Exploring desirable nature futures for Nationaal Park Hollandse Duinen

References

• Aguiar APD, Collste D, Harmáčková ZV, Pereira L, Selomane O, Galafassi D, Van Vuuren D, Van Der Leeuw S. 2020. Co-designing global target-seeking scenarios: a cross-scale participatory process for capturing multiple perspectives on pathways to sustainability. Glob Environ Chang. 65:102198. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai X, van der Leeuw S, O’Brien K, Berkhout F, Biermann F, Brondizio ES, Cudennec C, Dearing J, Duraiappah A, Glaser M, et al. 2016. Plausible and desirable futures in the anthropocene: a new research agenda. Glob Environ Chang. 39:351–362. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett EM, Biggs R, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ, . 2021. Patchwork earth: navigating pathways to just, thriving, and sustainable futures. One Earth. 4(2):172–176. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Berkes F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conserv Biol. 18(3):621–630. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes F. 2007. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104(39):15188–15193. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702098104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieling C, Eser U, Plieninger T. 2020. Towards a better understanding of values in sustainability transformations: ethical perspectives on landscape stewardship. Ecosyst People. 16(1):188–196. doi:10.1080/26395916.2020.1786165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrini-Feyerabend G, Dudley N, Jaeger T, et al. 2013. Governance of protected areas: from understanding to action. Gland (Switzerland): IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Caniglia G, Luederitz C, von Wirth T, Fazey I, Martín-López B, Hondrila K, König A, von Wehrden H, Schäpke NA, Laubichler MD, et al. 2021. A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability. Nat Sustain. 4(2):93–100. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00616-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebrián-Piqueras MA, Filyushkina A, Johnson DN, Lo VB, López-Rodríguez MD, March H, Oteros-Rozas E, Peppler-Lisbach C, Quintas-Soriano C, Raymond CM, et al. 2020. Scientific and local ecological knowledge, shaping perceptions towards protected areas and related ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol. 35(11):2549–2567. doi:10.1007/s10980-020-01107-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakroun L, Droz L. 2020. Sustainability through landscapes: natural parks, satoyama, and permaculture in Japan. Ecosyst People. 16(1):369–383. doi:10.1080/26395916.2020.1837244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, Chapman M, Díaz S, Gómez-Baggethun E, Gould R, Hannahs N, Jax K, Klain S, et al. 2016. Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113(6):1462–1465. doi:10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen PJ. 2002. Geology of mankind. Nature. 415(6867):23. doi:10.1038/415023a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming GS, Allen CR. 2017. Protected areas as social-ecological systems: perspectives from resilience and social-ecological systems theory. Ecol Appl. 27(6):1709–1717. doi:10.1002/eap.1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming GS, Allen CR, Ban NC, Biggs D, Biggs HC, Cumming DHM, De Vos A, Epstein G, Etienne M, Maciejewski K, et al. 2015. Understanding protected area resilience: a multi- scale, social-ecological approach. Ecol Appl. 25(2):299–319. doi:10.1890/13-2113.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry A, Hodgson A. 2008. Seeing in multiple horizons: connecting futures to strategy. J Futur Stud. 13:1–20. https://jfsdigital.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/131-A01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• De Argumentenfabriek. 2013. Waardenkaart Natuur. [accessed 2021 Aug 7]. https://www.argumentenfabriek.nl/media/1899/12118-waardenkaart-natuur-s.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, Ngo HT, Agard J, Arneth A, Balvanera P, Brauman KA, Butchart SHM, Chan KMA, et al. 2019. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science (80-). 366(6471). doi:10.1126/science.aax3100. 366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galafassi D, Tàbara JD, Heras M. 2018. Restoring our senses, restoring the earth. Fostering imaginative capacities through the arts for envisioning climate transformations. Elementa. 6. doi:10.1525/elementa.330.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann M, Biggs R, Pereira L, Preiser R, Hichert T, Blanchard R, Warrington-Coetzee H, King N, Merrie A, Nilsson W, et al. 2020. Scenarios of good anthropocenes in Southern Africa. Futures. 118:102526. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamel P, Guerry AD, Polasky S, Han B, Douglass JA, Hamann M, Janke B, Kuiper JJ, Levrel H, Liu H, et al. 2021. Mapping the benefits of nature in cities with the InVEST software. Npj Urban Sustain. 1(1). doi:10.1038/s42949-021-00027-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hanspach J, Jamila Haider L, Oteros-Rozas E, Stahl Olafsson A, Gulsrud NM, Raymond CM, Torralba M, Martín‐López B, Bieling C, García‐Martín M, et al. 2020. Biocultural approaches to sustainability: a systematic review of the scientific literature. People Nat. 2(3):643–659. doi:10.1002/pan3.10120.
   Google Scholar
• Harmáčková ZV, Blättler L, Aguiar APD, Daněk J, Krpec P, Vačkářová D. 2021. Linking multiple values of nature with future impacts: value-based participatory scenario development for sustainable landscape governance. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00953-8.
   Google Scholar
• Heath-Brown, N. 2015. Chatham House (Royal Institute of International Affairs). In: Heath-Brown, N. editor. The Statesman’s Yearbook 2016. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-57823-8_133
   Google Scholar
• Heinrup M, Schultz L. 2017. Swedish biosphere reserves as arenas for implementing the 2030 Agenda Swedish biosphere reserves as arenas for implementing the 2030 Agenda
   Google Scholar
• Hensler L, Merçon J, Vilsmaier U. 2021. Diverse values and a common utopia: insights from a participatory art-based plural valuation experience in Xalapa, Mexico. Case Stud Environ. 5(1). doi:10.1525/cse.2021.1234747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horcea-Milcu AI, Abson DJ, Apetrei CI, Duse IA, Freeth R, Riechers M, Lam DPM, Dorninger C, Lang DJ. 2019. Values in transformational sustainability science: four perspectives for change. Sustain Sci. 14(5):1425–1437. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00656-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2015. Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services ( deliverable 3 (d)). IPBES/4/INF/13
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2016. The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ferrier S, Ninan KN, Leadley P, Alkemade R, Acosta LA, Akçakaya HR, Brotons L, Cheung WWL, Christensen V, Harhash KA, et al., editors. Bonn (Germany): IPBES secretariat; p. 348. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3235428.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019a. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Brondizio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT, editors. Bonn (Germany): IPBES secretariat; p. 1148. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3831673.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019b. Information on work related to scenarios and models. Report of the Executive Secretary on the implementation of the first work programme for the period 2014–2018. IPBES/7/INF/11
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2021. Report of the IPBES task force on scenarios and models on its workshop on modelling nature futures scenarios under the 2030 IPBES rolling work programme. IPBES/TF/ SCN/WSP/2021/1/6
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs S, Zafra-Calvo N, Gonzalez-Jimenez D, Guibrunet L, Benessaiah K, Berghöfer A, Chaves-Chaparro J, Díaz S, Gomez-Baggethun E, Lele S, et al. 2020. Use your power for good: plural valuation of nature – the Oaxaca statement. Glob Sustain. 3:1–7. doi:10.1017/sus.2020.2.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen J. 2009a. Sustainable development and protected landscapes: the case of the Netherlands. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 16(1):37–47. doi:10.1080/13504500902757981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen J. 2009b. Protected landscapes in the Netherlands: changing ideas and approaches. Plan Perspect. 24(4):435–455. doi:10.1080/02665430903145689.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen ABG, Arhonditsis GB, Beusen A, Bolding K, Bruce L, Bruggeman J, Couture R-M, Downing AS, Alex Elliott J, Frassl MA, et al. 2015. Exploring, exploiting and evolving diversity of aquatic ecosystem models: a community perspective. Aquat Ecol. 49(4):513–548. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9544-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen J, Knippenberg L. 2012. From landscape preservation to landscape governance: European experiences with sustainable development of protected landscapes. Stud Environ Appl Geomorphol. doi:10.5772/29545.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aceituno A, Peterson GD, Norström AV, et al. 2020. Local lens for SDG implementation: lessons from bottom-up approaches in Africa. Sustain Sci. 15(3):729–743. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00746-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Peterson GD, Cheung W, et al. 2021. Towards a better future for biodiversity and people: modelling nature futures. SocArXiv. doi:10.31235/osf.io/93sqp.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinschroth F, Kowarik I. 2020. COVID-19 crisis demonstrates the urgent need for urban greenspaces. Front Ecol Environ. 18(6):318–319. doi:10.1002/fee.2230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok MTJ, Kok K, Peterson GD, et al. 2016. Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios. Sustain Sci. 12:1–5. doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0354-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci. 7(S1):25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclère D, Obersteiner M, Barrett M, Butchart SHM, Chaudhary A, De Palma A, DeClerck FAJ, Di Marco M, Doelman JC, Dürauer M, et al. 2020. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature. 585(7826):551–556. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2705-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembi RC, Cronemberger C, Picharillo C, Koffler S, Sena PHA, Felappi JF, Moraes ARD, Arshad A, Santos JPD, Mansur AV, et al. 2020. Urban expansion in the Atlantic forest: applying the nature futures framework to develop a conceptual model and future scenarios. Biota Neotrop. 20(suppl 1):1–13. doi:10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0904.
   Google Scholar
• Lum R. 2015. Working with Verge. APF Compass Methods Analog. April:5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mace GM. 2014. Whose conservation? Science (80-). 345(6204):1558–1560. doi:10.1126/science.1254704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPhearson T, Iwaniec DM, Bai X. 2016. Positive visions for guiding urban transformations toward sustainable futures. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 22:33–40. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrie A, Keys P, Metian M, Österblom H. 2017. Radical ocean futures − scenario development using science fiction prototyping. Futures. 0–1. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhr MM. 2020. Beyond words–the potential of arts-based research on human-nature connectedness. Ecosyst People. 16(1):249–257. doi:10.1080/26395916.2020.1811379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradian R, Pascual U. 2018. A typology of elementary forms of human-nature relations: a contribution to the valuation debate. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 35:8–14. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nationaal Parken Bureau. 2018. De standaard voor de gebiedsaanduiding nationaal park (werkversie mei 2018). Amersfoort: Nationale Parken Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Neefjes J. 2018. Landschapsbiografie Nationaal Park Hollandse Duinen: historisch-landschappelijke karakteristieken en hun ontstaan. Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed (RCE). Amersfoort.
   Google Scholar
• NPHD. 2017. Waar natuur stad en zee verbindt: Onze ambities voor Nationaal Park Hollandse Duinen. Zoetermeer. [accessed 2021 July 6]. https://www.nationaalparkhollandseduinen.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/NPHD-ambitiedocument.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NPHD. 2020a. Statusaanvraag Nationaal Park Holandse Duinen: een Nationaal Park Nieuwe Stijl dat stad en natuur verbindt. [accessed 6 July 2021]. https://www.nationaalparkhollandseduinen.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NPHD-Statusaanvraag-2020-LR3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NPHD. 2020b. Uitvoeringsprogramma Nationaal Park Hollandse Duinen 2021-2025. [accessed 6 July 2021]. https://www.nationaalparkhollandseduinen.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NPHD-Uitvoeringsprogramma-2020-LR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor S, Kenter JO. 2019. Making intrinsic values work; integrating intrinsic values of the more-than-human world through the life framework of values. Sustain Sci. 14(5):1247–1265. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00715-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F. 2004. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manage. 34(1):75–90. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oteros-Rozas E, Martin-Lopez B, Daw TM, et al. 2015. Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies. Ecol Soc. 20(4). doi:10.5751/ES-07985-200432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios-Agundez I, Onaindia M, Potschin M, et al. 2015. Relevance for decision making of spatially explicit, participatory scenarios for ecosystem services in an area of a high current demand. Environ Sci Policy. 54:199–209. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomo I, Montes C, Martín-López B, González JA, García-Llorente M, Alcorlo P, Mora MRG. 2014. Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the anthropocene. Bioscience. 64(3):181–191. doi:10.1093/biosci/bit033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PBL. 2020. Report from the workshop “New narratives for nature: operationalizing the IPBES nature futures scenarios”. The Hague, Netherlands, 41. Report: 4181
   Google Scholar
• Pereira LM, Davies KK, Belder E, Ferrier S, Karlsson‐Vinkhuyzen S, Kim H, Kuiper JJ, Okayasu S, Palomo MG, Pereira HM, et al. 2020. Developing multiscale and integrative nature–people scenarios using the nature futures framework. People Nat. 2(4):1172–1195. doi:10.1002/pan3.10146.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira LM, Hichert T, Hamann M, et al. 2017. Using futures methods to create transformative spaces: visions of a good anthropocene in Southern Africa. Ecol Soc. 23. art19. doi:10.5751/ES-09907-230119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira L, Sitas N, Ravera F, et al. 2019. Building capacities for transformative change towards sustainability: imagination in intergovernmental science-policy scenario processes. Elem Sci Anthr. 7. doi:10.1525/elementa.374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana S, Ávila-García D, Dib V, Familia L, Gerhardinger LC, Martin E, Martins PI, Pompeu J, Selomane O, Tauli JI, et al. 2020. The voices of youth in envisioning positive futures for nature and people. Ecosyst People. 16(1):326–344. doi:10.1080/26395916.2020.1821095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM, et al. 2020. Seeds of good anthropocenes: developing sustainability scenarios for Northern Europe. Sustain Sci. 15(2):605–617. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00714-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawluk A, Ford RM, Williams KJH. 2018. Value-Based scenario planning: exploring multifaceted values in natural disaster planning and management. Ecology and Society. 23(4):2. doi:10.5751/ES-10447-230402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly K, Adamowski J, John K. 2018. Participatory mapping of ecosystem services to understand stakeholders ’ perceptions of the future of the Mactaquac Dam, Canada. Ecosyst Serv. 30:107–123. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe M, Townshend T, Davies C, et al. 2018. Urban national parks or national park Cities? T Ctry Plan:261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa IMD, Pereira HM, Ferrier S, Alkemade R, Acosta LA, Akcakaya HR, den Belder E, Fazel AM, Fujimori S, Harfoot M, et al. 2017. Multiscale scenarios for nature futures. Nat Ecol Evol. 1(10):1416–1419. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0273-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruckelshaus M, McKenzie E, Tallis H, Guerry A, Daily G, Kareiva P, Polasky S, Ricketts T, Bhagabati N, Wood SA, et al. 2015. Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol Econ. 115:11–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz L, West S, Bourke AJ, d’Armengol L, Torrents P, Hardardottir H, Jansson A, Roldán AM. 2018. Learning to live with social-ecological complexity: an interpretive analysis of learning in 11 UNESCO biosphere reserves. Glob Environ Chang. 50:75–87. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH. 2012. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings Psychol Cult. 2(1):1–20. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2020. Global biodiversity outlook 5. Montreal, 10.5281/zenodo.4031437
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe B, Fazey I,G, Leicester G, Lyon A, Fazey I. 2016. Three Horizons: a powerful practice for transformation. Ecol Soc. 21(2). doi:10.5751/ES-08388-210247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, et al. 2015. The trajectory of the anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthr Rev. 2:81–98. doi:10.1177/2053019614564785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen W, Persson Å, Deutsch L, Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Richardson K, Crumley C, Crutzen P, Folke C, Gordon L, et al. 2011. The anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio. 40(7):739–761. doi:10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout E, Metze T, Wyborn C, Klenk N, Louder E. 2020. The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 42:15–21. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 2012. The future we want. A/RES/66/288.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. A/RES/70/1.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2021) Nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement. Synthesis report by the secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heeringen RM, Van der Velde HM. 2017. Struinen door de duinen: synthetiserend onderzoek naar de bewoningsgeschiedenis van het Hollands duingebied op basis van gegevens verzameld in het Malta-tijdperk, Nederlands, Nederlandse Archeologische Rapporten nr. 52. Amersfoort: Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooij S, Timmermans W, Roosenschoon O, et al. 2021. Landscape-based visions as powerful boundary objects in spatial planning: lessons from three Dutch projects. Land. 10:1–14. doi:10.3390/land10010016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kerkhoff KL, Munera C, Dudley N, et al. 2019. Towards future-oriented conservation : managing protected areas in an era of climate change. Ambio. 48:699–713. [accessed 2021 July 6]. doi:10.1007/s13280-018-1121-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra A (2020) Landschapsstrategie Nationaal Park Hollandse Duinen. [accessed 6 July 2021]. https://www.nationaalparkhollandseduinen.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RAPP-Landschapsstrategie-NPHD-def-23sep20-webversie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Winkler KJ. 2019. The implementation of the conceptual shift in conservation: pathways of three German UNESCO biosphere reserves. Ecosyst People. 15(1):173–180. doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1617351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WWF. 2020. Living planet report 2020 - bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Almond REA, Grooten M, Peterson T, editors. WWF. Gland (Switzerland).
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt KH, Arkema KK, Wells-Moultrie S, Silver JM, Lashley B, Thomas A, Kuiper JJ, Guerry AD, Ruckelshaus M. 2021. Integrated and innovative scenario approaches for sustainable development planning in the Bahamas. Ecol Soc. 26(4). doi:10.5751/es-12764-260423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyborn C, Montana J, Kalas N, et al. 2021. An agenda for research and action toward diverse and just futures for life on Earth. Conserv Biol. 00:1–12. doi:10.1111/cobi.13671.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Wang R, Hoekstra AY, Krol MS, Zhang Y, Guo K, Sanwal M, Sun Z, Zhu J, Zhang J, et al. 2021. Consideration of culture is vital if we are to achieve the sustainable development goals. One Earth. 4(2):307–319. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.01.012.
   Google Scholar