Advanced search
Publication Cover
Ecosystems and People Volume 19, 2023 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,745
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Mainstreaming biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people in Europe and Central Asia: insights from IPBES to inform the CBD post-2020 agenda

Camilla Sandströma Department of Political Science, Umeå University, Umeå, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7674-6197
ORCID Icon,
Irene Ringb International Institute Zittau, Technische Universität Dresden, Zittau, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-8947
ORCID Icon,
Roland Olschewskic Economics and Social Sciences Research Unit, WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3027-2897
ORCID Icon,
Riccardo Simoncinid Sustainable Use and Management of Ecosystems, Commission on Ecosystem Management, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, SwitzerlandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8046-4101
ORCID Icon,
Christian Alberte Institute of Geography, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2591-4779
ORCID Icon,
Sevil Acarf Center for Climate Change and Policy Studies, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5535-8673
ORCID Icon,
Malkhaz Adeishvilig Independent Environmental Policy Expert, Tbilisi, Georgia
,
Christina Allardh Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6869-5193
ORCID Icon,
Yakov Ankeri Department of Chemical Engineering and the Eastern R&D Center, Ariel University, Ariel, IsraelORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4747-0774
ORCID Icon,
Raphaël Arlettazj Division of Conservation Biology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6360-5339
ORCID Icon,
Györgyi Belak IDEAS Science Ltd., Budapest, Hungary
,
Luca Cosciemel Hot or Cool Institute, Berlin, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4427-3628
ORCID Icon,
Anke Fischerm Department of Urban and Rural Development, Division of Environmental Communication, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-3690
ORCID Icon,
Christine Fürstn Institute for Geosciences and Geography, Department of Sustainable Landscape Development, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany;u German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany
,
Bella Galilo Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5854-4228
ORCID Icon,
Stephen Hynesp Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit (SEMRU), University of Galway, Galway, IrelandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3670-0178
ORCID Icon,
Ulan Kasymovb International Institute Zittau, Technische Universität Dresden, Zittau, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5620-1379
ORCID Icon,
Cristina Marta-Pedrosoq MARETEC - Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, PortugalORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3081-7807
ORCID Icon,
Ana Mendesr MED – Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE – Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada, Laboratório de Ornitologia, University of Évora, Évora, PortugalORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3274-8227
ORCID Icon,
Ulf Molaus Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-6879
ORCID Icon &
Jan Perglt Department of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, Czech RepublicORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0045-1974
ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2138553 | Received 14 Mar 2022, Accepted 11 Oct 2022, Published online: 12 Jan 2023

References

  • Agnoletti M. 2006. Traditional knowledge and the European common agricultural policy (PAC): the case of the Italian National Rural Development Plan 2007–2013. In: Parrotta J, Agnoletti M, and Johann E, editors. Cultural heritage and sustainable forest management: the role of traditional knowledge. Florence, Italy, p. 17–14. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. http://www.foresteurope.org/documentos/volume_1c.pdf.
  • Albert C, Fürst C, Ring I, Sandström C. 2020. Research note: spatial planning in Europe and Central Asia – Enhancing the consideration of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landsc Urban Plan. 196:103741. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103741.
  • Albert C, Galler C, Hermes J, Neuendorf F, von Haaren C, Lovett A. 2016. Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: the ES-in-Planning framework. Ecol Ind. 61:100–113. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.029.
  • Atkinson MA, Edwards DM, Jensen FS, van der Jagt AP, Ditchburn BR, Sievänen T, Gasparini P. 2020. Harmonising, improving and using social and recreational data in National Forest Inventories across Europe. Ann For Sci. 77(3):1–10. doi:10.1007/s13595-020-00952-2. Europe.
  • Bastian O, Corti C, Lebboroni M. 2007. Determining environmental minimum requirements for functions provided by agro-ecosystems. Agron Sustain Dev. 27:279–291. doi:10.1051/agro:2007027.
  • Bateman IJ, Harwood AR, Mace GM, Watson RT, Abson DJ, Andrews B, Termansen M. 2013. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science. 341(6141):45–50. doi:10.1126/science.1234379.
  • Benson E, Forbes A, Korkeakoski M, Latif R, Lha D. 2014. Environment and climate mainstreaming: challenges and successes. Dev Pract. 24:605–614. doi:10.1080/09614524.2014.911819.
  • Bizikova L, Metternicht G, Yarde T. 2015. Advancing environmental mainstreaming in the Caribbean region: the role of regional institutions for overcoming barriers and capacity gaps. Sustainability. 7:13836–13855. doi:10.3390/su71013836.
  • Brouwer S, Rayner T, Huitema D. 2013. Mainstreaming climate policy: the case of climate adaptation and the implementation of EU water Policy. Environ Plan C Gov policy. 31(1):134–153. doi:10.1068/c11134.
  • Buizer M, Arts B, Kok K. 2011. Governance, scale and the environment: the importance of recognizing knowledge claims in transdisciplinary arenas. Ecol Soc. 16:21. doi:10.5751/ES-03908-160121.
  • Campese J, Sunderland T, Greiber T, Oviedo G, editors. 2009. Rights-based approaches: exploring issues and opportunities for conservation. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research) and IUCN.
  • CBD – Convention on Biological Diversity. 2011a. NBSAP training modules version 2.1 – Module 3. Mainstreaming biodiversity into national sectoral and cross-sectoral strategies, policies, plans and programs. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/nbsap/training/.
  • CBD – Convention on Biological Diversity. 2011b. Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, Including Aichi Biodiversity Targets. https://www.cbd.int/sp/.
  • CBD – Convention on Biological Diversity. 2014. Global biodiversity outlook 4. Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/.
  • CBD - Convention on Biological Diversity. 2019. Biodiversity Mainstreaming. Mainstreaming under the convention. https://www.cbd.int/mainstreaming/
  • Chaffin BC, Garmestani AS, Gunderson LH, Benson MH, Angeler DG, Arnold CA, Cosens B, Craig RK, Ruhl JB, Allen CR. 2016. Transformative environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 41:399–423. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085817.
  • Chen W, Van Assche K, Hynes S, Bekkby T, Christie H, Gundersen H. 2020. Ecosystem accounting’s potential to support coastal and marine governance. Marine Policy. 112:103758. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103758.
  • Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Change. 26:152–158. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
  • Dalal-Clayton DB, Bass S. 2009. The challenges of environmental mainstreaming: experience of integrating environment into development institutions and decisions (No. 1). London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
  • Dasgupta P. 2021. The Economics of Biodiversity: the Dasgupta Review. London: HM Treasury.
  • Deininger K, Byerlee D. 2011. Rising global interest in farmland. Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? Washington DC, USA: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-8591-3.
  • Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, Ngo HT, Agard J, Arneth A, Balvanera P, Brauman KA, Butchart SHM, Chan KMA, et al. 2019. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science. 366(6471):eaax3100. doi:10.1126/science.aax3100.
  • European Commission. 2019. COM/2019/640 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal: Brussels.
  • European Commission. 2020. COM/2020/380 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives. Brussels.
  • European Environment Agency. 2005. Environmental policy integration in Europe: state of play and an evaluation framework. EEA Technical Report No 2. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO. 31:437–440. doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437.
  • Galler C, von Haaren C, Albert C. 2015. Optimizing environmental measures for landscape multifunctionality: effectiveness, efficiency and recommendations for agrienvironmental programs. J Environ Manage. 151:243–257. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.011.
  • Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Benson MH. 2013. Can law foster social-ecological resilience? Ecol Soc. 18:37. doi:10.5751/ES-05927-180237.
  • Geneletti D. 2013. Ecosystem services in environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:1–2. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.02.005.
  • Grima N, Ringhofer L, Singh SJ, Smetschka B, Lauk C. 2017. Mainstreaming biodiversity in development practice: can the concept of PES deliver? Prog Dev Stud. 17(4):267–281. doi:10.1177/1464993417716356.
  • Gschwantner T, Alberdi I, Bauwens S, Bender S, Borota D, Bosela M, Tomter SM, Breidenbach J, Donis J, Fischer C, et al. 2022. Growing stock monitoring by European National Forest Inventories: historical origins, current methods and harmonisation. Forest Ecol Manag. 505:119868. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119868.
  • Harring N. 2014. Corruption, inequalities and the perceived effectiveness of economic pro-environmental policy instruments: a European cross-national study. Environ Sci Policy. 39:119–128. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.011.
  • Hasselman L. 2017. Adaptive management; adaptive co-management; adaptive governance: what’s the difference? Australas J Environ Manag. 24:31–46. doi:10.1080/14486563.2016.1251857.
  • Hauer N. 2017. The sidelined cross-cutting issue: mainstreaming environment into the water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) cluster. Thesis Lund University.
  • Hegetschweiler KT, Stride CB, Fischer C, Ginzler C, Hunziker M. 2022. Integrating recreation into National Forest Inventories – Results from a forest visitor survey in winter and summer. J Outdoor Recr Tour. 39:100489. 10.1016/j.jort.2022.100489
  • Helming K, Diehl K, Geneletti D, Wiggering H. 2013. Mainstreaming ecosystem services in European policy impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 40:82–87. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.004.
  • Hynes S, Burger R, Tudella J, Norton D, Chen W. 2022. Estimating the costs and benefits of protecting a coastal amenity from climate change-related hazards: nature based solutions via oyster reef restoration versus grey infrastructure. Ecol Econ. 194:107349. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107349.
  • IPBES. 2021. IPBES policy support gateway. https://www.ipbes.net/policy-support.
  • IPBES – Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2015a. IPBES/4/INF/13: Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services (deliverable 3 (d)).
  • IPBES – Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2015b. IPBES/4/INF/14: Information on work related to policy support tools and methodologies (deliverable 4 (c)). https://www.ipbes.net/events/ipbes-4-plenary.
  • IPBES – Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2018a. The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia. Rounsevell M, Fischer M, Torre-Marin Rando A, Mader A, editors. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: Germany; 892 p. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3237429
  • IPBES – Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2018b. Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Fischer M, Rounsevell M, Torre-Marin Rando A, Mader A, Church A, Elbakidze M, Elias V, Hahn T, Harrison PA, Hauck J, Martín-López B, Ring I, Sandström C, Sousa Pinto I, Visconti P, Zimmermann NE, Christie M, editors. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany; 48 p. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3237428.
  • IPBES – Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2018c. The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration. Montanarella L, Scholes R, Brainich A, editors. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany; 744 p. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3237392.
  • IPBES – Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Brondízio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT, editors. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany; 1144 p. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6417333.
  • Jakob M, Edenhofer O. 2015. Green growth, degrowth, and the commons. Oxford Rev Econ Policy. 30(3):447–468. doi:10.1093/oxrep/gru026.
  • Jax K. 2014. Thresholds, tipping points and limits. In: Potschin M, and Jax K, editors. OpenNESS ecosystem services reference book. EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428. http://www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book
  • Jordan A, Lenschow A. 2010. Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environ Policy Gov. 20:147–158. doi:10.1002/eet.539.
  • Jordan A, Wurzel RKW, Zito AR. 2013. Still the century of “new” environmental policy instruments? Exploring patterns of innovation and continuity. Env Polit. 22:155–173. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755839.
  • Kareiva PM, McNally BW, McCormick S, Miller T, Ruckelshaus M. 2015. Improving global environmental management with standard corporate reporting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112:7375–7382. doi:10.1073/pnas.1408120111.
  • Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen S, Boelee E, Cools J, Van Hoof L, Hospes O, Kok M, Peerlings J, van Tatenhove J, Termeer CJAM, Visseren-Hamakers IJ. 2018. Identifying barriers and levers of biodiversity mainstreaming in four cases of transnational governance of land and water. Environ Sci Policy. 85:132–140. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.011.
  • Kasymov U, Undeland A, Dörre A, MacKinnon A. 2016. Central Asia – Kyrgyzstan and the learning experience in design of pastoral institutions. OIE Sci and Tech Rev. 35(2):511–521. doi:10.20506/rst.35.2.2538.
  • Kelly C, McAteer B, Fahy F, Carr L, Norton D, Farrell D, Corless R, Hynes S, Kyriazi Z, Marhadour A, et al. 2021. Blue Growth: a transitions approach to developing sustainable pathways. J Ocean Coastal Econ. 8(2):Art. 8. doi:10.15351/2373-8456.1143.
  • Kenter JO, O’Brien L, Hockley N, Ravenscroft N, Fazey I, Irvine KN, Reed MS, Christie M, Brady E, Bryce R, et al. 2015. What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecol Econ. 111:86–99. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006.
  • Lamorgese L, Geneletti D. 2013. Sustainability principles in strategic environmental assessment: a framework for analysis and examples from Italian urban planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 42:116–126. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.004.
  • Lange P, Driessen PPJ, Sauer A, Bornemann B, Burger P. 2013. Governing towards sustainability— Conceptualizing modes of governance. J Environ Policy Plan. 15:403–425. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2013.769414.
  • Locke H, Ellis E, Venter O, Schuster R, Ma K, Shen X, Woodley S, Kingston N, Bhola N, Strassburg B, et al. 2019. Three global conditions for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use: an implementation framework. Nat Sci Rev. 6(6):1080–1082. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwz136.
  • Longato D, Cortinovis C, Albert C, Geneletti D. 2021. Practical applications of ecosystem services in spatial planning: lessons learned from a systematic literature review. Environ Sci Policy. 119:72–84. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.001.
