Plural valuation in space: mapping values of grasslands and their ecosystem services

References

• Al-assaf A, Nawash O, Omari M. 2014. Identifying forest ecosystem services through socio-ecological bundles: a case study from northern Jordan. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 21(4):314–321. doi:10.1080/13504509.2014.919968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Arévalo P, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Pérez-Rincón M. 2018. Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services: a Taxonomy of Plural Values and Valuation Methods. Environmental Values. 27(1):29–53. doi:10.3197/096327118X15144698637513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Arévalo P, Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E. 2017. Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. E&S. 22(4). art43. doi:10.5751/ES-09812-220443.
   Google Scholar
• Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Ancona ZH, Sherrouse BC. 2017. Evaluating alternative methods for biophysical and cultural ecosystem services hotspot mapping in natural resource planning. Landscape Ecol. 32(1):77–97. doi:10.1007/s10980-016-0430-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson J, Bullock JM, Egoh B, Everson C, Everson T, O’Connor T, O’Farrell PJ, Smith HG, Lindborg R. 2019. Grasslands-more important for ecosystem services than you might think. Ecosphere. 10(2):e02582. doi:10.1002/ecs2.2582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett NJ. 2016. Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology. 00:12.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G, Alessa L. 2005. A GIS–based Inductive Study of Wilderness Values. International Journal of Wilderness. 11:6.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G, Fagerholm N. 2015. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services. 13:119–133. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G, Raymond CM. 2014. Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning. 122:196–208. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casado-Arzuaga I, Madariaga I, Onaindia M. 2013. Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. Journal of Environmental Management. 129:33–43. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, Chapman M, Díaz S, Gómez-Baggethun E, Gould R, Hannahs N, Jax K, Klain S, et al. 2016. Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking Values and the Environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(6):1462–1465. doi:10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman M. 2019. When value conflicts are barriers_ Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs? Land Use Policy. 82:464–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie M, Martín-López B, Church A, Siwicka E, Szymonczyk P, Mena Sauterel J. 2019. Understanding the diversity of values of “Nature’s contributions to people”: insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asia. Sustain Sci. 14(5):1267–1282. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00716-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho-Junior MG, de Oliveira AL, da Silva-neto EC, Castor-Neto TC, Tavares DO, Basso AA, Turetta VM, Perkins APD, de Carvalho, A.g PE. 2021. Exploring Plural Values of Ecosystem Services: local Peoples. Perceptions and Implications for Protected Area Management in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Sustainability. 13:1019. doi:10.3390/su13031019.
   Google Scholar
• Crouzat E, Mouchet M, Turkelboom F, Byczek C, Meersmans J, Berger F, Verkerk PJ, Lavorel S, Diekötter T. 2015. Assessing bundles of ecosystem services from regional to landscape scale: insights from the French Alps. J Appl Ecol. 52(5):1145–1155. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 7(1):21–28. doi:10.1890/080025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese R, Leys M, Fontaine CM, Dendoncker N. 2016. Social mapping of perceived ecosystem services supply – the role of social landscape metrics and social hotspots for integrated ecosystem services assessment, landscape planning and management. Ecological Indicators. 66:517–533. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese R, Van Herzele A, Dendoncker N, Fontaine CM, Leys M. 2019. Are stakeholders’ social representations of nature and landscape compatible with the ecosystem service concept? Ecosystem Services. 37:100911. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A, et al. 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 14:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerholm N, Eilola S, Kisanga D, Arki V, Käyhkö N. 2019. Place-based landscape services and potential of participatory spatial planning in multifunctional rural landscapes in Southern highlands, Tanzania. Landscape Ecol. 34(7):1769–1787. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00847-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N, Ndumbaro F, Khamis M. 2012. Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments – mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators. 18:421–433. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getis A, Ord JK. 1992. The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics. Geographical Analysis. 24(3):189–206. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habel JC, Dengler J, Janišová M, Török P, Wellstein C, Wiezik M. 2013. European grassland ecosystems: threatened hotspots of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv. 22(10):2131–2138. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0537-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmáčková ZV, Blättler L, Aguiar APD, Daněk J, Krpec P, Vačkářová D. 2021. Linking multiple values of nature with future impacts: value-based participatory scenario development for sustainable landscape governance. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00953-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann H, Haensel M, Riebl R, Lohse EJ, Koellner T. 2021. Volksbegehren Artenvielfalt: gesetzesänderungen können auch Ökosystemdienstleistungen in Bayerns Agrarlandschaften stärken. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society. 30(2):106–113. doi:10.14512/gaia.30.2.8.
   Google Scholar
• Hedblom M, Hedenås H, Blicharska M, Adler S, Knez I, Mikusiński G, Svensson J, Sandström S, Sandström P, Wardle DA. 2020. Landscape perception: linking physical monitoring data to perceived landscape properties. Landscape Research. 45(2):179–192. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1611751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himes A, Muraca B. 2018. Relational values: the key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 35:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husson F, Josse J, Sebastian L, Mazet J, 2020. Package “FactoMineR”.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, McGrath FL, Vierikko K, Geneletti D, Sevecke KJ, et al. 2016. A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosystem Services. 22:213–220. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs S, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Dunford R, Harrison PA, Kelemen E, Saarikoski H, Termansen M, García-Llorente M, Gómez-Baggethun E, et al. 2018. The means determine the end – pursuing integrated valuation in practice. Ecosystem Services. 29:515–528. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs S, Zafra-Calvo N, Gonzalez-Jimenez D, Guibrunet L, Benessaiah K, Berghöfer A, Chaves-Chaparro J, Díaz S, Gomez-Baggethun E, Lele S, et al. 2020. Use your power for good: plural valuation of nature – the Oaxaca statement. Glob. Sustain. 3:e8. doi:10.1017/sus.2020.2.
   Google Scholar
• Jax K, Calestani M, Chan KM, Eser U, Keune H, Muraca B, O’Brien L, Potthast T, Voget-Kleschin L, Wittmer H. 2018. Caring for nature matters: a relational approach for understanding nature’s contributions to human well-being. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 35:22–29. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser FG, Wölfing S, Fuhrer U. 1999. Environmental Attitude and Ecological Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 19(1):1–19. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi A, Yazdandad H, Fagerholm N. 2020. Evaluating social perceptions of ecosystem services, biodiversity, and land management: trade-offs, synergies and implications for landscape planning and management. Ecosystem Services. 45:101188. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klain SC, Olmsted P, Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Zia A. 2017. Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm. PLoS ONE. 12(8):e0183962. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LDBV. 2016. Amtliches Digitales Basis-Landschaftsmodell (ATKIS). Bayerisches Landesamt für Digitalisierung, Breitband und Vermessung.
   Google Scholar
• Le Clec’h S, Finger R, Buchmann N, Gosal AS, Hörtnagl L, Huguenin-Elie O, Jeanneret P, Lüscher A, Schneider MK, Huber R. 2019. Assessment of spatial variability of multiple ecosystem services in grasslands of different intensities. Journal of Environmental Management. 251:109372. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini L, Fontana P, Scotton M, Klimek S. 2007. Vascular plant and Orthoptera diversity in relation to grassland management and landscape composition in the European Alps: local vs. landscape determinants of diversity. Journal of Applied Ecology. 45(1):361–370. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01402.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-López B. 2021. Plural valuation of nature matters for environmental sustainability and justice | royal Society [WWW Document]. The Royal Society. [accessed 2021 September 13]. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/biodiversity/plural-valuation-of-nature-matters-for-environmental-sustainability-and-justice/
   Google Scholar
• Massey DB. 2005. For space. London ; Thousand Oaks (Calif): SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Massey D. 2014. Taking on the world. Geography. 99(1):36–39. doi:10.1080/00167487.2014.12094389.
   Google Scholar
• Masterson VA, Stedman RC, Enqvist J, Tengö M, Giusti M, Wahl D, Svedin U. 2017. The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: a review and research agenda. E&S. 22(1). art49. doi:10.5751/ES-08872-220149.
   Google Scholar
• Morales-Reyes Z, Martín-López B, Moleón M, Mateo-Tomás P, Botella F, Margalida A, Donázar JA, Blanco G, Pérez I, Sánchez-Zapata JA. 2018. Farmer perceptions of the ecosystem services provided by scavengers: what, who, and to whom: ecosystem services provided by scavengers. Conservation Letters. 11(2):e12392. doi:10.1111/conl.12392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradian R, Pascual U. 2018. A typology of elementary forms of human-nature relations: a contribution to the valuation debate. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 35:8–14. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems, 2009. ASTER global digital elevation model.
   Google Scholar
• Newig J, Koontz TM. 2014. Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. Null. 21:248–267. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.834070.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto-Romero M, Oteros-Rozas E, González JA, Martín-López B. 2014. Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: insights for future research. Environmental Science & Policy. 37:121–133. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor S, Kenter JO. 2019. Making intrinsic values work; integrating intrinsic values of the more-than-human world through the life framework of values. Sustain Sci. 14(5):1247–1265. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00715-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, et al., 2020. Package ‘vegan’. R package version 2.5-6.
