliger’, Vivarium, 46 (2008), 392–417.
  • Malkevitch, Joseph, ‘Milestones in the history of polyhedra’, in Shaping space: Exploring polyhedra in nature, art, and the geometrical imagination, ed M Senechal, Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, 53–63.
  • Martens, Rhonda, ‘Harmony and simplicity: Aesthetic virtues and the rise of testability’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 40 (2009), 258–266.
  • Methuen, Charlotte, Kepler’s Tübingen: Stimulus to a theological mathematics, Farnham: Ashgate, 1998.
  • Moran, Bruce T, ‘German Prince-practitioners: Aspects in the development of courtly science, technology, and procedures in the Renaissance’, Technology and Culture, 22 (1981), 253–274.
  • Mosley, Adam, Bearing the heavens: Tycho Brahe and the astronomical community of the late sixteenth century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Netz, Reviel, Ludic proof: Greek mathematics and the Alexandrian aesthetic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  • Netz, Reviel, ‘What did Greek mathematicians find beautiful?’, Classical Philology, 105 (2010), 426–444.
  • Netz, Reviel, ‘Authorial presence in the ancient exact sciences’, in M Asper (ed), Writing science: Medical and mathematical authorship in ancient Greece, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013, 217–253.
  • Newman, William R, and Principe, Lawrence M, ‘Alchemy vs. chemistry: The etymological origins of a historiographic Mistake’, Early Science and Medicine, 3 (1998), 32–65.
  • Omodeo, Pietro Daniel, Copernicus in the cultural debates of the Renaissance, Leiden: Brill, 2014.
  • Omodeo, Pietro Daniel, ‘Epicurean astronomy? Atomistic and corpuscular stars in Kepler’s century’, in P Boner (ed), Kepler’s New Star (1604): Context and controversy, Leiden: Brill, 2021, 181–203.
  • Ossola, Carlo, Le antiche memorie del nulla, Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 2007.
  • Papadopoulos, Athanase, ‘Topology and biology: From Aristotle to Thom’, in S Dani and A Papadopouloss (ed), Geometry in history, Dordrecht: Springer, 2019, 89–128.
  • Pastorino, Cesare, ‘Johannes Kepler and the exploration of the weight of substances in the long sixteenth century’, Early Science and Medicine, 25 (2020), 328–359.
  • Regier, Jonathan, ‘An unfolding geometry: Appropriating Proclus in the Harmonice Mundi (1619)’, in M Granada, P Boner and D Tessicini (ed), Unifying heaven and earth: Essays in the history of modern cosmology, Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona, 2016, 217–237.
  • Regier, Jonathan, ‘Stars, crystals and courts: Johannes Kepler and Anselmus Boëtius de Boodt’, in P Boner (ed), Kepler’s New Star (1604): Context and controversy, Leiden: Brill, 2021, 107–128.
  • Regier, Jonathan, and Vermeir, Koen, Boundaries, extents and circulations: Space and spatiality in Early Modern natural philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer, 2016.
  • Reinhold, Erasmus, Prutenicae tabulae coelestium motuum, Tübingen: Morhart, 1562.
  • Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg, Toward a history of epistemic things, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.
  • Rothman, Aviva, ‘Forms of persuasion: Kepler, Galileo, and the dissemination of Copernicanism’, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 40 (2009), 403–419.
  • Rublack, Ulinka, The astronomer and the witch: Johannes Kepler’s fight for his mother, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  • Russell, J L, ‘Kepler’s laws of planetary motion: 1609–1666’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 2 (1964), 1–24.
  • Sakamoto, Kuni, ‘The German Hercules’s heir: Pierre Gassendi’s reception of Keplerian ideas’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 70 (2008), 69–91.
  • Serjeantson, Richard W, ‘Proof and persuasion’, in K Park and L Daston (ed), The Cambridge History of Science: III, Early Modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 132–175.
  • Shafranovskii, I I, ‘Kepler's crystallographic ideas and his tract “The six-cornered snowflake”’, Vistas in Astronomy, 18 (1975), 861–876.
  • Shank, J B, ‘Turning matter into mathematics’, unpublished draft (2020).
  • Simon, Gérard, Kepler, astronome, astrologue, Paris: Gallimard, 1979.
  • Smith, Pamela H, ‘The codification of vernacular theories of metallic generation in sixteenth-century European mining and metalworking’, in M Valleriani (ed), The structures of practical knowledge, Dordrecht: Springer, 2017, 371–392.
  • Staudacher, Fritz, Jost Bürgi, Johannes Kepler und der Kaiser, Zurich: Verlag NZZ Libro, 2014.
  • Steno, Nicolaus, Elementorum myologiae specimen, Florence: Stella, 1667.
  • Tessicini, Dario, ‘Straight paths and evanescent bodies: The physics and dynamics of celestial novelties in Kepler’s De stella nova’, in P Boner (ed), Kepler’s New Star (1604): Context and controversy. Leiden: Brill, 2021, 17–40.
  • Thoren, Victor E, The lord of Uraniborg: A biography of Tycho Brahe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • Van der Schoot, Albert, ‘Kepler’s search for form and proportion’, Renaissance Studies, 15 (2001), 59–78.
  • Van Damme, Stéphane, ‘Mathematical meditations: Revisiting moral practice in the sciences of the classical age’, Annales, 67 (2012), 133–149.
  • Van Nouhuys, Tabitta, The age of two-faced Janus: Comets of 1577 and 1618 and the decline of the Aristotelian world view in the Netherlands, Leiden: Brill, 1998.
  • Vassányi, Miklós, ‘Kepler, the supra-confessional Lutheran’, in D Vanden Auweele and M Vassányi (ed), Past and present political theology: Expanding the canon, London: Routledge, 2020, 11–34.
  • Vermeir, Koen, ‘Openness versus secrecy? Historical and historiographical remarks’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 45 (2012), 165–188.
  • Zorach, Rebecca, ‘Stones, snowflakes, and insect eggs’, 35 (2020), 341–363.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.