  • Mace GM, Reyers B, Alkemade R, Biggs R, Chapin III FS, Cornell SE, Díaz S, Jennings S, Leadley P, Mumby PJ, et al. 2014. Approaches to defining a planetary boundary for biodiversity. Glob Environ Change. 28:289–297. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.009.
  • Mårald E, Sandström C, Nordin A. 2017. Forest governance and management across time: developing a New Forest Social Contract. London, UK: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Forest-Governance-and-Management-Across-Time-Developing-a-New-Forest-Social/Marald-Sandstrom-Nordin-Others/p/book/9781138904309.
  • Martens P, Rotmans J, de Groot RS. 2003. Biodiversity: luxury or necessity. Glob Environ Change. 13:75–81. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00089-4.
  • Milner-Gulland EJ, Addison P, Arlidge WN, Baker J, Booth H, Brooks T, Bull JW, Burgass MJ, Ekstrom J, zu Ermgassen SOSE, et al. 2021. Four steps for the Earth: mainstreaming the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. One Earth. 4(1):75–87. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.011.
  • Muradian R, Rival L. 2012. Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 1:93–100. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009.
  • Nunan F, Campbell A, Foster E. 2012. Environmental mainstreaming: the organisational challenges of policy integration. Public Adm Dev. 32:262–277. doi:10.1002/pad.1624.
  • Olschewski R, Sandström C, Kasymov U, Johansson J, Fürst C, Ring I. 2018. Policy Forum: challenges and opportunities in developing new forest governance systems: insights from the IPBES assessment for Europe and Central Asia. For Policy Econ. 97:175–179. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.007.
  • Opdam P, Nassauer JI, Wang Z, Albert C, Bentrup G, Castella J-C, McAlpine C, Liu J, Sheppard S, Swaffield S. 2013. Science for action at the local landscape scale. Landsc Ecol. 28(8):1439–1445. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9925-6.
  • Ostrom E, Janssen MA, Anderies JM. 2007. Going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:15176–15178. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701886104.
  • Paloniemi R, Apostolopoulou E, Cen J, Bormpoudakis D, Scott A, Grodzińska-Jurczak M, Tzanopoulos J, Koivulehto M, Pietrzyk-Kaszyńnska A, Pantis JD. 2015. Public participation and environmental justice in biodiversity governance in Finland, Greece, Poland and the UK. Environ Policy Gov. 25:330–342. doi:10.1002/eet.1672.
  • Parks S, Gowdy J. 2013. What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay. Ecosyst Serv. 3:e1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.12.002.
  • Phang SC, Failler P, Bridgewater P. 2020. Addressing the implementation challenge of the global biodiversity framework. Biodivers Conserv. 29:3061–3066. doi:10.1007/s10531-020-02009-2.
  • Redford KH, Huntley BJ, Roe D, Hammond T, Zimsky M, Lovejoy TE, da Fonseca G, Rodriguez CM, Cowling RM. 2015. Mainstreaming biodiversity: conservation for the twenty-first century. Front Ecol Evol. 3(137). doi:10.3389/fevo.2015.00137.
  • Ring I, Sandström C, Acar S, Adeishvili M, Albert C, Allard C, Anker Y, Arlettaz R, Bela G, ten Brink B, et al. 2018. Chapter 6: options for governance and decision-making across scales and sectors. In: Rounsevell M, Fischer M, Torre-Marin Rando A Mader A, editors. The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia. Bonn, Germany: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services; p. 661–802. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3237429
  • Rist L, Moen J. 2013. Sustainability in forest management and a new role for resilience thinking. For Ecol Manag. 310:416–427. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.033.
  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, et al. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 461:472–475. doi:10.1038/461472a.
  • Rönnblom M. 2005. Letting women in? Gender mainstreaming in regional policies. Nord J Feminist Gender Res. 13:164–174. doi:10.1080/08038740600587711.
  • Rozas-Vásquez D, Fürst C, Geneletti D, Almendra O. 2018. Integration of ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment across spatial planning scales. Land Use Policy. 71:303–310. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.015.
  • Rulli MC, Saviori A, D’Odorico P. 2013. Global land and water grabbing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:892–897. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3549107&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  • Santos R, Antunes P, Ring I, Clemente P. 2015. Engaging local private and public actors in biodiversity conservation: the role of agri-environmental schemes and ecological fiscal transfers. Environ Policy Gov. 25:83–96. doi:10.1002/eet.1661.
  • Schleyer C, Görg C, Hauck J, Winkler KJ. 2015. Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming the ecosystem services concept in the multi-level policymaking within the EU. Ecosyst Serv. 16:174–181. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.014.
  • Schmidt S, Guerrero P, Albert C. 2022. Advancing sustainable development goals with localised nature-based solutions: opportunity spaces in the Lahn river landscape, Germany. J Environ Manag. 309:114696. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114696.
  • Schröter-Schlaack C, Ring I. 2011. Towards a framework for assessing instruments in policy mixes for biodiversity and ecosystem governance. In: Ring I, and Schröter-Schlaack C, editors. Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies. POLICYMIX Report, Issue No. 2/2011. Leipzig, Germany: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ; p. 175–208. http://policymix.nina.no.
  • Schröter M, van der Zanden EH, van Oudenhoven APE, Remme RP, Serna‐Chavez HM, de Groot RS, Opdam P. 2014. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter‐arguments. Cons Letters. 7:514–523. doi:10.1111/conl.12091.
  • Simoncini R. 2009. Developing an integrated approach to enhance the delivering of environmental goods and services by agro-ecosystems. Reg Environ Change. 9:153–167. doi:10.1007/s10113-008-0052-x.
  • Simoncini R, Ring I, Sandström C, Albert C, Kasymov U, Arlettaz R. 2019. Constraints and opportunities for mainstreaming biodiversity and ecosystem services in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy: insights from the IPBES assessment for Europe and Central Asia. Land Use Policy. 88:104099. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104099.
  • Šumrada T, Lovec M, Juvančič L, Rac I, Erjavec E. 2020. Fit for the task? Integration of biodiversity policy into the post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy: illustration on the case of Slovenia. J Nat Conserv. 54:125804. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125804.
  • Susskind LE, Ali SH. 2015. Environmental diplomacy: negotiating more effective global agreements. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://lawrencesusskind.mit.edu/environmental-diplomacy-negotiatingmore-effective-global-agreements-0.
  • TEEB. 2009. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policymakers – Summary: responding to the value of nature. http://www.teebweb.org.
  • TEEB. 2010. Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. http://www.teebweb.org/
  • Tinch R, Hynes S, Armstrong C, Chen W. 2021. Prospects for valuation in marine decision making in Europe. J Ocean Coastal Econ. 8(2):Art. 11. doi:10.15351/2373-8456.1150.
  • Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, Levac D, Ng C, Sharpe JP, Wilson K, et al. 2016. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 16(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4.
  • Turney C, Ausseil AG, Broadhurst L. 2020. Urgent need for an integrated policy framework for biodiversity loss and climate change. Nat Ecol Evol. 4:996. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1242-2.
  • UN – United Nations. 1992. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development; [accessed 2022 March 10]. https://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/Agenda%2021.pdf
  • UN – United Nations. 2015. UN General Assembly, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1. https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html.
  • UNCED – United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. 1992. Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992; [accessed 2022 March 10]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
  • Vidal C, Alberdi I, Hernandez L, Redmond J. 2016. National Forest Inventories - Assessment of wood availability and use. Cham: Springer; p. 845. doi:10.1007/978-3-319
  • Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Brondízio ES, Leemans R, Solecki WD. 2015. Integrative environmental governance: enhancing governance in the era of synergies. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 14:136–143. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.008.
  • Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Kok MTJ, editors. 2022. Transforming biodiversity governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wamsler C, Luederitz C, Brink E. 2014. Local levers for change: mainstreaming ecosystem-based adaptation into municipal planning to foster sustainability transitions. Glob Environ Change. 29:189–201. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.008.
  • Whitehorn PR, Navarro LM, Schröter M, Fernandez M, Rotllan-Puig X, Marques A. 2019. Mainstreaming biodiversity: a review of national strategies. Biol Conserv. 235:157–163. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.016.
  • Widerberg O, Pattberg P. 2015. International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC? Glob Policy. 6:45–56. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12184.
  • Willemen L, Barger NN, Brink BT, Cantele M, Erasmus BFN, Fisher JL, Gardner T, Holland TG, Kohler F, Kotiaho JS, et al. 2020. How to halt the global decline of lands. Nat Sustain. 3:164–166. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0477-x.
  • Wilson EO. 2016. Half-earth: our planet’s fight for life. New York and London: Liveright.
  • WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Young SB, Zhe Y, Dias G. 2014. Prospects for sustainability certification of metals. Metall Res Technol. 111:131–136. doi:10.1051/metal/2014008.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.