   Google Scholar
• Pachoud C, Re RD, Ramanzin M, Bovolenta S, Gianelle D, Sturaro E, 2020. Tourists and local stakeholders’ perception of ecosystem services provided by summer farms in the eastern Italian Alps 16.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M, Watson RT, Başak Dessane E, Islar M, Kelemen E, et al. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 26–27:7–16. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Bieling C. 2013. Resilience-based perspectives to guiding high-nature-value farmland through socioeconomic change. E&S. 18(4):art20. doi:10.5751/ES-05877-180420.
   Google Scholar
• Riechers M, Martín-López B, Fischer J. 2021. Human–nature connectedness and other relational values are negatively affected by landscape simplification: insights from lower saxony, Germany. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00928-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rstudio Team. 2020. Rstudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston (MA). https://support.rstudio.com/hc/en-us/articles/206212048-Citing-RStudio
   Google Scholar
• Schirpke U, Timmermann F, Tappeiner U, Tasser E. 2016. Cultural ecosystem services of mountain regions: modelling the aesthetic value. Ecological Indicators. 69:78–90. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirpke U, Zoderer BM, Tappeiner U, Tasser E. 2021. Effects of past landscape changes on aesthetic landscape values in the European Alps. Landscape and Urban Planning. 212:104109. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt TM, Martín-López B, Kaim A, Früh-Müller A, Koellner T. 2021. Ecosystem services from (pre-)Alpine grasslands: matches and mismatches between citizens’ perceived suitability and farmers’ management considerations. Ecosystem Services. 49:101284. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter M, Başak E, Christie M, Church A, Keune H, Osipova E, Oteros-Rozas E, Sievers-Glotzbach S, van Oudenhoven APE, Balvanera P, et al. 2020. Indicators for relational values of nature’s contributions to good quality of life: the IPBES approach for Europe and central Asia. Ecosystems and People. 16(1):50–69. doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1703039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz C, Martin-Ortega J. 2018. Quantifying relational values — why not? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 35:15–21. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer A-M, Leiderer A, Mitterwallner V, Walentowitz A, Mathes GH, Steinbauer MJ. 2021. Outdoor cycling activity affected by COVID-19 related epidemic-control-decisions. PLoS ONE. 16(5):e0249268. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ. 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography. 31(2):748–760. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stålhammar S, Thorén H. 2019. Three perspectives on relational values of nature. Sustain Sci. 14(5):1201–1212. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00718-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadaki M, Sinner J, Chan KMA. 2017. Making sense of environmental values: a typology of concepts. E&S. 22(1). art7. doi:10.5751/ES-08999-220107.
   Google Scholar
• Topp EN, Loos J, Martín-López B. 2021. Decision-making for nature’s contributions to people in the Cape Floristic Region: the role of values, rules and knowledge. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00896-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Heßberg A, Jentsch A, Berauer B. 2021. Almen in Zeiten des Klimawandels - Schutz der Artenvielfalt durch (Wieder-) Beweidung? Die Fallstudie Brunnenkopfalm im Ammergebirge. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung (NuL). 53(3):28–36. doi:10.1399/NuL.2021.03.02.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Mager C, Schmidt N, Kiese N, Growe A. 2019. Conflicts about urban green spaces in metropolitan areas under conditions of climate change: a multidisciplinary analysis of stakeholders. Perceptions of Planning Processes. Urban Science. 3:15. doi:10.3390/urbansci3010015.
   Google Scholar
• West S, Haider LJ, Masterson V, Enqvist JP, Svedin U, Tengö M. 2018. Stewardship, care and relational values. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 35:30–38. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YCE, Passarelli S, Lovell RJ, Ringler C. 2018. Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosystem Services. 31:58–67. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafra-Calvo N, Balvanera P, Pascual U, Merçon J, Martín-López B, van Noordwijk M, Mwampamba TH, Lele S, Ifejika Speranza C, Arias-Arévalo P, et al. 2020. Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: insights from the global South. Global Environmental Change. 63:102115. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Liu Z, Wu J. 2020. Grassland ecosystem services: a systematic review of research advances and future directions. Landscape Ecol. 35(4):793–814. doi:10.1007/s10980-020-00980-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Pfueller S, Whitelaw P, Winter C. 2010. Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the murray river region of Victoria, Australia. Environmental Management. 45(5):896–911. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9462-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar