Residents’ interest in landscape value trade related to wind energy: application of the attitude–behavior framework to willingness to pay

References

• Ajzen I 1985. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, and Beckmann J, editors. Action Control. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 11–16. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 50:179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M. 1977. Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol Bull. 84:888–918. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Peterson GL. 1988. Contingent value measurement: the price of everything and the value of nothing. In:, Peterson GL, Driver BL, Gregory R, editors. Amenity Resource Valuation: integrating Economics with Other Disciplines. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc; p. 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bang HK, Ellinger AE, Hadjimarcou J, Traichal PA. 2000. Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: an application of the reasoned action theory. Psychol Mark. 17(6):449–468. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200006)17:6<449:AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartczak A, Budzin’ski W, Gołębiowska B. 2021. Impact of beliefs about negative effects of wind turbines on preference heterogeneity and valuation regarding renewable energy development in Poland. Resour Conserv Recy. 169:105530. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernath K, Roschewitz A. 2008. Recreational benefits of urban forests: explaining visitors’ willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior. J Environ Manage. 89:155–166. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari P, KC M, Shrestha S, Aryal A, Shrestha UB. 2016. Assessments of ecosystem service indicators and stakeholder’s willingness to pay for selected ecosystem services in the Chure region of Nepal. Appl Geogr. 69:25–34. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidwell D. 2013. The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy. Energ Policy. 58:189–199. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanthorne C, Jones-Farmer LA, Almer ED. 2006. Why you should consider SEM: a guide to getting started. In: Arnold V, Clinton BD, Luckett P, Roberts R, Wolfe C Wright S, editors. Advances in accounting behavioral research. Vol. 9. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; p. 179–207.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle KJ, Bishop RC. 1988. Welfare measurements using contingent valuation: a comparison of techniques. Am J Agric Econ. 70:20–28. doi:10.2307/1241972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Motta RS, Ortiz RA. 2018. Costs and perceptions conditioning willingness to accept payments for ecosystem services in a Brazilian case. Ecol Econ. 147:333–342. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis M, Harvie D. 2013. The commons. In: Parker, M., Cheney, G., Fournier, V. and Land, C., editors. The Routledge Companion to Alternative Organizations, Routledge: Abington; p. 280–294. https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/85v92
   Google Scholar
• Dimitropoulos A, Kontoleon A. 2009. Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: a choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands. Energ Policy. 37(5):1842–1854. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drechsler M, Ohl C, Meyerhoff J, Eichhorn M, Monsees J. 2011. Combining spatial modeling and choice experiments for the optimal spatial allocation of wind turbines. Energ Policy. 39(6):3845–3854. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ek K. 2005. Public and private attitudes towards green electricity: the case of Swedish wind power. Energ Policy. 33:1677–1689. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Forest Centre. 2022. Ownership of forestry land by ownership group in Finland. [accessed 16 August 2022] https://www.metsakeskus.fi/fi/avoin-metsa-ja-luontotieto/tietoa-metsien-omistuksesta/metsatalousmaan-omistus-omistajaryhmittain
   Google Scholar
• Hackl F, Pruckner GJ. 1999. On the gap between payment card and closed-ended CVM-answers. Appl Econ. 31:733–742. doi:10.1080/000368499323940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halder P, Pietarinen J, Havu-Nuutinen S, Pöllänen S, Pelkonen P. 2016. The theory of planned behavior model and students’ intentions to use bioenergy: a cross-cultural perspective. Renew Energ. 89:627–635. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley H, Colombo S, Kriström B, Watson F. 2009. Accounting for negative, zero and positive willingness to pay for landscape change in a national park. J Agr Econ. 60:1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2008.00180.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberlein TA, Bishop RC. 1986. Assessing the validity of contingent valuation: three field experiments. Sci Total Environ. 56:99–107. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(86)90317-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz JK, McConnell KE. 2002. A review of WTA/WTP studies. J Environ Econ Manag. 44:426–447. doi:10.1006/jeem.2001.1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. 1999. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 6:1–55. doi10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttunen R. 2017. Valtioneuvoston selonteko kansallisesta energia- ja ilmastostrategiasta vuoteen 2030 (Government report on the national energy and climate strategy for 2030, in Finnish). Publications of the ministry of economic affairs and employment of Finland 4/2017. p. 119. ISBN (printed) 978-952-327-189-0, ISBN (PDF) 978-952-327-190-6. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-190-6.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson M, Laike T. 2007. Intention to respond to local wind turbines: the role of attitudes and visual perception. Wind Energy. 10:435–451. doi:10.1002/we.232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy S. 2005. Wind power planning: assessing long-term costs and benefits. Energ Policy. 33:1661–1675. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krekel C, Zerrahn A. 2017. Does the presence of wind turbines have negative externalities for people in their surroundings? Evidence from well-being data. J Environ Econ Manag. 82:221–238. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2016.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn S, Damborg S. 1999. On public attitudes towards wind power. Renew Energ. 16:954–960. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00339-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladenburg J. 2008. Attitudes towards on-land and offshore wind power development in Denmark; Choice of development strategy. Renew Energ. 33:111–118. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2007.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land Use and Building Act 132/1999, 1999. Land Use and Building Act. Unofficial translation. https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990132.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lei Z, Jingxiao J, Ruyang L. 2011. Research on the consumption mode of green electricity in China-based on theory of reasoned action. Enrgy Proced. 5:938–944. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.166.
   Google Scholar
• Lindén A, Rapeli L, Brutemark A. 2015. Community attachment and municipal economy: public attitudes towards wind power in a local context. Environ Sci Policy. 54:10–14. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Curtis C, Upchurch RS. 2019. The Evolving field of wind energy tourism: an application of the theory of reasoned action. null. 23:37–53. doi:10.3727/154427219X15656150709479.
   Google Scholar
• López-Mosquera N, García T, Barrena R. 2014. An extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict willingness to pay for the conservation of an urban park. J Environ Manage. 135:91–99. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntymaa E, Juutinen A, Mönkkönen M, Svento R. 2009. Participation and compensation claims in voluntary forest conservation: a case of privately owned forests in Finland. For Policy Econ. 11:498–507. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntymaa E, Ovaskainen V, Juutinen A, Tyrväinen L. 2018. Integrating nature-based tourism and forestry in private lands under heterogeneous visitor preferences for forest attributes. J Environ Plan Manag. 61:724–746. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1333408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntymaa E, Pouta E, Hiedanpää J. 2021. Forest owners’ interest in participation and their compensation claims in voluntary landscape value trading: the case of wind power parks in Finland. For Policy Econ. 124:102382. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariel P, Meyerhoff J, Hess S. 2015. Heterogeneous preferences toward landscape externalities of wind turbines – Combining choices and attitudes in a hybrid model. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 41:647–657. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matilainen A. 2019. Feelings of psychological ownership towards private forests. University of Helsinki, Ruralia Institute, Publications 36. Mikkeli & Seinäjoki. 71. accessed 6 September 2022 https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/300433/FEELINGSO.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff J. 2013. Do turbines in the vicinity of respondents’ residences influence choices among programmes for future wind power generation? J Choice Model. 7:58–71. doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2013.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff J, Ohl C, Hartje V. 2010. Landscape externalities from onshore wind power. Energ Policy. 38:82–92. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell RC, Carson RT. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. New York (NY): RFF Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen-Pincus M, Sussman P, Bennett DE, Gosnell H, Parker R. 2017. The influence of place on the willingness to pay for ecosystem services. Soc Nat Resour. 30:1423–1441. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1347976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notaro S, Grilli S, Paletto A. 2019. The role of emotions on tourists’ willingness to pay for the Alpine landscape: a latent class approach. Landscape Res. 44:743–756. doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1513129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oerlemans LAG, Chan KY, Volschenk J. 2016. Willingness to pay for green electricity: a review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 66:875–885. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Official Statistics of Finland. 2020. Demographic structure. Statistics Finland, Helsinki. [accessed 6 September 2022] http://pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/fi/StatFin/StatFin__vrm__vaerak/
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2002. Reformulating the commons. Ambiente Soc. 10:5–25. doi:10.1590/S1414-753X2002000100002.
   Google Scholar
• Groothuis PA, Groothuis JD, Whitehead JC. 2008. Green vs. green: measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed. Energ Policy. 36:1545–1550. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Verdin G, Sanjurjo-Rivera E, Galicia L, Hernandez-Diaz JC, Hernandez-Trejo V, Marquez-Linares MA. 2016. Economic valuation of ecosystem services in Mexico: current status and trends. Iss Environ Sci Tech. 21:6–19. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• Pouta E, Rekola M. 2010. The theory of planned behavior in predicting willingness to pay for abatement of forest regeneration. Soc Nat. 14:93–106. doi:10.1080/089419201300000517.
   Google Scholar
• Rakotonarivo OS, Jacobsen LB, Poudyal M, Rasoamanana A, Hockley N. 2018. Estimating welfare impacts where property rights are contested: methodological and policy implications. Land Use Policy. 70:71–83. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand J, Hoen B. 2017. Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: what have we learned? Energy Res Soc Sci. 29:135–148. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read DL, Brown RF, Thorsteinsson EB, Morgan M, Price I. 2013. The theory of planned behaviour as a model for predicting public opposition to wind farm developments. J Environ Psychol. 36:70–76. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regional Council of Satakunta. 2014. Satakunnan vaihemaakuntakaava 1, Maakunnallisesti merkittävät tuulivoimatuotannon alueet, Ehdotuksen kaavaselostus 25.11.2013 (Phase 1 regional plan of Satakunta, Provincially significant wind power generation areas, Description of the proposal 25 November 2013, in Finnish). Satakuntaliitto: Alueiden käyttö. p. 161. [accessed 6 September 2022]. http://www.satakuntaliitto.fi/sites/satakuntaliitto.fi/files/tiedostot/vmk_ehdotus2/Vahvistamisvaihemateriaali/SELOSTUS_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Regional Council of Southwest Finland. 2011. Varsinais-Suomen tuulivoimaselvitys 2010–2011 (Wind power study of Southwest Finland 2010–2011, in Finnish). p. 100. [accessed 6 September 2022] https://www.varsinais-suomi.fi/images/tiedostot/Maankaytto/2011/Tuulivoima/tuulivoimaselvitys2010_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Lu L, Zhang H, Chen H, Zhu D. 2020. Residents’ willingness to pay for ecosystem services and its influencing factors: a study of the Xin’an River basin. J Clean Prod. 268:122301. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe B, Teisl MF, Levy A, Russell M. 2001. US consumers’ willingness to pay for green electricity. Energ Policy. 29:917–925. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-42150100006-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Watson V. 2009. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 18:389–401. doi:10.1002/hec.1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith S, Rowcroft P, Everard M, Couldrick L, Reed M, Rogers H, Quick T, Eves C, White C. 2013. Payments for Ecosystem Services: a Best Practice Guide. Dept Environ Food Rural Affairs, London. 85. http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/payments-for-ecosystem-services-pes-best-practice-guide
   Google Scholar
• Stigka EK, Paravantis JA, Mihalakakou GK. 2014. Social acceptance of renewable energy sources: a review of contingent valuation applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 32:100–106. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrväinen L, Mäntymaa E, Juutinen A, Kurttila M, Ovaskainen V. 2021. Private landowners’ preferences for trading forest landscape and recreational values: a choice experiment application in Kuusamo, Finland. Land Use Policy. 107:104478. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg RJ. 2006. Introduction: statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: where, pray tell, did they get this idea? Organ Res Method. 9:194–201. doi:10.1177/1094428105285506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varian HR. 2010. Intermediate Microeconomics: a modernapproach. 8th ed. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Vecchiato D. 2014. How do you like wind farms? Understanding people’s preferences about new energy landscapes with choice experiments. Aestimum. 64:15–37. doi:10.13128/Aestimum-14707.
   Google Scholar
• Warren CR, Lumsden C, O’Dowd S, Birnie RV. 2005. ‘Green on Green’: public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. J Environ Plan Manag. 48:853–875. doi:10.1080/09640560500294376.
   Google Scholar
• Wolsink M. 2007. Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 11:1188–1207. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink M. 2015. Wind power: basic challenge concerning social acceptance. In: Meyers RA, editor. Encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology Vol. 17. p. 12218–12254. http://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.378451
   Google Scholar
• Wunder S. 2007. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conserv Biol. 21:48–58. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerrahn A. 2017. Wind power and externalities. Ecol Econ. 141:245–260. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar