Beyond words – the potential of arts-based research on human-nature connectedness

References

• Abson DJ, Fischer J, Leventon J, Newig J, Schomerus T, Vilsmaier U, Von Wehrden H, Abernethy P, Ives CD, Jager NW, et al. 2017. Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio. Springer Netherlands. 46(1):30–39. doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuthnott KD, Sutter GC. 2019. Songwriting for nature: increasing nature connection and well-being through musical creativity. Environ Educ Res. Routledge. 25(9):1300–1318. doi:10.1080/13504622.2019.1608425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone T, Eisner EW. 2012. Arts based research. Thousand Oaks (CA, USA): SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchet BKD. 2009. Sustainability program profile, green mountain college puts liberal arts focus on the environment and sustainability. Sustainability: J Rec. 2(5):288–291. doi:10.1089/SUS.2009.9840.
   Google Scholar
• Boal A. 2002. Games for actors and non-actors. 2nd ed. London/New York (NY, UK/USA): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdon Z. 2016. Towards understanding the development of connectedness-to-nature, and its role in land stewardship behaviour. Waterloo (ON, Canada): University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg R, Wood C, Barton J, Pretty J 2013. Measuring connection to nature in children aged 8-12: A robust methodology for the RSPB, A short report for RSPB.
   Google Scholar
• Brand R, Karvonen A. 2007. The ecosystem of expertise: complementary knowledges for sustainable development. Sustainability: Sci, Pract, Policy. 3(1):21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni CM, Schultz PW. 2010. Implicit beliefs about self and nature: evidence from an IAT game. J Environ Psychol. Elsevier Ltd. 30(1):95–102. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni CM, Winter PL, Schultz PW, Omoto AM, Tabanico JJ. 2017. Getting to know nature: evaluating the effects of the get to know program on children’s connectedness with nature. Environ Educ Res. 23(1):43–62. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1074659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capaldi CA, Dopko RL, Zelenski JM. 2014. The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 5(August):1–15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cervinka R, Röderer K, Hefler E. 2012. Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. J Health Psychol. 17(3):379–388. doi:10.1177/1359105311416873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilton G. 2013. Altered inquiry: discovering arts-based research through an altered book. Int J Qual Methods. 12(1):457–477. doi:10.1177/160940691301200123.
   Google Scholar
• Cole AL, Knowles JG. 2008. Arts-informed research. In: Knowles JG, Cole AL, editors. Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues. Thousand Oaks (CA, USA): SAGE Publications; p. 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke B, West S, Boonstra WJ. 2016. Dwelling in the biosphere: exploring an embodied human–environment connection in resilience thinking. Sustainability Sci. Springer Japan. 11(5):831–843. doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0367-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgriff M. 2011. Learning from leisure: developing nature connectedness in outdoor education. Asia-Pac J Health, Sport Phys Educ. 2(1):51–65. doi:10.1080/18377122.2011.9730343.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgriff M, Little DE, Wilson E. 2009. The nature of nature: how new zealand women in middle to later life experience nature-based leisure. Leisure Sci. 32(1):15–32. doi:10.1080/01490400903430822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot WT, Zwaal N. 2007. Storytelling as a medium for balanced dialogue on conservation in Cameroon. Environ Conserv. 34(1):45–54. doi:10.1017/S0376892907003682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutcher DD, Finley JC, Luloff AE, Johnson JB. 2007. Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environ Behav. 39(4):474–493. doi:10.1177/0013916506298794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner EW. 1997. The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educ Res. 26(6):4–10. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1176961.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Giménez ME. 2015. “A shepherd has to invent”: poetic analysis of social-ecological change in the cultural landscape of the central Spanish Pyrenees. Ecol Soc. 20(4):art29. doi:10.5751/ES-08054-200429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer A, Young JC. 2007. Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biol Conserv. 136(2):271–282. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer J, Riechers M. 2019. A leverage points perspective on sustainability. People Nat. 1(1):115–120. doi:10.1002/pan3.13.
   Google Scholar
• Folke C, Jansson Å, Rockström J, Olsson P, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Crépin AS, Daily G, Danell K, Ebbesson J, et al. 2011. Reconnecting to the Biosphere. AMBIO. 40(7):719–738. doi:10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman C, Van Heezik Y, Hand K, Stein A. 2015. Making cities more child- and nature-friendly: a child-focused study of nature connectedness in New Zealand cities. Child Youth Environ. 25(2):176–207. doi:10.7721/chilyoutenvi.25.2.0176.
   Google Scholar
• Geng L, Xu J, Ye L, Zhou W, Zhou K. 2015. Connections with nature and environmental behaviors. Plos One. Edited by M. Friese. 10(5):e0127247. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons M. 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks (CA, USA): SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbertson E. 2012. When nature speaks: evoking connectedness with nature in children through role-play in outdoor programming. Colwood (BC, Canada): Royal Roads University.
   Google Scholar
• Goris M, Van den Berg L, Da Silva Lopes I, Behagel J, Verschoor G, Turnhout E. 2019. Resignification practices of youth in zona da mata, Brazil in the transition toward agroecology. Sustainability (Switzerland). 11:1. doi:10.3390/su11010197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling E, Williams KJH. 2010. Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: testing connectedness theory among farmers. J Environ Psychol. Elsevier Ltd. 30(3):298–304. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray T, Birrell C. 2015. “Touched by the Earth”: a place-based outdoor learning programme incorporating the arts. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn. 15(4):330–349. doi:10.1080/14729679.2015.1035293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray T, Thomson C. 2016. Transforming environmental awareness of students through the arts and place-based pedagogies. LEARNing Landscapes. 9(2):239–260. doi:10.36510/learnland.v9i2.774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiney MS, Oberhauser KS. 2009. Conservation volunteers’ connection to nature. Ecopsychology. 1(4):187–197. doi:10.1089/eco.2009.0030.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrichs H. 2018. Sustainability science with Ozzy Osbourne, Julia Roberts and Ai Weiwei. Gaia. 27(1):132–137.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrichs H. 2019. Strengthening sensory sustainability science-theoretical and methodological considerations. Sustainability (Switzerland). 11:3. doi:10.3390/su11030769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heras M, Tàbara JD. 2014. Let’s play transformations! Performative methods for sustainability. Sustainability Sci. 9(3):379–398. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0245-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heras M, Tàbara JD. 2016. Conservation theatre: mirroring experiences and performing stories in community management of natural resources. Soc Nat Resour. Taylor & Francis. 29(8):948–964. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1095375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoot RE, Friedman H. 2011. Connectedness and environmental behavior: sense of interconnectedness and pro-environmental behavior. Int J Transpersonal Stud. 30(1–2):89–100. Available at: http://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/ijts-transpersonalstudies/vol30/iss1/10/.
   Google Scholar
• Howell AJ, Howell AJ, Dopko RL, Passmore H, Buro K. 2011. Nature connectedness: associations with well-being and mindfulness. Pers Individ Dif. 51(2):166–171. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundertwasser F. 1983. Schöne Wege: gedanken Über Kunst Und Leben. Schurian W Edited by. Munich (Germany): Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ives CD, Giusti M, Fischer J, Abson DJ, Klaniecki K, Dorninger C, Laudan J, Barthel S, Abernethy P, Martín-López B, et al. 2017. Human-nature connection: a multidisciplinary review. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 26–27(November 2016):106–113. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Ives CD, Abson DJ, von Wehrden H, Dorninger C, Klaniecki K, Fischer J. 2018. Reconnecting with nature for sustainability. Sustainability Sci. 13(5):1389–1397. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0542-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson SK, Seavey JR, Mueller RC. 2016. Integrated science and art education for creative climate change communication. Ecol Soc. 21(3):art30. doi:10.5751/ES-08626-210330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagodzinski J, Wallin J. 2013. Arts-based research: a critique and a proposal. Rotterdam (Netherlands): Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson EL, Isgren E. 2017. Local perceptions of land-use change: using participatory art to reveal direct and indirect socioenvironmental effects of land acquisitions in Kilombero Valley, Tanzania. Ecol Soc. 22(1):art3. doi:10.5751/ES-08986-220103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 33(7):14–26. Available at: http://edr.sagepub.com/content/33/7/14.short.
   Google Scholar
• Keniger L, Gaston KJ, Irvine KN, Fuller RA. 2013. What are the benefits of interacting with nature? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 10(3):913–935. doi:10.3390/ijerph10030913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen MJ. 2010. Connectedness to nature: comparing rural and urban youths’ relationships with nature. Colwood (BC, Canada): Royal Roads University. Available at: http://media.proquest.com.ezproxy.royalroads.ca/media/pq/classic/doc/2005489331/fmt/ai/rep/NPDF?hl=&cit%3Aauth=Klassen%2C+Michael+Jonathan&cit%3Atitle=Connectedness+to+nature%3A+Comparing+rural+and+urban+youths%27+relationships+with+nature&cit%3Apub=ProQu.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles JG, Cole AL. 2008. Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues. Thousand Oaks (CA, USA): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kossak M. 2018. A different way of knowing: assessment and feedback in art-based research. In: Prior RW, editor. Using art as research in learning and teaching: multidisciplinary approaches across the arts. Bristol/Chicago (IL, UK, USA): Intellect; p. 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Sci. 7(Supplement 1):25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy P. 2009. Method meets art: arts-based research practice. New York (NY, USA): The Guilford Press. Available at: http://libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/login?url=http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/griffith/detail.action?docID=352685.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy P. 2017. Research design: quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York (NY, USA): The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez FR, Wickson F, Hausner VH. 2018. Finding creative voice: applying arts-based research in the context of biodiversity conservation. Sustainability (Switzerland). 10(6):1–18. doi:10.3390/su10061778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louv R. 2008. Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill (NC, USA): Algonquin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lumber R, Richardson M, Sheffield D. 2017. Beyond knowing nature: contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS ONE. 12(5):1–24. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Materia CJ. 2016. Climate state anxiety and connectedness to nature in rural Tasmania. Hobart (Australia): University of Tasmania. Available at: http://eprints.utas.edu.au/23089/.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer FS, Frantz CM. 2004. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol. 24(4):503–515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiff S. 1998. Art-based research. London (UK): Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows D. 1999. Leverage points: places to intervene in a system, world futures. Hartland (VT, USA): The Sustainability Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JR. 2005. Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol. 20(8):430–434. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller TR. 2013. Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustainability Sci. 8(2):279–293. doi:10.1007/s11625-012-0180-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon K. 2016. A guideline to improve qualitative social science publishing in ecology and conservation journals. Ecol Soc. 21(3):art17. doi:10.5751/ES-08663-210317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse M. 2011. River experience: a phenomenological description of meaningful experiences on a wilderness river journey. Hobart (Australia): University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM. 2013. The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Front Psychol. 4(NOV):1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA. 2009. The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ Behav. 41(5):715–740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins HE. 2010. Measuring love and care for nature. J Environ Psychol. Elsevier Ltd. 30(4):455–463. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pett TJ. 2016. Unpacking the people–biodiversity paradox: a conceptual framework. BioScience. 66(7):576–583. doi:10.1093/biosci/biw036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior RW. 2018. Art as the topic, process and outcome of research within higher education. In: Prior RW, editor. Using art as research in learning and teaching: multidisciplinary approaches across the arts, 43–60. Bristol/Chicago (IL, UK, USA): Intellect. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/2436/622185.
   Google Scholar
• Pyle RM. 1993. The thunder tree: lessons from an urban wildland. Boston (MA, USA): Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Pyle RM. 2003. Nature matrix: reconnecting people and nature. Oryx. 37(2):206–214. doi:10.1017/S0030605303000383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathwell KJ, Armitage D. 2016. Art and artistic processes bridge knowledge systems about social-ecological change: an empirical examination with Inuit artists from Nunavut, Canada. Ecol Soc. 21(2):art21. doi:10.5751/ES-08369-210221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restall B, Conrad E. 2015. A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. J Environ Manage. 159:264–278. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson L. 2016. Sharing knowledge: performing co-production in collaborative artistic work. Environ Plan A. 48(11):2256–2271. doi:10.1177/0308518X16653963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riechers M. 2019. Stories of favourite places in public spaces: emotional responses to landscape change. Sustainability. 11(14):3851. doi:10.3390/su11143851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolling JH Jr. 2010. A paradigm analysis of arts-based research and implications for education. Stud Art Educ. 51(2):102–114. doi:10.1080/00393541.2010.11518795.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa H. 2016. Resonanz: eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. 1 ed. Berlin (Germany): Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden M, Wimpenny K. 2014. A practical guide to arts-related research. Rotterdam (Netherlands): Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffer M. 2015. Dual thinking for scientists. Ecol Soc. 20(2):art3. doi:10.5751/ES-07434-200203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz PW. 2001. The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. J Environ Psychol. 21(4):327–339. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz PW. 2002. Inclusion with nature: the psychology of human-nature relations. Psychol Sustainable Dev. Boston, MA, USA: Springer US:61–78. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz PW. 2004. Implicit connections with nature. J Environ Psychol. 24(1):31–42. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz PW, Tabanico J. 2007. Self, identity, and the natural environment: exploring implicit connections with nature. J Appl Soc Psychol. 37(6):1219–1247. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepardson DP, Wee B, Priddy M, Harbor J. 2007. Students’ mental models of the environment. J Res Sci Teach. 44(2):327–348. doi:10.1002/tea.20161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvas DV. 2013. Measuring an emotional connection to nature among children. Colorado State University. Available at: https://dspace.library.colostate.edu/bitstream/handle/10217/78868/Silvas_colostate_0053A_11603.pdf;jsessionid=1uby4fhgox2gj1rop2nokdk8g3?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Soga M, Gaston KJ. 2016. Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions. Front Ecol Environ. 14(2):94–101. doi:10.1002/fee.1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangenberg JH. 2011. Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv. 38(3):275–287. doi:10.1017/S0376892911000270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springgay S. 2008. Being with a/r/tography. Rotterdam (Netherlands): Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tam K-P. 2013a. Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: similarities and differences. J Environ Psychol. 34(June 2013):64–78. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Tam K-P. 2013b. Dispositional empathy with nature. J Environ Psychol. 35:92–104. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomashow M. 1995. Ecological identity: becoming a reflective environmentalist. Cambridge (MA, USA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell JL, Francis AJP, Bagot KL. 2014. Nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: spirituality as a potential mediator. Ecopsychology. 6(4):241–251. doi:10.1089/eco.2014.0025.
   Google Scholar
• Van Borek S. 2013. Natural capital: illuminating the true value of nature’s services through community-engaged, site-specific creative production and exhibition. Sustainability: J Rec. 6(5):282–288. doi:10.1089/SUS.2013.9838.
   Google Scholar
• Von Wehrden H. 2017. Methodological challenges in sustainability science: a call for method plurality, procedural rigor and longitudinal research. Challenges Sustainability. 5(1):35–42. doi:10.12924/cis2017.05010035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroegop J. 2014. Nature connectedness & winter camping: a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Linköping (Sweden): Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Windhorst E, Williams A. 2015. Growing up, naturally: the mental health legacy of early nature affiliation. Ecopsychology. 7(3):115–125. doi:10.1089/eco.2015.0040.
   Google Scholar
• Zelenski JM, Nisbet EK. 2014. Happiness and feeling connected: the distinct role of nature relatedness. Environ Behav. 46(1):3–23. doi:10.1177/0013916512451901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurba M, Berkes F. 2014. Caring for country through participatory art: creating a boundary object for communicating Indigenous knowledge and values. Local Environ. 19(8):821–836. doi:10.1080/13549839.2013.792051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zylstra MJ, Knight AT, Esler KJ, Le Grange LL. 2014. Connectedness as a core conservation concern: an interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Sci Rev. 2(1–2):119–143. doi:10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3.
   Google Scholar