The implementation of the conceptual shift in conservation: pathways of three German UNESCO biosphere reserves

References

• Bennett NJ. 2016. Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol. 30(3):582–592. doi:10.1111/cobi.12681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgewater P. 2016. The Man and Biosphere programme of UNESCO: rambunctious child of the sixties, but was the promise fulfilled? Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 19:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. 2016. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN). 2016. Daten zur Natur 2016. Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN). 2017. Biosphärenreservate in Deutschland. https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/BfN/gebietsschutz/Dokumente/BR_Tab_06_2017_barrierefrei.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzer KL, Witkowski ETF, Erasmus BFN. 2014. Reviewing biosphere reserves globally: effective conservation action or bureaucratic label? Biol Rev. 89(1):82–104. doi:10.1111/brv.12044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley N, Eds. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland (Switzerland): IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles PFJ, Romagosa F, Buteau-Duitschaever WC, Havitz M, Glover TD, McCutcheon B. 2013. Good governance in protected areas: an evaluation of stakeholders’ perceptions in British Columbia and Ontario Provincial Parks. J Sustainable Tourism. 21(1):60–79. doi:10.1080/09669582.2012.671331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdmann K-H, Kerner HF, Köppel J, Mayerl D, Mattern K, Pokorny D, Schönthaler K, Spandau L, Weidenhammer S. 1995. Leitlinien für Schutz, Pflege und Entwicklung der Biosphärenreservate in Deutschland. Pages 1–59 in Ständige Arbeitsgruppe der Biosphärenreservate in Deutschland, editor. Biosphärenreservate in Deutschland - Leitlinien für Schutz, Pflege und Entwicklung. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Farke H, Potel P. 1995. Biosphärenreservat Niedersächsiches Wattenmeer. in Ständige Arbeitsgruppe der Biosphärenreservate. In: Deutschland, editor. Biosphärenreservate in Deutschland - Leitlinien für Schutz, Pflege und Entwicklung. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; p. 127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Folke C. 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environ Change. 16(3):253–267. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görg C, Spangenberg JH, Tekken V, Burkhard B, Thanh Truong D, Escalada M, Luen Heong K, Arida G, Marquez LV, Victor Bustamante J, et al. 2014. Engaging local knowledge in biodiversity research: experiences from large inter- and transdisciplinary projects. Interdiscip Sci Rev. 39(4):323–341. doi:10.1179/0308018814Z.00000000095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer T, Mose I, Siegrist D, Weixlbaumer N. editors. 2016. Parks of the future: protected areas in Europe challenging regional and global change. München: oekom Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hausner VH, Engen S, Bludd EK, Yoccoz NG. 2017. Policy indicators for use in impact evaluations of protected area networks. Ecol Indic. 75:192–202. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernes MI, Metzger MJ. 2017. Understanding local community’s values, worldviews and perceptions in the Galloway and Southern Ayrshire biosphere reserve, Scotland. J Environ Manage. 186:12–23. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling CSS. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 4(1):1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
   Google Scholar
• Huber M, Arnberger A. 2016. Opponents, waverers or supporters: the influence of place-attachment dimensions on local residents’ acceptance of a planned biosphere reserve in Austria. J Environ Plann Manage. 59(9):1610–1628. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1083415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishwaran N, Persic A, Tri NH. 2008. Concept and practice: the case of UNESCO biosphere reserves. Int J Environ Sustainable Dev. 7(2):118. doi:10.1504/IJESD.2008.018358.
   Google Scholar
• Linnell JDC, Kaczensky P, Wotschikowsky U, Lescureux N, Boitani L. 2015. Framing the relationship between people and nature in the context of European conservation. Conserv Biol. 29(4):978–985. doi:10.1111/cobi.12534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood M. 2010. Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. J Environ Manage. 91(3):754–766. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace GM. 2014. Whose conservation? Science. 345(6204):1558–1560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-López B, van Oudenhoven APE, Balvanera P, Crossman ND, Parrotta J, Rusch GM, Schröter M, Smith-Hall C. 2019. Ecosystems and People – an inclusive, interdisciplinary journal. Ecosyst People. 15(1):1–2. doi:10.1080/26395908.2018.1540160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathevet R, Thompson J, Folke C, Chapin FS. 2016. Protected areas and their surrounding territory: social-ecological systems in the context of ecological solidarity. Ecol Appl. 26(1):5–16. doi:10.1890/14-0421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald. 2010. 40 Jahre Nationalpark-Geschichte und -Geschichten: festschrift 40 Jahre Nationalpark Bayrerischer Wald. Grafenau: Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald.
   Google Scholar
• Nationalpark Wattenmeer. 2017, September 1. Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer als UNESCO-Biosphärenreservat bestätigt.
   Google Scholar
• Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, B and Klimaschutz (NMU). 2005a. UNESCO Biosphärenreservat Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer: Sander - Wir wollen am Biosphärenreservat festhalten.
   Google Scholar
• Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, B and Klimaschutz (NMU). 2005b. UNESCO Biosphärenreservat Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer: Sander - Menschen in der Region sind gefragt.
   Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Kizos T, Bieling C, Le Dû-Blayo L, Budniok M-A, Bürgi M, Crumley CL, Girod G, Howard P, Kolen J, et al. 2015. Exploring ecosystem-change and society through a landscape lens: recent progress in European landscape research. Ecol Soc. 20(2):art5. doi:10.5751/ES-07443-200205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MF. 2017. The re-territorialisation of biosphere reserves: the case of Wester Ross, Northwest Scotland. Environ Sci Policy. 72:30–40. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MF, Park JJ, Bouamrane M. 2010. Reporting progress on internationally designated sites: the periodic review of biosphere reserves. Environ Sci Policy. 13(6):549–557. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed M, Massie M. 2013. Embracing ecological learning and social learning: UNESCO biosphere reserves as exemplars of changing conservation practices. Conserv Soc. 11(4):391. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.125755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MG. 2016. Conservation (In)Action: renewing the relevance of UNESCO biosphere reserves. Conserv Lett. 9(6):448–456. doi:10.1111/conl.2016.9.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliep R, Stoll-Kleemann S. 2010. Assessing governance of biosphere reserves in Central Europe. Land Use Policy. 27(3):917–927. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll-Kleemann S, Welp M. 2008. Participatory and integrated management of biosphere reserves. GAIA - Ecol Perspect Sci Hum Econ. 17:(S1):161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Wakamatsu N. 2018. Analysis of the governance structures in Japan’s biosphere reserves: perspectives from bottom–up and multilevel characteristics. Environ Manage. 61(1):155–170. doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0949-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengö M, Brondizio ES, Elmqvist T, Malmer P, Spierenburg M. 2014. Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: the multiple evidence base approach. Ambio. 43(5):579–591. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidball KG, Metcalf S, Bain M, Elmqvist T. 2017. Community-led reforestation: cultivating the potential of virtuous cycles to confer resilience in disaster disrupted social–ecological systems. Sustainability Sci. 13(3):797–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1996. Biosphere reserves: the Seville strategy and the statutory framework of the world network. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2017a. Fulfilling the three functions. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/biosphere-reserves/main-characteristics/functions/.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2017b. Biosphere reserves withdrawn from the world network of biosphere reserves. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/biosphere-reserves/withdrawal-of-biosphere-reserves/.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. n.d.. Wadden sea. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1314.
   Google Scholar
• van Oudenhoven APE, Martín-López B, Schröter M, de Groot R. 2018. Advancing science on the multiple connections between biodiversity, ecosystems and people. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage. 14(1):127–131. doi:10.1080/21513732.2018.1479501.
   Google Scholar
• Wallner A, Bauer N, Hunziker M. 2007. Perceptions and evaluations of biosphere reserves by local residents in Switzerland and Ukraine. Landsc Urban Plan. 83(2–3):104114. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar