Learning from sticky variables in cross-case analyses of collaboration in social-ecological systems

References

• Abrams J, Burns S. 2007. Case Study of a community stewardship success: the White Mountain Stewardship Contract. Flagstaff (AZ): Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University. http://openknowledge.nau.edu/1294/1/Abrams_Burns_2007_ERIWhitePaper_CaseStudyOfACommunity.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Aburto JA, Gaymer CF, Cundill G. 2017. Towards local governance of marine resources and ecosystems on Easter Island. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwater Ecosyst. 27(2):353–13. doi:10.1002/aqc.2665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell C. 2022. Chapter 2: collaboration: key concepts. In: Handbook on theories of governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; [accessed 2022 Jun 1]. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800371965/9781800371965.00053.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell C, Gash A. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory. 18(4):543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N, editors. 2010. Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver(BC): UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage DR, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur RI, Charles AT, Davidson-Hunt IJ, Diduck AP, Doubleday NC, Johnson DS, Marschke M, et al. 2009. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ. 7(2):95–102. doi:10.1890/070089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumberg BF, Peiró JM, Roe RA. 2015. Chapter: trust and social capital: challenges for studying their dynamic relationship. In: Lyon F, Mollering G, Saunders M, editors. Handbook of research methods on trust. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 86–96 .
   Google Scholar
• Carr Kelman C, Brady U, Baggio J, Lee J, Rojas C, Srinivasan J, Vallury S, Schoon M. 2018. Practitioner brief on factors for effective environmental management collaboration. Center for behavior, institutions and the environment working paper series. #CBIE-2018-003Carr.
   Google Scholar
• Carr Kelman C, Brady U, Raschke BA, Schoon ML. under review. A systematic review of core components of effective collaborative governance of social-ecological systems: 22 key criteria building upon Ostrom’s institutional design principles.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers JM, Wyborn C, Ryan ME, Reid RS, Riechers M, Serban A, Bennett NJ, Cvitanovic C, Fernández-Giménez ME, Galvin KA, et al. 2021. Six modes of co-production for sustainability. Nat Sustain. 4(11):983–996. doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisneros P. 2019. What makes collaborative water governance partnerships resilient to policy change? A comparative study of two cases in Ecuador. Ecol Soc. 24(1). doi:10.5751/es-10667-240129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn J. 2021. Knowledge integration in transdisciplinary sustainability science: tools from applied critical realism. Sustain Dev. 1–17. doi:10.1002/sd.2279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn J, Palmer CTG, Biggs H, Rosenberg E. 2018. Navigating multiple tensions for engaged praxis in a complex social-ecological system. Land. 7(4):129. doi:10.3390/land7040129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn J, Schoon M, Cundill G, Robinson C, Aburto JA, Alexander SM, Baggio JA, Barnaud C, Chapman M, Llorente MG, et al. 2020. Understanding the context of multifaceted collaborations for social-ecological sustainability: a methodology for cross-case analysis. Ecol Soc. 25(3):1–15. doi:10.5751/ES-11527-250307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coglianese C. 2003. Is satisfaction success? Evaluating public participation in regulatory policymaking. In: O’Leary R, and Bingham L, editors. The promise and performance of environmental conflict resolution. New York (NY): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connick S, Innes JE. 2003. Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: applying complexity thinking to evaluation. J Environ Plann Manage. 46(2):177–197. doi:10.1080/0964056032000070987.
   Google Scholar
• Corsín Jiménez A. 2011. Trust in anthropology. Anthropol Theory. 11(2):177–196. doi:10.1177/1463499611407392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox M, Arnold G, Villamayor-Tomas S. 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol Soc. 15(4):38. doi:10.5751/ES-03704-150438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming GS, Cumming DHM, Redman CL. 2006. Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecol Soc. 11(1):14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art14/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science. 302(5652):1907–1912. doi:10.1126/science.1091015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gash A. 2022. Chapter 43: collaborative governance. In: Handbook on theories of governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; [accessed 2022 Jun 1]. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/ed.coll/9781800371965/9781800371965.00053.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Gould RK, Coleman KJ, Krymkowski DH, Zafira I, Gibbs‐plessl T, Doty A. 2019. Broader impacts in conservation research. Conserv Sci Pract. 1(11):e108. doi:10.1111/csp2.108.
   Google Scholar
• Grothmann T, Patt A. 2005. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate. Global Environ Change. 15(3):199–213. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber J. 2010. Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environ Manage. 45(1):52–66. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9235-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill R, Harkness P, Raisbeck-Brown N, Lyons I, Álvarez-Romero JG, Kim MK, Chungalla D, Wungundin H, Aiken M, Malay J, et al. 2021. Learning together for and with the martuwarra Fitzroy river. Sustainability Sci. 17(2):351–375. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00988-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz TM, Gupta D, Mudliar P, Ranjan P. 2015. Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: a synthesis framework. Environ Sci Policy. 53:139–151. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz TM, Thomas CW. 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Adm Rev. 66(s1):111–121. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach WD, Sabatier PA. 2005. Are trust and social capital the keys to success? In: Sabatier PA, editor. Watershed partnerships in California and Washington. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; p. 233–258.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki RJ, Brinsfield C. 2012. Chapter 4: trust research: measuring trust beliefs and behaviours. In: Lyon, F, Möllering, G, Saunders, MNK, editors. Handbook of research methods on trust. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 46–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lotz-Sisitka H, Pahl-Wostl C, Meissner R, Scholz G, Cockburn J, Jalasi EM, Stuart-Hill S, Palmer CT. Forthcoming. Towards qualitative cross case analysis of transformative processes in the face of resource nexus challenges. Ecosyst People.
   Google Scholar
• Mtati N. 2020. Towards realising the benefits of citizen participation in environmental monitoring: a case study in an Eastern Cape natural resource management programme [ master’s thesis]. South Africa: Rhodes University. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/167562.
   Google Scholar
• Newig J, Moss T. 2017. Scale in environmental governance: moving from concepts and cases to consolidation. J Environ Policy Plan. 19(5):473–479. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2017.1390926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norström AV, Cvitanovic C, Löf MF, West S, Wyborn C, Balvanera P, Bednarek AT, Bennett EM, Biggs R, de Bremond A, et al. 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nat Sustain. 3(3):182–190. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling C. 2006. Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 11(1):18. doi:10.5751/ES-01595-110118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science. 325(5939):419–422. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E, Cox M. 2010. Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environ Conserv. 37(4):451–463. doi:10.1017/S0376892910000834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl C, Basurto X, Villamayor-Tomas S. 2021. Comparative case study analysis. In: Biggs, R, de Vos, A, Preiser, R, Clements, H, Maciejewski, K, Schlüter, M. The Routledge handbook of research methods for social-ecological systems. London (UK): Routledge; p. 282–294.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Tilley N. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer R, Armitage DR. 2007. Charting the new territory of adaptive co-management: a delphi study. Ecol Soc. 12(2):10. doi:10.5751/ES-02091-120210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer R, Crona B, Armitage DR, Olsson P, Tengö M, Yudina O. 2012. Adaptive comanagement: a systematic review and analysis. Ecol Soc. 17(3):11. doi:10.5751/ES-04952-170311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poteete AR. 2012. Levels, scales, linkages, and other ‘multiples’ affecting natural resources. Int J Commons. 6(2):134–150. doi:10.18352/ijc.318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser R, Biggs R, De Vos A, Folke C. 2018. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems. Ecol Soc. 23(4). doi:10.5751/ES-10558-230446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter KL, Kothari A. 2014. Using realist evaluation to open the black box of knowledge translation: a state-of-the-art review. Implement Sci. 9(1):115. doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0115-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sayles JS, Baggio JA. 2017. Social–ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration. PNAS. 114(10):E1776–1785. doi:10.1073/pnas.1604405114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlager E, Ostrom E. 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ. 68(3):249–262. doi:10.2307/3146375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlüter M, Caniglia G, Orach K, Bodin Ö, Magliocca N, Meyfroidt P, Reyers B. 2022. Why care about theories? Innovative ways of theorizing in sustainability science. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 54:101154. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoon M, Brady U, Carr Kelman C, Baggio J, Goddard K, Vallury S, Rojas C, Lorenzo T, Srinivasan J, Whittaker D. 2020. Coding Manual: characteristics of collaborative governance. CBIE working paper series #CBIE-2020-001. Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Schoon M, Chapman M, Loos J, Ifejika Speranza C, Carr Kelman C, Aburto J, Alexander S, Baggio J, Brady U, Cockburn J, et al. 2021. On the frontiers of collaboration and conflict: how context influences the success of collaboration. Ecosyst People. 17(1):383–399. doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1946593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon D, Schiemer F. 2015. Crossing boundaries: complex systems, transdisciplinarity and applied impact agendas. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 12:6–11. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitko S, Hurteau S. 2010. Evaluating the impacts of forest treatments: the first five years of the white mountain stewardship project. Phoenix: The Nature Conservancy. http://azconservation.org/dl/TNCAZ_White_Mountain_Stewardship_Project_5years.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen E, Torfing J. 2011. Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Admin Soc. 43(8):842–868. doi:10.1177/0095399711418768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern PC. 2011. Design principles for global commons: natural resources and emerging technologies. Int J Commons. 5(2):213–232. doi:10.18352/ijc.305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL. 2000. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyborn C, Bixler RP. 2013. Collaboration and nested environmental governance: scale dependency, scale framing, and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation. J Environ Manage. 123:58–67. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young OR. 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar