Ecosystem services in postsecondary and professional education: an overview of programs and courses

References

• Abson DJ, von Wehrden H, Baumgärtner S, Fischer J, Hanspach J, Härdtle W, Heinrichs H, Klein AM, Lang DJ, Martens P, et al. 2014. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecol Econ. 103:29–17. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainscough J, de Vries Lentsch A, Metzger M, Rounsevell M, Schröter M, Delbaere B, de Groot R, Staes J. 2019. Navigating pluralism: understanding perceptions of the ecosystem services concept. Ecosyst Serv. 36:100892. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander VD, Thomas H, Cronin A, Fielding J, Moran-Ellis J. 2008. Mixed methods. In: Gilbert N, editor. Researching social life. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications; p. 125–145.
   Google Scholar
• Allen K, Castellano C, Pessagno S. 2021. Using dialogue to contextualize culture, ecosystem services, and cultural ecosystem services. Ecol Soc. 26(2). doi:10.5751/ES-12187-260207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Arévalo P, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Pérez-Rincón M. 2018. Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: a taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods. Environ Values. 27(1):29–53. doi:10.3197/096327118X15144698637513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balvanera P, Jacobs S, Nagendra H, O’Farrell P, Bridgewater P, Crouzat E, Dendoncker N, Goodwin S, Gustafsson KM, Kadykalo AN, et al. 2020. The science-policy interface on ecosystems and people: challenges and opportunities. Ecosyst People. 16(1):345–353. doi:10.1080/26395916.2020.1819426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett EM, Chaplin-Kramer R. 2016. Science for the sustainable use of ecosystem services. F1000Research. 5:2622. doi:10.12688/f1000research.9470.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouwma I, Schleyer C, Primmer E, Winkler KJ, Berry P, Young J, Carmen E, Špulerová J, Bezák P, Preda E, et al. 2018. Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies. Ecosyst Serv. 29:213–222. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braat LC. 2012. Ecosystem services—science, policy and practice: introduction to the journal and the inaugural issue. Ecosyst Serv. 1(1):1–3. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braat LC, de Groot R. 2012. The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst Serv. 1(1):4–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell SE, Khalfan W, Bergmann D, Simoni R. 2013. Explorations: a research-based program introducing undergraduates to diverse biology research topics taught by grad students and postdocs. J Coll Sci Teach. 42(3):8.
   Google Scholar
• Bull JW, Jobstvogt N, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Mascarenhas A, Sitas N, Baulcomb C, Lambini CK, Rawlins M, Baral H, Zähringer J, et al. 2016. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats: a SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework. Ecosyst Serv. 17:99–111. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhard B, Maes J, editors. 2017. Mapping ecosystem services. Sofia (BG): Pensoft Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Díaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 106(5):1305–1312. doi:10.1073/pnas.0808772106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang H, Granek EF, Ervin D, Yeakley A, Dujon V, Shandas V. 2020. A community-engaged approach to transdisciplinary doctoral training in urban ecosystem services. Sustainability Sci. 15(3):699–715. doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00785-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Guerry AD, Balvanera P, Klain S, Satterfield T, Basurto X, Bostrom A, Chuenpagdee R, Gould R, Halpern BS, et al. 2012. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience. 62(8):744–756. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Satterfield T. 2020. The maturation of ecosystem services: social and policy research expands, but whither biophysically informed valuation? People Nat. 2(4):1021–1060. doi:10.1002/pan3.10137.
   Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. 2012. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ. 74:8–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary S, McGregor A, Houston D, Chettri N. 2015. The evolution of ecosystem services: a time series and discourse-centered analysis. Environ Sci Policy. 54:25–34. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark TN. 1968. Institutionalization of innovations in higher education: four models. Adm Sci Q. 13(1):1. doi:10.2307/2391259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark TN. 1972. The stages of scientific institutionalization. Int Soc Sci J. 24(4):658–672.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv. 28:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, Kubiszewski I. 2012. The authorship structure of “ecosystem services” as a transdisciplinary field of scholarship. Ecosyst Serv. 1(1):16–25. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily GC, editor. 1997. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ. 7(1):21–28. doi:10.1890/080025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A, et al. 2015. The IPBES conceptual framework—Connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 14:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droste N, D’Amato D, Goddard JJ. 2018. Where communities intermingle, diversity grows – the evolution of topics in ecosystem service research. PLoS One. 13(9):e0204749. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberly MB, Newton SE, Wiggins RA. 2001. The syllabus as a tool for student-centered learning. J Gen Educ. 50(1):56–74. doi:10.1353/jge.2001.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Evans MC, Cvitanovic C. 2018. An introduction to achieving policy impact for early career researchers. Palgrave Commun. 4(1):88. doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0144-2.
   Google Scholar
• Felipe-Lucia MR, de Frutos A, Comín FA. 2022. Modelling landscape management scenarios for equitable and sustainable futures in rural areas based on ecosystem services. Ecosyst People. 18(1):76–94. doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.2021288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson A, Markewitz K, Frayret J-M. 2014. Postsecondary education in industrial ecology across the world. J Ind Ecol. 18(6):931–941. doi:10.1111/jiec.12215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geith C, Vignare K. 2008. Access to education with online learning and open education resources: can they close the gap? J Asynchronous Learn Netw. 12(1):22. doi:10.24059/olj.v12i1.39.
   Google Scholar
• Geneletti D, editor. 2016. Handbook on biodiversity and ecosystem services in impact assessment. Edward Elgar Publishing Inc. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/handbook-on-biodiversity-and-ecosystem-services-in-impact-assessment-9781783478989.html.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin S, Brogaard S, Krause T. 2019. Values held by Swedish primary school students towards forest ecosystems and the relevance for a nature’s contributions to people approach. Ecosyst People. 15(1):331–346. doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1687585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould RK, Bremer LL, Pascua P, Meza-Prado K. 2020. Frontiers in cultural ecosystem services: toward greater equity and justice in ecosystem services research and practice. BioScience. biaa112, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Govindarajan V, Srivastava A. 2020 March 31. What the shift to virtual learning could mean for the future of higher ed. Harv Bus Rev. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero A, Bennett N, Wilson K, Carter N, Gill D, Mills M, Ives C, Selinske M, Larrosa C, Bekessy S, et al. 2018. Achieving the promise of integration in social-ecological research: a review and prospectus. Ecol Soc. 23(3). doi:10.5751/ES-10232-230338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenburg DM, Adams A, Brownson K, Borokini IT, Gladkikh TM, Herd-Hoare SC, Jolly H, Kadykalo AN, Kraus EB, McDonough KR, et al. 2019. Meaningfully engaging the next generation of ecosystem services specialists. Ecosyst Serv. 40:101041. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider LJ, Hentati-Sundberg J, Giusti M, Goodness J, Hamann M, Masterson VA, Meacham M, Merrie A, Ospina D, Schill C, et al. 2018. The undisciplinary journey: early-career perspectives in sustainability science. Sustainability Sci. 13(1):191–204. doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0445-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison PA, Dunford R, Barton DN, Kelemen E, Martín-López B, Norton L, Termansen M, Saarikoski H, Hendriks K, Gómez-Baggethun E, et al. 2018. Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach. Ecosyst Serv. 29:481–498. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermelingmeier V, Nicholas KA. 2017. Identifying five different perspectives on the ecosystem services concept using Q methodology. Ecol Econ. 136:255–265. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holfelder A-K. 2019. Towards a sustainable future with education? Sustainability Sci. 14(4):943–952. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00682-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES secretariat; p. 56.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs S, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Dunford R, Harrison PA, Kelemen E, Saarikoski H, Termansen M, García-Llorente M, Gómez-Baggethun E, et al. 2018. The means determine the end – Pursuing integrated valuation in practice. Ecosyst Serv. 29:515–528. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis RM, Borrelle SB, Forsdick NJ, Pérez-Hämmerle K-V, Dubois NS, Griffin SR, Recalde-Salas A, BUschke F, Rose DC, Archibald CL, et al. 2020. Navigating spaces between conservation research and practice: are we making progress? - Jarvis—2020—Ecological solutions and Evidence—Wiley online library. Ecol Solut Evid. 1(2). doi:10.1002/2688-8319.12028.
   Google Scholar
• Kadykalo AN, Kelly LA, Berberi A, Reid JL, Findlay CS. 2021. Research effort devoted to regulating and supporting ecosystem services by environmental scientists and economists. PLoS One. 16(5):e0252463. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadykalo AN, López-Rodriguez MD, Ainscough J, Droste N, Ryu H, Ávila-Flores G, Le Clec’h S, Muñoz MC, Nilsson L, Rana S, et al. 2019. Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature’s contributions to people. Ecosyst People. 15(1):269–287. doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1669713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky, S., editors. 2011. Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588992.001.0001/acprof-9780199588992.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi Mashizi A, Sharafatmandrad M. 2021. Investigating tradeoffs between supply, use and demand of ecosystem services and their effective drivers for sustainable environmental management. J Environ Manage. 289:112534. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konno K, Akasaka M, Koshida C, Katayama N, Osada N, Spake R, Amano T. 2020. Ignoring non-English-language studies may bias ecological meta-analyses. Ecol Evol. 10(13):6373–6384. doi:10.1002/ece3.6368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavorel S, Locatelli B, Colloff MJ, Bruley E. 2020. Co-producing ecosystem services for adapting to climate change. Phil Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 375(1794):20190119. doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löw Beer D. 2018. Teaching and learning ecosystem assessment and valuation. Ecol Econ. 146:425–434. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubchenco J. 1998. Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science. 279(5350):491–497. doi:10.1126/science.279.5350.491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall C, Meagher LR. 2012. A masterclass in interdisciplinarity: research into practice in training the next generation of interdisciplinary researchers. Futures. 44(6):608–617. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough K, Hutchinson S, Moore T, Hutchinson JMS. 2017. Analysis of publication trends in ecosystem services research. Ecosyst Serv. 25:82–88. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone L, Kuchel L. 2017. Core skills for effective science communication: a teaching resource for undergraduate science education. Int J Sci Educ Part B. 7(2):181–201. doi:10.1080/21548455.2015.1113573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger MJ, Dick J, Gardner A, Bellamy C, Blackstock K, Brown C, Chisholm R, Cochrane P, Drewitt J, Gimona A, et al. 2019. Knowledge sharing, problem solving and professional development in a Scottish ecosystem services community of practice. Reg Environ Change. 19(8):2275–2286. doi:10.1007/s10113-019-01537-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder HAJ, Longnecker N, Davis LS. 2008. The state of science communication programs at universities around the world. Sci Commun. 30(2):277–287. doi:10.1177/1075547008324878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSF. 2022. National science foundation research traineeship (NRT) program (NSF 21-536). https://beta.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/national-science-foundation-research-traineeship-program.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes PALD, Kumar P, Dedeurwaerdere T, editors. 2014. Handbook on the economics of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/handbook-on-the-economics-of-ecosystem-services-and-biodiversity-9781781951507.html.
   Google Scholar
• Posner SM, McKenzie E, Ricketts TH. 2016a. Policy impacts of ecosystem services knowledge. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 113(7):1760–1765. doi:10.1073/pnas.1502452113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner S, Verutes G, Koh I, Denu D, Ricketts T. 2016b. Global use of ecosystem service models. Ecosyst Serv. 17:131–141. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Fish R, Turner RK, editors. 2016. Routledge handbook of ecosystem services. 1st ed. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-of-Ecosystem-Services/Potschin-Haines-Young-Fish-Turner/p/book/9781138588974.
   Google Scholar
• Raatikainen KJ, Juhola K, Huhmarniemi M, Peña-Lagos H. 2020. “Face the cow”: reconnecting to nature and increasing capacities for pro-environmental agency. Ecosyst People. 16(1):273–289. doi:10.1080/26395916.2020.1817151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raby G, Chapman JM, De Bruijn R, Eliason EJ, Elvidge CK, Hasler CT, Madliger CL, Nyboer EA, Reid AJ, Roche DG, et al. 2020. Teaching post-secondary students in ecology and evolution: strategies for early-career researchers. Ideas Ecol Evol. 13:14–24. doi:10.24908/iee.2020.13.3.e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoten D, Parker A. 2004. Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science. 306(5704):2046. doi:10.1126/science.1103628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose DC, Sutherland WJ, Amano T, González-Varo JP, Robertson RJ, Simmons BI, Wauchope HS, Kovacs E, Durán AP, Vadrot ABM, et al. 2018. The major barriers to evidence-informed conservation policy and possible solutions. Conserv Lett. 11(5):e12564. doi:10.1111/conl.12564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruckelshaus M, McKenzie E, Tallis H, Guerry A, Daily G, Kareiva P, Polasky S, Ricketts T, Bhagabati N, Wood SA, et al. 2015. Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol Econ. 115:11–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarikoski H, Primmer E, Saarela S-R, Antunes P, Aszalós R, Baró F, Berry P, Blanko GG, Goméz-Baggethun E, Carvalho L, et al. 2018. Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice. Ecosyst Serv. 29:579–598. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleyer C, Görg C, Hauck J, Winkler KJ. 2015. Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming the ecosystem services concept in the multi-level policy-making within the EU. Ecosyst Serv. 16:174–181. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlüter M, Caniglia G, Orach K, Bodin Ö, Magliocca N, Meyfroidt P, Reyers B. 2022. Why care about theories? Innovative ways of theorizing in sustainability science. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 54:101154. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter M, van der Zanden EH, van Oudenhoven APE, Remme RP, Serna-Chavez HM, de Groot RS, Opdam P. 2014. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conserv Lett. 7(6):514–523. doi:10.1111/conl.12091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh GG, Farjalla VF, Chen B, Pelling AE, Ceyhan E, Dominik M, Alisic E, Kerr J, Selin NE, Bassioni G, et al. 2019. Researcher engagement in policy deemed societally beneficial yet unrewarded. Front Ecol Environ. 17(7):375–382. doi:10.1002/fee.2084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmack CM, Sinclair AJ, Fitzpatrick P. 2005. An overview of the state of environmental assessment education at Canadian universities. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ. 6(1):36–53. doi:10.1108/14676370510573122.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor ZP, Bennett DE. 2016. Ecosystem services valuation as an opportunity for inquiry learning. J Geosci Educ. 64(3):175–182. doi:10.5408/15-138.1.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JL, Kaiser A, Sparks EL, Shelton M, Brunden E, Cherry JA, Cebrian J. 2016. Ecosystem – What? Public understanding and trust in conservation science and ecosystem services. Front Commun. 1. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2016.00003.
   Google Scholar
• Trench B. 2012. Vital and vulnerable: science communication as a university subject. In: Schiele B, Claessens M Shi S, editors. Science communication in the world. Springer Netherlands; p. 241–257. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4279-6_16.
   Google Scholar
• Turner R, Cotton D, Morrison D, Kneale P. 2022. Embedding interdisciplinary learning into the first-year undergraduate curriculum: drivers and barriers in a cross-institutional enhancement project. Teach High Educ. 1–17. doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2056834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2012. International standard classification of education: ISCED 2011. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• University of Ottawa Institute of the Environment. 2016. University of Ottawa institute of the environment. https://www.uottawa.ca/environment/node?page=25.
   Google Scholar
• Wang B, Zhang Q, Cui F. 2021. Scientific research on ecosystem services and human well-being: a bibliometric analysis. Ecol Indic. 125:107449. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch-Devine M, Hardy D, Brosius J, Heynen N. 2014. A pedagogical model for integrative training in conservation and sustainability. Ecol Soc. 19(2):10. doi:10.5751/ES-06197-190210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler KJ, Rodrigues JG, Albrecht E, Crockett ETH. 2021. Governance of ecosystem services: a review of empirical literature. Ecosyst People. 1(1):306–319. doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1938235.
   Google Scholar
• Wood SLR, Jones SK, Johnson JA, Brauman KA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Fremier A, Girvetz E, Gordon LJ, Kappel CV, Mandle L, et al. 2018. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the sustainable development goals. Ecosyst Serv. 29:70–82. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarime M, Trencher G, Mino T, Scholz RW, Olsson L, Ness B, Frantzeskaki N, Rotmans J. 2012. Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustainability Sci. 7(S1):101–113. doi:10.1007/s11625-012-0157-5.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman J. 2020. The amateur hour: a history of college teaching in America. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar