The use and value of wild harvested provisioning ecosystem services along a landscape heterogeneity gradient in rural South Africa

References

• Angelsen A, Dokken T. 2018. Climate exposure, vulnerability and environmental reliance: a cross-section analysis of structural and stochastic poverty. Environ Dev Econ. 23:257–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, Belcher B, Hogarth NJ, Bauch S, Börner J, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S. 2014. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Dev. 64:S12–28. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asfaw A, Lemenih M, Kassa H, Ewnetu Z. 2013. Importance, determinants and gender dimensions of forest income in eastern highlands of Ethiopia: the case of communities around Jelo Afromontane Forest. For Policy Econ. 28:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babulo B, Muys B, Nega F, Tollens E, Nyssen J, Deckers J, Mathijs E. 2009. The economic contribution of forest resource use to rural livelihoods in Tigray, northern Ethiopia. For Policy Econ. 11:109–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian O. 2013. The role biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecol Indic. 24:12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belcher B, Schreckenberg K. 2007. Commercialisation of non-rimber forest products: a reality check. Dev Policy Rev. 25:355–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockerhoff EG, Barbaro L, Castagneyrol B, Forrester DI, Gardiner B, Gonza´lez-Olabarria JR, Lyver PO, MEURISSE N, Oxbrough A, Taki H, et al. 2017. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodivers Conserv. 26:3005–3035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocks M, Wiersum K. 2003. The significance of plant diversity to rural households in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. For Trees Livelihoods. 13:39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Daw DM, Hicks C, Brown K, Chaigneau T, Januchowski-Hartley FA, Cheung WW, Rosendo S, Crona B, Coulthard S, Sandbrook C, et al. 2016. Elasticity in ecosystem services: exploring the variable relationship between ecosystems and human well-being. Ecol Soc. 21(2):11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vletter F. 2001. Coping with extreme poverty through traditional skills: the case of the xirundzu basket makers of Mozambique. Harare: International Lvour Office, Southern Africa Multidisciplinary Advisory Team.
   Google Scholar
• Dovie D, Shackleton C, Witkowski T. 2002. Direct-use values of woodland resources consumed and traded in a South African village. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 9:269–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovie D, Witkowski E, Shackleton C 2005. Monetary valuation of livelihoods for understanding the composition and complexity of rural households. Agric & Hum Val. 22:87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekroos J, Kuussaari M, Tiainen J, Heliöplä J, Seimola T, Helenius J. 2013. Correlations in species richness between taxa depend on habitat, scale and landscape context. Ecol Indic. 34:528–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falayi M, Shackleton SE, Cundill G, Shackleton CM. 2019. Changes in the use and sale of local collected environmental resources over a 15-year period in a rural village, South Africa. For Trees Livelihoods. 28:90–107.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher JA, Patenaude G, Giri K, Lewis K, Meir P, Pinho P, Rounsevell MD, Williams M. 2014. Understanding the relationships between ecosystem servcies and poverty alleviation: a conceptual framework. Ecosyst Serv. 7:34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadju F, Neves D, Granlund S. 2020. Changing livelihoods in the Eastern Cape, South Africa (2002 – 2016): diminishing employment and expanding social protection. J South Afr Stud. 46:743–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herd-Hoare S 2018. The relative role of ecosystem services and disservices in rural livelihoods in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa [ M.Sc. thesis]. Grahamstown: Rhodes University, 160.
   Google Scholar
• Herd-Hoare S, Shackleton CM. 2020a. Ecosystem disservices matter when valuing ecosystem benefits from small-scale arable agriculture. Ecosyst Serv. 46:101201. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.1010201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herd-Hoare S, Shackleton CM. 2020b. Integrating ecosystem services and disservices in valuing smallholder livestock and poultry production in three villages in South Africa. Land. 9:294. doi:10.3390/land9090294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Ruedas MA, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Meave JA, Martínez-Ramos M, Ibarra-Manríquez G, Martínez E, Jamangapé J, Melo FP, Santos BA. 2014. Conserving Tropical Tree Diversity and Forest Structure: the Value of Small Rainforest Patches in Moderately-Managed Landscapes. Plos One. 9(6):e98931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth NJ, Belcher B, Campbell B, Stacey N. 2013. The role of forest-related income in household economies and rural livelihoods in the border-region of southern China. World Dev. 43:111–123. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacopino S, Piazzi C, Opio J, Muhwezi DK, Ferrari E, Caporale F, Sitzia T. 2022. Tourist agroforestry landscape from the perception of local communities: a case study of Rwenzori, Uganda. Land. 11:650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevon T, Shackleton CM. 2015. Integrating local knowledge and forest surveys to assess Lantana camara impacts on indigenous species recruitment in Mazeppa Bay, South Africa. Hum Ecol. 43:247–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaba FK, Quinn CH, Dougill AJ. 2013. Contribution of forest provisioning ecosystem services to rural livelihoods in the Miombo woodlands of Zambia. Popul Environ. 35:159–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke T, Carola P, Hildebrandt P, Calvas B, Castro LM, Härtl F, Döllerer M, Hamer U, Windhorst D, Wiersma YF, et al. 2016. Compositional diversity of rehabilitated tropical lands supports multiple ecosystem services and buffers uncertainties. Nat Commun. 7:11877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity influences native and nonnative plant species richness. Ecology. 87:3186–3199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Lautenbach S. 2016. A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services. Ecol Indic. 66:340–351. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’Roe J, Naughton-Treves L. 2014. Effects of a policy-induced income shock on forest-dependent households in the Peruvian Amazon. Ecol Econ. 97:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahonya S, Shackleton CM, Schreckenberg K. 2019. Non-timber forest product use and market chains along a deforestation gradient in southwest Malawi. Front For Global Change. 2:71. doi:10.3389/ffgc.2019.00071.
   Google Scholar
• Maroyi A 2011. The gathering and consumption of wild edible plants in Nhema communal area, Midlands province, Zimbabwe. Ecol Food & Nutri. 50:506–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroyi A. 2022. Traditional uses of wild and tended plants in maintaining ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes of the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 18:17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium ecosystem assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mjoli N, Shackleton C. 2015. The trade in and households use of Phoenix relinata palm frond hand brushes on the Wild Coast, South Africa. Econ Bot. 69:218–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucina L, Rutherford M. 2006. The vegetation of South Africa. Lesotho and Swaziland, Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mucina L, Scott-Shaw R, Rutherford M, Camp K, Matthews W, Powrie L, Hoare D. 2006. Indian Ocean Coastal Belt. In: Macina L, and Rutherford M, editors. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria, South Africa: South African Biodiversity Institute; p. 568-583.
   Google Scholar
• Mugido W, Shackleton C. 2017. The safety-net function of PES in different agro-ecological zones of South Africa. Population Environ. 39:107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutua K, Massimo S, Mburu P. 2004. An empirical study of the Botswana handicraft market. J Afr Bus. 5:93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ncube K, Shackleton CM, Swallow BM, Dassanayake W. 2016. Impacts of HIV/AIDS on food consumption and wild food use in rural South Africa. Food Secur. 8:1135–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngwenya P, Hassan R. 2005. An environmental accounting approach to valuing the services of natural forests and woodlands in Swaziland. Agrekon. 44:264–283.
   Google Scholar
• Njwaxu A, Shackleton CM. 2019. The availability of non-timber forest products under forest succession on abandoned fields on the Wild Coast, South Africa. Forests. 10:1093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oteros-Rozas E, Martín-López B, Fagerholm N, Bieling C, Plieninger T. 2018. Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European site. Ecol Indic. 94:74–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paumgarten F, Shackleton C. 2009. Wealth differentiation in household use and trade in non-timber forest products in South Africa. Ecol Econ. 68:2950–2959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendleton MC, Sedgwick S, Kettenring KM, Atwood TB. 2020. Ecosystem functioning of Great Salt Lake wetlands. Wetlands. 40:2163–2177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port St Johns Municipality. 2021. Final Integrated Development Plan 2022/23 –2026/27. http://www.psjmunicipality.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/PSJ-IDP-2022-2027-Final.pdf. [accessed 2022 July24].
   Google Scholar
• Priego-Santander ÁG, Campos M, Bocco G, Ramírez-Sánchez LG. 2013. Relationship between landscape heterogeneity and plant species richness on the Mexican pacific coast. Appl Geogr. 40:171–178. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullanikkatil D, Shackleton CM editors. 2018. Poverty reduction through non-timber forest products: personal storiesSpringer, Heidelberg, 160
   Google Scholar
• Ranchhod V 2009. Household responses to adverse income shocks: pensioner out-migration and mortality in South Africa. Working Paper Number 35. Cape Town: University of Cape Town: Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for statistical computing.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro Palacios M, Huber-Sannwald E, Luis Garcia L, Peña De Paz B, Carrera Hernández J, Galindo Mendoza M. 2013. Landscape diversity in a rural territory: emerging land use mosaics coupled to livelihood diversification. Land Use Policy. 30:814–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Pérez M, Belcher B, Achdiawan R, Alexiades M, Aubertin C, Caballero J, Campbell B, Clement C, Cunningham T, Fantini A, et al. 2004. Markets drive the specialization strategies of forest peoples. Ecol Soc. 9(2):4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr S, White A, Kaimowitz D. 2004. A new agenda for forest conservation and poverty reduction. Making markets work for low income producers. Washington, D.C: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Schippers P, Van Der Heide CM, Koelewijn HP, Schouten MA, Smulders RM, Cobben MP, Sterk M, Vos CC, Verboom J. 2015. Landscape diversity enhances the resilience of populations, ecosystems and local economy in rural areas. Landsc Ecol. 30:193–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreckenberg K, Torres-Vitolas C, Willcock S, Shackleton C, Harvey C, Kafumbata D 2016. Participatory data collection for ecosystem services research: a practitioner’s manual. ESPA Working Paper Series No. 003. ASSETS Project.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler LG, Bugmann H, Snell RS. 2017. From monocultures to mixed species forests: is tree diversity key for providing ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Landsc Ecol. 32:1499–1516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton C. 2003. The prevalence of use and value of wild edible herbs in South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 99:23–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton R. 2020. Loss of land and livelihoods from mining operations: a case in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Land Use Policy. 99:104825. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton S, Campbell B. 2007. The traditional broom trade in Bushbuckridge, South Africa: helping poor women cope with adversity. Econ Bot. 61:256–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton S, Campbell B, Lotz-Sisitka H. 2007c. Viable but invisibile: recognising local markets for non-timber forest products. Int For Rev. 9:697–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton S, Campbell B, Lotz-Sisitka H, Shackleton C. 2008. Links between the local trade in natural products, livelihoods and poverty alleviation in a semi-arid region in South Africa. World Dev. 36:505–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton CM, De Vos A. 2022. How many people globally actually use non-timber forest products? For Policy Econ. 135:102659. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton CM, Mograbi P, Drimie S, Fay D, Hebinck P, Hoffman MT, Maciejewski K, Twine W. 2019. Deactivation of field cultivation in communal areas of South Africa: patterns, drivers and socio-economic and ecological consequences. Land Use Policy. 82:686–699. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton S, O Delang C, Angelsen A 2011b. From subsistence to safety nets and cash income: exploring the diverse values of non-timber forest products for livelihoods and poverty alleviation In: Shackleton S, Shackleton C & Shanley P. eds. Non-Timber Forest Products in the Global Context. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; p. 55-81.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton C, Shackleton S. 2004. The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 100:658–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton C, Shackleton S. 2006. Household wealth status and natural resource use in the Kat River valley, South Africa. Ecol Econ. 57:306–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton S, Shackleton C, Netshiluvhi T, Geach B, Ballance A, Fairbanks D 2002b. Use patterns and value of savanna resources in three rural villages in South Africa. Econ Bot. 56:130–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton C, Shackleton S, Ntshudu M, Ntzebeza J. 2002a. The role and value of savanna non-timber forest products to rural households in the Kat River Valley, South Africa. J Trop For Prod. 8:45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton C, Timmermans H, Nongwe N, Hamer N, Palmer N, Palmer R. 2007b. Direct-use values of non-timber forest products from two areas on the Transkei Wild Coast. Agrekon. 46:135–156.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa. 2011. Njela/Gogogo/Ludaka [ Online]. www.statssa.gov.za/?page_id=4286&id=4467. [accessed 2016 July 6].
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland IJ, Gergel SE, Bennett EM. 2016. Seeing the forest for its multiple ecosystem services: indicators for cultural services in heterogeneous forests. Ecol Indic. 71:123–133. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrbe R-U, Walz U. 2012. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol Indic. 21:80–88. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thondhlana G, Vedeld P, Shackleton S. 2012. Natural resource use, income and dependence among San and Mier communities bordering Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, southern Kalahari, South Africa. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 19:460–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twine W, Moshe D, Netshiluvhi T, Siphugu V. 2003. Consumption and direct-use values of savanna bio-resources used by rural households in Mametja, a semi-arid area of Limpopo province, South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 99:467–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2008. Principles and recommendations for population and housing censuses, revision 2. New York, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Wollenberg E, Nawir A. 2005. Turning straw into gold: specialization among damar agroforest farmers in pesisir, Sumatra. For Trees Livelihoods. 15:317–336.
   Google Scholar
• Wunder S, Börner J, Shively G, Wyman M. 2014. Safety nets, gap filling and forests: a global comparative perspective. World Dev. 64:S29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar